The Plot to Manage Democracy

Those seeking the power resist and try to overturn all efforts that make it more difficult to cheat in the voter registration and election process. They aren't even reluctant any more to say that their intent is to do away with the electoral college, the First and Second Amendments. And once they obtain control of government again, they will enlarge and so pack the Supreme Court with Democrat activists that it will forever simply be a rubber stamp of anything they do.

The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the founding documents, real American history will no longer be available in school curriculum and children will be even more strongly indoctrinated that the government is good and necessary for their well being and it is immoral to question it. The goal is total control that they'll never ever have to give up again, i.e. totalitarianism.

I think most Democrats do not want that but they are too programmed/indoctrinated to be able to admit what they have to see is happening. They continue to defend it and attack any who object to it. And when those seeking total power achieve it, those hapless Democrats will see how they have been used as useful idiots and will be horrified at what they have wrought.
I guess I'm not all that freaked out about this "cheating" when it's never really shown to be a problem. In 2020, the right claimed over and over again that they had proof of widespread cheating but it never turned out to exist.
 
To be clear, the main threat to democracy is not being able to shitpost on Twitter. Is that right?
There are plenty of shitposts as you put it on X (formerly Twitter.) The Democrats hostility and efforts to shut down Elon Musk's policy of allowing ALL points of view to be expressed on X is one illustration of their contempt for the First Amendment. To the Democrats, disinformation is what THEY say it is and they demand to be able to dictate what the public is and is not allowed to see, hear, know.

The rumor is Musk is working on developing a really good search engine to rival Google and Microsoft but that will not allow the deep state to dictate what will be seen and what will be suppressed on it. It will allow all points of view. You can certainly expect all kinds of lawfare to be engaged to keep him from doing that.

Controlling the message is one of the first initiatives of an intended Marxist coup and the Democrats are dangerously close to achieving that. The Founders trust the people to be able to evaluate and sort out truth from fiction when all voices are heard. The Democrats definitely don't want the people to have any opportunity to do that. They want to dictate what the message is from what pronouns will be allowed to how much authority parents will have over their children to what is 'hate speech' to what is 'disinformation.' And any who challenge their policy will be labeled existential threats to 'our democracy.'
 
Last edited:
There are plenty of shitposts as you put it on X (formerly Twitter.) The Democrats hostility and efforts to shut down Elon Musk's policy of allowing ALL points of view to be expressed on X is one illustration of their contempt for the First Amendment. To the Democrats, disinformation is what THEY say it is and they demand to be able to dictate what the public is and is not allowed to see, hear, know.

Controlling the message is one of the first initiatives of an intended Marxist coup and the Democrats are dangerously close to achieving that.
As a result, we have widespread delusions like the government controlling weather. Is that making the country better or worse?
 
I guess I'm not all that freaked out about this "cheating" when it's never really shown to be a problem. In 2020, the right claimed over and over again that they had proof of widespread cheating but it never turned out to exist.
We may never know since so much of the 'evidence' was destroyed or compromised before serious audits could be completed. I honestly don't know whether there was enough cheating to make a difference but being very heavily involved in the process on election night I am reasonably certain cheating was not only wide spread but significant.

And the Democrats taking advantage of COVID to revise, often illegally, the process and rules to not only make cheating easier but to encourage it, only reinforces the widespread opinion that a whole lot of the vote was not on the up and up.
 
We may never know since so much of the 'evidence' was destroyed or compromised before serious audits could be completed. I honestly don't know whether there was enough cheating to make a difference but being very heavily involved in the process on election night I am reasonably certain cheating was not only wide spread but significant.

And the Democrats taking advantage of COVID to revise, often illegally, the process and rules to not only make cheating easier but to encourage it, only reinforces the widespread opinion that a whole lot of the vote was not on the up and up.
And what facts make you so certain that there was widespread cheating on election night?

What changes "encouraged" cheating?
 
And what facts make you so certain that there was widespread cheating on election night?

What changes "encouraged" cheating?
You've read all the threads that has been discussed ad nauseum. Don't pretend ignorance please. It doesn't become you.

I will give you one example here in New Mexico. Normally we have to ask for a mail in ballot in order to get one. The governor changed the rules in 2020 to just send everybody a ballot in hopes they would mail it in instead of voting in person. The laws here would not allow her to require there would be no in person voting.

My husband and I live alone. We received five ballots in 2020, one for each of us, one for our son and then daughter-in-law who lived with us briefly decades ago--both live out of state now--and one for the previous owner of our house, now deceased. We most likely could have filled out every one of those ballots, mailed them in, and they probably would have been accepted. A friend involved in checking signatures said people just glanced at the sigs and really didn't bother to compare the one on file with the signature on the envelope.

Once the ballot is separated from the envelope, any audit of the process becomes impossible.

We trashed all the ballots and voted in person. But that's just one small example of the problems with the 2020 election. There were millions and millions of other problems all over the country.
 
You've read all the threads that has been discussed ad nauseum. Don't pretend ignorance please. It doesn't become you.

I will give you one example here in New Mexico. Normally we have to ask for a mail in ballot in order to get one. The governor changed the rules in 2020 to just send everybody a ballot in hopes they would mail it in instead of voting in person. The laws here would not allow her to require there would be no in person voting.

My husband and I live alone. We received five ballots in 2020, one for each of us, one for our son and then daughter-in-law who lived with us briefly decades ago--both live out of state now--and one for the previous owner of our house, now deceased. We most likely could have filled out every one of those ballots, mailed them in, and they probably would have been accepted. A friend involved in checking signatures said people just glanced at the sigs and really didn't bother to compare the one on file with the signature on the envelope.

Once the ballot is separated from the envelope, any audit of the process becomes impossible.

We trashed all the ballots and voted in person. But that's just one small example of the problems with the 2020 election. There were millions and millions of other problems all over the country.
New Mexico didn't send out ballots to everyone, they sent out applications for ballots to everyone. There's a difference between sending a ballot and sending an application for a ballot.

 
New Mexico didn't send out ballots to everyone, they sent out applications for ballots to everyone. There's a difference between sending a ballot and sending an application for a ballot.

Perhaps. But I'm pretty darn sure if we had returned five applications we would have received five ballots. I grew up in this state and have lived here as a voting adult for a very long time. There is absolutely no way a New Mexico knows if their ballot was counted as they voted or if it was counted at all. And that is just one of the problems here.
 
Few of my posts generate more negative evaluations, even hostility, than does my belief that the Democrats goals/intentions are to achieve essentially a totalitarian government. They are working to exercise and retain total unchallenged power without consequence. Few of my fellow Patriots dare wade in on any discussion of that concept.

It is therefore reassuring to me when somebody else sees and evaluates the same phenomenon as I do. Jacob Siegel sees and acknowledges the same dishonesty/dangerous methods the Democrats are using to do accomplish their end game.


Jacob Siegel is hardly anybody's idea of a right wing nutjob as most publications he has worked/written for are left of center, even hard left of center. But it turns out he is a journalist after all and his essay linked here is both interesting, provocative, and justifiable.

He documents a great many of the anomalies and dirty tricks we at USMB have been debating over the past year(s) and it is the Democrats who come under his critical scrutiny. The take home paragraph (emphasis mine):

". . .All of which is to say that current efforts to manipulate the American electoral system are not subtle or restricted to working around the law. The Democratic Party’s strategy to win the presidency in 2024 hinges in large part on preventing a normal election from taking place. Procedural and voting irregularities that would have triggered alarm across the political spectrum until recently have become an accepted feature of the landscape. The party has pursued this strategy since 2016, when the Obama White House and the Hillary Clinton campaign worked with U.S. intelligence agencies to frame Trump falsely as a Russian agent. The strategy aims to preserve the ceremony of voting, while constraining its influence, in the same way ideologically motivated bans on “hate” and “misinformation” uphold the appearance of a right to speak, while dictating what can or can’t be said. . ."

And he concludes:

". . .But the damage the party-state is inflicting to the republic in the meantime is massive and should worry all Americans, regardless of their partisan identifications—as RFK Jr. discovered when he sought to challenge Biden for the 2024 Democratic nomination and found himself facing media smears and extensive litigation to keep him off the ballot. Green Party candidate Jill Stein has faced similar ballot opposition. Support for the legitimacy of our political institutions is eroding. . ."

And without stating what he hopes is the outcome he closes with:

". . .Still, the race has already undergone two dramatic shifts in less than two months—once after Trump survived the July 13 attempt on his life, and again when Harris revived her party’s flagging fortunes. American voters may yet have their say."

LOL..

Okay... Since 2000, we’ve had 12 years of Democratic Party rule in the Oval Office. Nobody can seem to identify a single freedom they lost in those 12 years (much less the 24 years of this century).

MODS: Please move this crap to the conspiracy section.
 
Perhaps. But I'm pretty darn sure if we had returned five applications we would have received five ballots. I grew up in this state and have lived here as a voting adult for a very long time. There is absolutely no way a New Mexico knows if their ballot was counted as they voted or if it was counted at all. And that is just one of the problems here.
Well, go ahead and try it...photo and post them here.
 
We may never know since so much of the 'evidence' was destroyed or compromised before serious audits could be completed. I honestly don't know whether there was enough cheating to make a difference but being very heavily involved in the process on election night I am reasonably certain cheating was not only wide spread but significant.

And the Democrats taking advantage of COVID to revise, often illegally, the process and rules to not only make cheating easier but to encourage it, only reinforces the widespread opinion that a whole lot of the vote was not on the up and up.
Nothing was destroyed.
Nothing was compromised.
Every recount proved you were a loser. Every post you make proves it too by the way.
 
Back then our disagreements were on what policy was best for Americans, not what policy was best for those seeking unchallengeable power.

Tell that to your designated champion of democracy...

''The biggest change I’ve seen in Congress is Israel literally owned Congress — you understand that — 10 years ago, 15 years ago. And it was so powerful. It was so powerful....''

''They had such power, Israel had such power — and rightfully (😳) — over Congress, and now it doesn’t. It’s incredible, actually...''

They are working to exercise and retain total unchallenged power without consequence. Few of my fellow Patriots dare wade in on any discussion of that concept.

Few indeed, dear ''Patriot.'' Few indeed...

But some still do.
patriot.gif


And the cold, hard truth usually stings.

Then our self-professed purveyors of American democracy call you a name for daring to speak it.

It's a heck of a thing...
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom