The Second Greatest Threat…


But they don’t have the tech. They can start an activity to cure baldness too. Doesn’t mean they will be successful
Rightwinger doesn't care about Iran, the Middle East, or the US and likely couldn't identify any of 'em if the map didn't name them. He is a leftarded broken record caring only about his nearly 3 yr long battle with acute TDS butt-hurt and if yours stung as his does you'd be cranky and unhinged also.
 
Last edited:
You are a very confused individual.

Trump tore up an agreement preventing them from developing nukes
Now, there is nothing stopping them

Why does Trump want Iran to be a nuclear power?

He did that because they were funneling monies to Hezbollah and Hamas. Show proof that Iran has the capabilities to become a nuclear power.



Who are Israel's enemies.


Western Civilization's enemies, and America's enemies.


Clear?

Nope , only Israel's.

Islamists and anti semites. Aka you.
 
Then why is our president letting them get nukes?

What is he thinking?

You are a very confused individual.

Trump tore up an agreement preventing them from developing nukes
Now, there is nothing stopping them

Why does Trump want Iran to be a nuclear power?

Nothing in that agreement with Obama (only) prevented anything.

Later, he gave them $1,800,000,000.
Of their own money.
 

But they don’t have the tech. They can start an activity to cure baldness too. Doesn’t mean they will be successful


You are not correct here, Az


Iran has been subsidizing their nuclear lab for years.....in North Korea



"Assist from North Korea

Regardless of any deal to which Iran may agree, Asia expert Gordon Chang said North Korea for years has been helping Tehran in a “secret program” to develop nuclear weapons.

It’s questionable, he said, that a secret program outside Iran’s borders would be covered under the deal with the West.

“The international community wants the preliminary arrangement … to ensure that the country remains at least one year away from being able to produce an atomic device,” Chang said.

“But no inspections of Iranian sites will solve a fundamental issue,” he added. “As can be seen from the North Korean base housing Tehran’s weapons specialists, Iran is only one part of a nuclear weapons effort spanning the Asian continent.

“North Korea, now the world’s proliferation superstar, is a participant. China, once the mastermind, may still be a co-conspirator,” he said.

“Inspections inside the borders of Iran, therefore, will not give the international community the assurance it needs.”
ttp://www.wnd.com/2015/04/will-interim-nuke-deal-provoke-mideast-nuclear-arms-race/






"North Korea’s Deadly Partnership With Iran
If he is forging deals to help Iran get the kind of nuclear and missile technology with which North Korea has surprised and frightened the world, but relations between the two governments go back a long way, and shared weaponry and technology has been key to their rapport.

[As The Daily Beast has reported, critics of the Iran nuclear deal with the West have gone so far as to raise the possibility that Iran continues to develop nuclear weapons and missiles inside North Korea.]"
North Korea’s Deadly Partnership With Iran




And, of course, the crypto-Islamofascist President Obama knew it.
I recall a prominent Saudi Prince some years ago, when regional fears of nuclear Iran were hot, who claimed his country would - if deemed necessary - get nukes from their client state, Pakistan. I understand their bond probably precludes Iran getting theirs from Pakistan but they do share a border (as well as cultural & religious links) so little would impede clandestine Paki help in developing Iranian nukes.
 
Then why is our president letting them get nukes?

What is he thinking?

You are a very confused individual.

Trump tore up an agreement preventing them from developing nukes
Now, there is nothing stopping them

Why does Trump want Iran to be a nuclear power?

Nothing in that agreement with Obama (only) prevented anything.

Later, he gave them $1,800,000,000.
Of their own money.



How about bank robbers, arrested.....give 'em back 'their own money, too'?....you dunce.


Now....what do they do with 'their own money'...????

How about the $billion Hussein Obama let them get by selling cocaine to American kids, then using the funds for IED to kill American soldiers.



You must support that as well?
 

But they don’t have the tech. They can start an activity to cure baldness too. Doesn’t mean they will be successful


You are not correct here, Az


Iran has been subsidizing their nuclear lab for years.....in North Korea



"Assist from North Korea

Regardless of any deal to which Iran may agree, Asia expert Gordon Chang said North Korea for years has been helping Tehran in a “secret program” to develop nuclear weapons.

