The Right To Bear Arms

[TRFjr]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

 

[danielpalos]

Whomever says that natural rights are not protected by the U.S Constitution knows ****-all about Constitutional Law.

.

natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions and available in our federal Constitution via Due Process.

 

[danielpalos]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

it must be up to the conscience of the individual.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Whomever says that natural rights are not protected by the U.S Constitution needs to go back to ******* law school and stop pretending to know a goddamn thing.

 

[hadit]

Only you are so consistently incoherent and dogmatic.

Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

As do individuals.

Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control laws.

Doesn't matter who complains about it.

Yes, it does. The unorganized militia is expressly subject to the police power of the State.

Complaining does precisely nothing, therefore it doesn't matter who complains. I know this is one of your core cherished phrases, but it simply means nothing. You can stop using it now.

 

[hadit]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

it must be up to the conscience of the individual.

And owning a firearm must also be up to the conscience of the individual.

 

[TRFjr]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

the coma after "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, " was placed for a reason
its to separate what follows next not in conjunction with
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" is an addition to not in conjunction with

 

[danielpalos]

Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

As do individuals.

Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control laws.

Doesn't matter who complains about it.

Yes, it does. The unorganized militia is expressly subject to the police power of the State.

Complaining does precisely nothing, therefore it doesn't matter who complains. I know this is one of your core cherished phrases, but it simply means nothing. You can stop using it now.

get well regulated, don't be lazy.

 

[danielpalos]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

it must be up to the conscience of the individual.

And owning a firearm must also be up to the conscience of the individual.

i am not claiming it isn't. but, States have police power.

 

[danielpalos]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

the coma after "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, " was placed for a reason
its to separate what follows next not in conjunction with
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" is an addition to not in conjunction with

not the case in this case. it merely separates the first clause from the second clause.

there are no individual terms or rights expressed in our Second Article of Amendment to our federal Constitution. It is not a Constitution unto itself.

 

[hadit]

As do individuals.

Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control laws.

Doesn't matter who complains about it.

Yes, it does. The unorganized militia is expressly subject to the police power of the State.

Complaining does precisely nothing, therefore it doesn't matter who complains. I know this is one of your core cherished phrases, but it simply means nothing. You can stop using it now.

get well regulated, don't be lazy.

Get a clue, don't be dogmatic.

 

[hadit]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

it must be up to the conscience of the individual.

And owning a firearm must also be up to the conscience of the individual.

i am not claiming it isn't. but, States have police power.

Over abortion as well?

 

[hadit]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

the coma after "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, " was placed for a reason
its to separate what follows next not in conjunction with
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" is an addition to not in conjunction with

not the case in this case. it merely separates the first clause from the second clause.

there are no individual terms or rights expressed in our Second Article of Amendment to our federal Constitution. It is not a Constitution unto itself.

The Supreme Court (for the uncounted nth time) disagrees with you. You can stop saying that now.

 

[TRFjr]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

the coma after "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, " was placed for a reason
its to separate what follows next not in conjunction with
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" is an addition to not in conjunction with

not the case in this case. it merely separates the first clause from the second clause.

there are no individual terms or rights expressed in our Second Article of Amendment to our federal Constitution. It is not a Constitution unto itself.

sorry until you show me your constitutional law degree I will put my credibility on those that sit on the supreme court

District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's Right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home

How A Comma Gave Americans The Right To Own Guns
Take a look at the Second Amendment:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

That little, red comma caused the Supreme Court to strike down D.C.'s ban on handguns, the country's strictest gun control law to date.

Before the Supreme Court heard the case, the D.C. circuit court of appeals nixed the ban, too. "According to the court, the second comma divides the amendment into two clauses: one 'prefatory' and the other 'operative.' On this reading, the bit about a well-regulated militia is just preliminary throat clearing; the framers don't really get down to business until they start talking about 'the right of the people ... shall not be infringed,'" The New York Times reported.

How A Comma Gave Americans The Right To Own Guns

 

[Blues Man]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

the coma after "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, " was placed for a reason
its to separate what follows next not in conjunction with
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" is an addition to not in conjunction with

not the case in this case. it merely separates the first clause from the second clause.

there are no individual terms or rights expressed in our Second Article of Amendment to our federal Constitution. It is not a Constitution unto itself.

sorry until you show me your constitutional law degree I will put my credibility on those that sit on the supreme court

District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's Right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home

Stop wasting your time with this asshat

 

[danielpalos]

Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control laws.

Doesn't matter who complains about it.

Yes, it does. The unorganized militia is expressly subject to the police power of the State.

Complaining does precisely nothing, therefore it doesn't matter who complains. I know this is one of your core cherished phrases, but it simply means nothing. You can stop using it now.

get well regulated, don't be lazy.

Get a clue, don't be dogmatic.

i have a clue. it is about equality regardless of wealth under the socialism of our supreme law of the land.

 

[Papageorgio]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

it must be up to the conscience of the individual.

And owning a firearm must also be up to the conscience of the individual.

I agree, I respect all who own or carry guns, I would never own one however my right to choose not to should not infringe on another's right to choose to.

 

[TRFjr]

Heller v DC made the right for an individual to own a firearm including so-called assault rifles settled law
just like you liberals claim Woe v Wade made the right for a woman to have an abortion settled law

so get over it only recourse you have is a constitutional amendment

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

it must be up to the conscience of the individual.

And owning a firearm must also be up to the conscience of the individual.

I agree, I respect all who own or carry guns, I would never own one however my right to choose not to should not infringe on another's right to choose to.

a right only goes so far till it violates the right of another
and the right to life is probably the most fundamental right of them all

my owning a firearm in no way infringes on any right of yours
an abortion infringes on the right to life of the unborn

 

[danielpalos]

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

it must be up to the conscience of the individual.

And owning a firearm must also be up to the conscience of the individual.

I agree, I respect all who own or carry guns, I would never own one however my right to choose not to should not infringe on another's right to choose to.

a right only goes so far till it violates the right of another
and the right to life is probably the most fundamental right of them all

my owning a firearm in no way infringes on any right of yours
an abortion infringes on the right to life of the unborn

you only care about natural rights in abortion threads. you need to establish more confidence in your sincerity than that.

 

[Papageorgio]

The error in DC v. Heller is that there is no such Thing as well regulated militia of Individuals.

You are either, well regulated or unorganized militia of the United States and of the State in which you reside.

yet you believe the right to an abortion isn't in error when nowhere in the constitution is abortion ever mentioned

it must be up to the conscience of the individual.

And owning a firearm must also be up to the conscience of the individual.

I agree, I respect all who own or carry guns, I would never own one however my right to choose not to should not infringe on another's right to choose to.

a right only goes so far till it violates the right of another
and the right to life is probably the most fundamental right of them all

my owning a firearm in no way infringes on any right of yours
an abortion infringes on the right to life of the unborn

Where the hell did I say otherwise? I never ******* said you couldn't own a fire arm, I stated my right to choose not to should not infringe on your right to.

In other words, I was ******* agreeing with hadit. Learn to comprehend what is written! What any of this has to do with abortion is beyond me, but I am also against abortion, so again, learn to read.