- Banned
- #21
Militias are not private armies.Private armies are not American.
Here is a great example of a militia being formed and opposing government tyranny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Militias are not private armies.Private armies are not American.
Can they hold jobs? Drive? Vote? Is barefoot and pregnant they way it’s supposed to be?I do not know what the law says, but I am against a woman being a military man, this is ridiculous and harms the patriarchal traditions of our peoples.
I know that they were allowed to serve in the army in 2016, but this is the federal armyWomen get left at home, when the men go off to fight. That woman should have a gun to protect herself and her children.
ANYONE OR ANY LAW, that says otherwise, is morally and ethically wrong.
I know that they were allowed to serve in the army in 2016, but this is the federal army
Does the US have a law that allows women to own weapons and participate in militias?
This right here. The 3%ers, check them out. And you will get the ideaMilitia simply means armed civilians who band together for a common goal. No rules of formation.
defend herself or our child
Has your wife acquired a weapon legally?
This is the man's task. It has always been this way and it worked. According to your logic, we should distribute rifled weapons to children. That's bullshit. These problems are generated not by the fact that a woman does not have a weapon, but by the fact that the leftish scum has spawned criminality.
2nd Amendment provides the creation of the state militia to defend the rights of the people of the state. What is the mechanism for creating such a militia, is it stipulated somewhere? Could it be a spontaneous militia, should its creation first be discussed at the level of the State Council, or should there be a plebescite. Is this mechanism regulated by the law? What are the rules for the legal formation of a militia?
no, it means that instead of solving problems, you are treating the symptoms of the same problem with crazy methods. Weapon possession is a responsibile deal and is used appropriately. Distribution of weapons to hysteric women and children is in itself a danger to society.I agree that the criminals are the problem.
Guns in the hands of the intended victims, is always part of the solution.
Your lack of meaningful, rational response, noted.it looks like a fairy tale for children
2nd Amendment provides the creation of the state militia to defend the rights of the people of the state.
What is the mechanism for creating such a militia, is it stipulated somewhere?
Could it be a spontaneous militia, should its creation first be discussed at the level of the State Council, or should there be a plebescite.
Is this mechanism regulated by the law? What are the rules for the legal formation of a militia?
Militias have been around throughout recorded history. Militias are formed by individuals or cities or counties or States or Nations. Militias are simply a group of armed civilians. The Constitution affirms the Right to keep and bare arms and the Right to assemble. I believe that constitutes a defacto militia. The government may not legally pass legislation that violates the Constitution. The American Revolution, The War of 1812, and The American Civil War (both sides) was fought mostly by militias that were sometimes "federalized" and sometimes not.No, it doesn't. The 2nd Amendment does not speak to militia in any legal manner, shape or form. The 2nd Amendment has never been examined to inform on any aspect of militia organization or control.
The authority to call-up, organize and command the citizens as militia is enumerated in the Constitution's grant of powers to Congress in Article 1, Section 8, clauses 15 & 16 and Article 2, Section 2, clause 1 of the Constitution, establishing the President as Commander in Chief of the part of the militia in actual service to the nation.
Congress exercised that authority by enacting the Militia Act of 1792 (made permanent in 1795). Congress repealed and superseded those Militia Acts in 1903 when it federalized the state militias and absorbed them into the National Guard. The Militia Act of 1903 eliminated the 1792 Act's impressment of militia service on the citizens.
Currently there is no legal mechanism for any entity (federal, state, local governments or the citizens themselves) to organize the general citizenry as militia (selective service notwithstanding).
As I said, there is none . . . The only legal "regulation" is there is no right for the citizens to form themselves as militia. Whatever laws that may be enacted that forbid the citizens to organize themselves as militia -- "to associate themselves together as a military company or organization, or to drill or parade with arms" -- do not violate any right retained / possessed by the citizen(s), see Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886) and DC v Heller which reaffirmed Presser, saying:
"Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252 (1886) , held that the right to keep and bear arms was not violated by a law that forbade “bodies of men to associate together as military organizations, or to drill or parade with arms in cities and towns unless authorized by law.” Id., at 264–265. This does not refute the individual-rights interpretation of the Amendment; no one supporting that interpretation has contended that States may not ban such groups."
.
The Constitution affirms the Right to keep and bare arms and the Right to assemble. I believe that constitutes a defacto militia. The government may not legally pass legislation that violates the Constitution.
Wrong. The Constitution trumps any law-including case law alleged precedent-passed by government at any level making them null void and without effect. That includes city county, State, and federal law.I provided the case citations, you can either read the applicable law -or not- but the law doesn't require you to agree or "believe" it, for it to be true.
To voluntarily associate together as a military company or organization, or to drill or parade with arms, without, and independent of, an act of Congress or law of the state authorizing the same, is not a right to be claimed by the citizen under the Constitution.
Under the Constitution, armed bodies of citizens are subject to the regulation and control of the state and federal governments. That means a state law that forbids bodies of citizens to associate together as a military organization, to drill or parade with arms unless authorized by the law, do not violate the Constitution, or any right of the citizen secured by the Constitution (yes, including assembly).
Read Presser and DC v Heller which, in 2008, reaffirmed this principle stated Presser.
.
Wrong. The Constitution trumps any law-including case law alleged precedent-passed by government at any level making them null void and without effect. That includes city county, State, and federal law.
When I read what you wrote I see someone looking desperately for an excuse for government to throw out the Bill of Rights. Where exactly do you think that the Constitution restricts the formation of a militia to the State or federal governments? Militia is civilian; not military.When I read that I envision you with your eyes squinted shut, fingers in your ears. shouting La, La, La, La, La at the top of your lungs.
When I read what you wrote I see someone looking desperately for an excuse for government to throw out the Bill of Rights.
Where exactly do you think that the Constitution restricts the formation of a militia to the State or federal governments? Militia is civilian; not military.