It’s questionable, he said, that a secret program outside Iran’s borders would be covered under the deal with the West.

“The international community wants the preliminary arrangement … to ensure that the country remains at least one year away from being able to produce an atomic device,” Chang said.

“But no inspections of Iranian sites will solve a fundamental issue,” he added. “As can be seen from the North Korean base housing Tehran’s weapons specialists, Iran is only one part of a nuclear weapons effort spanning the Asian continent.

“North Korea, now the world’s proliferation superstar, is a participant. China, once the mastermind, may still be a co-conspirator,” he said.

“Inspections inside the borders of Iran, therefore, will not give the international community the assurance it needs.”
ttp://www.wnd.com/2015/04/will-interim-nuke-deal-provoke-mideast-nuclear-arms-race/






"North Korea’s Deadly Partnership With Iran
If he is forging deals to help Iran get the kind of nuclear and missile technology with which North Korea has surprised and frightened the world, but relations between the two governments go back a long way, and shared weaponry and technology has been key to their rapport.

[As The Daily Beast has reported, critics of the Iran nuclear deal with the West have gone so far as to raise the possibility that Iran continues to develop nuclear weapons and missiles inside North Korea.]"
North Korea’s Deadly Partnership With Iran




And, of course, the crypto-Islamofascist President Obama knew it.
I recall a prominent Saudi Prince some years ago, when regional fears of nuclear Iran were hot, who claimed his country would - if deemed necessary - get nukes from their client state, Pakistan. I understand their bond probably precludes Iran getting theirs from Pakistan but they do share a border (as well as cultural & religious links) so little would impede clandestine Paki help in developing Iranian nukes.



This is the nuclear arms race the war criminal, Hussein, encouraged.



1. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.



2. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during timesof war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillaw
war criminal
Nuclear_explosion_obama.jpg




4. Is there precedent for the one who gave the weapons used to kill innocents, to be prosecuted????

You betcha'!!!!!


a. "Human rights lawyers say they hope the case signals a trend. In Europe's growing practice of domestic courts' taking on human rights abuses that happened far away, the accused havecommonly been foreign military or political officials, rather than local businessmen. But in December, a Dutch court sentenced a Dutch businessman, Frans van Anraat, to 15 years in prison for selling chemicals to Saddam Hussein. The chemicals were used in poison gas weapons that killed Kurdish villagers."
Holding arms dealers accountable at home


b. "....the provision of arms, ammunition, and other forms of military support to known human rights abusers has enabled them to carry out atrocities against civilians. The perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide are on notice that they may be hauled before a national or international criminal tribunal to face charges."
https://www.hrw.org/legacy/wr2k4/download/13.pdf



c. Dutch Court Convicts Arms Dealer for Role in Liberian Atrocities.

".... an appeals court in the Netherlands sentenced Guus Kouwenhoven, a Dutch businessman and citizen, to 19 years in prison for serving as an accessory to war crimes in Liberia. For years, Kouwenhoven smuggled weapons into the African nation using his timber business as cover. His operation supplied Liberian war criminal Charles Taylor with weapons for use in a conflict that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives."
Dutch Court Convicts Arms Dealer for Role in Liberian Atrocities. What Does It Say About Justice for Economic Crime?
 
Then why is our president letting them get nukes?

What is he thinking?

You are a very confused individual.

Trump tore up an agreement preventing them from developing nukes
Now, there is nothing stopping them

Why does Trump want Iran to be a nuclear power?

Nothing in that agreement with Obama (only) prevented anything.

Later, he gave them $1,800,000,000.
Of their own money.

Irrelevant. No one of sound mind would give $1,800,000,000 to an enemy sworn to destroy us unless that person was in with them.
 
Then why is our president letting them get nukes?

What is he thinking?

You are a very confused individual.

Trump tore up an agreement preventing them from developing nukes
Now, there is nothing stopping them

Why does Trump want Iran to be a nuclear power?

He did that because they were funneling monies to Hezbollah and Hamas. Show proof that Iran has the capabilities to become a nuclear power.

Who are Israel's enemies.
In 2016, the Arab League - no friend to Israel or the US - designated Hezbollah a terrorist organization. You support and defend Hezbollah because … well … everyone knows why, Eva Braun.
 
