- Oct 16, 2017
- Reaction score
Yes, that was partially my point, but we atheists obviously have no "filthy God" by definition. My main point was that just having any old "evidence" is never sufficient. Far beyond "what can be asserted without evidence", much of what gets asserted with purported evidence "can be dismissed without evidence." The phrase does a disservice to logic by clearly neglecting that large and fundamental portion.That's a pathetic justification for teaching children lies about your filthy God.