The question I'd like to put out for discussion is, has the response to the violations of law always been part.....

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

Wait

You think people crossing the border illegally get a trial by jury?

They most certainly do. The U.S. Constitution applies to all people within the United States, regardless of their immigration status.

 

[kyzr]

They most certainly do. The U.S. Constitution applies to all people within the United States, regardless of their immigration status.

1. That would take too long for millions of illegals
2. They need to "Remain in Mexico" for their hearing.

Remain in Mexico - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

1. That would take too long for millions of illegals
2. They need to "Remain in Mexico" for their hearing.

Remain in Mexico - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Regardless of what YOU believe, the fact remains The U.S. Constitution applies to all people within the United States, regardless of their immigration status.

 

[the watcher]

Why is Congress and the State pushing back? Against the violations of "the law'? There is the spirit of "the law" and then there is the application of the "law". Power is a drug. Here's the people that make "the law", and how it works for them.

 

[kyzr]

Regardless of what YOU believe, the fact remains The U.S. Constitution applies to all people within the United States, regardless of their immigration status.

Based on what?
Non-citizens snuck in, they have no rights.
They get to remain in Mexico for their "hearing".

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

Based on what?
Non-citizens snuck in, they have no rights.
They get to remain in Mexico for their "hearing".

Based on legal precedence. Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86, 100–01 (1903); summary..
Aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognized as persons guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.


Additionally, foreign nationals living among us are "persons" within the meaning of the Constitution, and are protected by those rights that the Constitution does not expressly reserve to citizens.
The Dictator is deporting persons that were deprived of their Right to Due Process.

 

[kyzr]

Based on legal precedence. Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86, 100–01 (1903); summary..
Aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognized as persons guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Additionally, foreign nationals living among us are "persons" within the meaning of the Constitution, and are protected by those rights that the Constitution does not expressly reserve to citizens. The Dictator is deporting persons that were deprived of their Right to Due Process.

1903? Superseded by current immigration law, which gives them a "hearing", but the backlog is 10-years or more, so they are to "Remain in Mexico" until their hearing. That is current LAW.

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-administration-reinstating-remain-mexico-program-2025-01-21/

WASHINGTON, Jan 21 - The Trump administration said on Tuesday it was reinstating the "remain in Mexico" program, resuming an initiative that forced non-Mexican asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for the resolution of their U.S. cases.

 

[westwall]

Regardless of what YOU believe, the fact remains The U.S. Constitution applies to all people within the United States, regardless of their immigration status.

International law sets out remain in Mexico as the LAWFUL option.

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

1903? Superseded by current immigration law, which gives them a "hearing", but the backlog is 10-years or more, so they are to "Remain in Mexico" until their hearing. That is current LAW.

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-administration-reinstating-remain-mexico-program-2025-01-21/

WASHINGTON, Jan 21 - The Trump administration said on Tuesday it was reinstating the "remain in Mexico" program, resuming an initiative that forced non-Mexican asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for the resolution of their U.S. cases.

do keep up... my response was directed at

Wait

You think people crossing the border illegally get a trial by jury?

Show us where the constitution denies the right to Due Process to non citizens.

 

[schmidlap]

'Blatant violation of the Court's Order'

To be sure, there are those who abhor the rule of law, but for patriots who respect it, what can be done?

​

​

"I don't care what judges think!"​

​

​

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I don't recall you whining when Biden ignored SCOTUS on student loans

/thread

 

[IM2]

I don't recall you whining when Biden ignored SCOTUS on student loans

/thread

Let's stop trying to make ignoring a court decision to do something to help people with ignoring the court to commit human rights violations.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Let's stop trying to make ignoring a court decision to do something to help people with ignoring the court to commit human rights violations.

Why don't you stop annoying me. You can't have it both ways

 

[TemplarKormac]

Let's stop trying to make ignoring a court decision to do something to help people with ignoring the court to commit human rights violations.

Doing something wrong to do something right taints the good deed altogether.

 

[Polishprince]

Let's stop trying to make ignoring a court decision to do something to help people with ignoring the court to commit human rights violations.

What "human rights violations"? Do you really think that Venezuelan Gangsters have a "human right" to live in America?

Fortunately , another country volunteered to take them, and I hope they enjoy their new residence in El Salvador.

BTW, why didn't any of the libs' allies like Germany and Ukraine volunteer to take these ne'er-do-wells?

Ukraine is in need of cannon fodder, after all.

 

[1srelluc]

 

[80zephyr]

'Blatant violation of the Court's Order'

To be sure, there are those who abhor the rule of law, but for patriots who respect it, what can be done?

View attachment 1090484​

​

View attachment 1090490​

"I don't care what judges think!"​

​

​

Say, wasn't it the left that legalized marijuana and sanctuary cities?

 

[eagle1462010]

They need to stay in their lane.

These departments are managed by the executive branch.

 

[Independent thinker]

'Blatant violation of the Court's Order'

To be sure, there are those who abhor the rule of law, but for patriots who respect it, what can be done?

View attachment 1090484​

​

View attachment 1090490​

"I don't care what judges think!"​

​

​

Simple answer: Get rid of democrats.

 

[IM2]

Doing something wrong to do something right taints the good deed altogether.

Where was the supreme court when the banks got bailed out? Where were you right-wing stooges when farmers got bailed out? So was Biden wrong or did the court pull a Dred Scott?