Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Vintage ignorant left-wing post. First make a claim that is 100% false. Then come back with “whatever” when proven wrong. That is how progressives view facts and the truth - “whatever”.WhateverSnowflake...you don’t have the faintest clue who I voted for. Your ignorant comment right here proves it.You voted for the most pro-corporation COC ever to darken the office
Just so you know, snowflake, I have never cast a single vote in my entire life for either Donald Trump or Gary Johnson. Never. Not once.
In fact, I was so disgusted with both Donald Trump and Hitlery Clinton that I didn’t even vote in the last election. I refused to. But unlike you, I’m not a partisan hack. And I can admit when I’m wrong.
Then YOU HAVE NO VOICE. STFU. No one cares to hear opinions from the uninvolved dregs of the political peanut gallery. Thanks for proving you can't even do pretty much the easiest civic responsibility we as citizens have. Game, Set, Match. You're a loser.
Snowflake...do you have any idea how insane you sound right now? We didn’t have “Net Neutrality” for the first 30 years of the internet and nobody was “affected badly”. Nobody. You’re such a blind, partisan hack that you have absolutely no idea what Net Neutrality was or what it did. You just know that you love Obama and he supported it so it must be “good”.This will affect ALL lovers and users of the internet.
So a corporation is offering consumers unlimited data to “binge” on platforms like Netflix, HBO, and Hulu. That’s a consumers dream. But what do the progressive fascist control freaks do? They lobby a government bureaucracy to kill it.That same year, T-Mobile introduced a “Binge On” plan, which offered customers unlimited data on some video options including Netflix, HBO, and Hulu.
While then-FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler called the “Binge On” plan “innovative,” progressive activists thought the plan was a clear violation of the brand new net neutrality regulations and lobbied the FCC to kill the plan.
So we went from FREE and UNLIMITED to an extra $25 per month thanks to idiot progressives such as yourself supporting “Net Neutrality”. And who does that hurt? Like all progressive policies - it hurts the poor. The wealthy can afford the $25 per month. The poor can’t.But before the FCC could act, T-Mobile ended Binge On and created a new plan called “Uncarrier,” which allows customers to download all the data they want, but charges an extra $25 to upgrade the quality of video from 480p to HD quality.
That is freaking hilarious. The people who have supported and created every unconstitutional “non-elected regulatory board” are the same one’s who cry like little bitches the moment they no longer control them.The Orange Virus appointed him to chair a NON-ELECTED regulatory board
I don’t surrender my 1st Amendment rights if I choose not to vote on an issue or an in election, fascist.Then YOU HAVE NO VOICE.
Didn’t that term go out in the mid-1980’s?You're a loser.
That’s the left’s entire view of facts and truth. When one is more interested in an ideology and propaganda, facts and the truth become “eh...whatever”.WhateverSnowflake...you don’t have the faintest clue who I voted for. Your ignorant comment right here proves it.You voted for the most pro-corporation COC ever to darken the office
I'm sure there's a point there, but considering the source, I don't care.Is there more now? Yeah, I agree with that, and I see two reasons: First, we're just worse and more divided with each President. We're just getting uglier. And second, the Left thought it was over, that demographics had finally taken over and they were on their way. This threw a huge monkey wrench into that notion and they completely lost their shit as a result. Their behavior been a big disappointment.There are always going to be differences. No two situations are EVER the same. Equivalency is rare.but the difference is that Palin was attacked for being who she is, Dolezal is being attacked for pretending to be something she isn't. Not anywhere near equivalent.
My point is that both ends shamelessly exploit any perceived weakness at every opportunity, regardless of the validity of the argument.
That allows them both to (a) ignore and avoid the sins of their own tribe, and (b) avoid concentrating on actually improving things.
.
I agree with you in principle, but it is quite evident that there are more attacks generated by the left than by the right, the constant attacking of Trump is much greater than any attacks on Obama, the difference being that much of the media are leftists who have not been able to get over Hillary losing.
the other problem IMHO is career politicians, the founders never intended being in congress to be a lifetime pursuit, they envisioned that people would serve the government for a term or two and then return to real life. Being in congress has become much too lucrative financially and that is why we see so much corruption, lying, and cheating.
The question is whether 2016 was a Big Change or a Last Gasp. My guess is the latter, but I'm lousy at political predictions.
.
Yep, because there is some sort of equivalency between Trump and Obama when it comes to WELL DESERVED contempt.
It's not that they are ACTUALLY different, it's that the left is just so much worse and not giving Trump the good will he deserves.
But thanks for the input, really.
.
I marvel at the restraint that conservatives display all over the nation on a daily basis. If this is me, there would be teeth all over the ground and a shit-ton of unconscious progressive fascists in my wake.Felarca — a well-known Antifa activist who advocates violence and squashing free speech — has been arrested for riot-related offenses a couple times herself.
