Like this:
From their first days at kindergarten, children are taught to rely on government kitchens for their lunches because parents are discouraged from providing nutritious food from home.
Fact or opinion?
Opinion. Parents aren't discouraged.
They may not be discouraged from lunches at home; they certainly are enabled to avoid making them at home.
I once taught in a small country town where kids could walk to town at lunch and get a good meal and some relaxation at lunch, even though school lunch was available.
That ended because the school lunch program was tied to federal funding, and when it dipped below a certain level, and money was at risk the policy changed and they went to a "closed campus".
One thing I did learn; if I wanted a great A+ rating when my standard observations from my supervisor was due, instead of teaching a history or geography lesson in my "social studies" class, I just did a "how to fill out federal forms" lesson.
Had to train them for how to get on the dole; that became the guiding principle of education, down in the Dirty South.
So many were on food stamps, and free lunch, that they did not even charge the few kids that could have paid, because it was not worth the book-keeping effort.
That school today serves, breakfast and lunch, and has the kitchen open all summer so the kids can walk over from the projects and get two free meals, in addition to the chips, sodas, candy and other junk their SNAP cards buy.
There is no doubt we have an epidemic of morbid obesity among youth and adults.
Government knows fatasses don't rebel.
Never doubt that.