The revisionist view of Iranian history that libs are sure to hate

EMH said:
It was at least well into the tens of thousands.
RIDICULOUS REPLIES BY 'EMH'



The no.1 joke on all forums EMH with his "theories":

1. also claimed Islamo-socialist Mamdani is "not" Muslim;

51% of American Muslims favor same-sex marriage

and doesn't believe Holocaust figures which occurred outside Germany [led by German Nazis], because inside Germany there were only a few hundred thousand Jews... get it?
Jewish Population of Europe in 1933: Population Data by Country
18 Nov 2024 — In 1933, approximately 9.5 million Jews lived in Europe, comprising 1.7% of the total European population.

2. EMH, as a Nazi type [fake] "expert" in "deciding" who is a "Jew".

Here is a text EMH typed on 2.24.26:

Read it again and laugh:


9.5 million Jews in Europe... OK.... so Hitler got 2/3rds of those?? And never took Switzerland... as both "Switzer" and "Land" are both Jewish names... or England... On the surface of that, the 6 million number seems high....- EMH

3. Ashkenaz first mentioned in Genesis 10:3. Jews exiled by the Romans and lived for centuries in Europe adopted this term since in previous history it was the dominant.

4. Albert Einstein: Scientist, Pacifist, Zionist 17 Mar 2015 — Yes, Einstein was a self-proclaimed Zionist...
Full article: Albert Einstein's early Zionist involvement, 1918‒1920 by N Goldstein · 2017

5. POLLS?
mondoweiss is not reliable when it comes to Israel.

Of course the genocidal Hamas war with your Islamic Hamas-allied Qatar dirty money on campus proved succes.

How Qatar Bought America
14 May 2025 — A Free Press investigation reveals that the Gulf state has spent almost $100 billion across Congress, colleges, think tanks, and corporations

Of course when a country is in a war, this is what happens.

_

[URL='https://www.frontpagemag.com/diversity-is-driving-dem-opposition-to-israel/' is Driving Dem Opposition to Israel[/URL]
3 Oct 2025 — 40% of white voters support Israel. Minority voters support the "Palestinians".

_

There are even Zionists who criticize the war. So what?

But it will rebound in the future.
It always does.

Still, what's amazing is that against all the odds:

The MAGA Youth Are Still Pro-Israel, Free Beacon-Echelon Insights Poll Shows
Free Beacon | Sep 15, 2025 | Eliana Johnson.
 
Reagan was scum, just like Trump is now.
Republicans love their corrupt criminals.
If you think Reagan was scum that says mor about you than him

And not in a good way for you

Reagan was a great president who will be ranked higher than the lib-leaning historians than anyone since Eisenhower
 
It should come as no coincidence that the transformation of Iran from 20th century progress to Middle Ages complete repression was fomented in academia.
Direct parallel to the strategy being born out in America right now.
 
Please try to explain that one…..

Running rings round the Terrorists who now have no idea what to do next ,
World trade grinding to a halt thanks to the Freedom Fighting Hooty Tooty boys , --- and Israel taking a bad mauling in the north and noticing that its major cities look
much flatter .
Trump running around in circles now because his fifth rate attempt at Shock and Awe 2.0 has been ignored and returned with much more relish and effect .
What happened to those 20+ bases and effective anti missile defence systems?

Gone forever with no reserves .

AIRCRAFT CARRIERS HIDING IN GOD FORSKEN PLACES WITH SAILORS NOT EVEN ABLE TO HAVE A BATHROOM VISIT .

TOTALLY CRAZY .
SURRENDER DONALD
 
If you think Reagan was scum that says mor about you than him

And not in a good way for you

Reagan was a great president who will be ranked higher than the lib-leaning historians than anyone since Eisenhower

Anyone who lies to the American people to gain political power, isn't a "great President" at all. His administration was one of the most corrupt in history. And his policies set the American worker back for decades.
 
Reagan was a racist, whose tax cuts for the wealthy, and union busting policies destroyed the American middle class.
You have no proof Reagan was racist. Here’s proof you are a racist because you voted for and supported this guy.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0583.webp
    IMG_0583.webp
    89.8 KB · Views: 6
The Shah was a horrible mass murdering monster we propped up because he was PRO ISRAEL.

Another COST to America from supporting Israel, ALL OF IT.

He was a reliable ally to the Americans and the British. They installed him.
 
You are the victim of false history, not me

In 1953, both before and after, the king appointed the prime minister and could replace him


Your problem is that you get your “facts” from some rightvwing podcaster.