Then why is our president letting them get nukes?

What is he thinking?

You are a very confused individual.

Trump tore up an agreement preventing them from developing nukes
Now, there is nothing stopping them

Why does Trump want Iran to be a nuclear power?
The Obama Agreement Accelerated Iran's Nuclear Program. Furthermore Obama gave Iran $150 Billion in violation of International Law to purchase Uranium Centrifuges, US Uranium Russia Acquired through deception and the dishonesty of Clinton, Obama and Eric Holder, covered up by Mueller and Comey (Rosatom - Uranium One Bribery Scandal) and they used this money for nuclear weapons development and to buy Russian Weapons that they gave to Terrorist Groups.

Lastly, you are a Schmuck, and have BO. Go take a bath you Commie Hippie.
 
So if you had a deranged neighbor who threatened to burn down your house if you don't give him $1000, you'd pay him?
The Great Obama took away their matches. Trump gave them back
Obama paid them their own money. We know tramp would of kept it and pocketed it.
So your fellow leftist loon (Rightwinger) says "The Great Obama took away their matches. Trump gave them back" while you admit it was Obama who supplied the 1.8 billion matches.

You Nazi clowns really do need to get on the same page.
 
Last edited:
This is what I don't like about Trump, he should have hit Iran with enough drones, RPVs and cruise missiles to overwhelm the air defense of their refineries and oil fields but around two years ago.
I appreciate Trump's reluctance to involve the US in other's probs. There are plenty of Mideast countries with the capacity and motivation to deter a nuclear Iran. Let them deal with it.
 
“Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says”
Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says





7. “Bombings, assassinations, and hostage-taking are all part of the Iranian regime’s DNA, and no major government institution can be thought of as isolated from the use of terrorism as a form of statecraft.

8. …even Iranian officials have pointed to the intimate connections between paramilitary and diplomatic entities within the regime. In a recent interview with Iranian state media, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi declared that the Foreign Ministry, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security all pursue the same objectives.

9. In the wake of last year’s thwarted terror plots, an appropriate policy would involve dramatically expanding economic sanctions as well as expelling Iranian diplomats.” Western Dealings With Iran Must Recognize The Extent Of Terrorist Threats




In light of these facts, and the title of the thread, one’s curiosity might be piqued as to who, or what, the greatest threat.

That would be the individual and political party that serves at the beck and call of Iran, and has been the greatest enabler of this barbaric nation……Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party....who fund and arm the 7th century savages.
Thing is, "people" like Pene do not care how many innocents are slaughtered (nor how, nor by whom) as long as there is a Jew among the dead. Everything she posts is rooted in her all-consuming hate for the Jooo. Everything.
 
Last edited:
“Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says”
Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says





7. “Bombings, assassinations, and hostage-taking are all part of the Iranian regime’s DNA, and no major government institution can be thought of as isolated from the use of terrorism as a form of statecraft.

8. …even Iranian officials have pointed to the intimate connections between paramilitary and diplomatic entities within the regime. In a recent interview with Iranian state media, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi declared that the Foreign Ministry, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security all pursue the same objectives.

9. In the wake of last year’s thwarted terror plots, an appropriate policy would involve dramatically expanding economic sanctions as well as expelling Iranian diplomats.” Western Dealings With Iran Must Recognize The Extent Of Terrorist Threats




In light of these facts, and the title of the thread, one’s curiosity might be piqued as to who, or what, the greatest threat.

That would be the individual and political party that serves at the beck and call of Iran, and has been the greatest enabler of this barbaric nation……Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party....who fund and arm the 7th century savages.
Thing is, "people" like Pene do not care how many innocents are slaughtered as long as there is a Jew among the dead. Everything she posts is rooted in her all-consuming hate for the Jooo. Everything.


Let's go over the sort of things she does seem to support:


“Salafists adhere to a strict version of Islam,” the report explains. “They do not believe in women’s rights and call for women to be clothed from head to toe. The Salafists adopt a hostile stance towards non-Muslims, saying they are not full citizens.”

Indeed, Sheikh Yasser al-Burhami has authored numerous fatwas—edicts based on Islamic scriptures—that demand hate and hostility for non-Muslims, most specifically the nation’s largest and most visible minority, the Christian Copts, whom Burhami has referred to as “a criminal and infidel minority,” one that he regularly invokes “Allah’s curse” on.



