The ONLY reason MOST Obama voters voted for Obama...

[tjvh]

Obama gonna fill my gas tank and pay off my Mortgage... And a phone of course.

?

I figured you wouldn't grasp that.

 

[rightwinger]

Obama gonna fill my gas tank and pay off my Mortgage... And a phone of course.

?

I figured you wouldn't grasp that.

Still don't

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

?

I figured you wouldn't grasp that.

Still don't

Let me help you then...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRgB2eeHZEw&feature=youtube_gdata_player]Your Higher Taxes pay for My healthcare thanks President Obama Healthcare Reform - GloZell - YouTube[/ame]

 

[tjvh]

?

I figured you wouldn't grasp that.

Still don't

Here... I'll make it easy for you...[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI]Obama Is Going To Pay For My Gas And Mortgage!!! - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I figured you wouldn't grasp that.

Still don't

Let me help you then...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRgB2eeHZEw&feature=youtube_gdata_player]Your Higher Taxes pay for My healthcare thanks President Obama Healthcare Reform - GloZell - YouTube[/ame]

Of course I fully expect to get called a racist for posting a vidwo of an admitted racist.

 

[Vandalshandle]

I am wondering just how long the Right is going to whine about losing the last two elections to Obama. One would think that, after the first loss, they would do a better job at winning the second election. After the second loss, instead of figuring, "...there seems to be something wrong with our party and candidates...", they are still blameing the very voters that they are tring to convince to vote for them!

In short, this may be hard for you to grasp, but claiming that people who did not vote for your candidate are stupid, ill-informed, and ignorant, is NOT a winning stratagy in an election. For example, having Palin make a campaign speech supporting your party, should not begin by mocking voters not in the GOP camp by saying, "How is that hopey-changy thing working out for ya?"

 

[kwc57]

Obviously, an overwhelming majority disagreed with your assessment. Obama rescued the economy, ended the war in Iraq and Republicans still looked scary

Wrong....the economy is still screwed, we still have just as many people out of work as there were when Bush left (probably more with all the people that just dropped out of site when they ran out of unemployment!), and Obama got us out of Iraq on BUSH'S time-line that was already set up and agreed on.

Sorry.....But Bush gets zero credit for Iraq

ZERO, nothing, nada, not one iota of credit

It was Bush's blunder of a decision that got us there. It was his poor execution that cost 5000 lives, eight years, $2 trillion (and growing) debt that will never be paid.

Bush wanted that war from the day he took office and he got it

The fact that Obama eventually ended it is no credit to Bush

RW knows it's so because Maddow and Matthews told him so!

 

[kwc57]

I am wondering just how long the Right is going to whine about losing the last two elections to Obama. One would think that, after the first loss, they would do a better job at winning the second election. After the second loss, instead of figuring, "...there seems to be something wrong with our party and candidates...", they are still blameing the very voters that they are tring to convince to vote for them!

In short, this may be hard for you to grasp, but claiming that people who did not vote for your candidate are stupid, ill-informed, and ignorant, is NOT a winning stratagy in an election. For example, having Palin make a campaign speech supporting your party, should not begin by mocking voters not in the GOP camp by saying, "How is that hopey-changy thing working out for ya?"

After two terms of Bush, it was easy for any democrat to get elected. After 2 terms of Obama, it's going to be easy for any republican to get elected. It's called a cycle and happens when you only have an option between what you may consider at the time to be the "lesser" of two evils.

 

[Misty]

The media sold the public on Obama at the same time ripping apart McCain/palin and Romney/Ryan.

It was all in the sales pitch.

When bush sold the war in Iraq, the public and the congress bought it.

It all comes down to who sells the best just like the shamwow for 19.95.

 

[rightwinger]

I figured you wouldn't grasp that.

Still don't

Here... I'll make it easy for you...[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI]Obama Is Going To Pay For My Gas And Mortgage!!! - YouTube[/ame]

I'm sorry. Did you post the right video?

No where in there does she say she expects anything for free or that Obama would pay for it

 

[Ernie S.]

Obviously, an overwhelming majority disagreed with your assessment. Obama rescued the economy, ended the war in Iraq and Republicans still looked scary

Wrong....the economy is still screwed, we still have just as many people out of work as there were when Bush left (probably more with all the people that just dropped out of site when they ran out of unemployment!), and Obama got us out of Iraq on BUSH'S time-line that was already set up and agreed on.

Sorry.....But Bush gets zero credit for Iraq

ZERO, nothing, nada, not one iota of credit

It was Bush's blunder of a decision that got us there. It was his poor execution that cost 5000 lives, eight years, $2 trillion (and growing) debt that will never be paid.

Bush wanted that war from the day he took office and he got it

The fact that Obama eventually ended it is no credit to Bush

So obama gets credit for following the withdrawal scheduled by Bush? Are you daft?

 

[rightwinger]

I am wondering just how long the Right is going to whine about losing the last two elections to Obama. One would think that, after the first loss, they would do a better job at winning the second election. After the second loss, instead of figuring, "...there seems to be something wrong with our party and candidates...", they are still blameing the very voters that they are tring to convince to vote for them!

In short, this may be hard for you to grasp, but claiming that people who did not vote for your candidate are stupid, ill-informed, and ignorant, is NOT a winning stratagy in an election. For example, having Palin make a campaign speech supporting your party, should not begin by mocking voters not in the GOP camp by saying, "How is that hopey-changy thing working out for ya?"

