The reasons to impeach Obama!

[ReallyMeow]

Well, NO, presidents have a veto, they can use it to enforce the budget, blue presidents do, red presidents dont. Remember when bush was handed a surplus and promptly spent it? How about when obama was handed a 1.4t deficit and promptly shrunk it?

 

[UseCaution]

1) we are $16 trillion in debt; headed to $50 trillion and he wants to eliminate the debt ceiling because as a communist who voted to the left of Bernie Sanders he does not mind bankrupting the country he hates.


2) Obama is so desperate to callously spend our money, money we won't give him, and money he won't dare ask for in new taxes, he has virtually ordered the Fed to print all the money he needs. In fact, 70% of his recent record breaking very liberal deficits have been paid for with money that his obedient Treasury department has printed!!

Even Greece, the very best example of modern socialist profligacy, has a strict debt ceiling and absolutely no ability to print money in secret as Obama does.

I say because he live. For no other reason but to expedite. ​

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Well, NO, presidents have a veto, they can use it to enforce the budget,

too stupid it all depends on who controls Congress and polling showing what people and independents are thinking. We have separation of powers here, dear.

Remember when bush was handed a surplus and promptly spent it?

too stupid, Bush was a liberal and was handed 9/11, the tech bust plus 2 wars!!!

How about when obama was handed a 1.4t deficit and promptly shrunk it?

how about when he kept us in depression for 4 years so far, doubled the debt from 9 to 16 trillion and now wants to erase the debt ceiling altogether????????


See why we say a liberal will be slow, so very very slow!!

 

[jillian]

Well, NO, presidents have a veto, they can use it to enforce the budget,

too stupid it all depends on who controls Congress and polling showing what people and independents are thinking. We have separation of powers here, dear.

Remember when bush was handed a surplus and promptly spent it?

too stupid, Bush was a liberal and was handed 9/11, the tech bust plus 2 wars!!!

How about when obama was handed a 1.4t deficit and promptly shrunk it?

how about when he kept us in depression for 4 years so far, doubled the debt from 9 to 16 trillion and now wants to erase the debt ceiling altogether????????


See why we say a liberal will be slow, so very very slow!!

So if its all congress, then people should stop blaming the president for our recovery being less robust. Right?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Well, NO, presidents have a veto, they can use it to enforce the budget,

too stupid it all depends on who controls Congress and polling showing what people and independents are thinking. We have separation of powers here, dear.




too stupid, Bush was a liberal and was handed 9/11, the tech bust plus 2 wars!!!

How about when obama was handed a 1.4t deficit and promptly shrunk it?

how about when he kept us in depression for 4 years so far, doubled the debt from 9 to 16 trillion and now wants to erase the debt ceiling altogether????????


See why we say a liberal will be slow, so very very slow!!

So if its all congress, then people should stop blaming the president for our recovery being less robust. Right?

I didn't say its all Congress??????? I said power is divided among president congress people press and that the economy moves in 10 years cycles so it is very hard to find a correlation between just president and economy. Got it now???

 

[edthecynic]

I always laugh at all of the folks screaming about 16 trillion, even though they didn't make much of a stink all the way up to 9 trillion, as if that's more reasonable a figure.

too stupid and perfectly liberal!! Republicans were signing the pledge at $9 trillion too!! Jefferson the first Republican proposed the first Balanced Budget Amendment 200 years ago. Libturds have defeated 30 Balanced BUdget Amendments since then!!

And here you are implying that we need not to worry about $16 trillion!! Why not sub moron???

"Reagan proved deficits don't matter."
Dick Cheney

'I don't worry about the deficit. It's big enough to take care of itself.'
Ronald Reagan

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I always laugh at all of the folks screaming about 16 trillion, even though they didn't make much of a stink all the way up to 9 trillion, as if that's more reasonable a figure.

too stupid and perfectly liberal!! Republicans were signing the pledge at $9 trillion too!! Jefferson the first Republican proposed the first Balanced Budget Amendment 200 years ago. Libturds have defeated 30 Balanced BUdget Amendments since then!!

And here you are implying that we need not to worry about $16 trillion!! Why not sub moron???

"Reagan proved deficits don't matter."
Dick Cheney

'I don't worry about the deficit. It's big enough to take care of itself.'
Ronald Reagan

and??????????????