For example and in keeping with the doctrine of al-wala’ w’al bara’ (“Loyalty and Enmity”), Burhami has called on all Muslims to hate all non-Muslims—going as far as to say that, although a Muslim man is permitted to marry Christian or Jewish women (ahl al-kitab), he must make sure he still hates them in his heart—and show them this hate—because they are infidels; otherwise he risks compromising his Islam.



Burhami has stated that churches—which he refers to as “places of polytheism (shirk) and houses of infidelity (kufr)”—must never be built in Egypt. He issued a separate fatwa forbidding Muslim taxi and bus drivers from transporting Christian clergymen to their churches, an act he depicted as being “more forbidden than taking someone to a liquor bar.”

Burhami has also stated that Egypt’s Christians must pay jizya—“protection” money in exchange for a measure of tolerance, a la Koran 9:29—or be fought to death.



Even so, the wily sheikh insists that circumstance is the ultimate deciding factor. In a 2013 video, Burhami said that “Destroying churches is permissible—as long as the destruction does not bring harm to Muslims, …

Burhami elaborated on the importance of circumstances in an earlier video:

The Jews of Medina represent a paradigm—laid by the prophet [Muhammad]—that shows how Muslims should deal with infidels. ….. Today in Gaza, we do not tell Muslims to launch rockets every day and so destroy the country, but we tell them “Refrain from action and respect the truce.” When the Prophet first arrived in Medina, he made conciliation with the Jews, conciliation without jizya [i.e., equal-term conciliation without forcing Jews to pay tribute and live as second-class dhimmis]—this is a pattern that can be followed whenever circumstances dictate…. Yes we can deal with those Christians [Egypt’s Copts] as the Jews were dealt with in Medina; it is an option. The Prophet made the Hudaybiya Reconciliation with the infidels and held a truce for ten years [which he abrogated on becoming stronger]; that is also an option…. So, it is legitimate to choose from examples set by the Prophet, depending on what suits the situation of Muslims now.



In plain language, when strong, wage jihad—including by destroying churches and forcing jizya/extortion money from non-Muslims; when weak, preach peace and coexistence, including with the “archenemy,” Israel.



Even so, according to the reinsno circumstance ever requires Muslims to be on friendly terms with non-Muslims. tated Salafi cleric, Burhami has accordingly issued fatwas banning Muslims from congratulating the nation’s Christian minorities during the latter’s religious holidays; banning Muslims from in anyway participating in such festivities; and, in an effort to further impoverish the nation’s Christians, banning Muslims from going to Christian businesses, pharmacies, hospitals, or any other place of business.



One can go on and on with Burhami’s fatwas—including calling for the persecution of apostates, permitting Muslim husbands to abandon their wives to rape, permitting “marriage” to 12-year-old girls, and banning Mother’s Day—but his quality should be evident by now.

Egypt’s Muslim leaders are not alone in their silence and/or complicity; as the Arab Weekly explains, ..."
Egypt Reinstates Hate Preaching against Non-Muslims - Raymond Ibrahim
 
Last edited:
“Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says”
Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says





7. “Bombings, assassinations, and hostage-taking are all part of the Iranian regime’s DNA, and no major government institution can be thought of as isolated from the use of terrorism as a form of statecraft.

8. …even Iranian officials have pointed to the intimate connections between paramilitary and diplomatic entities within the regime. In a recent interview with Iranian state media, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi declared that the Foreign Ministry, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security all pursue the same objectives.

9. In the wake of last year’s thwarted terror plots, an appropriate policy would involve dramatically expanding economic sanctions as well as expelling Iranian diplomats.” Western Dealings With Iran Must Recognize The Extent Of Terrorist Threats




In light of these facts, and the title of the thread, one’s curiosity might be piqued as to who, or what, the greatest threat.

That would be the individual and political party that serves at the beck and call of Iran, and has been the greatest enabler of this barbaric nation……Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party....who fund and arm the 7th century savages.
Thing is, "people" like Pene do not care how many innocents are slaughtered as long as there is a Jew among the dead. Everything she posts is rooted in her all-consuming hate for the Jooo. Everything.


