The Regressive Left and Islam -- What is happening here?

[Dogmaphobe]

I've read his posts over and over. He attacks anyone who defends innocent Muslims. That bigotry against Islam.

Now that you mention it, yes -- his IQ IS quite obviously 40-50 points higher than yours.

 

[imawhosure]

What I'm specifically focusing on is the behaviors of those who are so tolerant and defensive of one religion while simultaneously being so hateful of another.

No doubt it will get dragged in other directions, but that's my question here.
.

Well then perhaps you would be kind enough to give a specific example and put away your hasty generalizations.

What? You're serious here?

Just from this board alone, you can't think of any examples of people deflecting to the evils of Christianity after a jihadist attack?

You can't think of Leftists leveraging "hasty generalizations" about Christians?

You can't think of any examples of leftists attacking Christianity for many of the same ideals or acts perpetrated by Islam?

You can't think of any times a leftist has deflected to "Islamophobia" or even "racism" when someone pointed out a misdeed of Islam?

There's no way you're serious.
.

You've never heard innocent Muslims condemned on this board? Fuckinay that's funny.

Another backhanded apology for Islam, just as the OP asked.

The type of response I predicted in the OP.

It is what it is.
.

Most all of Western Civilization was built on Christian values. So, if you want to change a nation, or continent, how do you do it? Tear down the belief system that it was created on.

What everyone needs understand is that the Wests citizens are no smarter than other cultures of the world. What is different is the freedom we have had, which allowed us as a culture to design, and build, modern society. We aren't stealing technology from the Chinese or the Middle East, they are stealing it from the West. It is no accident that Western Europe, and the United States......built from Western European cultures, lead the world in technology. But here is the thing------------>other cultures are so much easier to bamboozle, and enslave.

So why demonize Christianity? I think I covered it in the last paragraph, if leaders/politicians want to change societies from what they were/are, to socialism!

 

[Mac1958]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed/examined like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

 

[LoneLaugher]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

 

[Freewill]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

Muslim Vs. Christian Terrorist Kill Scores

 

[Mac1958]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

Muslim Vs. Christian Terrorist Kill Scores

Freewill, I put that poster on ignore about three years ago, and he knows it, yet he keeps posting to and about me. Interesting, huh? Unfortunately, I can still see his posts when someone quotes him while posting to me, or if I get an "alert". Yucky!

Now, please carefully note what he did there, it's a lovely example of the blatant dishonesty of his that motivated me to dump him into ignore, and of the kind of deflection I so brilliantly (!) predicted in the OP:

I've never said that he and the other Regressive Lefties "defend the acts of Islamic terrorists". I have made their actual behaviors (primarily deflection) abundantly clear on this and many other threads. But nasty, dishonest straw man arguments are all they have in response to my points. Which essentially demonstrate my accuracy.

These are nasty, hateful, bigoted liars.
.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I've read his posts over and over. He attacks anyone who defends innocent Muslims. That is bigotry against Islam.

Now that you mention it, yes -- his IQ IS quite obviously 40-50 points higher than yours.

Because he's an Islamophobe that makes him smarter?

That's very telling.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, I guess the OP missed the fact that the newly elected mayor of London was the liberal in the race.

A liberal Muslim. Something the Islamophobes say can't exist.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well then perhaps you would be kind enough to give a specific example and put away your hasty generalizations.

What? You're serious here?

Just from this board alone, you can't think of any examples of people deflecting to the evils of Christianity after a jihadist attack?

You can't think of Leftists leveraging "hasty generalizations" about Christians?

You can't think of any examples of leftists attacking Christianity for many of the same ideals or acts perpetrated by Islam?

You can't think of any times a leftist has deflected to "Islamophobia" or even "racism" when someone pointed out a misdeed of Islam?

There's no way you're serious.
.

You've never heard innocent Muslims condemned on this board? Fuckinay that's funny.

Another backhanded apology for Islam, just as the OP asked.

Islam isn't guilty. People are. You and the OP who condemn a religion for the acts of individuals are no different than Hitler and his condemnation of the Jews.

