The Religous Nuts in the Gop

[JakeStarkey]

The false equivalency fallacies above are still just that. The whining does not change it. Added addendum: All the subsequent whining does not change the fallacy.

 

[irosie91]

Liberals are far more religious than the right. Liberalism IS a religion. It is not based on reality but on hope, wishful thinking, feelings, an omnipresent government to right all wrongs. And anyone that dares to disagree essentially blasphemes and isn't just wrong, they're evil.

a religious cult is more like it. and intolerance is one of it's traits, though they'll beat you over the head, of how they are the More tolerant than those evil people in the Gop
no offense to you Penny

It is curious how someone who claims to be moral and righteous because they determined on their own what is truth is considered trustworthy while someone who looks for guidance from God and seeks to follow His truth is not.

What is more nuts? Believing there is a supreme being who is wiser and more powerful than you, or believing you are the equivalent of a supreme being?

I guess what Isis is doing in Iran and Syria, in the name of their God, is ok then. Do you honestly find us that much differene than ISIS, they have rifles and we have tanks and planes. (We are both trying to take over the country, along with the FSA, which is funded and supplied by the US)

You didn't answer my question.

Um, because they are thinking they are the supreme being, they are talking to themselves and trying to rationalize their actions to everyone else. Or they are plan nuts.

hmm. A half assed cliche' and an insult must be the best you can manage. Well. Thanks for the response. It actually does explain where you are coming from.

What we did in Iraq in the 90's was in the name of humanity, and yet, M. Albright when asked if over 500,000 thousand child deaths were worth it, the witch said, "I think it was". Really.

We never attack and put sanctions on a country for inhumanity, we do it for our allies and oil and natural resources and to maintain control over the globe. If we did it for humanity why are we not taking out the Al Saud regime and the Israel Regime?

because neither the al SAUD regime nor Israel is engaging in the genocide and
oppression that so TITTILATES scum like you. The Saudis do not oppress
minorities------much. Their treatment of "guest workers" leaves much to be
desired-------but that issue is never addressed internationally-------the guest workers do get to LEAVE

 

[mudwhistle]

First up:


Boehner: 'Catholic guilt' changed Ryan's mind on speakership

WASHINGTON (AP) — Former House Speaker John Boehner says he used "Catholic guilt" to persuade Paul Ryan to run for speaker.

On CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday Boehner said he invoked God to persuade his fellow Catholic from refusing to run for speaker to agreeing to do so.

Boehner says he told Ryan: "'This isn't about what you want to do. It's about what God wants you to do. And God has told me, he wants you to" run for speaker.

Boehner: 'Catholic guilt' changed Ryan's mind on speakership

Harry Reid - Mormon
Nancy Pelosi - Catholic
Joe Biden - Catholic

Obama - Extremely pro-Muslim

 

[irosie91]

Liberals are far more religious than the right. Liberalism IS a religion. It is not based on reality but on hope, wishful thinking, feelings, an omnipresent government to right all wrongs. And anyone that dares to disagree essentially blasphemes and isn't just wrong, they're evil.

a religious cult is more like it. and intolerance is one of it's traits, though they'll beat you over the head, of how they are the More tolerant than those evil people in the Gop
no offense to you Penny

It is curious how someone who claims to be moral and righteous because they determined on their own what is truth is considered trustworthy while someone who looks for guidance from God and seeks to follow His truth is not.

What is more nuts? Believing there is a supreme being who is wiser and more powerful than you, or believing you are the equivalent of a supreme being?

I guess what Isis is doing in Iran and Syria, in the name of their God, is ok then. Do you honestly find us that much differene than ISIS, they have rifles and we have tanks and planes. (We are both trying to take over the country, along with the FSA, which is funded and supplied by the US)

You didn't answer my question.

Um, because they are thinking they are the supreme being, they are talking to themselves and trying to rationalize their actions to everyone else. Or they are plan nuts.

hmm. A half assed cliche' and an insult must be the best you can manage. Well. Thanks for the response. It actually does explain where you are coming from.

What we did in Iraq in the 90's was in the name of humanity, and yet, M. Albright when asked if over 500,000 thousand child deaths were worth it, the witch said, "I think it was". Really.

We never attack and put sanctions on a country for inhumanity, we do it for our allies and oil and natural resources and to maintain control over the globe. If we did it for humanity why are we not taking out the Al Saud regime and the Israel Regime?

The question was based on a false premise. The false premise was the Saddam
claim that sanctions upon Iraq caused the deaths (by starvation, no less) of
500,000 Iraqi children-------He lied-----he, himself, MURDERED more than
one million Iraqis-------there was no REAL starvation in Iraq------isolation, siege
and starvation is a very classical form of warfare in the "Islamic" "culture"
Saddam certainly looked well fed as did his sons and whores. It is very likely that
the classical Islamic technique was used on Shiites and Kurds

 

[Penelope]

Then there is Ben Carson:

Ben Carson: The World Was Created in 6 Days. Literally.

His beliefs could have real political consequences.


