The Politicization of the Dept of Justice- Investigates Parade float

[NYcarbineer]

The article is a lie. The CRS sent someone to Nebraska.

From the CRS website:

CRS uses conflict resolution strategies and does not investigate, prosecute, impose solutions, assign blame, or assess fault.

Of course you're free to pretend otherwise.

What We Do | CRS | Department of Justice

the funny part is, you actually believe that shit.., don't you ?

Only the ignorant refuse to believe an irrefutable, undeniable fact.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

The article is a lie. The CRS sent someone to Nebraska.

From the CRS website:

CRS uses conflict resolution strategies and does not investigate, prosecute, impose solutions, assign blame, or assess fault.

Of course you're free to pretend otherwise.

What We Do | CRS | Department of Justice

Why the **** are they there? The CRS is chartered to resolve disputes, not to jump into non existent problems that only exist in the minds of idiots that think mocking the president is a right reserved to Democrats when a Republican is president.

First acknowledge that the OP lied.

You're full of shit. Liberals think they can change the debate by focusing on an obscure word or phrase and somehow that negates the facts. WRONG. The National Democrat Party in Nebraska were offended by a float in a parade so they called the DOJ and asked for this man to be investigated who in turn is using CRS to do their first leg of intimidating and shutting this man's free speech rights down- sending a message that dear leader cannot be criticized. That is the mark of a true tyrant. How the **** is an outhouse racist??? ROFLMAO You ******* crybabies.. go get a diaper and diaper your boy king. Put a ******* lid on his incessant whining. Embarrassment doesn't begin to describe this nation's feeling toward that clusterfuck.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Did the DOJ send the CRS to investigate the Black Panthers???

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

When were leftists groups targeted for their outrageous language toward Bush and investigated?? Show us the times the "CRS" was sent over speech??

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Anti-Obama political satire is not only frowned upon in Obama's America, it's considered possibly criminal, because the Holder Justice Department - which refuses to properly investigate the IRS targeting of American citizens - actually saw fit to send an DOJ emissary to the town to investigate a stupid parade float

Holder DOJ Finally Finds A Scandal Worth Investigating - An Anti-Obama Parade Float

Indeed.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

In case you're wondering - yeah, that's Bush’s head in a basket after being decapitated by a guillotine, at an Obama campaign rally, Denver, October 26, 2008.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Remember this about the rodeo clown:
NAACP calls on Justice Dept., Secret Service to investigate rodeo clown flap - Washington Times

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Obama needs to grow a set and so does his lackey ,Crybaby Holder who sees a racist boogeyman around every corner and who stands in contempt of Congress. What a disgusting circus these liberal assclowns have made of our nation.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

AG Holder explodes over contempt of Congress citation | Human Events


LOL

 

[Statistikhengst]

AG Holder explodes over contempt of Congress citation | Human Events


LOL

Didn't know that Eric Holder's nickname is suddenly "Stonewall"....


And what a great neutral source you got there.

Uh, you do realize that this "news" is more than 3 months old, right?





Oh, Right-Wing intelligence. A wonder to behold.

 

[JoeB131]

DOJ investigates Nebraska parade float critical of Obama - Washington Times

So the IRS, Benghazi, Fast N Furious all do not warrant investigation but a parade float critical of dear leader does? More and more this NUTTER in the WH is sounding tyrannical. The Constitution protects free speech to include political expression.

Um, all those thing have been investigated.

You've had seven investigations of Benghazi. (Psst. Psst. It was still about a video!) Oh, yeah, and we caught the guy who did it. (Unlike Bush, who never caught the guy who did 9/11, or found those WMD's)

So a Community Relations Team Member sits in on a meeting between the racist asshole who made this float and the NAACP complaining about it, and you guys are up in arms.

Oh, what a world we live in where you can't be a racist asshole without someone complaining about it.

 

[BlindBoo]

And now for the real story

The Department of Justice (DOJ), under the Bush Administration,............

Politicization of Department of Justice | Center for Public Integrity

Does that somehow justify what is happening now? You do understand that the person who started this thread has criticized Bush right in this thread, don't you?

Excuse me if I don't get outraged at the DOJ sending someone from Public Relation to look into a float. That is not politicization. The link actually describes how that was done.

"Under law, certain DOJ positions are reserved for political appointees, but legal internships, assistant U.S. Attorney positions, and immigration judgeships are supposed to be filled without regard to political affiliation. Before 2003, those interested in becoming immigration judges generally applied in response to public job postings, but then, according to a report by the DOJ inspector general, the White House and the Office of the Attorney General began expressing interest in these positions. Monica Goodling, DOJ White House liaison and senior counsel to the Attorney General, judged candidates for these and other jobs on criteria that included membership in a conservative legal society, statements on their “political philosophy,” and opinions on hot-button issues like abortion and gay marriage."

 

[Dante]

DOJ investigates Nebraska parade float critical of Obama - Washington Times

So the IRS, Benghazi, Fast N Furious all do not warrant investigation but a parade float critical of dear leader does? More and more this NUTTER in the WH is sounding tyrannical. The Constitution protects free speech to include political expression.

Why do you waste everyone's time with these Washington Times pieces?

We click over to the whacky site and we find the headlines are never justified by the stories. A racial thing with -- gulp -- somebody from Justice who handles racial complaints meeting with NAACP



This is a Rubber Room thread, but gawd forbid anyone put it where it belongs

Conspiracy thread?

http://www.justice.gov/crs/what-we-do

 

[Quantum Windbag]

The article is a lie. The CRS sent someone to Nebraska.

From the CRS website:

CRS uses conflict resolution strategies and does not investigate, prosecute, impose solutions, assign blame, or assess fault.

Of course you're free to pretend otherwise.