I've never condemned Islam or any other religion for the acts of individuals.
.

You lie. You never fail to attack people like myself who defend innocent Muslims, and innocent Muslims only.

 

[Freewill]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

Muslim Vs. Christian Terrorist Kill Scores

Freewill, I put that poster on ignore about three years ago, and he knows it, yet he keeps posting to and about me. Interesting, huh? Unfortunately, I can still see his posts when someone quotes him while posting to me, or if I get an "alert". Yucky!

Now, please carefully note what he did there, it's a lovely example of the blatant dishonesty of his that motivated me to dump him into ignore, and of the kind of deflection I so brilliantly (!) predicted in the OP:

I've never said that he and the other Regressive Lefties "defend the acts of Islamic terrorists". I have made their actual behaviors (primarily deflection) abundantly clear on this and many other threads. But nasty, dishonest straw man arguments are all they have in response to my points. Which essentially demonstrate my accuracy.

These are nasty, hateful, bigoted liars.
.

Well we knew this from the beginning. It feels kinda good to put some folks on ignore. I almost put him on ignore because of his Nazi reference but decided not to.

I hope the one example I provided for you is proof enough for him..(I laughed as I typed)

 

[NYcarbineer]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

He can't name any because there aren't any.

He manipulates one's defense of innocent Muslims to try to make it appear they are defending terrorists.

Plus you can note his bigotry in the OP:

"This is so fascinating to watch, and election of London's new mayor is shedding even more light on it.

Members of one specific religion - a religion with a current record of extreme violence, intimidation and terror - are telling us precisely what they're going to do, and they're doing it. It's expansion is clear and rapid and undeniable. We're watching it happen in real time, particularly across Europe. This isn't a partisan or religious opinion, it is a clear fact, based on observation."

See how he starts with the election of London's new Muslim mayor, and then weasely launches into a rant about terrorists?
Classic guilt by association tactic.

 

[Mac1958]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

Muslim Vs. Christian Terrorist Kill Scores

Freewill, I put that poster on ignore about three years ago, and he knows it, yet he keeps posting to and about me. Interesting, huh? Unfortunately, I can still see his posts when someone quotes him while posting to me, or if I get an "alert". Yucky!

Now, please carefully note what he did there, it's a lovely example of the blatant dishonesty of his that motivated me to dump him into ignore, and of the kind of deflection I so brilliantly (!) predicted in the OP:

I've never said that he and the other Regressive Lefties "defend the acts of Islamic terrorists". I have made their actual behaviors (primarily deflection) abundantly clear on this and many other threads. But nasty, dishonest straw man arguments are all they have in response to my points. Which essentially demonstrate my accuracy.

These are nasty, hateful, bigoted liars.
.

Well we knew this from the beginning. It feels kinda good to put some folks on ignore. I almost put him on ignore because of his Nazi reference but decided not to.

I hope the one example I provided for you is proof enough for him..(I laughed as I typed)

How ironic is it that they're putting this much effort into derailing the thread, perfectly illustrating the very point of the thread?

It's who they are, it's what they are.
.

 

[LoneLaugher]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

Muslim Vs. Christian Terrorist Kill Scores

Freewill, I put that poster on ignore about three years ago, and he knows it, yet he keeps posting to and about me. Interesting, huh? Unfortunately, I can still see his posts when someone quotes him while posting to me, or if I get an "alert". Yucky!

Now, please carefully note what he did there, it's a lovely example of the blatant dishonesty of his that motivated me to dump him into ignore, and of the kind of deflection I so brilliantly (!) predicted in the OP:

I've never said that he and the other Regressive Lefties "defend the acts of Islamic terrorists". I have made their actual behaviors (primarily deflection) abundantly clear on this and many other threads. But nasty, dishonest straw man arguments are all they have in response to my points. Which essentially demonstrate my accuracy.

These are nasty, hateful, bigoted liars.
.

Well we knew this from the beginning. It feels kinda good to put some folks on ignore. I almost put him on ignore because of his Nazi reference but decided not to.

