The Right To Bear Arms
- Thread starter Lakhota
- Start date
Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,441
- 2,180
Shit, chief, they funneled more money to the shrilary than they did to trump. Why doesn't that bother you? Oh, yeah, 'cause you're a progressive stalinist, so of course you want pootins ***** to win! How silly of me.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 113,040
- 53,531
- 2,290
Wow....you must have been sleeping off a lot of booze....that lie hasn't been thrown around for months now....you have to catch up...we are already on the Trump knew epstein lie.....
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 51,789
- 43,382
- 3,615
What's so great about top governmental officials using their incredible power to harass their political opponents?
What's the goal of Ms. James here? To throw the NRA out of NY? Imprison those who would stand up for their right to self-preservation?
Rigby5
Diamond Member
The NRA is America's oldest Civil Rights Organization. The Left hates civil rights because they desire tyranny and imagine they would be in control of it.
I support a consumption tax for everyone, effectively ending non-profit/tax-exempt status completely.
As for The Right To Bear Arms:
Fireams Policy Coallition reported,
"The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court issued a significant 53-page majority opinion in the criminal appeal of Commonwealth v. Hicks. Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) filed an important coalition amicus brief cited by the Court supporting Hicks in December of 2017, alongside Firearms Owners Against Crime (FOAC) and seven Members of Pennsylvania’s General Assembly. The Court’s decision, concurring opinions, and the FPC/FPF amicus brief can be viewed at www.firearmspolicy.org/legal.
"At issue was whether someone’s carrying of a firearm could be used as reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct, and thus justification for police to conduct a stop-and-frisk of the gun owner. The court ruled in Hicks that such searches and seizures, in the absence of other evidence are completely unlawful."
The appellant is Michael J. Hicks, who had a concealed gun permit, who was caught on a surveillance camera showing off his gun in June 2014. Officers stopped and frisked him.
The Morning Call reported,
"after officers smelled alcoholic beverages on Hicks’ breath, he was charged with drunken driving, among other misdemeanor offenses.
"Hicks, then 35 and living in Allentown, asked a Lehigh County judge to throw out the charges on grounds that the stop was illegal, but the judge found his arrest was justified. He was convicted of driving under the influence of a high rate of alcohol for a second offense and sentenced to 30 days to six months in jail."
Such a conviction would cost him his concealed gun permit. Justice was done. It took five years.
Wrong.
A misdemeanor DUI does nothing at all to one's concealed carry permit.
You need to be convicted of a felony to lose your rights.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
I don't particularly like the political bias of the NRA, but why would this matter?
The NRA does nothing that harms anyone.
So who cares?
The NRA is America's oldest Civil Rights Organization. The Left hates civil rights because they desire tyranny and imagine they would be in control of it.
I support a consumption tax for everyone, effectively ending non-profit/tax-exempt status completely.
As for The Right To Bear Arms:
Fireams Policy Coallition reported,
"The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court issued a significant 53-page majority opinion in the criminal appeal of Commonwealth v. Hicks. Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) filed an important coalition amicus brief cited by the Court supporting Hicks in December of 2017, alongside Firearms Owners Against Crime (FOAC) and seven Members of Pennsylvania’s General Assembly. The Court’s decision, concurring opinions, and the FPC/FPF amicus brief can be viewed at www.firearmspolicy.org/legal.
"At issue was whether someone’s carrying of a firearm could be used as reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct, and thus justification for police to conduct a stop-and-frisk of the gun owner. The court ruled in Hicks that such searches and seizures, in the absence of other evidence are completely unlawful."
The appellant is Michael J. Hicks, who had a concealed gun permit, who was caught on a surveillance camera showing off his gun in June 2014. Officers stopped and frisked him.
The Morning Call reported,
"after officers smelled alcoholic beverages on Hicks’ breath, he was charged with drunken driving, among other misdemeanor offenses.
"Hicks, then 35 and living in Allentown, asked a Lehigh County judge to throw out the charges on grounds that the stop was illegal, but the judge found his arrest was justified. He was convicted of driving under the influence of a high rate of alcohol for a second offense and sentenced to 30 days to six months in jail."
Such a conviction would cost him his concealed gun permit. Justice was done. It took five years.
Wrong.
A misdemeanor DUI does nothing at all to one's concealed carry permit.
You need to be convicted of a felony to lose your rights.
Depends on the State. In Nevada any misdemeanor conviction results in the loss of your CCW.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
There are over 1 million successful serious violent crimes every year, so it it more likely that there are several million unsuccessful do to someone using defensive arms.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
That seems pretty silly.
Actually, I kind of like the Russians.
They not only were our allies, but are not attacking countries all over the world, or trying to flood our markets with cheap plagiarized copies of our stuff.
We really have no conflict with them, and they have very little world presence.
But that has nothing to do with the post you were responding to.
The FACTS are that a democratic republic relies on the population being armed.
That was there is no need for an armed police or military, because an armed police or military always ends up causing the destruction of any democratic republic.
That is because police and military do what those who sign their paychecks want, not what we want.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
The NRA is America's oldest Civil Rights Organization. The Left hates civil rights because they desire tyranny and imagine they would be in control of it.
I support a consumption tax for everyone, effectively ending non-profit/tax-exempt status completely.
As for The Right To Bear Arms:
Fireams Policy Coallition reported,
"The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court issued a significant 53-page majority opinion in the criminal appeal of Commonwealth v. Hicks. Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) filed an important coalition amicus brief cited by the Court supporting Hicks in December of 2017, alongside Firearms Owners Against Crime (FOAC) and seven Members of Pennsylvania’s General Assembly. The Court’s decision, concurring opinions, and the FPC/FPF amicus brief can be viewed at www.firearmspolicy.org/legal.
"At issue was whether someone’s carrying of a firearm could be used as reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct, and thus justification for police to conduct a stop-and-frisk of the gun owner. The court ruled in Hicks that such searches and seizures, in the absence of other evidence are completely unlawful."
The appellant is Michael J. Hicks, who had a concealed gun permit, who was caught on a surveillance camera showing off his gun in June 2014. Officers stopped and frisked him.
The Morning Call reported,
"after officers smelled alcoholic beverages on Hicks’ breath, he was charged with drunken driving, among other misdemeanor offenses.
"Hicks, then 35 and living in Allentown, asked a Lehigh County judge to throw out the charges on grounds that the stop was illegal, but the judge found his arrest was justified. He was convicted of driving under the influence of a high rate of alcohol for a second offense and sentenced to 30 days to six months in jail."
Such a conviction would cost him his concealed gun permit. Justice was done. It took five years.
Wrong.
A misdemeanor DUI does nothing at all to one's concealed carry permit.
You need to be convicted of a felony to lose your rights.
Depends on the State. In Nevada any misdemeanor conviction results in the loss of your CCW.
That is not true.
Here is a quote from a brief summary of the requirements for a concealed carry permit in Nevada:
{...
8. No felony criminal conviction (regardless of crime or date of occurance). If you have a felony on your criminal record you can NOT obtain a CCW, nor can you own a handgun.
9. No misdemeanor criminal conviction that involved the use of violence or threats thereof within 3 years prior to submitting your application.
...}
Nevada CCW Permit Requirements
So only a misdemeanor involving threats and violence can cause the CCW to be revoked, and even then for only 3 years.
A DUI is not involving threats or violence.
The NRA is America's oldest Civil Rights Organization. The Left hates civil rights because they desire tyranny and imagine they would be in control of it.
I support a consumption tax for everyone, effectively ending non-profit/tax-exempt status completely.
As for The Right To Bear Arms:
Fireams Policy Coallition reported,
"The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court issued a significant 53-page majority opinion in the criminal appeal of Commonwealth v. Hicks. Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) filed an important coalition amicus brief cited by the Court supporting Hicks in December of 2017, alongside Firearms Owners Against Crime (FOAC) and seven Members of Pennsylvania’s General Assembly. The Court’s decision, concurring opinions, and the FPC/FPF amicus brief can be viewed at www.firearmspolicy.org/legal.
"At issue was whether someone’s carrying of a firearm could be used as reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct, and thus justification for police to conduct a stop-and-frisk of the gun owner. The court ruled in Hicks that such searches and seizures, in the absence of other evidence are completely unlawful."
The appellant is Michael J. Hicks, who had a concealed gun permit, who was caught on a surveillance camera showing off his gun in June 2014. Officers stopped and frisked him.
The Morning Call reported,
"after officers smelled alcoholic beverages on Hicks’ breath, he was charged with drunken driving, among other misdemeanor offenses.
"Hicks, then 35 and living in Allentown, asked a Lehigh County judge to throw out the charges on grounds that the stop was illegal, but the judge found his arrest was justified. He was convicted of driving under the influence of a high rate of alcohol for a second offense and sentenced to 30 days to six months in jail."
Such a conviction would cost him his concealed gun permit. Justice was done. It took five years.
Wrong.
A misdemeanor DUI does nothing at all to one's concealed carry permit.
You need to be convicted of a felony to lose your rights.
Depends on the State. In Nevada any misdemeanor conviction results in the loss of your CCW.
That is not true.
Here is a quote from a brief summary of the requirements for a concealed carry permit in Nevada:
{...
8. No felony criminal conviction (regardless of crime or date of occurance). If you have a felony on your criminal record you can NOT obtain a CCW, nor can you own a handgun.
9. No misdemeanor criminal conviction that involved the use of violence or threats thereof within 3 years prior to submitting your application.
...}
Nevada CCW Permit Requirements
So only a misdemeanor involving threats and violence can cause the CCW to be revoked, and even then for only 3 years.
A DUI is not involving threats or violence.
Those are ISSUING requirements. Get a misdemeanor arrest after you have it, and it is instantly placed on Suspension, and upon conviction it is Revoked.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
Almost 900 pages.
This is silly.
How could anyone ever possibly consider gun control in a democratic republic?
Clearly a democratic republic must have the general population with superior right of arms than the police or military, or else you don't have a democratic republic.
This is silly.
How could anyone ever possibly consider gun control in a democratic republic?
Clearly a democratic republic must have the general population with superior right of arms than the police or military, or else you don't have a democratic republic.
Because they don't want us to be a Constitutional Republic. Before they can make that happen though, they must disarm us.
EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,169
- 1,100
Bill of Right attempts to make liberalism illegal yet you have it pictured above your name? Why??
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,416
- 2,180
That's the same woman who is going after Trump's tax records.
Man, Mueller should have just asked you instead of spending years and millions of dollars.
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,905
- 1,940
- Banned
- #8,898
- Banned
- #8,900
The NRA has some high level corruption going on now. The corruption has absolutely nothing to do with the right to keep and bear arms.
Don't start your filthy Moon Bat party just yet. Gun lobby money is being channeled through other sources now.
You are confused Moon Bat. The NRA is losing members now but it is because they have been pandering too much to you filthy ass Libtard anti gun nut assholes instead of being strong proponents of our Constitutional rights. They supported background checks, bump stock bans, age restrictions and all that other oppressive shit you Liberals love so much. You should all be members but you are too stupid to figure it out.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
The Chinese NEED for the Strait of Hormuz to Re-open...Whoooooda Thunkit?- Started by DGS49
- Replies: 1
-
Now there is a push from the left to eliminate the police body cameras they demanded.- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 15
-
-