After two terms of Bush, it was easy for any democrat to get elected. After 2 terms of Obama, it's going to be easy for any republican to get elected. It's called a cycle and happens when you only have an option between what you may consider at the time to be the "lesser" of two evils.

Very true. Voters tend to follow an 8 year cycle and then switch to the other party

There are exceptions though

After the Depression the nation waited 20 years before it elected another Republican
After the Carter administration the nation waited 12 years before electing another Democrat

After Bush, do you think the voters will wait just 8 years before electing another Republican? really?

 

[Vandalshandle]

I am wondering just how long the Right is going to whine about losing the last two elections to Obama. One would think that, after the first loss, they would do a better job at winning the second election. After the second loss, instead of figuring, "...there seems to be something wrong with our party and candidates...", they are still blameing the very voters that they are tring to convince to vote for them!

In short, this may be hard for you to grasp, but claiming that people who did not vote for your candidate are stupid, ill-informed, and ignorant, is NOT a winning stratagy in an election. For example, having Palin make a campaign speech supporting your party, should not begin by mocking voters not in the GOP camp by saying, "How is that hopey-changy thing working out for ya?"

After two terms of Bush, it was easy for any democrat to get elected. After 2 terms of Obama, it's going to be easy for any republican to get elected. It's called a cycle and happens when you only have an option between what you may consider at the time to be the "lesser" of two evils.

Let me guess...you are also a big fan of the Chcago Cubs, right?

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong....the economy is still screwed, we still have just as many people out of work as there were when Bush left (probably more with all the people that just dropped out of site when they ran out of unemployment!), and Obama got us out of Iraq on BUSH'S time-line that was already set up and agreed on.

Sorry.....But Bush gets zero credit for Iraq

ZERO, nothing, nada, not one iota of credit

It was Bush's blunder of a decision that got us there. It was his poor execution that cost 5000 lives, eight years, $2 trillion (and growing) debt that will never be paid.

Bush wanted that war from the day he took office and he got it

The fact that Obama eventually ended it is no credit to Bush

So obama gets credit for following the withdrawal scheduled by Bush? Are you daft?

Obama gets full credit and Bush deserves ZERO CREDIT

You don't get credit for a war you shouldn't have started in the first place

 

[francoHFW]

Booosh scheduled a lot of things, and none of them happened LOL.

 

[Ernie S.]

Sorry.....But Bush gets zero credit for Iraq

ZERO, nothing, nada, not one iota of credit

It was Bush's blunder of a decision that got us there. It was his poor execution that cost 5000 lives, eight years, $2 trillion (and growing) debt that will never be paid.

Bush wanted that war from the day he took office and he got it

The fact that Obama eventually ended it is no credit to Bush

So obama gets credit for following the withdrawal scheduled by Bush? Are you daft?

Obama gets full credit and Bush deserves ZERO CREDIT

You don't get credit for a war you shouldn't have started in the first place

Liberal logic...

 

[rightwinger]

So obama gets credit for following the withdrawal scheduled by Bush? Are you daft?

Obama gets full credit and Bush deserves ZERO CREDIT

You don't get credit for a war you shouldn't have started in the first place

Liberal logic...

Lets see...

I started a raging forest fire just because I could. I fought the fire for seven years and could not put it out.

The next guy comes in and puts out the fire and I say....See? Its all that firefighting I did for seven years

Do I deserve credit for putting out a fire I never should have started?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

So obama gets credit for following the withdrawal scheduled by Bush? Are you daft?

Obama gets full credit and Bush deserves ZERO CREDIT

You don't get credit for a war you shouldn't have started in the first place

Liberal logic...

I know right? Its like some weird episode of the twilight zone

 

[kwc57]

I am wondering just how long the Right is going to whine about losing the last two elections to Obama. One would think that, after the first loss, they would do a better job at winning the second election. After the second loss, instead of figuring, "...there seems to be something wrong with our party and candidates...", they are still blameing the very voters that they are tring to convince to vote for them!

In short, this may be hard for you to grasp, but claiming that people who did not vote for your candidate are stupid, ill-informed, and ignorant, is NOT a winning stratagy in an election. For example, having Palin make a campaign speech supporting your party, should not begin by mocking voters not in the GOP camp by saying, "How is that hopey-changy thing working out for ya?"

After two terms of Bush, it was easy for any democrat to get elected. After 2 terms of Obama, it's going to be easy for any republican to get elected. It's called a cycle and happens when you only have an option between what you may consider at the time to be the "lesser" of two evils.

Very true. Voters tend to follow an 8 year cycle and then switch to the other party

There are exceptions though

After the Depression the nation waited 20 years before it elected another Republican
After the Carter administration the nation waited 12 years before electing another Democrat

After Bush, do you think the voters will wait just 8 years before electing another Republican? really?

After "OBAMA"!? Absolutely!

 

[rightwinger]

After two terms of Bush, it was easy for any democrat to get elected. After 2 terms of Obama, it's going to be easy for any republican to get elected. It's called a cycle and happens when you only have an option between what you may consider at the time to be the "lesser" of two evils.

Very true. Voters tend to follow an 8 year cycle and then switch to the other party

There are exceptions though

After the Depression the nation waited 20 years before it elected another Republican
After the Carter administration the nation waited 12 years before electing another Democrat

After Bush, do you think the voters will wait just 8 years before electing another Republican? really?

After "OBAMA"!? Absolutely!

We will have to see.
You guys tried that "Obama is the worst president in history" nonsense last time and nobody bought it.

Now you are going to have to try "Hillary will be the worst president in history"