The Spender-in-Chief

[Muhammed]

It is impossible for tax cuts to cost anything, jackass.

Hey retard, what do you think will happen to our budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

OF COURSE there is a budgetary cost to doing that!

Bullshit. Taking less of people's money doesn't cost a ******* penny.

You didn't answer the question asshole.

I'll ask again: what do you think will happen to our budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

It certainly wouldn't hurt my budget.

 

[rightwinger]

The tax cuts will pay for themselves over time, as history has shown over and over again since the early 1900s.

Trump is doing the best he can with a Congress that has a Senate with 49 Democrats. If we had 60 Republicans in the Senate, the budget deal would have been far different, and far better. As Trump tweeted:

Without more Republicans in Congress, we were forced to increase spending on things we do not like or want in order to finally, after many years of depletion, take care of our Military. Sadly, we needed some Dem votes for passage. Must elect more Republicans in 2018 Election!​

More ....Alll tax cuts pay for themselves idiocy

When will people learn?

 

[Flopper]

The tax cuts will pay for themselves over time, as history has shown over and over again since the early 1900s.

Trump is doing the best he can with a Congress that has a Senate with 49 Democrats. If we had 60 Republicans in the Senate, the budget deal would have been far different, and far better. As Trump tweeted:

Without more Republicans in Congress, we were forced to increase spending on things we do not like or want in order to finally, after many years of depletion, take care of our Military. Sadly, we needed some Dem votes for passage. Must elect more Republicans in 2018 Election!​

Take a look at 3 biggest tax cuts,

The tax cuts will pay for themselves over time, as history has shown over and over again since the early 1900s.

Trump is doing the best he can with a Congress that has a Senate with 49 Democrats. If we had 60 Republicans in the Senate, the budget deal would have been far different, and far better. As Trump tweeted:

Without more Republicans in Congress, we were forced to increase spending on things we do not like or want in order to finally, after many years of depletion, take care of our Military. Sadly, we needed some Dem votes for passage. Must elect more Republicans in 2018 Election!​

Take a look at three of the most significant tax cuts, the Coolidge tax cuts, the Kennedy tax cuts, and the Reagan tax cuts.

The Coolidge tax cuts developed economic growth but still did not cover the cost. The Kennedy tax cuts reduced revenues by $12 billion on an annual basis, but CBO models indicated that only between $3 billion and $9 billion was recaptured through additional revenue. Reagan’s own 1990 budget, his last one, concluded that the “net effect” of 1981 tax cut was a reduction in revenue by $613 billion over five years; all but $367 billion was recouped by Reagan tax increases, the budget document said. This estimate was made in 1988, meaning it incorporated whatever growth occurred in the 1980s.

The belief that tax cuts pay for themselves is a great selling point for congressmen trying to pass tax relief bills. Just cut taxes without spending cuts and everybody wins. One need only look at the national debt to see the truth.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/12/07/history-lesson-do-big-tax-cuts-pay-for-themselves/?utm_term=.dd8cfff86f6e

Lol
The well is dry asshole...

How about reading post before replying

 

[AntonToo]

It is impossible for tax cuts to cost anything, jackass.

Hey retard, what do you think will happen to our budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

OF COURSE there is a budgetary cost to doing that!

Bullshit. Taking less of people's money doesn't cost a ******* penny.

You didn't answer the question asshole.

I'll ask again: what do you think will happen to our budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

It certainly wouldn't hurt my budget.

I didn't ask about your budget, grow a pair and answer honestly.

what do you think will happen to our FEDERAL budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

 

[basquebromance]

"Government's job is not to get you stuff, or to get somebody else's stuff for you. It's to preserve your liberty." - Supercilious Rand Paul

 

[mikegriffith1]

What a comical OP. Will liberals here ever, ever deal with the fact that every single major tax cut since the early 1900s has been followed by a substantial *increase* in federal revenue?

And where was this comical liberal hand-wringing over spending when Obama was busy adding $7.9 trillion to the national debt? Gee, didn't hear a word from liberals about the debt or the deficit for eight long years under Obama. But now, oh wow, their suddenly worried about the effects of letting Americans keep more of their own money and of making our companies more competitive by lowering our obscenely high corporate tax rate.

 

[Rustic]

It is impossible for tax cuts to cost anything, jackass.

Hey retard, what do you think will happen to our budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

OF COURSE there is a budgetary cost to doing that!

Bullshit. Taking less of people's money doesn't cost a ******* penny.

You didn't answer the question asshole.

I'll ask again: what do you think will happen to our budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

It certainly wouldn't hurt my budget.

I didn't ask about your budget, grow a pair and answer honestly.

what do you think will happen to our FEDERAL budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

Career politicians/deep state people and their federal government should have to beg for funding...

 

[danielpalos]

It is impossible for tax cuts to cost anything, jackass.

Hey retard, what do you think will happen to our budgets if we tax-cut to zero?

OF COURSE there is a budgetary cost to doing that!

Bullshit. Taking less of people's money doesn't cost a ******* penny.

Socialized income redistribution is all it is. Only the right wing never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

So enabling people who had to buy insurance as individuals the opportunity to buy as part of a large group an insurance policy of their own choosing from a private insurance company of their choosing to get care from private doctors in private institutions is controlling people?

