The SC will decide if domestic abusers get to possess firearms.

[Mac-7]

Why not try making one and we'll see.

I have but you refuse to accept them

 

[Mac-7]

Your evidence?

You weren't there

Why assume the husband is at fault?

If he is a danger he should be locked up rather than allowed to run around loose

 

[M14 Shooter]

If he is a danger he should be locked up rather than allowed to run around loose

We keep saying that, and they keep ignoring it.
They just want the guns.

 

[Flash]

Your evidence?

Unfortunately the FBI or other law enforcement agencies don't keep stats on false reporting of domestic violence like they do most crimes.

You would would be naive and stupid to think it doesn't happen.

Of course you stupid uneducated low IQ Moon Bats are always confused about things like this.

Taking away a person's Constitutional rights for the fear of they might do something is not what the Bill of Rights is all about, is it?

That would be like me saying given all the damage done by the Negroes and Communists in their destructive six month Insurrection I don't think any Black or Moon Bat should have the right to protest. They might burn down a city, doncha know?

The confusion with you stupid Moon Bats is that you don't think that anybody should have the right to keep and bear arms so you will never get it right.

 

[pknopp]

Which enumerated power or amendment allows for the removal of rights?

Please stop. Are people locked up?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Please stop. Are people locked up?

The question isn’t “what does government do to people”….the question is “are they empowered to do what they do to people”?

 

[Lord-Humungus]

If someone is considered responsible enough to cast a vote they should be allowed to own a gun if they wish. if someone is considered a danger to society they should be in jail. If someone is considered rehabilitated enough to be released from jail and no longer a danger to society they should have their rights restored.

 

[rightwinger]

Unfortunately far too many of these "domestic violence reports" are nothing more than a vindictive wife falsely claiming abuse.

Taking away a person's Constitutional right based on the claim that they MIGHT do some harm in the future ain't cool and not the way most Americans view justice.

Hopefully the Supremes will rationaly sort it out.

If a domestic violence complaint results in a restraining order and gun confiscation, you will be allowed your day in court.

In one case you will not be able to shoot your partner
In the other, you will not have your guns for a few months while the issue is resolved

 

[Orangecat]

Kagan joined with Jackson in cutting through the procedural fog.

I read this line and realized your post was satire.

 

[Independentthinker]

A Restraining Order is due process

A restraining order is nothing but a different form of toilet paper. It doesn't make anyone safe.

 

[rightwinger]

A restraining order is nothing but a different form of toilet paper. It doesn't make anyone safe.

For the most case, it does

 

[pknopp]

The question isn’t “what does government do to people”….the question is “are they empowered to do what they do to people”?

Obviously.

 

[Independentthinker]

For the most case, it does

LOL. Yeah, when you terrorize or kill the person who has a restraining order against you they throw the book at you after you violate it. Meanwhile, the person was not protected by a piece of paper.

 

[Flash]

If someone is considered responsible enough to cast a vote they should be allowed to own a gun if they wish. if someone is considered a danger to society they should be in jail. If someone is considered rehabilitated enough to be released from jail and no longer a danger to society they should have their rights restored.

The crime should NEVER be the possession of a firearm. The crime should be what is Illegally done with the firearm.

 

[Mac-7]

We keep saying that, and they keep ignoring it.
They just want the guns.

all they care about is taking the guns

If a domestic violence complaint results in a restraining order and gun confiscation, you will be allowed your day in court.

In one case you will not be able to shoot your partner
In the other, you will not have your guns for a few months while the issue is resolved

can you hit your woman with a crowbar or baseball bat?

Sure you can

Also run over her with a car or hack her to pieces with a machete

 

[rightwinger]

LOL. Yeah, when you terrorize or kill the person who has a restraining order against you they throw the book at you after you violate it. Meanwhile, the person was not protected by a piece of paper.

Restraining orders are very effective. Violate it and you get arrested. All it takes is a phone call.

The intent is to keep warring parties apart. Keeping guns out of the picture helps prevent escalation

 

[rightwinger]

all they care about is taking the guns

can you hit your woman with a crowbar or baseball bat?

Sure you can

Also run over her with a car or hack her to pieces with a machete

Yes you can

But for some strange reason, it is most often a gun

 

[Rogue AI]

Once again we see liberals attempting to twist reality to match their evil world view. In this case the matter at hand is the confiscation, and the government's ability to steal from the citizen without due process. Of course the liberal morons on the Court cannot comprehend that, as theft is so embedded into their demented ideology.

 

[rightwinger]

Once again we see liberals attempting to twist reality to match their evil world view. In this case the matter at hand is the confiscation, and the government's ability to steal from the citizen without due process. Of course the liberal morons on the Court cannot comprehend that, as theft is so embedded into their demented ideology.

Nobody is stealing your guns
You have a right to contest a Restraining Order and Restraining Orders are usually temporary while both parties “cool off”

 

[Rogue AI]

Nobody is stealing your guns
You have a right to contest a Restraining Order and Restraining Orders are usually temporary while both parties “cool off”

They steal your property based upon specious accusations, and getting that property back is no simple feat. There couldn't even be a case if the state was confiscating property with valid search warrants and probable cause. That is what's missing here.