 

[edthecynic]

too stupid and perfectly liberal!! Republicans were signing the pledge at $9 trillion too!! Jefferson the first Republican proposed the first Balanced Budget Amendment 200 years ago. Libturds have defeated 30 Balanced BUdget Amendments since then!!

And here you are implying that we need not to worry about $16 trillion!! Why not sub moron???

"Reagan proved deficits don't matter."
Dick Cheney

'I don't worry about the deficit. It's big enough to take care of itself.'
Ronald Reagan

and??????????????

Too stupid, but 100% CON$ervoFascist.
What does your fear tell us about your IQ and character??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

"Reagan proved deficits don't matter."
Dick Cheney

'I don't worry about the deficit. It's big enough to take care of itself.'
Ronald Reagan

and??????????????

Too stupid, but 100% CON$ervoFascist.
What does your fear tell us about your IQ and character??

please say exactly what is too stupid or admit as a liberal you lack the IQ to do so. Thanks

 

[edthecynic]

and??????????????

Too stupid, but 100% CON$ervoFascist.
What does your fear tell us about your IQ and character??

please say exactly what is too stupid or admit as a liberal you lack the IQ to do so. Thanks

Thank you for admitting that as a member of the CON$ervoFascist Brotherhood you lack the IQ to know what is stupid about your posts.

March 01, 2012
RUSH: To put it bluntly, dumb people are too dumb to know it." It's a blessing! You know, the worst thing would be to be dumb and to know it -- and there's evidence all over that the dumb do not know they're dumb.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

ThanksThank you for admitting that as a member of the CON$ervoFascist Brotherhood you lack the IQ to know what is stupid about your posts.

dear, is there anyone who knows what's stupid in their posts?? If they did know they obviously would not make the post. Do you know whats stupid in your posts????


See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow?????

 

[ReallyMeow]

Well, NO, presidents have a veto, they can use it to enforce the budget,

too stupid it all depends on who controls Congress and polling showing what people and independents are thinking. We have separation of powers here, dear.

At any point did congress have the power to over ride the presidential veto? In particular, was there a red president and blue congress?
Composition of Congress by Party 1855?2013 ? Infoplease.com

Remember when bush was handed a surplus and promptly spent it?

too stupid, Bush was a liberal and was handed 9/11, the tech bust plus 2 wars!!!

BWAAAAA HAHAHA, you guys have no mercy. Is ANYONE a republican anymore? If not dubya, then who? reagan? heh, dont look his track record up. and bush arbitrarily decided to engage in both of those wars, we were not under invasion. the bush tax cuts were a self inflicted wound, they concisely prove that tax cuts on the rich do not lead to economic prosperity.

How about when obama was handed a 1.4t deficit and promptly shrunk it?

how about when he kept us in depression for 4 years so far, doubled the debt from 9 to 16 trillion and now wants to erase the debt ceiling altogether?[/QUOTE]
the debt was 10.5t when obama came into office and that deficit spending is 90% bushs, dumbass.
Is Obama responsible for a $5 trillion increase in the debt? - The Washington Post

Heres where we may find some common ground though, rather than have a wildly irresponsible system where we decide whether we are going to pay our bills after we have spent the money, we should figure out where the money is going to come from up front: Appropriation bill - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

At any point did congress have the power to over ride the presidential veto? In particular, was there a red president and blue congress?

Dear, presidents and congresses do what they can politicially. The center changes as the independents who decide elections flip flop back and forth. When the country moves left so do the Republicans, and when it moves right so do Democrats. Clinton is the prime example. The country made him say, "the era of big government is over." He didn't mean it for a second of course.

So now even you know the numbers of red and blue mean nothing compared to what independents are thinking.

 

[ReallyMeow]

That doesnt contest my central point, that for the last 30 years, republican presidents have been making concerted efforts to increase the national debt as much as possible, which democrat administrations have sought to lower it.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

That doesnt contest my central point, that for the last 30 years, republican presidents have been making concerted efforts to increase the national debt as much as possible, which democrat administrations have sought to lower it.

too stupid but perfectly 1000% liberal. Republicans have introduced 30 Balanced Budget Amendments all of which were killed by Democrats. They sign the pledge, libturds don't!! THey have shut down the government, not libturds. Republicans want a debt ceiling, libturds don't!

Republicans now want to cut spending, while BO doesn't!! Catchiong on now????


See why we are positive a liberal will be slow???