Let's go over the sort of things she does seem to support:


“Salafists adhere to a strict version of Islam,” the report explains. “They do not believe in women’s rights and call for women to be clothed from head to toe. The Salafists adopt a hostile stance towards non-Muslims, saying they are not full citizens.”

Indeed, Sheikh Yasser al-Burhami has authored numerous fatwas—edicts based on Islamic scriptures—that demand hate and hostility for non-Muslims, most specifically the nation’s largest and most visible minority, the Christian Copts, whom Burhami has referred to as “a criminal and infidel minority,” one that he regularly invokes “Allah’s curse” on.

For example and in keeping with the doctrine of al-wala’ w’al bara’ (“Loyalty and Enmity”), Burhami has called on all Muslims to hate all non-Muslims—going as far as to say that, although a Muslim man is permitted to marry Christian or Jewish women (ahl al-kitab), he must make sure he still hates them in his heart—and show them this hate—because they are infidels; otherwise he risks compromising his Islam.

Burhami has stated that churches—which he refers to as “places of polytheism (shirk) and houses of infidelity (kufr)”—must never be built in Egypt. He issued a separate fatwaforbidding Muslim taxi and bus drivers from transporting Christian clergymen to their churches, an act he depicted as being “more forbidden than taking someone to a liquor bar.”

Burhami has also stated that Egypt’s Christians must pay jizya—“protection” money in exchange for a measure of tolerance, a la Koran 9:29—or be fought to death.

Even so, the wily sheikh insists that circumstance is the ultimate deciding factor. In a 2013 video, Burhami said that “Destroying churches is permissible—as long as the destruction does not bring harm to Muslims, …

Burhami elaborated on the importance of circumstances in an earlier video:

The Jews of Medina represent a paradigm—laid by the prophet [Muhammad]—that shows how Muslims should deal with infidels. ….. Today in Gaza, we do not tell Muslims to launch rockets every day and so destroy the country, but we tell them “Refrain from action and respect the truce.” When the Prophet first arrived in Medina, he made conciliation with the Jews, conciliation without jizya [i.e., equal-term conciliation without forcing Jews to pay tribute and live as second-class dhimmis]—this is a pattern that can be followed whenever circumstances dictate…. Yes we can deal with those Christians [Egypt’s Copts] as the Jews were dealt with in Medina; it is an option. The Prophet made the Hudaybiya Reconciliation with the infidels and held a truce for ten years [which he abrogated on becoming stronger]; that is also an option…. So, it is legitimate to choose from examples set by the Prophet, depending on what suits the situation of Muslims now.

In plain language, when strong, wage jihad—including by destroying churches and forcing jizya/extortion money from non-Muslims; when weak, preach peace and coexistence, including with the “archenemy,” Israel.

Even so, according to the reinstated Salafi cleric, no circumstance ever requires Muslims to be on friendly terms with non-Muslims. Burhami has accordingly issued fatwas banning Muslims from congratulating the nation’s Christian minorities during the latter’s religious holidays; banning Muslims from in anyway participating in such festivities; and, in an effort to further impoverish the nation’s Christians, banning Muslims from going to Christian businesses, pharmacies, hospitals, or any other place of business.

One can go on and on with Burhami’s fatwas—including calling for the persecution of apostates, permitting Muslim husbands to abandon their wives to rape, permitting “marriage” to 12-year-old girls, and banning Mother’s Day—but his quality should be evident by now.

Egypt’s Muslim leaders are not alone in their silence and/or complicity; as the Arab Weekly explains, ..."

Egypt Reinstates Hate Preaching against Non-Muslims - Raymond Ibrahim
I get it. The point being she would chew off her own arm if she thought she could blame the Jooos.
 
“Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says”
Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says





7. “Bombings, assassinations, and hostage-taking are all part of the Iranian regime’s DNA, and no major government institution can be thought of as isolated from the use of terrorism as a form of statecraft.

8. …even Iranian officials have pointed to the intimate connections between paramilitary and diplomatic entities within the regime. In a recent interview with Iranian state media, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi declared that the Foreign Ministry, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security all pursue the same objectives.

9. In the wake of last year’s thwarted terror plots, an appropriate policy would involve dramatically expanding economic sanctions as well as expelling Iranian diplomats.” Western Dealings With Iran Must Recognize The Extent Of Terrorist Threats




In light of these facts, and the title of the thread, one’s curiosity might be piqued as to who, or what, the greatest threat.

