Which simply means the people have the right to bear arms, not the militia.The People are the Militia.The militia is the people.The People are the Militia. Well regulated militia of the People may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The militia is the people. People have the right to bear arms, not the militia.The People are the Militia. You cannot ignore that legal fact.That states cannot make laws that are unconstitutional. The Second Amendment is clear, the people have the right to bear arms.I don't disagree with it; your usage of it is merely irrelevant in this context. Our Second Amendment is clear.You disagree with the 14th Amendment, Daniel? Why is that?Amendment 14.Amendment XThe SC agrees with it, so no. Look, you can regurgitate your talking points all day long, but it won't change reality. People can have guns, it's that simple.That is nothing but right wing propaganda.The people have the right to bear arms, full stop. The people, not the militia.The State has a right to organize militia. The People are the Militia. You are simply appealing to ignorance, like usual for the right-wing.The right of the PEOPLE to bear arms shall not be infringed. The militia does not bear arms, the people do,
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
What point are you trying to make with our Fourteenth Amendment?