I hope the one example I provided for you is proof enough for him..(I laughed as I typed)

What Nazi reference?

 

[NYcarbineer]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

Muslim Vs. Christian Terrorist Kill Scores

Freewill, I put that poster on ignore about three years ago, and he knows it, yet he keeps posting to and about me. Interesting, huh? Unfortunately, I can still see his posts when someone quotes him while posting to me, or if I get an "alert". Yucky!

Now, please carefully note what he did there, it's a lovely example of the blatant dishonesty of his that motivated me to dump him into ignore, and of the kind of deflection I so brilliantly (!) predicted in the OP:

I've never said that he and the other Regressive Lefties "defend the acts of Islamic terrorists". I have made their actual behaviors (primarily deflection) abundantly clear on this and many other threads. But nasty, dishonest straw man arguments are all they have in response to my points. Which essentially demonstrate my accuracy.

These are nasty, hateful, bigoted liars.
.

Well we knew this from the beginning. It feels kinda good to put some folks on ignore. I almost put him on ignore because of his Nazi reference but decided not to.

I hope the one example I provided for you is proof enough for him..(I laughed as I typed)

Hitler didn't condemn innocent Jews? Hitler didn't condemn Jewry itself, in general, by its nature,

the same way you condemn all of Islam by its nature?

 

[Freewill]

What? You're serious here?

Just from this board alone, you can't think of any examples of people deflecting to the evils of Christianity after a jihadist attack?

You can't think of Leftists leveraging "hasty generalizations" about Christians?

You can't think of any examples of leftists attacking Christianity for many of the same ideals or acts perpetrated by Islam?

You can't think of any times a leftist has deflected to "Islamophobia" or even "racism" when someone pointed out a misdeed of Islam?

There's no way you're serious.
.

You've never heard innocent Muslims condemned on this board? Fuckinay that's funny.

Another backhanded apology for Islam, just as the OP asked.

Islam isn't guilty. People are. You and the OP who condemn a religion for the acts of individuals are no different than Hitler and his condemnation of the Jews.

I've never condemned Islam or any other religion for the acts of individuals.
.

You lie. You never fail to attack people like myself who defend innocent Muslims, and innocent Muslims only.

What "innocent" Muslim did mac attack in this thread? I can't recall him attacking any Muslims, most time I consider him a closet liberal.

I am glad you will defend innocent gun owners.

 

[NYcarbineer]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

Muslim Vs. Christian Terrorist Kill Scores

Freewill, I put that poster on ignore about three years ago, and he knows it, yet he keeps posting to and about me. Interesting, huh? Unfortunately, I can still see his posts when someone quotes him while posting to me, or if I get an "alert". Yucky!

Now, please carefully note what he did there, it's a lovely example of the blatant dishonesty of his that motivated me to dump him into ignore, and of the kind of deflection I so brilliantly (!) predicted in the OP:

I've never said that he and the other Regressive Lefties "defend the acts of Islamic terrorists". I have made their actual behaviors (primarily deflection) abundantly clear on this and many other threads. But nasty, dishonest straw man arguments are all they have in response to my points. Which essentially demonstrate my accuracy.

These are nasty, hateful, bigoted liars.
.

Well we knew this from the beginning. It feels kinda good to put some folks on ignore. I almost put him on ignore because of his Nazi reference but decided not to.

I hope the one example I provided for you is proof enough for him..(I laughed as I typed)

How ironic is it that they're putting this much effort into derailing the thread, perfectly illustrating the very point of the thread?

It's who they are, it's what they are.
.

No one's derailing the thread. You admitted the thread was intended to be an attack on posters here.

 

[LoneLaugher]

They are conditioned to attack when they are exposed like this.

The fact remains that they are defensive of and very tolerant of Islam, that they deflect in favor of Islam (as is being so clearly demonstrated here), and they are very quick to attack Christianity as viciously as possible at every opportunity.

They can't deny those facts, so off the track they go.