Obamacare was made to fail so they can bring on single payer which is all about control and nothing to do with health

But it has not failed at all.

Even the might Donald can't seem to destroy it.

You take away funding. You take away the mandate. Still ticking

I could care less as long as there is no mandate...

it should be affordable for anyone.

As long as it’s 100% voluntary and no mandate... go for it.
No one should forced into such programs, it is not necessary

How about a competing solution on how to make it affordable instead of just lip service, like usual, and nothing but repeal as a right wing result.

 

[danielpalos]

The tax cuts will pay for themselves over time, as history has shown over and over again since the early 1900s.

Trump is doing the best he can with a Congress that has a Senate with 49 Democrats. If we had 60 Republicans in the Senate, the budget deal would have been far different, and far better. As Trump tweeted:

Without more Republicans in Congress, we were forced to increase spending on things we do not like or want in order to finally, after many years of depletion, take care of our Military. Sadly, we needed some Dem votes for passage. Must elect more Republicans in 2018 Election!​

More ....Alll tax cuts pay for themselves idiocy

When will people learn?

the right wing never gets it; and claim they are not really like that, afterward.

 

[Rustic]

Obamacare was made to fail so they can bring on single payer which is all about control and nothing to do with health

But it has not failed at all.

Even the might Donald can't seem to destroy it.

You take away funding. You take away the mandate. Still ticking

I could care less as long as there is no mandate...

it should be affordable for anyone.

As long as it’s 100% voluntary and no mandate... go for it.
No one should forced into such programs, it is not necessary

How about a competing solution on how to make it affordable instead of just lip service, like usual, and nothing but repeal as a right wing result.

Why would anyone with any common sense wanna be involved in the collective?

 

[danielpalos]

"Government's job is not to get you stuff, or to get somebody else's stuff for you. It's to preserve your liberty." - Supercilious Rand Paul

Why are we wasting the other Peoples' money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror? There is no common offense clause nor any general warfare clause in our federal Constitution.

And,

A Commerce Clause.

 

[danielpalos]

What a comical OP. Will liberals here ever, ever deal with the fact that every single major tax cut since the early 1900s has been followed by a substantial *increase* in federal revenue?

And where was this comical liberal hand-wringing over spending when Obama was busy adding $7.9 trillion to the national debt? Gee, didn't hear a word from liberals about the debt or the deficit for eight long years under Obama. But now, oh wow, their suddenly worried about the effects of letting Americans keep more of their own money and of making our companies more competitive by lowering our obscenely high corporate tax rate.

Why are we adding to the national debt by cutting taxes and not wasteful, unenumerated spending that does not provide for the common defense and general welfare.

 

[danielpalos]

But it has not failed at all.

Even the might Donald can't seem to destroy it.

You take away funding. You take away the mandate. Still ticking

I could care less as long as there is no mandate...

it should be affordable for anyone.

As long as it’s 100% voluntary and no mandate... go for it.
No one should forced into such programs, it is not necessary

How about a competing solution on how to make it affordable instead of just lip service, like usual, and nothing but repeal as a right wing result.

Why would anyone with any common sense wanna be involved in the collective?

Well regulated militia always win over any form of militia of one.

 

[dudmuck]

"Government's job is not to get you stuff, or to get somebody else's stuff for you. It's to preserve your liberty." - Supercilious Rand Paul

ah, but it is.

 

[Rustic]

I could care less as long as there is no mandate...

it should be affordable for anyone.

As long as it’s 100% voluntary and no mandate... go for it.
No one should forced into such programs, it is not necessary

How about a competing solution on how to make it affordable instead of just lip service, like usual, and nothing but repeal as a right wing result.

Why would anyone with any common sense wanna be involved in the collective?

Well regulated militia always win over any form of militia of one.

People that depend on the collective are dimwitted… They deserve to be dominated. Lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

it should be affordable for anyone.

As long as it’s 100% voluntary and no mandate... go for it.
No one should forced into such programs, it is not necessary

How about a competing solution on how to make it affordable instead of just lip service, like usual, and nothing but repeal as a right wing result.

Why would anyone with any common sense wanna be involved in the collective?

Well regulated militia always win over any form of militia of one.

People that depend on the collective are dimwitted… They deserve to be dominated. Lol

The US military is the most collective institution in the US.

 

[whitehall]

Hypocrite lefties have a strong economy, bonuses and extra money in their paycheck but they still whine about the unjustice of it all. The debit went up during Obama but we got nothing except promises of electric cars and dying solar energy factories propped up by taxpayer money.

 

[Rustic]

As long as it’s 100% voluntary and no mandate... go for it.
No one should forced into such programs, it is not necessary

How about a competing solution on how to make it affordable instead of just lip service, like usual, and nothing but repeal as a right wing result.

Why would anyone with any common sense wanna be involved in the collective?

Well regulated militia always win over any form of militia of one.

People that depend on the collective are dimwitted… They deserve to be dominated. Lol

The US military is the most collective institution in the US.

It is also 100% volunteer so other words it is not a collective. Collectives are always forced.
There’s a reason why drafts always fail

 

[NYcarbineer]

Several have commented that the GOP's budget bill represents the death of the Tea Party, of which Rand Paul was a leading figure, so...