That would be the individual and political party that serves at the beck and call of Iran, and has been the greatest enabler of this barbaric nation……Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party....who fund and arm the 7th century savages.
Thing is, "people" like Pene do not care how many innocents are slaughtered as long as there is a Jew among the dead. Everything she posts is rooted in her all-consuming hate for the Jooo. Everything.


Let's go over the sort of things she does seem to support:


“Salafists adhere to a strict version of Islam,” the report explains. “They do not believe in women’s rights and call for women to be clothed from head to toe. The Salafists adopt a hostile stance towards non-Muslims, saying they are not full citizens.”

Indeed, Sheikh Yasser al-Burhami has authored numerous fatwas—edicts based on Islamic scriptures—that demand hate and hostility for non-Muslims, most specifically the nation’s largest and most visible minority, the Christian Copts, whom Burhami has referred to as “a criminal and infidel minority,” one that he regularly invokes “Allah’s curse” on.

For example and in keeping with the doctrine of al-wala’ w’al bara’ (“Loyalty and Enmity”), Burhami has called on all Muslims to hate all non-Muslims—going as far as to say that, although a Muslim man is permitted to marry Christian or Jewish women (ahl al-kitab), he must make sure he still hates them in his heart—and show them this hate—because they are infidels; otherwise he risks compromising his Islam.

Burhami has stated that churches—which he refers to as “places of polytheism (shirk) and houses of infidelity (kufr)”—must never be built in Egypt. He issued a separate fatwaforbidding Muslim taxi and bus drivers from transporting Christian clergymen to their churches, an act he depicted as being “more forbidden than taking someone to a liquor bar.”

Burhami has also stated that Egypt’s Christians must pay jizya—“protection” money in exchange for a measure of tolerance, a la Koran 9:29—or be fought to death.

Even so, the wily sheikh insists that circumstance is the ultimate deciding factor. In a 2013 video, Burhami said that “Destroying churches is permissible—as long as the destruction does not bring harm to Muslims, …

Burhami elaborated on the importance of circumstances in an earlier video:

The Jews of Medina represent a paradigm—laid by the prophet [Muhammad]—that shows how Muslims should deal with infidels. ….. Today in Gaza, we do not tell Muslims to launch rockets every day and so destroy the country, but we tell them “Refrain from action and respect the truce.” When the Prophet first arrived in Medina, he made conciliation with the Jews, conciliation without jizya [i.e., equal-term conciliation without forcing Jews to pay tribute and live as second-class dhimmis]—this is a pattern that can be followed whenever circumstances dictate…. Yes we can deal with those Christians [Egypt’s Copts] as the Jews were dealt with in Medina; it is an option. The Prophet made the Hudaybiya Reconciliation with the infidels and held a truce for ten years [which he abrogated on becoming stronger]; that is also an option…. So, it is legitimate to choose from examples set by the Prophet, depending on what suits the situation of Muslims now.

In plain language, when strong, wage jihad—including by destroying churches and forcing jizya/extortion money from non-Muslims; when weak, preach peace and coexistence, including with the “archenemy,” Israel.

Even so, according to the reinstated Salafi cleric, no circumstance ever requires Muslims to be on friendly terms with non-Muslims. Burhami has accordingly issued fatwas banning Muslims from congratulating the nation’s Christian minorities during the latter’s religious holidays; banning Muslims from in anyway participating in such festivities; and, in an effort to further impoverish the nation’s Christians, banning Muslims from going to Christian businesses, pharmacies, hospitals, or any other place of business.

One can go on and on with Burhami’s fatwas—including calling for the persecution of apostates, permitting Muslim husbands to abandon their wives to rape, permitting “marriage” to 12-year-old girls, and banning Mother’s Day—but his quality should be evident by now.

Egypt’s Muslim leaders are not alone in their silence and/or complicity; as the Arab Weekly explains, ..."

Egypt Reinstates Hate Preaching against Non-Muslims - Raymond Ibrahim
I get it. The point being she would chew off her own arm if she thought she could blame the Jooos.



These, and their Democrat apologists, are not fit as members of civilization.
 
“Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says”
Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says





7. “Bombings, assassinations, and hostage-taking are all part of the Iranian regime’s DNA, and no major government institution can be thought of as isolated from the use of terrorism as a form of statecraft.

8. …even Iranian officials have pointed to the intimate connections between paramilitary and diplomatic entities within the regime. In a recent interview with Iranian state media, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi declared that the Foreign Ministry, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security all pursue the same objectives.

9. In the wake of last year’s thwarted terror plots, an appropriate policy would involve dramatically expanding economic sanctions as well as expelling Iranian diplomats.” Western Dealings With Iran Must Recognize The Extent Of Terrorist Threats




In light of these facts, and the title of the thread, one’s curiosity might be piqued as to who, or what, the greatest threat.

That would be the individual and political party that serves at the beck and call of Iran, and has been the greatest enabler of this barbaric nation……Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party....who fund and arm the 7th century savages.
Thing is, "people" like Pene do not care how many innocents are slaughtered as long as there is a Jew among the dead. Everything she posts is rooted in her all-consuming hate for the Jooo. Everything.


Let's go over the sort of things she does seem to support:


“Salafists adhere to a strict version of Islam,” the report explains. “They do not believe in women’s rights and call for women to be clothed from head to toe. The Salafists adopt a hostile stance towards non-Muslims, saying they are not full citizens.”

Indeed, Sheikh Yasser al-Burhami has authored numerous fatwas—edicts based on Islamic scriptures—that demand hate and hostility for non-Muslims, most specifically the nation’s largest and most visible minority, the Christian Copts, whom Burhami has referred to as “a criminal and infidel minority,” one that he regularly invokes “Allah’s curse” on.

For example and in keeping with the doctrine of al-wala’ w’al bara’ (“Loyalty and Enmity”), Burhami has called on all Muslims to hate all non-Muslims—going as far as to say that, although a Muslim man is permitted to marry Christian or Jewish women (ahl al-kitab), he must make sure he still hates them in his heart—and show them this hate—because they are infidels; otherwise he risks compromising his Islam.

Burhami has stated that churches—which he refers to as “places of polytheism (shirk) and houses of infidelity (kufr)”—must never be built in Egypt. He issued a separate fatwaforbidding Muslim taxi and bus drivers from transporting Christian clergymen to their churches, an act he depicted as being “more forbidden than taking someone to a liquor bar.”

Burhami has also stated that Egypt’s Christians must pay jizya—“protection” money in exchange for a measure of tolerance, a la Koran 9:29—or be fought to death.

Even so, the wily sheikh insists that circumstance is the ultimate deciding factor. In a 2013 video, Burhami said that “Destroying churches is permissible—as long as the destruction does not bring harm to Muslims, …

Burhami elaborated on the importance of circumstances in an earlier video:

The Jews of Medina represent a paradigm—laid by the prophet [Muhammad]—that shows how Muslims should deal with infidels. ….. Today in Gaza, we do not tell Muslims to launch rockets every day and so destroy the country, but we tell them “Refrain from action and respect the truce.” When the Prophet first arrived in Medina, he made conciliation with the Jews, conciliation without jizya [i.e., equal-term conciliation without forcing Jews to pay tribute and live as second-class dhimmis]—this is a pattern that can be followed whenever circumstances dictate…. Yes we can deal with those Christians [Egypt’s Copts] as the Jews were dealt with in Medina; it is an option. The Prophet made the Hudaybiya Reconciliation with the infidels and held a truce for ten years [which he abrogated on becoming stronger]; that is also an option…. So, it is legitimate to choose from examples set by the Prophet, depending on what suits the situation of Muslims now.

In plain language, when strong, wage jihad—including by destroying churches and forcing jizya/extortion money from non-Muslims; when weak, preach peace and coexistence, including with the “archenemy,” Israel.

Even so, according to the reinstated Salafi cleric, no circumstance ever requires Muslims to be on friendly terms with non-Muslims. Burhami has accordingly issued fatwas banning Muslims from congratulating the nation’s Christian minorities during the latter’s religious holidays; banning Muslims from in anyway participating in such festivities; and, in an effort to further impoverish the nation’s Christians, banning Muslims from going to Christian businesses, pharmacies, hospitals, or any other place of business.

