THE Singular Reason The LGBT Cult Is Taking Over...

[Syriusly]

Very soon they will teach kids that being heterosexual is wrong and bigotted, .

Very soon they will teach kids that being a homosexual is wrong and that homosexuals should be arrested and locked up and even castrated.

Oh wait- your people already did that.

Really? You have any examples of it happening here? They do do that in Muslim countries.

Are you really that incredibly ignorant? Oh wait.....that is self evident.

Homosexuals were being arrested as recently as 2 1/2 years ago for agreeing to have consensual sex
https://thinkprogress.org/louisiana...sex-under-sodomy-laws-53a316be6c6b#.94e7sv2n7

Even though the Supreme Court already said that you folk could not actually tell Americans what kind of private consensual sex we can have in Lawrence v. Texas in 2003.

Until 2003, in numerous states around the United States, your people had laws in place to arrest and lock up homosexuals- for private consensual sex.

And as far as castration- look at the sad history of Alan Turing- the Brit who helped defeat Nazi Germany by his code breaking work- and was subjected to chemical castration

How Britain drove its greatest genius Alan Turing to suicide... just for being gay | Daily Mail Online
The London-born mathematician was convicted of 'gross indecency with a male' in March 1952. Instead of prison, he was sentenced to chemical castration - injections of the female hormone oestrogen, designed to suppress his homosexuality.

Unlike your fantasies about how the gay community is coming after you- the gay community really had people like you coming after them-

Conspiracy garbage, from a leftist nutjob website. .

What bullshit. I provided citations from newspapers- you of course provide nothing but what you pull out of your ass.

As I said originally- and demonstrated- the reality is that gays have suffered actual persecution from you folk- and they have fought long and hard to overcome your persecution.

Are you really that incredibly ignorant? Oh wait.....that is self evident.

Homosexuals were being arrested as recently as 2 1/2 years ago for agreeing to have consensual sex
https://thinkprogress.org/louisiana...sex-under-sodomy-laws-53a316be6c6b#.94e7sv2n7

Even though the Supreme Court already said that you folk could not actually tell Americans what kind of private consensual sex we can have in Lawrence v. Texas in 2003.

Until 2003, in numerous states around the United States, your people had laws in place to arrest and lock up homosexuals- for private consensual sex.

And as far as castration- look at the sad history of Alan Turing- the Brit who helped defeat Nazi Germany by his code breaking work- and was subjected to chemical castration

How Britain drove its greatest genius Alan Turing to suicide... just for being gay | Daily Mail Online
The London-born mathematician was convicted of 'gross indecency with a male' in March 1952. Instead of prison, he was sentenced to chemical castration - injections of the female hormone oestrogen, designed to suppress his homosexuality.

Unlike your fantasies about how the gay community is coming after you- the gay community really had people like you coming after them

 

[bodecea]

You must have missed the part where I stated it's not something that should be taught in schools. I'm from South Alabama so that kind of shit ain't likely to happen around my home town for quit a while if ever. All of my children have finished school and are old enough to form their own opinion on such matters they are of course well aware of mine.
I don't sit on my ass for anything I feel strongly about but what others do in private is none of my goddamn business as long as they are not breaking the laws of the land. That is a true Conservatives stance.

The youth need to learn all about it somehow eventually.

Parents should teach it, and they will learn when their time comes, you don't go telling kids at the age of fkn four how the hell to screw, .

And no one is teaching kids the age of 4 how to screw.

CALIFORNIA ACTIVISTS WANT SEXUAL CONSENT TAUGHT TO KINDERGARTNERSH]

Why don't you want kids to learn that they should keep their hands to yourself?

“Concerned parents might think we’re talking about consent in purely sexual context, when really we’re talking on a day-to-day basis,” Melgoza explained. What that basically means is the old “keep your hands to yourself” policy, she said

It's all tied to Pizzagate..........

 

[Silhouette]

As I said originally- and demonstrated- the reality is that gays have suffered actual persecution from you folk- and they have fought long and hard to overcome your persecution.

And...the children roped into gay lifestyles are now suffering, via contract, the persecution of being forcibly removed from any hope of ever being mentored by either a mother or father...for life....100% of the time with "gay marriage". Obergefell is a social experiment forced upon an unwilling majority, using children's minds as petri dishes for the cult of depraved sex...with huge issues of denial and untreated mental problems (butch/femme syndrome; closeted heterosexuality) acting as "legally"-legitimized "parents".

 

[Syriusly]

As I said originally- and demonstrated- the reality is that gays have suffered actual persecution from you folk- and they have fought long and hard to overcome your persecution.

And...the children roped into gay lifestyles are now suffering, via contract, the persecution

They are suffering from the persecution of assholes like you who hate gays so much that you want to harm them through their kids.

 

[Silhouette]

They are suffering from the persecution of assholes like you who hate gays so much that you want to harm them through their kids.