Carson decried the Big Bang theory and asserted that Darwin's theory of evolution was "encouraged" by Satan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlaeVkO-cYw

 

[Penelope]

Then there is Donald Trump: Does whatever to get the evangelical vote.


http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2015/09/watch-as-robert-jeffress-kenneth-copeland-go-to-new-york-to-lay-hands-on-donald-trump.html/

 

[irosie91]

Then there is Ben Carson:

Ben Carson: The World Was Created in 6 Days. Literally.

His beliefs could have real political consequences.


Carson decried the Big Bang theory and asserted that Darwin's theory of evolution was "encouraged" by Satan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlaeVkO-cYw

what are the political consequences of a faith based belief that the "big bang"
origin of the Universe theory is incorrect and that Darwin's theories of evolution
are flawed?

 

[irosie91]

Then there is Donald Trump: Do whatever to get the evangelical vote.


http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2015/09/watch-as-robert-jeffress-kenneth-copeland-go-to-new-york-to-lay-hands-on-donald-trump.html/

Can you name any persons running for president of the USA who DID NOT
engage diplomatically with religious leaders?

 

[Iceweasel]

Then there is Ben Carson:

Ben Carson: The World Was Created in 6 Days. Literally.

His beliefs could have real political consequences.

How so? He would burn all the heretics?

 

[Penelope]

Then there is Ben Carson:

Ben Carson: The World Was Created in 6 Days. Literally.

His beliefs could have real political consequences.

How so? He would burn all the heretics?

I guess that would be lots of people, including Christians who are not as delusional as he is.

 

[Iceweasel]

What we did in Iraq in the 90's was in the name of humanity, and yet, M. Albright when asked if over 500,000 thousand child deaths were worth it, the witch said, "I think it was". Really.

We never attack and put sanctions on a country for inhumanity, we do it for our allies and oil and natural resources and to maintain control over the globe. If we did it for humanity why are we not taking out the Al Saud regime and the Israel Regime?

Where do you get the 500,000 figure? Not to minimize the importance of oil but why didn't we take the oil when we could have? Desert Storm happened, with the Saudis, because Saddam was on the march and invaded an ally.

 

[irosie91]

Then there is Ben Carson:

Ben Carson: The World Was Created in 6 Days. Literally.

His beliefs could have real political consequences.

How so? He would burn all the heretics?

I guess that would be lots of people, including Christians who are not as delusional as he is.

Penelope------I do not believe that Ben Carson would persecute those people
who believe that the BIG BANG THEORY is valid or that Darwin's theory of
evolution of the species is valid. You believe that he would (or WILL if
elected president) I am willing to place a wager that he will not

 

[Iceweasel]

Then there is Ben Carson:

Ben Carson: The World Was Created in 6 Days. Literally.

His beliefs could have real political consequences.

How so? He would burn all the heretics?

I guess that would be lots of people, including Christians who are not as delusional as he is.

You've had too much obama. The president can't actually kill people.

 

[playtime]

It is curious how someone who claims to be moral and righteous because they determined on their own what is truth is considered trustworthy while someone who looks for guidance from God and seeks to follow His truth is not.

What is more nuts? Believing there is a supreme being who is wiser and more powerful than you, or believing you are the equivalent of a supreme being?

I guess what Isis is doing in Iran and Syria, in the name of their God, is ok then. Do you honestly find us that much differene than ISIS, they have rifles and we have tanks and planes. (We are both trying to take over the country, along with the FSA, which is funded and supplied by the US)

Yeah cuz Christians are just as bad as the sick Islamic *****.

Get out of here.

No, not as bad (present day ones v the crusades & Spanish inquisition)

but

not nearly as different as they should be.

 

[irosie91]

What we did in Iraq in the 90's was in the name of humanity, and yet, M. Albright when asked if over 500,000 thousand child deaths were worth it, the witch said, "I think it was". Really.

We never attack and put sanctions on a country for inhumanity, we do it for our allies and oil and natural resources and to maintain control over the globe. If we did it for humanity why are we not taking out the Al Saud regime and the Israel Regime?

Where do you get the 500,000 figure? Not to minimize the importance of oil but why didn't we take the oil when we could have? Desert Storm happened, with the Saudis, because Saddam was on the march and invaded an ally.

the 500,000 was the claim of Penelope's god SADDAM HUSSEIN It has
never been even remotely verified. Not a single Iraqi sunni kid dead in the dust
of starvation---------somehow Iraq lost all its cameras We certainly saw lots of
Biafran babies dried up and dead in the dust-----but not a single Iraqi sunni kid

 

[irosie91]

Then there is Ben Carson:

Ben Carson: The World Was Created in 6 Days. Literally.

His beliefs could have real political consequences.

How so? He would burn all the heretics?

I guess that would be lots of people, including Christians who are not as delusional as he is.

You've had too much obama. The president can't actually kill people.

Obama does not kill people-------and his wife does healthful lunches

 

[irosie91]

What we did in Iraq in the 90's was in the name of humanity, and yet, M. Albright when asked if over 500,000 thousand child deaths were worth it, the witch said, "I think it was". Really.