One can go on and on with Burhami’s fatwas—including calling for the persecution of apostates, permitting Muslim husbands to abandon their wives to rape, permitting “marriage” to 12-year-old girls, and banning Mother’s Day—but his quality should be evident by now.

Egypt’s Muslim leaders are not alone in their silence and/or complicity; as the Arab Weekly explains, ..."

Egypt Reinstates Hate Preaching against Non-Muslims - Raymond Ibrahim
I get it. The point being she would chew off her own arm if she thought she could blame the Jooos.



These, and their Democrat apologists, are not fit as members of civilization.
Nazis - by one name and form or another - have pretty much always been with us.

Pene and our left proudly carry on the tradition.
 
11. Just as Bill Clinton, once the most popular of Democrat icons, was no longer a political asset, the truth was admitted about this trailer park trash low-life.




The United States State Department, even with it’s long antipathy toward Israel, the State Department says Iran is the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism.

Yet, this was Hussein’s behavior toward that 7th century barbaric regime:

Barack Obama was ushering in the age of the ‘Iranian Nuclear Bomb’ and fueling Iran’s war machine.

Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.


Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism

He gave his nod to ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons for 7th century barbarians.



Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.

The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.





I love the silence from Democrat drones and slaves when these facts are revealed….they have no explanation other than that they fear disputing their masters.
Time to admit who, and what, Hussein Obama really is.


 
Then why is our president letting them get nukes?

What is he thinking?

You are a very confused individual.

Trump tore up an agreement preventing them from developing nukes
Now, there is nothing stopping them

Why does Trump want Iran to be a nuclear power?

Nothing in that agreement with Obama (only) prevented anything.

Later, he gave them $1,800,000,000.
Of their own money.
That didnt have to be given back so they could finance little pieces of dhit like you, the DNC, ANTIFA, BLM. the American Communist and Socialist parties, Cairo and the Muslim brotherhood, and a host of others that want to destroy our democracy....you Anti- American scumbag!
 
…to the Middle East, America, and all of Western Civilization, is Iran.



1.Who says so? The United States State Department, even with it’s long antipathy toward Israel, the State Department says Iran is the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism.

“Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says”
Iran still top state sponsor of terrorism, U.S. report says


2. “…Iran was firm in its backing of anti-Israel groups as well as proxies that have destabilized already devastating conflicts in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. It also said Iran continued to recruit in Afghanistan and Pakistan for Shiite militia members to fight in Syria and Iraq. And, it said Iranian support for Lebanon’s Hezbollah movement was unchanged.”
Ibid.





3. “The Iranian regime has been virtually and universally described as the world’s foremost state-sponsor of terrorism.

…in France, where an opposition rally organized by Iranian expatriates was targeted in June 2018.At Villepinte, just outside Paris, the Free Iran rally brought together an estimated 100,000 advocates for Iranian democracy, under the banner of the National Council of Resistance of Iran. It also nearly attracted two aspiring bombers, who were fortunately stopped on their way to the gathering on June 30, 2018. Shortly thereafter, a senior Iranian "diplomat" named Assadollah Assadi was also arrested and identified as the mastermind of the plot.

4. … European authorities’ awareness of the persistent threat emanating from Tehran. A subsequent investigation by French intelligence left no doubt about the fact that Assadi and his Iranian-Belgian assets were acting upon orders from the highest ranks of the regime.





5. … the Paris plot was not one of a kind. About three months earlier, Iranian operatives had also tried to attack a compound in Albania which houses 3,000 members of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK), the main constituent group in the NCRI coalition.The French and Albania plots were only two of at least six that were publicly exposed over the course of 2018.

6. …a spokesperson for the Belgian police to affirm that almost all Iranian diplomats play a role in the Iranian secret service. This makes them probable terrorist operatives, working under the direction of the Foreign Ministry.” Western Dealings With Iran Must Recognize The Extent Of Terrorist Threats





In light of these facts, and the title of the thread, one’s curiosity might be piqued as to who, or what, the greatest threat.

That would be the individual and political party that serves at the beck and call of Iran, and has been the greatest enabler of this barbaric nation……Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party....who fund and arm the 7th century savages.


Gee....then why did obama give them 150 billion dollars in cash.....?
 

Forum List

Back
Top