No, I want standards for marriage that used to extend the vital benefit of both a mother and a father to children; to remedy a lack of that in their life by enticing incentives. You want a lack in their life to be rewarded with said incentives. This is where we disagree. And I'm not alone in disagreeing with you. As you know, there is a poll at this website of 100 people, of which 85% said they feel it is important for children to have both a mother and father in their lives. Ergo, they logically cannot be in favor of so-called "gay marriage"..

What this thread is about is a nudge to those 85% to consider that because they feel strongly about normal marriage for the sake of children, they should get off their dead butts and say something about it; as often as they can, to as many people as they can.

 

[Syriusly]

They are suffering from the persecution of assholes like you who hate gays so much that you want to harm them through their kids.

No, I want standards for marriage.

But all you do is advocate persecution of gays- and for harm to their children.

 

[Silhouette]

But all you do is advocate persecution of gays- and for harm to their children.

I've never once said to harm children involved with the gay cult. Just as I would never suggest harming children caught up in Scientology. Just as I would never suggest harming children caught up in Warren Jeff's cult.

I'm advocating for all children IN GENERAL..for whom the marriage contract used to provide the VITAL benefits of having both mother and father...to remedy all inferior situations to that gold standard..by each state enticing said gold standard with monetary benefits for the adults they woo to create that contract on behalf of children IN GENERAL.

Just because a pack of wolves have successfully raised a child, does not therefore mean "I hate children raised by wolves by refusing to let wolves marry". Just because a brother and sister have sex and have a child does not therefore mean "I hate children raised by incest by refusing to let brothers & sisters marry". Just because polygamists get together and have children does not therefore mean "I hate children raised by polygamists by refusing to let polygamists marry". It's just that states have figured out with real, actual studies and real, actual statistics that children raised by wolves, incest and polygamy do not make the best formed & productive citizens. A state should not be forced as a matter of law to entice child-raising that produces adult citizens later on who become indigent, drug-addicted, suicidal or otherwise mentally ill. PRINCE'S TRUST 2010 YOUTH INDEX SURVEY

You want special exception IN ORDER TO BRING KNOWN HARM TO CHILDREN for your particular inferior situation to them. You don't give a flying **** about their wellbeing; because if you did, you'd be like Dolce & Gabbana (the gay Italian designers) who said they felt their own mother and father, respective were vital to their upbringing and that it isn't right to have marriage without mother/father for the sake of children. Before, you know, your cult cracked down and threatened economic terrorism on their business using Elton John and his buddy (with a couple of adopted male infants, don't you know..) who himself used to believe a mother and father were vital...before he was "audited" by your version of Scientology to "come into the fold or be cast out"..

Your anything-goes-social-experiment-marriage advocacy is the true hatred of children. Because for you, the focus is ALL on the adults. Because if it wasn't, you'd be yelling your head off about allowing children of wolves, incest & polygamny to have their "parents" have the benefits of marriage also. Yet on all those types of lifestyles, you are quite mute. Even vocally opposed. And yet their children sit without any benefits of marriage.

You are a perverse, lying HYPOCRITE who actually hates children in deed, while professing to care about them as your cult-advocate phasod.

 

[Silhouette]

Gay activists admit their goal is to destroy heterosexuality.

Well here's the funny thing about that. And a point I which that regular people should discuss and turn into a meme, using laughter as a lubricant to implant the concept deep inside the listener(s) minds: In almost every single "gay" relationship you have closeted heterosexuality, paired with identity dysfunction.

Take lesbians for example. One of them is invariably dressing, cutting hair, talking and swaggering like a stereotypical "male thug". The other one is inexplicably drawn to that. Now I said "inexplicably" because she is supposedly a "lesbian"...but is attracted to ALL the trappings of maleness. You bring that up in a room of lesbians and ask them to explain it. Might want to wear a flack jacket just in case. Denial isn't very forgiving..

Same with gay men. One of them invariably is a lisping, falsetto, hip-wiggling "bottom". How "gay" is the other male who is attracted to that? I mean, really? If he's into feminine behaviors, looks and wants his sex partner to lay before him offering up a hole (artificial vagina), then is he REALLY gay? Again, wear flack jacket if you plan on confronting a group of these people.

But you don't need a flack jacket if you're around normal people. They'll "get it". Just find a clever way, maybe just one or two sentences to sum the whole charade and ruse up and call it to the fore.

You could say "Why would a gay man be attracted to a dude that acts like a woman?". or "gee, when that lesbian gets tired of her butch partner, she might be tempted to make the final step to the real thing?" Stuff like that. I'm not as clever as some. I'm sure some of you reading can call this elephant in the living room out to a crowd's attention with tact and humor?

That's my challenge.

 

[mdk]

Men that **** other men in the ass is clealry a sign of closeted heterosexuality.

 

[Silhouette]

"hole"...you forgot...ass-hole. Emphasis on "hole"..

 

[mdk]

"hole"...you forgot...ass-hole. Emphasis on "hole"..

Anal sex between men is a classic sign of heterosexuality. I hope one day they break free from the straight closet.