We never attack and put sanctions on a country for inhumanity, we do it for our allies and oil and natural resources and to maintain control over the globe. If we did it for humanity why are we not taking out the Al Saud regime and the Israel Regime?

Where do you get the 500,000 figure? Not to minimize the importance of oil but why didn't we take the oil when we could have? Desert Storm happened, with the Saudis, because Saddam was on the march and invaded an ally.

with the Saudis? I do not recall that detail

 

[Iceweasel]

What we did in Iraq in the 90's was in the name of humanity, and yet, M. Albright when asked if over 500,000 thousand child deaths were worth it, the witch said, "I think it was". Really.

We never attack and put sanctions on a country for inhumanity, we do it for our allies and oil and natural resources and to maintain control over the globe. If we did it for humanity why are we not taking out the Al Saud regime and the Israel Regime?

Where do you get the 500,000 figure? Not to minimize the importance of oil but why didn't we take the oil when we could have? Desert Storm happened, with the Saudis, because Saddam was on the march and invaded an ally.

with the Saudis? I do not recall that detail

http://www.ushistory.org/us/60a.asp

60a. Operation Desert Storm
The first major foreign crisis for the United States after the end of the Cold War presented itself in August 1990. Saddam Hussein, the dictator of Iraq, ordered his army across the border into tiny Kuwait. This was no ordinary act of aggression. Iraq's army was well equipped. The United States had provided massive military aid to Iraq during their eight-year war with Iran, giving them the fourth largest army in the world.

Kuwait was a major supplier of oil to the United States. The Iraqi takeover posed an immediate threat to neighboring Saudi Arabia, another major exporter of oil. If Saudi Arabia fell to Saddam, Iraq would control one-fifth of the world's oil supply. All eyes were on the White House, waiting for a response. President Bush, who succeeded President Reagan, stated simply: "This will not stand."

In the last months of 1990, the United States participated in the defense of Saudi Arabia in a deployment known as Operation Desert Shield. Over 500,000 American troops were placed in Saudi Arabia in case of an Iraqi attack on the Saudis. The U.S. further sought multilateral support in the United Nations Security Council. Traditionally, Iraq was an ally of the Soviet Union, who held a veto power over any potential UN military action. Looking westward for support for their dramatic internal changes, the USSR did not block the American plan. The UN condemned Iraq and helped form a coalition to fight Saddam militarily.

 

[Penelope]

What we did in Iraq in the 90's was in the name of humanity, and yet, M. Albright when asked if over 500,000 thousand child deaths were worth it, the witch said, "I think it was". Really.

We never attack and put sanctions on a country for inhumanity, we do it for our allies and oil and natural resources and to maintain control over the globe. If we did it for humanity why are we not taking out the Al Saud regime and the Israel Regime?

Where do you get the 500,000 figure? Not to minimize the importance of oil but why didn't we take the oil when we could have? Desert Storm happened, with the Saudis, because Saddam was on the march and invaded an ally.

Kuwait was slant drilling and the Saud's and gulf states were pricing Saddam out of business.

 

[irosie91]

What we did in Iraq in the 90's was in the name of humanity, and yet, M. Albright when asked if over 500,000 thousand child deaths were worth it, the witch said, "I think it was". Really.

We never attack and put sanctions on a country for inhumanity, we do it for our allies and oil and natural resources and to maintain control over the globe. If we did it for humanity why are we not taking out the Al Saud regime and the Israel Regime?

Where do you get the 500,000 figure? Not to minimize the importance of oil but why didn't we take the oil when we could have? Desert Storm happened, with the Saudis, because Saddam was on the march and invaded an ally.

with the Saudis? I do not recall that detail

http://www.ushistory.org/us/60a.asp

60a. Operation Desert Storm
The first major foreign crisis for the United States after the end of the Cold War presented itself in August 1990. Saddam Hussein, the dictator of Iraq, ordered his army across the border into tiny Kuwait. This was no ordinary act of aggression. Iraq's army was well equipped. The United States had provided massive military aid to Iraq during their eight-year war with Iran, giving them the fourth largest army in the world.

Kuwait was a major supplier of oil to the United States. The Iraqi takeover posed an immediate threat to neighboring Saudi Arabia, another major exporter of oil. If Saudi Arabia fell to Saddam, Iraq would control one-fifth of the world's oil supply. All eyes were on the White House, waiting for a response. President Bush, who succeeded President Reagan, stated simply: "This will not stand."

In the last months of 1990, the United States participated in the defense of Saudi Arabia in a deployment known as Operation Desert Shield. Over 500,000 American troops were placed in Saudi Arabia in case of an Iraqi attack on the Saudis. The U.S. further sought multilateral support in the United Nations Security Council. Traditionally, Iraq was an ally of the Soviet Union, who held a veto power over any potential UN military action. Looking westward for support for their dramatic internal changes, the USSR did not block the American plan. The UN condemned Iraq and helped form a coalition to fight Saddam militarily.

thanks-------I thought you meant that Saudi arabia participated in the ----INVASION of Kuwait-------the US has bases in Saudi arabia------desert storm did not start
that fact