The War Powers Act of 1973 is easily brushed aside when it stands in the way of something a president wants.
Will They Call It A Police Action?
Will They Call It A Police Action?
If Hillary Clinton did it as secretary of state imagine what she can do as president.
“Secretary Clinton decided she had to get rid of Gadhafi because she wanted to take credit when she ran for president for being the government official responsible for liberating Libya,” Napolitano said.
Clinton knew she would never get a declaration of war from Congress or authorization under the war powers resolution enacted over President Nixon’s veto in 1973, he asserted.
“So, Secretary Clinton persuaded Obama to use CIA intelligence assets who would be exempted from the war powers resolution even if they wore military fatigues in Libya.”
Napolitano explained that to use intelligence assets under the war powers resolution, Clinton needed the cooperation and informal consent of the “Congress within the Congress,” referring to the House Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, which are sworn to secrecy.
“The result is the president of the United States, the secretary of state and about two dozen people in the House and Senate, including the leadership of both parties in both houses, can authorize a clandestine war using CIA assets,” he said.
“And this is exactly what President Obama and Secretary Clinton did.”
Clinton knew she would never get a declaration of war from Congress or authorization under the war powers resolution enacted over President Nixon’s veto in 1973, he asserted.
“So, Secretary Clinton persuaded Obama to use CIA intelligence assets who would be exempted from the war powers resolution even if they wore military fatigues in Libya.”
Napolitano explained that to use intelligence assets under the war powers resolution, Clinton needed the cooperation and informal consent of the “Congress within the Congress,” referring to the House Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, which are sworn to secrecy.
“The result is the president of the United States, the secretary of state and about two dozen people in the House and Senate, including the leadership of both parties in both houses, can authorize a clandestine war using CIA assets,” he said.
“And this is exactly what President Obama and Secretary Clinton did.”
Judge Napolitano: Case exposes Hillary's 'secret war'
Posted By Jerome R. Corsi On 10/05/2016 @ 9:10 pm
Judge Napolitano: Case exposes Hillary’s ‘secret war’
Posted By Jerome R. Corsi On 10/05/2016 @ 9:10 pm
Judge Napolitano: Case exposes Hillary’s ‘secret war’
The truth is that Hillary Clinton & Company do not kill to satisfy personal ambition, or policy, or even to win a war. They kill because killing is the only thing that satisfies freaks like Hillary Clinton and Obama.
I was right on the money years ago when I repeatedly referred to Hillary’s bloodlust. Hillary’s taste for killing should only come as a surprise if you believe the media. She was soaked in blood before she ran for the Senate. The killing she ordered in the Waco Massacre whetted her appetite for the mass killing she ordered in the Middle East. After all that is known about Hillary Clinton the media is still hiding the blood on her hands.
Finally, power corrupts is a hackneyed observation if killing is not the ultimate power.
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad man. John Emerich Edward Dalberg
Hillary is not a great woman, but she is proof that cruel women with power are almost always bad women.
Last edited: