Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
A new angle on climate model uncertainty: changing the order in which different climate processes are computed can vary climate feedback parameter by half the full CMIP5 spread in climate feedback. “
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a wiz at statistics. You can get up to be down and in to be out with such ease.The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
As in any mathematical endeavor, the order in which you do the operations is the difference between right and wrong... In life it is the difference between life and death. Since we still have little understanding as to what the proper order of operations is in our climate, making the assumption you know the proper order is fantasy. Empirical review of your models shows they are 100% failures, without exception. Thus your order of operations is wrong!The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
Mann used the Tinjaunder proxies upside down and added a nice single year plot trend to a 500 year plot series creating the Hokey Schtick...I'm a wiz at statistics. You can get up to be down and in to be out with such ease.The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
Global warming Mythers know the tricks too.
A simple error in forcing could render the whole absurdly out of range as we have today.. Failing to understand that CO2 has no driving capabilities and that there is no magic "enhancement" factor makes all the pontification hilarious...A new angle on climate model uncertainty: changing the order in which different climate processes are computed can vary climate feedback parameter by half the full CMIP5 spread in climate feedback. “
A simple math lesson proves your side wrong... It takes very little effort on anyone's part to discredit you alarmists..The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
Wait... you're not playing the democrat name change game... you're not supposed to call it GLOBAL WARMING anymore... it's CLIMATE CHANGE.Global Warming is ghey
As in any mathematical endeavor, the order in which you do the operations is the difference between right and wrong... In life it is the difference between life and death. Since we still have little understanding as to what the proper order of operations is in our climate, making the assumption you know the proper order is fantasy. Empirical review of your models shows they are 100% failures, without exception. Thus your order of operations is wrong!The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
Given your abject ignorance of simple math and basic science principals, your doing a fine job of being the village idiot.. Still waiting for a single shred of empirical evidence proving your assertions of man caused global climate change..As in any mathematical endeavor, the order in which you do the operations is the difference between right and wrong... In life it is the difference between life and death. Since we still have little understanding as to what the proper order of operations is in our climate, making the assumption you know the proper order is fantasy. Empirical review of your models shows they are 100% failures, without exception. Thus your order of operations is wrong!The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
Billy, given your extensive experience, I was wondering if you could give us a quick overview on the technique of working from abject ignorance with willful lies? Have you found that to be a productive and beneficial technique or does the corporal punishment your poor, embarrassed mother inflicts on you daily build on whatever it is tht serves you as a conscience?
Your a whiz at nonsense. LOL The science is settled that water vapor, CO2, CH4, and NOx are GHGs. That was settled in 1859 by John Tyndall. Svante Arrhenius did the calculations for the doubling of CO2 in 1896, and the figure he arrived at was pretty accurate. You are a know nothing with delusions of intelligence.I'm a wiz at statistics. You can get up to be down and in to be out with such ease.The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
Global warming Mythers know the tricks too.
Silly Billy, you don't even know basic statistics, let alone any higher math. All the stinky 'facts' you present come right out of your ass. You have no business denigrating anyone else's knowledge. There are established fact in this debate. The first of which is that we have increased the CO2 level in the atmosphere from 280 ppm to 400+ ppm. CH4 from about 700 ppb to over 1850 ppb. That has increased the water vapor in the atmosphere by 7%. All these are GHGs, and the atmosphere and ocean is warming.As in any mathematical endeavor, the order in which you do the operations is the difference between right and wrong... In life it is the difference between life and death. Since we still have little understanding as to what the proper order of operations is in our climate, making the assumption you know the proper order is fantasy. Empirical review of your models shows they are 100% failures, without exception. Thus your order of operations is wrong!The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
When all one has but faithThe more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
Your a whiz at nonsense. LOL The science is settled that water vapor, CO2, CH4, and NOx are GHGs. That was settled in 1859 by John Tyndall. Svante Arrhenius did the calculations for the doubling of CO2 in 1896, and the figure he arrived at was pretty accurate. You are a know nothing with delusions of intelligence.I'm a wiz at statistics. You can get up to be down and in to be out with such ease.The more we learn...My problem is when your side wants to completely discredit science without even attempting to do any science to do it.
Global warming Mythers know the tricks too.