My question here is why. Their motivation for this behavior. I think Dogmaphobe provided excellent theories in post 39.
.

You have yet to prove your theory.

Please name names. Provide examples of people here defending acts of Islamic terrorists and then attacking Christianity. Can you do that?

He can't name any because there aren't any.

He manipulates one's defense of innocent Muslims to try to make it appear they are defending terrorists.

Plus you can note his bigotry in the OP:

"This is so fascinating to watch, and election of London's new mayor is shedding even more light on it.

Members of one specific religion - a religion with a current record of extreme violence, intimidation and terror - are telling us precisely what they're going to do, and they're doing it. It's expansion is clear and rapid and undeniable. We're watching it happen in real time, particularly across Europe. This isn't a partisan or religious opinion, it is a clear fact, based on observation."

See how he starts with the election of London's new Muslim mayor, and then weasely launches into a rant about terrorists?
Classic guilt by association tactic.

But...Mac doesn't condemn all Muslims as terrorists. Those are just his words being misunderstood by us. It is clearly our problem.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You've never heard innocent Muslims condemned on this board? Fuckinay that's funny.

Another backhanded apology for Islam, just as the OP asked.

Islam isn't guilty. People are. You and the OP who condemn a religion for the acts of individuals are no different than Hitler and his condemnation of the Jews.

I've never condemned Islam or any other religion for the acts of individuals.
.

You lie. You never fail to attack people like myself who defend innocent Muslims, and innocent Muslims only.

What "innocent" Muslim did mac attack in this thread? I can't recall him attacking any Muslims, most time I consider him a closet liberal.

I am glad you will defend innocent gun owners.

He's attacking me for defending innocent Muslims.

I am an innocent gun owner fucktard.

 

[Mac1958]

Well then perhaps you would be kind enough to give a specific example and put away your hasty generalizations.

What? You're serious here?

Just from this board alone, you can't think of any examples of people deflecting to the evils of Christianity after a jihadist attack?

You can't think of Leftists leveraging "hasty generalizations" about Christians?

You can't think of any examples of leftists attacking Christianity for many of the same ideals or acts perpetrated by Islam?

You can't think of any times a leftist has deflected to "Islamophobia" or even "racism" when someone pointed out a misdeed of Islam?

There's no way you're serious.
.

You've never heard innocent Muslims condemned on this board? Fuckinay that's funny.

Another backhanded apology for Islam, just as the OP asked.

The type of response I predicted in the OP.

It is what it is.
.

Most all of Western Civilization was built on Christian values. So, if you want to change a nation, or continent, how do you do it? Tear down the belief system that it was created on.

What everyone needs understand is that the Wests citizens are no smarter than other cultures of the world. What is different is the freedom we have had, which allowed us as a culture to design, and build, modern society. We aren't stealing technology from the Chinese or the Middle East, they are stealing it from the West. It is no accident that Western Europe, and the United States......built from Western European cultures, lead the world in technology. But here is the thing------------>other cultures are so much easier to bamboozle, and enslave.

So why demonize Christianity? I think I covered it in the last paragraph, if leaders/politicians want to change societies from what they were/are, to socialism!

I can see that. Another example is how they're so aggressive in attacking the Founding Fathers. Tear them down and you tear down the document they created.
.

 

[LoneLaugher]

You've never heard innocent Muslims condemned on this board? Fuckinay that's funny.

Another backhanded apology for Islam, just as the OP asked.

Islam isn't guilty. People are. You and the OP who condemn a religion for the acts of individuals are no different than Hitler and his condemnation of the Jews.

I've never condemned Islam or any other religion for the acts of individuals.
.

You lie. You never fail to attack people like myself who defend innocent Muslims, and innocent Muslims only.

What "innocent" Muslim did mac attack in this thread? I can't recall him attacking any Muslims, most time I consider him a closet liberal.

I am glad you will defend innocent gun owners.

Read the OP. It contains a wholesale attack on the Muslim religion. Both Mac and I have attacked the Muslim religion in this thread. You haven't been able to recognize either attack. Why is that?