The real 'threat to democracy'? Pols who polarize us with their opinions

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2013
47,215
25,495
2,605
Oregon
I've been saying since the verdict, that leaders are being very irresponsible by publicly slamming the decision by the jury. This does NOTHING but polarizing the population even further.
The decision was made by a jury of the defendants peers. Leaders need to respect that and act accordingly.


For the past few years we've heard a lot of accusations coming from Democrats about "threats to democracy." Of course, Donald Trump tops the list of their villains, but he's hardly alone. As far as his critics are concerned, Republicans in general are a threat to democracy.

Here's a headline from a piece in The Atlantic magazine this past April: "The GOP Is a Grave Threat to American Democracy."

 
I've been saying since the verdict, that leaders are being very irresponsible by publicly slamming the decision by the jury. This does NOTHING but polarizing the population even further.
The decision was made by a jury of the defendants peers. Leaders need to respect that and act accordingly.






Now why would they do that?
Who benefits from the polarization of America?
Certainly none of the above benefits the average American citizen. It does benefit those in politics and the Quisling biased Media complex that foment racism, class warfare and religious unrest.
Their aim is to claim that the population is in need of them and have to give them more power so they can stem the unrest that they themselves have created.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top