 

[Uncensored2008]

1) we are $16 trillion in debt; headed to $50 trillion and he wants to eliminate the debt ceiling because as a communist who voted to the left of Bernie Sanders he does not mind bankrupting the country he hates.


2) Obama is so desperate to callously spend our money, money we won't give him, and money he won't dare ask for in new taxes, he has virtually ordered the Fed to print all the money he needs. In fact, 70% of his recent record breaking very liberal deficits have been paid for with money that his obedient Treasury department has printed!!

Even Greece, the very best example of modern socialist profligacy, has a strict debt ceiling and absolutely no ability to print money in secret as Obama does.

The reason to Impeach Obama is the he ordered the murder of three American citizens on separate occasions, without warrant, indictment, or any hint of due process, in direct violation of the United States Constitution.

Obama should be impeached, removed from office, arrested, and tried on capital murder charges.

Standard Disclaimer: Joe murders his wife, and is sloppy about it. The police know Joe is guilty and are working to build a case for a Grand Jury indictment. Fred comes along and shoots Joe in the head, killing him. Is Fred guilty of a crime? Joe was known as a murderer, so did Fred do anything wrong? Yes, Fred is guilty of murder.

That Anwar Al-Awliki was indisputably a terrorist has zero bearing on his murder by Barack Obama. The way to handle a terrorist who is an American citizen is to arrest, prosecute, and THEN execute. Murder is NOT part of the American justice system.

Impeach and prosecute Barack Obama, who is irrefutably guilty of murder.

 

[Uncensored2008]

John Birch Society Song - YouTube

Quick, name the top three things the JBS was wrong about....


I got nothing...

 

[Uncensored2008]

The House, with its Republican majority, has only to draw up some charges and vote to impeach and Obama is impeached. That simple. So why don't they?

Because there are no legitimate grounds to impeach him on and doing so will only bite the Republicans in the ass in the long run, just like the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

I would concur with the person who said that Obama hates this country. I think he would sell it out in a heartbeat if the highest bidder offered him a seat of power, but until he does so, he has committed no "high crimes or misdemeanors".

Immie

You might rethink that.

{Is this the world we want? Where the president of the United States can place an American citizen, or anyone else for that matter, living outside a war zone on a targeted assassination list, and then have him murdered by drone strike. }

Anwar al-Awlaki's extrajudicial murder | Michael Ratner | World news | guardian.co.uk

Obama is very much impeachable, and should be immediately impeached, then prosecuted for murder. There is no doubt of his guilt.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

1) we are $16 trillion in debt; headed to $50 trillion and he wants to eliminate the debt ceiling because as a communist who voted to the left of Bernie Sanders he does not mind bankrupting the country he hates.


2) Obama is so desperate to callously spend our money, money we won't give him, and money he won't dare ask for in new taxes, he has virtually ordered the Fed to print all the money he needs. In fact, 70% of his recent record breaking very liberal deficits have been paid for with money that his obedient Treasury department has printed!!

Even Greece, the very best example of modern socialist profligacy, has a strict debt ceiling and absolutely no ability to print money in secret as Obama does.

The reason to Impeach Obama is the he ordered the murder of three American citizens on separate occasions, without warrant, indictment, or any hint of due process, in direct violation of the United States Constitution.

Obama should be impeached, removed from office, arrested, and tried on capital murder charges.

Standard Disclaimer: Joe murders his wife, and is sloppy about it. The police know Joe is guilty and are working to build a case for a Grand Jury indictment. Fred comes along and shoots Joe in the head, killing him. Is Fred guilty of a crime? Joe was known as a murderer, so did Fred do anything wrong? Yes, Fred is guilty of murder.

That Anwar Al-Awliki was indisputably a terrorist has zero bearing on his murder by Barack Obama. The way to handle a terrorist who is an American citizen is to arrest, prosecute, and THEN execute. Murder is NOT part of the American justice system.

Impeach and prosecute Barack Obama, who is irrefutably guilty of murder.

Well if you can kill an active enemy combatant far easier than arrest him I'd say, kill him asap, and so apparently do even most Republicans and Democrats.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well if you can kill an active enemy combatant far easier than arrest him I'd say, kill him asap, and so apparently do even most Republicans and Democrats.

Regardless of what you, or most dims and Republicans say, our CONSTITUTION says;

Article [V.]

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

When Obama murdered Al-Awliki and the other two, he violated the constitution and criminal law.