Most informed people have known of tha Anglo-American plot to overthrow Mossadehq for decades.

Trying to rewrite history to excuse American brinksmanship may be what you want to hear.

But it’s not fact.
 
Not really. He WASN'T willing to stack bodies. That's why he was overthrown.

The mad mullahs ARE willing to stack bodies.

Huge difference.
Nonsense.

The Shah was never shy about stacking bodies.

He had Savak, the most feared and brutal secret police force in the world.
 
Correction

Make that most uninformed people

You have no idea what you're talking about.

I don't get my "facts" from right wing podcast videos. That's all trash for know nothings.

The events in Iran in the 1950's are well known, and uncontested.

Except by people trying to pretend the US hasn't really been meddling in Iran for 75 years, because the fact of our consistant duplicity and distortions don't serve the current narrative that the right wing noisemakers have dreamed up to cover for the fool in the White House.
 
The Shah was a horrible mass murdering monster we propped up because he was PRO ISRAEL.

Another COST to America from supporting Israel, ALL OF IT.
Our relationship with the Shah was close because of his stance on the Cold War and opposition to socialism

That’s why he was overthrown by a radical leftist regime in 79.
 
You have no idea what you're talking about.

I don't get my "facts" from right wing podcast videos. That's all trash for know nothings.

The events in Iran in the 1950's are well known, and uncontested.

Except by people trying to pretend the US hasn't really been meddling in Iran for 75 years, because the fact of our consistant duplicity and distortions don't serve the current narrative that the right wing noisemakers have dreamed up to cover for the fool in the White House.
Timmy nobody has ever accused you of getting your facts…anywhere
 
Our relationship with the Shah was close because of his stance on the Cold War and opposition to socialism

That’s why he was overthrown by a radical leftist regime in 79.



So a completely undemocratic mass murdering dictator who did not tolerate free speech or dissent in his own country was really a "conservative" because he was replaced by a faux democracy theocracy.... which you call "leftist."


wow...
 
So a completely undemocratic mass murdering dictator who did not tolerate free speech or dissent in his own country was really a "conservative" because he was replaced by a faux democracy theocracy.... which you call "leftist."


wow...
The supreme leader of Iran is a leftist it’s a leftist run regime that overthrew the shah (who was no different then King Charles in England today) for a number of reasons, mainly he’s closes to Americ and democratic policies like allowing women to work
 
Timmy nobody has ever accused you of getting your facts…anywhere
You're laughable. You're probably one of the two or three least informed people on this forum.

You get your "news" from trashy podcasts with adolecent graphics manned by people who make it up.

The history of US involvement in the installation of the Shah is well known throughout the world.

But, for the reccod, you have no idea what you're talking about (as usual). You've had that pointed out to you and documented by many people on this thread.

You can stop trolling now. Your ignorant and proud of it stance has been noted by all.
 
15th post
The supreme leader of Iran is a leftist it’s a leftist run regime that overthrew the shah (who was no different then King Charles in England today) for a number of reasons, mainly he’s closes to Americ and democratic policies like allowing women to work
You know that from the Iranian elections during his reign.
 
You're laughable. You're probably one of the two or three least informed people on this forum.

You get your "news" from trashy podcasts with adolecent graphics manned by people who make it up.

The history of US involvement in the installation of the Shah is well known throughout the world.

But, for the reccod, you have no idea what you're talking about (as usual). You've had that pointed out to you and documented by many people on this thread.

You can stop trolling now. Your ignorant and proud of it stance has been noted by all.
Holy shit dude, the Shah took the thrown in 1941 from his father.

You are referring to the coup that overthrow the prime minister of Iran, the shah was already in power and there then
 
You know that from the Iranian elections during his reign.
Yes there were elections during his regimes. A prime minister, a legislature with a senate and lower chamber, and a constitution

Your knowledge of Iran is shape by the propaganda from the supreme leader and your allies in the leading state sponsor of terror
 
You have no idea what you're talking about.

I don't get my "facts" from right wing podcast videos. That's all trash for know nothings.

The events in Iran in the 1950's are well known, and uncontested.

Except by people trying to pretend the US hasn't really been meddling in Iran for 75 years, because the fact of our consistant duplicity and distortions don't serve the current narrative that the right wing noisemakers have dreamed up to cover for the fool in the White House.
The Shah had a right to fire Mossadehq

Both sides were fighting with the gloves off
 
Back
Top Bottom