Not2BSubjugated
Callous Individualist
This is NOT the same as the baker. The baker didn't kick the gay people out of the bakery and tell them they couldn't buy cake there. The baker simply refused to engage in a specific contract that would have required them to create an expression of a sentiment that they reject at a religious level.At least make an effort to keep up. We were discussing the baker.I really don't care. Meanwhile, it damn well proves the left is more than willing to use the threat of government violence to punish Thoughtcrime.I did. Why don't you do a quick search and find a post of mine on the subject? Any one will do. It might pop your little head wide open....unless you're a Christian baker refusing to make a custom cake for a gay wedding.Attention, liberals:
There is no right to not be offended. You just need to grow the fuck up.
Hope that clears up your obvious confusion.
Of course there's not a right to not be offended. But there is a right to be offended, and a right to refuse to accommodate people you find offensive.
Maybe you heard about that.
What proves that? I happen to agree with you that the left is eager to do that. But what laws have they passed recently censoring speech?
Well, let's discuss that. Because it's exactly the same thing Trump is trying for force on tech companies. Same violation of rights. Same weak excuses. Leftists want to bully homophobic bakers, and you guys want to bully tech companies that won't play ball with trolls. Same shit, different party.
Trump and the right aren't demanding that the social media companies create for us a specific product whereby they are forced to actively endorse ideas that they reject. All we're demanding is that they let us buy the same generic cake off of the shelf that they would sell to anybody of ANY political stripe.
We'll put the icing and the two grooms on that fucker ourselves, thanks.