Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 136,393
- 28,255
- 2,180
...n or you are just in denial about racism in this country.
...
No one denies that YOU are a vile racist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...n or you are just in denial about racism in this country.
...
No one denies that YOU are a vile racist.
Naw, man, you're relying too much on leftist race-baiting to shield you from a failed attempt at argument.Naw, you are really just stupid.. and either you are a sub-moron or you are just in denial about racism in this country.
And frankly, I'm at the point where I don't care which.
Naw, man, you're relying too much
According to the 1860 census there were four and a half million blacks in the USA. There were over 500,000 free blacks that year. I think a half million people qualify as quite a few as I said. That looks to me to be about twenty percent of the total black population.Hey, having a law on the books does not change society, you stupid cow.
I mean, seriously, are you really this stupid?
No, there really weren't.
Only about 10% of the black population was "Free" in 1860.
According to the 1860 census there were four and a half million blacks in the USA. There were over 500,000 free blacks that year. I think a half million people qualify as quite a few as I said. That looks to me to be about twenty percent of the total black population.
Let me know when you can behave like a grownup and not litter your comments with schoolboy insults.Let me know when you have something to add to a conversation which isn't whatever you heard on Hate Radio and think is an original idea.
Would that be the Emancipation Proclamation that freed slaves from the Democrat Party, the Party of Slavery?Um... no. 500,000/4,500,000 = 11%.
The few free blacks who did volunteer to serve in the Civil War were put in segregated regiments, and Lincoln had to fight to get those.
In fact, colored regiments could not be formed until after the Emancipation Proclamation.
Let me know
After all your nasty comments about Jews, you’re not one to call other people hateful.Let me know when you have something to add to a conversation which isn't whatever you heard on Hate Radio and think is an original idea.
Would that be the Emancipation Proclamation that freed slaves from the Democrat Party, the Party of Slavery?
After all your nasty comments about Jews, you’re not one to call other people hateful.
I see. It’s gotten so bad for you that you’re forced to invent a class of “Southern inbreds” as your excuse for slavery that was a product of the Democrat party, the Party of Slavery.Um, no, that would be the Southern inbreds who all joined the GOP when Democrats supported Civil Rights.
We threw them out, you welcomed them with open arms.
religion isn't a race.
If you are going to go through life acting like a jerk because you think you are God's Chosen People... I'm happy to point out that there isn't a God and most of the misery you people get you bring down on yourselves.
I see. It’s gotten so bad for you that you’re forced to invent a class of “Southern inbreds”
I don;t have to invent them... just turn on Fox News and you'll see them.
Slack jawed white trash morons who keep voting against their own economic interests out of morbid fear a darky might get something.
Slack jawed white trash morons who keep voting against their own economic interests out of morbid fear a darky might get something.
One had nothing to do with the other. The Emancipation Proclamation only covered slaves in the states that were in rebellion against the Union, NOT slaves held in Union states like Maryland and Kentucky.Um... no. 500,000/4,500,000 = 11%.
The few free blacks who did volunteer to serve in the Civil War were put in segregated regiments, and Lincoln had to fight to get those.
In fact, colored regiments could not be formed until after the Emancipation Proclamation.
You're right my math was off.Um... no. 500,000/4,500,000 = 11%.
The few free blacks who did volunteer to serve in the Civil War were put in segregated regiments, and Lincoln had to fight to get those.
In fact, colored regiments could not be formed until after the Emancipation Proclamation.
One had nothing to do with the other. The Emancipation Proclamation only covered slaves in the states that were in rebellion against the Union, NOT slaves held in Union states like Maryland and Kentucky.
No they were already free men. The Emancipation Proclamation had nothing to do with them. Blacks were just as unpopular in the Union as they were in the Confederacy. By modern standards, the most ardent abolitionist was an utter and unredeemable racist. The most liberal whites of the time KNEW, didn't just think, they KNEW, deep down in their bones, that ALL minorities were inferior to whites. Abolitionists were anti-slavery, not pro-black. Poor whites, especially recent immigrants, saw free blacks as direct economic competition that kept their wages low and took their jobs.But the 54th and other colored regiments couldn't be organized until it was. They didn't serve side by side with the white soldiers.
Conversely, when Lincoln started a draft, there were riots among white people where black people were lynched in NYC.
No they were already free men. The Emancipation Proclamation had nothing to do with them. Blacks were just as unpopular in the Union as they were in the Confederacy. By modern standards, the most ardent abolitionist was an utter and unredeemable racist. The most liberal whites of the time KNEW, didn't just think, they KNEW, deep down in their bones, that ALL minorities were inferior to whites. Abolitionists were anti-slavery, not pro-black. Poor whites, especially recent immigrants, saw free blacks as direct economic competition that kept their wages low and took their jobs.