The Royal Family dealing with LefTarded Californication?

England is changing so fast.

Maybe the unimaginable is the solution: The abolition of the monarchy.
 
Megxit was not driven by racism

Why are liberals so determined to turn the princess into a victim?

First they said Brexit was caused by racism. Now they’re saying Megxit was caused by racism.

By ‘they’, I mean the liberal-left commentariat, the people who hate Brexit, hate ordinary people, and have for some reason grown to love our departing royals, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

This past 24 hours they have closed ranks around the couple – who announced yesterday that they plan to keep their royal titles (and most of their royal income) but leave behind their royal duties – like some woke version of the Queen’s Guard.

They have chastised anyone outraged by the staggering entitlement shown by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who have essentially said that they want the status but none of the responsibilities of monarchy. They insist that the poor couple have been driven out by racism.

Megxit was not driven by racism
 
England is changing so fast.

Maybe the unimaginable is the solution: The abolition of the monarchy.
Put them in a circus and let them earn their living.Scrounging bastards.

You do know the Royal Family is a net earner for Great Britain, right?

How the British Royal Family Makes Money - Royals' Income Source

While the majority of The Crown Estate's profits go directly to the government, around 15 percent make up the Sovereign Grant, an annual stipend that goes toward the royals' official duties, essential maintenance, press and communications, security detail, and travel of a few key royal family members. The 2018–19 expenditure report included an approximate £20 million (around $25 million) increase, which according to the Express is due to the extension renovations at Buckingham Palace.
 
Megxit was not driven by racism

Why are liberals so determined to turn the princess into a victim?

First they said Brexit was caused by racism. Now they’re saying Megxit was caused by racism.

By ‘they’, I mean the liberal-left commentariat, the people who hate Brexit, hate ordinary people, and have for some reason grown to love our departing royals, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

This past 24 hours they have closed ranks around the couple – who announced yesterday that they plan to keep their royal titles (and most of their royal income) but leave behind their royal duties – like some woke version of the Queen’s Guard.

They have chastised anyone outraged by the staggering entitlement shown by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who have essentially said that they want the status but none of the responsibilities of monarchy. They insist that the poor couple have been driven out by racism.

Megxit was not driven by racism

I have a feeling she didn't realize how much the Royals actually do, and how many responsibilities, even if ceremonial, they have.
 
England is changing so fast.

Maybe the unimaginable is the solution: The abolition of the monarchy.
Put them in a circus and let them earn their living.Scrounging bastards.

You do know the Royal Family is a net earner for Great Britain, right?

How the British Royal Family Makes Money - Royals' Income Source

While the majority of The Crown Estate's profits go directly to the government, around 15 percent make up the Sovereign Grant, an annual stipend that goes toward the royals' official duties, essential maintenance, press and communications, security detail, and travel of a few key royal family members. The 2018–19 expenditure report included an approximate £20 million (around $25 million) increase, which according to the Express is due to the extension renovations at Buckingham Palace.
Tourists would come anyway. Lack of a royal family hasnt harmed Rome or Paris or even New York.
 
Megxit was not driven by racism

Why are liberals so determined to turn the princess into a victim?

First they said Brexit was caused by racism. Now they’re saying Megxit was caused by racism.

By ‘they’, I mean the liberal-left commentariat, the people who hate Brexit, hate ordinary people, and have for some reason grown to love our departing royals, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

This past 24 hours they have closed ranks around the couple – who announced yesterday that they plan to keep their royal titles (and most of their royal income) but leave behind their royal duties – like some woke version of the Queen’s Guard.

They have chastised anyone outraged by the staggering entitlement shown by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who have essentially said that they want the status but none of the responsibilities of monarchy. They insist that the poor couple have been driven out by racism.

Megxit was not driven by racism

I have a feeling she didn't realize how much the Royals actually do, and how many responsibilities, even if ceremonial, they have.

Not only that, but the British mentality.

She made open reference to it in a recent TV documentary about the pair.

Stoic, and stiff upper lip she had a problem with.
 
England is changing so fast.

Maybe the unimaginable is the solution: The abolition of the monarchy.
Put them in a circus and let them earn their living.Scrounging bastards.

You do know the Royal Family is a net earner for Great Britain, right?

How the British Royal Family Makes Money - Royals' Income Source

While the majority of The Crown Estate's profits go directly to the government, around 15 percent make up the Sovereign Grant, an annual stipend that goes toward the royals' official duties, essential maintenance, press and communications, security detail, and travel of a few key royal family members. The 2018–19 expenditure report included an approximate £20 million (around $25 million) increase, which according to the Express is due to the extension renovations at Buckingham Palace.
Tourists would come anyway. Lack of a royal family hasnt harmed Rome or Paris or even New York.

Your critical appraisals are legendary.
 
England is changing so fast.

Maybe the unimaginable is the solution: The abolition of the monarchy.
Put them in a circus and let them earn their living.Scrounging bastards.

You do know the Royal Family is a net earner for Great Britain, right?

How the British Royal Family Makes Money - Royals' Income Source

While the majority of The Crown Estate's profits go directly to the government, around 15 percent make up the Sovereign Grant, an annual stipend that goes toward the royals' official duties, essential maintenance, press and communications, security detail, and travel of a few key royal family members. The 2018–19 expenditure report included an approximate £20 million (around $25 million) increase, which according to the Express is due to the extension renovations at Buckingham Palace.
Tourists would come anyway. Lack of a royal family hasnt harmed Rome or Paris or even New York.

It's not the Tourism, it's the actual production of the lands. The agreement is the royal family's land income goes to the government, and the government gives them a stipend from it. Remove the Royal Family and the lands are still theirs.
 
Megxit was not driven by racism

Why are liberals so determined to turn the princess into a victim?

First they said Brexit was caused by racism. Now they’re saying Megxit was caused by racism.

By ‘they’, I mean the liberal-left commentariat, the people who hate Brexit, hate ordinary people, and have for some reason grown to love our departing royals, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

This past 24 hours they have closed ranks around the couple – who announced yesterday that they plan to keep their royal titles (and most of their royal income) but leave behind their royal duties – like some woke version of the Queen’s Guard.

They have chastised anyone outraged by the staggering entitlement shown by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who have essentially said that they want the status but none of the responsibilities of monarchy. They insist that the poor couple have been driven out by racism.

Megxit was not driven by racism

I have a feeling she didn't realize how much the Royals actually do, and how many responsibilities, even if ceremonial, they have.

Not only that, but the British mentality.

She made open reference to it in a recent TV documentary about the pair.

Stoic, and stiff upper lip she had a problem with.

I think the stifling of political views is what she has an issue with. The Royals can have broad political viewpoints, but they must be muted, and not seen as policy advocation towards the government.
 
From Spiked; further upthread.


British author Afua Hirsch, writing in the New York Times, decries the ‘racist treatment of Meghan’ in the press. She says it is hardly a surprise that Markle has walked away from a nation with a prime minister ‘whose track record includes overtly racist statements’ and a ‘Brexit project linked to native nationalism’.

Of course, Boris Johnson has no such track record and the only people linking Brexit to native nationalism are elitist upper-crust Remainers like Hirsch. But no matter. Why let reality spoil the narrative?

These claims made about the ‘racist’ treatment of Meghan at the hands of the British press are incredibly thin. The same non-examples are just recycled over and over again. You’ve probably seen them quoted (out of context) a thousand times.
 
England is changing so fast.

Maybe the unimaginable is the solution: The abolition of the monarchy.
Put them in a circus and let them earn their living.Scrounging bastards.

You do know the Royal Family is a net earner for Great Britain, right?

How the British Royal Family Makes Money - Royals' Income Source

While the majority of The Crown Estate's profits go directly to the government, around 15 percent make up the Sovereign Grant, an annual stipend that goes toward the royals' official duties, essential maintenance, press and communications, security detail, and travel of a few key royal family members. The 2018–19 expenditure report included an approximate £20 million (around $25 million) increase, which according to the Express is due to the extension renovations at Buckingham Palace.
Tourists would come anyway. Lack of a royal family hasnt harmed Rome or Paris or even New York.

It's not the Tourism, it's the actual production of the lands. The agreement is the royal family's land income goes to the government, and the government gives them a stipend from it. Remove the Royal Family and the lands are still theirs.
They would still pay taxes on production. So...................big deal.
 
From Spiked; further upthread.


British author Afua Hirsch, writing in the New York Times, decries the ‘racist treatment of Meghan’ in the press. She says it is hardly a surprise that Markle has walked away from a nation with a prime minister ‘whose track record includes overtly racist statements’ and a ‘Brexit project linked to native nationalism’.

Of course, Boris Johnson has no such track record and the only people linking Brexit to native nationalism are elitist upper-crust Remainers like Hirsch. But no matter. Why let reality spoil the narrative?

These claims made about the ‘racist’ treatment of Meghan at the hands of the British press are incredibly thin. The same non-examples are just recycled over and over again. You’ve probably seen them quoted (out of context) a thousand times.
Watermelon smiles and picaninnies? Not racist ? Adjust your compass girl.
 

Forum List

Back
Top