The question I'd like to put out for discussion is, has the response to the violations of law always been part.....

The left will lie about anything. I particularly love it when they claim republicans are in disarray and fragmented, at the very same time the democrat party is disintegrating.

If you take whats going on with Democrats as disintegrating, you're as delusional as you come off.

Democrats are as pissed off right now as I have seen them in my lifetime. The midterms next year will be a wipeout of Republicans, as that anger is going to turn in to record high turnout.

Trumps second two years will be defunded, and shut down. And Senate Republicans will have to take their tongues out of his ass, because they are going to have to face angry constituents themselves.

Trump will be a demented and broken 82 year old that can't run again. And the reality that there will be criminal charges in state courts waiting for him. his last years won't be pleasant ones.
 
Trump thinks he should be able to do whatever he wants with no one ever questioning him.

His "advisors" try and find some sort of justification for his actions but rarely are they actually applicable.

Trump has went his entire life not having to deal with "no".
And leftists judges think they can create their own laws
 
If you take whats going on with Democrats as disintegrating, you're as delusional as you come off.

Democrats are as pissed off right now as I have seen them in my lifetime. The midterms next year will be a wipeout of Republicans, as that anger is going to turn in to record high turnout.

Trumps second two years will be defunded, and shut down. And Senate Republicans will have to take their tongues out of his ass, because they are going to have to face angry constituents themselves.

Trump will be a demented and broken 82 year old that can't run again. And the reality that there will be criminal charges in state courts waiting for him. his last years won't be pleasant ones.

It's going to be a long two years for you.
 
If you take whats going on with Democrats as disintegrating, you're as delusional as you come off.

Democrats are as pissed off right now as I have seen them in my lifetime. The midterms next year will be a wipeout of Republicans, as that anger is going to turn in to record high turnout.

Trumps second two years will be defunded, and shut down. And Senate Republicans will have to take their tongues out of his ass, because they are going to have to face angry constituents themselves.

Trump will be a demented and broken 82 year old that can't run again. And the reality that there will be criminal charges in state courts waiting for him. his last years won't be pleasant ones.
Democrat voters as a whole want the party to move back to the center. The ones pissed off at Schumer are the progressives. Progressives aren't going to win against republicans, except in some local House districts and even those are very few and far between. For example, AOC is not going to defeat a Republican in a state wide race for senator.
 
......of the plan or did the pushback catch the admin off guard?

A federal judge on Saturday ordered the Trump administration to cease use of an obscure wartime law to deport Venezuelans without a hearing, saying that any planes that had departed the United States with immigrants under the law needed to return.

As of early Sunday morning, it was unclear whether any such planes had departed or returned.

On Saturday, the administration published an executive order invoking the law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, to target Venezuelan gang members in the United States.

But shortly after the announcement, James E. Boasberg, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., said he would issue a temporary order blocking the government from deporting any immigrants under the law.


Put another way, when Russ Vought sat down to write the P 2025 playbook, the one trump knows nothing about ;), was it his desire to see virtually every part of its enactment challenged in court? Did Pam Bondi know what was coming when she incredulously answered a question during her confirmation testimony about how she would handle trump asking her to use the DoJ for illegal acts?

Does the board think the necessity of funneling multiple cases questioning the authority trump is asserting to his friendly SC was eagerly anticipated or an unexpected obstacle?

Is the rule of law being intentionally broken so it can be reshaped to match trump's desires or did they think the fictitious mandate Don has claimed would be enough to steamroll the Constitution?

BTW, Judge Boasberg was originally nominated to be a judge by Shrub.
Lawfare.
 
I did that? Dang, that's something you would think I would remember.

Wow..

"You guys".... that would seem to indicate a group of people..
 
Trump thinks he should be able to do whatever he wants with no one ever questioning him.

His "advisors" try and find some sort of justification for his actions but rarely are they actually applicable.

Trump has went his entire life not having to deal with "no".
He ignored the court order ans sent them anyway.
 
......of the plan or did the pushback catch the admin off guard?

A federal judge on Saturday ordered the Trump administration to cease use of an obscure wartime law to deport Venezuelans without a hearing, saying that any planes that had departed the United States with immigrants under the law needed to return.

As of early Sunday morning, it was unclear whether any such planes had departed or returned.

On Saturday, the administration published an executive order invoking the law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, to target Venezuelan gang members in the United States.

But shortly after the announcement, James E. Boasberg, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., said he would issue a temporary order blocking the government from deporting any immigrants under the law.


Put another way, when Russ Vought sat down to write the P 2025 playbook, the one trump knows nothing about ;), was it his desire to see virtually every part of its enactment challenged in court? Did Pam Bondi know what was coming when she incredulously answered a question during her confirmation testimony about how she would handle trump asking her to use the DoJ for illegal acts?

Does the board think the necessity of funneling multiple cases questioning the authority trump is asserting to his friendly SC was eagerly anticipated or an unexpected obstacle?

Is the rule of law being intentionally broken so it can be reshaped to match trump's desires or did they think the fictitious mandate Don has claimed would be enough to steamroll the Constitution?

BTW, Judge Boasberg was originally nominated to be a judge by Shrub.
The judge overstepped his authority, skippy.
 
Then take that up with them and address what I said to me.
I did address it, whether YOU support it or not, the left has broken all the laws allowing them to come here.

Under their plan, well have millions per year coming over, and the system will be so back logged they will never have a court date, even if they show up for the court hearing.
 
Well, at least our Stalinists are making it quite clear that that their only political priority is to destroy this country by any means necessary
 
Back
Top Bottom