What We Do | CRS | Department of Justice

Why the **** are they there? The CRS is chartered to resolve disputes, not to jump into non existent problems that only exist in the minds of idiots that think mocking the president is a right reserved to Democrats when a Republican is president.

First acknowledge that the OP lied.

What part was a lie? Did the DOJ not send someone into an Oklahoma town when there is no legitimate reason for them being there? Is it not a fact that, despite what your link says, the law specifically authorizes the CRS to conduct investigations?

§2000a–4. Community Relations Service; investigations and hearings; executive session; release of testimony; duty to bring about voluntary settlements

The Service is authorized to make a full investigation of any complaint referred to it by the court under section 2000a–3(d) of this title and may hold such hearings with respect thereto as may be necessary. The Service shall conduct any hearings with respect to any such complaint in executive session, and shall not release any testimony given therein except by agreement of all parties involved in the complaint with the permission of the court, and the Service shall endeavor to bring about a voluntary settlement between the parties.
(Pub. L. 88–352, title II, §205, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 244.)

42 U.S.C. 2000a-4 - Sec. 2000a-4 - Community Relations Service; investigations and hearings; executive session; release of testimony; duty to bring about voluntary settlements :: 1996 US Code :: US Codes and Statutes :: US Law :: Justia

In other words, the OP is not a lie. That makes you wrong, as usual, because all you have is lies.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

The article is a lie. The CRS sent someone to Nebraska.

From the CRS website:

CRS uses conflict resolution strategies and does not investigate, prosecute, impose solutions, assign blame, or assess fault.

Of course you're free to pretend otherwise.

What We Do | CRS | Department of Justice

the funny part is, you actually believe that shit.., don't you ?

Only the ignorant refuse to believe an irrefutable, undeniable fact.

Like the fact that it is impossible to resolve a conflict unless you actually investigate to see what is going on, which is why the CRS actually does investigate complaints?

Nice to see you admit your ignorance though

 

[Quantum Windbag]

And now for the real story

The Department of Justice (DOJ), under the Bush Administration,............

Politicization of Department of Justice | Center for Public Integrity

Does that somehow justify what is happening now? You do understand that the person who started this thread has criticized Bush right in this thread, don't you?

Excuse me if I don't get outraged at the DOJ sending someone from Public Relation to look into a float. That is not politicization. The link actually describes how that was done.

"Under law, certain DOJ positions are reserved for political appointees, but legal internships, assistant U.S. Attorney positions, and immigration judgeships are supposed to be filled without regard to political affiliation. Before 2003, those interested in becoming immigration judges generally applied in response to public job postings, but then, according to a report by the DOJ inspector general, the White House and the Office of the Attorney General began expressing interest in these positions. Monica Goodling, DOJ White House liaison and senior counsel to the Attorney General, judged candidates for these and other jobs on criteria that included membership in a conservative legal society, statements on their “political philosophy,” and opinions on hot-button issues like abortion and gay marriage."

Does the fact that you are not outraged somehow excuse the fact that you wrongly accursed the OP of political bias? Does the fact that your personal bias blinds you to a blatantly political act somehow force me to agree with you?

Is there something about Bush that makes the fact that every single president appoints DOJ lawyers for political reasons suddenly not matter? Are you outraged that it works the same way under Obama, except for the organizations they belong to?

Every thinking person on the planet should be outraged whenever the government steps in to investigate a clear exercise of human rights that does not break a law, or infringe on anyone else's rights. The fact that you choose only to be outraged when a Republican does it tells the rest of us how insignificant you are.

 

[idb]

Does that somehow justify what is happening now? You do understand that the person who started this thread has criticized Bush right in this thread, don't you?

Excuse me if I don't get outraged at the DOJ sending someone from Public Relation to look into a float. That is not politicization. The link actually describes how that was done.

"Under law, certain DOJ positions are reserved for political appointees, but legal internships, assistant U.S. Attorney positions, and immigration judgeships are supposed to be filled without regard to political affiliation. Before 2003, those interested in becoming immigration judges generally applied in response to public job postings, but then, according to a report by the DOJ inspector general, the White House and the Office of the Attorney General began expressing interest in these positions. Monica Goodling, DOJ White House liaison and senior counsel to the Attorney General, judged candidates for these and other jobs on criteria that included membership in a conservative legal society, statements on their “political philosophy,” and opinions on hot-button issues like abortion and gay marriage."

Does the fact that you are not outraged somehow excuse the fact that you wrongly accursed the OP of political bias? Does the fact that your personal bias blinds you to a blatantly political act somehow force me to agree with you?

Is there something about Bush that makes the fact that every single president appoints DOJ lawyers for political reasons suddenly not matter? Are you outraged that it works the same way under Obama, except for the organizations they belong to?

Every thinking person on the planet should be outraged whenever the government steps in to investigate a clear exercise of human rights that does not break a law, or infringe on anyone else's rights. The fact that you choose only to be outraged when a Republican does it tells the rest of us how insignificant you are.

There was no investigation.
There you go...you can now go about the rest of your day a little less upset.

 

[Erand7899]

LOL that says a lot more about that inbred hillbilly than president Obama, what a shitstain.

What it says is that this administration is so paranoid, and so enraptured with the bullying aspects of federal power, that they continually attempt to instill fear of government reprisal for any criticism of the President. The fact that it bothers you not in the least, is telling on your abject political partisanship.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Politicization of the Dept of Justice- Investigates Parade float

DOJ always looks at the other side more closely?

Remember Bush's DOJ? They were justifying torture, for heavens sake.

 

[OKTexas]

My question is where the hell has Americas sense of humor gone? Damn, as Red Skelton said, "Don't take life too seriously, because you ain't gonna get out of it alive anyways.".