The right killed Abraham Lincoln

[Lesh]

Who cares? Just be glad he did it.

That was a pretty fucked up statement

 

[Lesh]

John Wilkes Booth was a famous actor, much like modern liberal actors like DeNiro or Alec Baldwin are today, and had the same liberal agenda.

And you are right, there was quite a lib conspiracy to whack the leader of the Party of Lincoln and Helms, just like in the current era with last summers failed plots to clip President Trump.

Now that Ryan Wesley Routh has been found guilty and will be going to the ADX for life, maybe he might be willing to talk so he could serve his time in Club Fed instead?

There was certainly a conspiracy to kill Lincoln

It was NOT a “lib” conspiracy

 

[Correll]

There was certainly a conspiracy to kill Lincoln

It was NOT a “lib” conspiracy

Assigning political labels across historical time is a ... pretty shaky and generally useless tactic.

BUT, if you want to play that game, MAGA today si still on the same page of Enlightenment Age ideas as the Abolistionists of that era,

and dems today are still playing the same Race Bases pandering/oppression games that there were then too. Except instead of pandering to white racists and oppressing blacks,


today you are panding to ANTI-WHITE racists and oppressing whites.


So, yeah.

 

[Polishprince]

There was certainly a conspiracy to kill Lincoln

It was NOT a “lib” conspiracy

Booth, a famous actor was a well known lib, and an advocate of Slavery.

That's why he was so devoted to getting rid of our Dittohead President in the 1860's.

One thing you are forgetting is that modern Obamacare has been compared to Slavery- they are basically the same thing with a different name. Under Slavery, people were told to "pick that cotton" or else, whether they want to or not.

Under the ACA, people are told to "buy that insurance policy or else" regardless of whether they want it or not.

Slavery is the idea that someone else can run your life better than you.

 

[Lesh]

Booth, a famous actor was a well known lib, and an advocate of Slavery.

That's why he was so devoted to getting rid of our Dittohead President in the 1860's.

One thing you are forgetting is that modern Obamacare has been compared to Slavery- they are basically the same thing with a different name. Under Slavery, people were told to "pick that cotton" or else, whether they want to or not.

Under the ACA, people are told to "buy that insurance policy or else" regardless of whether they want it or not.

Slavery is the idea that someone else can run your life better than you.

Well know. Lib, your ass

What a stupid statement

 

[Lesh]

Assigning political labels across historical time is a ... pretty shaky and generally useless tactic.

BUT, if you want to play that game, MAGA today si still on the same page of Enlightenment Age ideas as the Abolistionists of that era,

and dems today are still playing the same Race Bases pandering/oppression games that there were then too. Except instead of pandering to white racists and oppressing blacks,


today you are panding to ANTI-WHITE racists and oppressing whites.


So, yeah.

So you note that applying political labels from the current time to people from 250 years ago is stupid… and then do exactly that

 

[TNHarley]

That was a pretty fucked up statement

That greedy sumbitch causes hundreds of thousands of deaths, hundreds of unconstitutional arrests that includes journalists, thousands of acres of farms and ranches burnt to the ground. Even the animals that lived on them.
**** that tyrant POS. He deserved more than a bullet to the head.

 

[Polishprince]

Well know. Lib, your ass

What a stupid statement

You are saying Obamacare isn't an risky ultraliberal scheme- much like Slavery was during the 19th Century?

Get your head out of your butt.

 

[Lesh]

You are saying Obamacare isn't an risky ultraliberal scheme- much like Slavery was during the 19th Century?

Get your head out of your butt.

Nothing about Obamacare applies to any of this
And Booth was no Lib

You’re insane

 

[Lesh]

That greedy sumbitch causes hundreds of thousands of deaths, hundreds of unconstitutional arrests that includes journalists, thousands of acres of farms and ranches burnt to the ground. Even the animals that lived on them.
**** that tyrant POS. He deserved more than a bullet to the head.

Wow.

A Confederate apologist

You do realize that your wonderful Confederacy started that war right

 

[Correll]

So you note that applying political labels from the current time to people from 250 years ago is stupid… and then do exactly that

Correct. i'm not going to let you do that, and not respond. Even if I think that the value of it is limited.


I know that you are not too stupid to understand that. That you are just shit talking to avoid addressing the points I made.


THe fact remains. The side of racism and racists today, is the modern Left.


YOUR side supports a system of discrimination and privileges given to blacks and others groups, AT THE EXPENSE OF WHITES or white males, depending on the situtation.

That is a political reality. We are supposed to pretend that it is not the case, but it is and we all know it.

 

[TNHarley]

Wow.

A Confederate apologist

You do realize that your wonderful Confederacy started that war right

Im not apologizing for anyone, you binary moron.

 

[whitehall]

It's a waste of time trying to define conservative vs. liberal in the mid 19's century. Suffice to say that Lincoln was a republican and Booth was an actor and a southerner and most likely a radical democrat.

 

[hadit]

I asked ChatGPT if John Wilkes Booth was a liberal or a conservative for 1865 standards:

The answer:

“So: Booth was not a “liberal” in the 19th-century sense (which then leaned more toward abolition, free soil, and Republican ideas). He aligned with the reactionary, anti-Lincoln, pro-slavery faction—what historians usually describe as conservative or extremist for his time.

ChatGPT - Booth political alignment

Shared via ChatGPT

chatgpt.com

Then I asked Elon Musk’s Grok, which answered:

“John Wilkes Booth, the assassin of President Abraham Lincoln, is difficult to categorize strictly as a “liberal” or “conservative” in the modern sense, as political ideologies in the 1860s were shaped by different issues and contexts than today. However, based on historical evidence, Booth’s actions and beliefs align more closely with what would be considered conservative or reactionary views for his time, particularly due to his staunch support for the Confederacy and its values.”.

John Wilkes Booth's Political Ideology | Shared Grok Conversation

Was John Wilkes Booth a liberal or conservative

grok.com

What's your point?

 

[Anathema]

Regardless 9f who, how, why or anything else, it’s the WHEN of the assassination that is truly important…,4 years too late and 6 Months too early…

If it had happened before the outbreak of the war, we might not have had the issues we did.

If it had happened 6 months later, Lincoln’s plan to deport slaves might have actually taken place.

 

[Quantrill]

Wow.

A Confederate apologist

You do realize that your wonderful Confederacy started that war right

That is not true, but is often taught.

If you do a thorough study of the battle of Fort Sumter you will see it was Lincoln and Seward who purposely started the war.

Quantrill

 

[Lesh]

That is not true, but is often taught.

If you do a thorough study of the battle of Fort Sumter you will see it was Lincoln and Seward who purposely started the war.

Quantrill

Nonsense but what would one expect from someone who names himself after a notorious murderer and terrorist

 

[Quantrill]

Nonsense but what would one expect from someone who names himself after a notorious murderer and terrorist

Why 'nonsense'? Seward had already said there was an 'irrepressible conflict' coming. And Lincoln said a 'house divided cannot stand'. Seward was a radical abolitionist. And Lincoln appointed him as Secretary of State. The writing was on the wall. Only a fool could not see it.

I didn't name myself after Sherman.

Quantrill