Snowflake...do you have any idea how insane you sound right now? We didn’t have “Net Neutrality” for the first 30 years of the internet and nobody was “affected badly”. Nobody. You’re such a blind, partisan hack that you have absolutely no idea what Net Neutrality was or what it did. You just know that you love Obama and he supported it so it must be “good”.
Net Neutrality did what all progressive agenda do - took away freedom (in this case, internet freedom) and drastically increased costs.
It was about controlling the internet. It’s always about control with the left. Here is just one small example, you uneducated partisan hack:
That same year, T-Mobile introduced a “Binge On” plan, which offered customers unlimited data on some video options including Netflix, HBO, and Hulu.
While then-FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler called the “Binge On” plan “innovative,” progressive activists thought the plan was a clear violation of the brand new net neutrality regulations and lobbied the FCC to kill the plan.
So a corporation is offering consumers unlimited data to “binge” on platforms like Netflix, HBO, and Hulu. That’s a consumers dream. But what do the progressive fascist control freaks do? They lobby a government bureaucracy to kill it.
So we went from FREE and UNLIMITED to an extra $25 per month thanks to idiot progressives such as yourself supporting “Net Neutrality”. And who does that hurt? Like all progressive policies - it hurts the poor. The wealthy can afford the $25 per month. The poor can’t.But before the FCC could act, T-Mobile ended Binge On and created a new plan called “Uncarrier,” which allows customers to download all the data they want, but charges an extra $25 to upgrade the quality of video from 480p to HD quality.
Net Neutrality Is On the Outs. This Bill Would Repeal It for Good.
That is freaking hilarious. The people who have supported and created every unconstitutional “non-elected regulatory board” are the same one’s who cry like little bitches the moment they no longer control them.
You don’t want “non-elected regulatory boards”? Stop supporting big government fascists, you dimwit. The FCC was created under FDR, dumb ass.
I would bet everything I own that Tumbleweed lives in a trailer park. You can tell by his intellect and his dialogue.
Anyway, cool story, bro, yet irrelevant once again. Strike three, you're done.When one is more interested in an ideology and propaganda, facts and the truth become “eh...whatever”.
It's okay, I don't hate ya.
A “definition”. From the left-wing lunatics who created it.I already offered you the exact, non-partisan definition of NN. You give me a definition of... partisan, anecdotal nonsense. Who here is blinded by partisanship again?Snowflake...do you have any idea how insane you sound right now? We didn’t have “Net Neutrality” for the first 30 years of the internet and nobody was “affected badly”. Nobody. You’re such a blind, partisan hack that you have absolutely no idea what Net Neutrality was or what it did. You just know that you love Obama and he supported it so it must be “good”.
I already explained that. Your illiteracy is showing. It takes away the freedom to decide how you want to operate your internet business and it takes away a consumers freedom to decide. Please refer back to post #162 and ask a family member or friend to read it to you and then explain it to you.Oh yeah, genius? HOW? Can you tell me HOW it took away freedom? You'd better be detailed. I know you don't possess the capacity, but I'll bite. Please explain yourself.Net Neutrality did what all progressive agenda do - took away freedom (in this case, internet freedom) and drastically increased costs.
Every time you get owned with facts, you say stupid shit like “whatever” or “irrelevant”. More proof that you’re a blind, partisan hack.Entertaining, yet irrelevant.That is freaking hilarious. The people who have supported and created every unconstitutional “non-elected regulatory board” are the same one’s who cry like little bitches the moment they no longer control them.
The “treatment of data”.Net Neutrality concerns the treatment of data. It has nothing to do with limiting bandwidth
Good grief...your illiteracy is agonizing. I can see why you are a typical low IQ Dumbocrat voter.What lobby? You're simply lying.It was about controlling the internet. It’s always about control with the left. Here is just one small example, you uneducated partisan hack:
That same year, T-Mobile introduced a “Binge On” plan, which offered customers unlimited data on some video options including Netflix, HBO, and Hulu.
While then-FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler called the “Binge On” plan “innovative,” progressive activists thought the plan was a clear violation of the brand new net neutrality regulations and lobbied the FCC to kill the plan.
So a corporation is offering consumers unlimited data to “binge” on platforms like Netflix, HBO, and Hulu. That’s a consumers dream. But what do the progressive fascist control freaks do? They lobby a government bureaucracy to kill it.
Once again we see the left denying science, biology, and reality. Rachel Dolezal not only “identifies” as being black, she also apparently “identifies” as being poor.
Rachel Dolezal, former NAACP leader exposed as white, charged with welfare fraud
