Jesus christ, even Z's own description of his action indicates that he stalked the victim. The transcripts of the 911 call confirms it. What more do you ******* need?
This is why the right wing looks so stupid to everyone. They will defend their own, despite guilt or ignorance.
1) Stop taking the Lord's name in vain simply because you want to make things up and people wont let you.
2) Zimmermans own description of his actions do not indicate that he stalked anyone. If they did, he would be charged with stalking. Stalking
requires repetitious behavior. Following someone 1 time can
never be stalking because it's not repetitious behavior. It's not really that difficult to understand. We've even quoted the definition multiple times in multiple threads.
You cannot just make things up. Just because you are to lazy or dishonest to actually know what you're talking about doesn't mean the rest of us are.
There is zero evidence on who intiated contact. There is zero evidence of who threw the first punch. There is zero evidence that Zimmerman threw
any punches. All we have is the eye witness who testified that he saw martin on top punching Zimmerman while Zimmerman cried for help. The injuries Zimmerman had to his face and head. The forensic evidence showing that the only injuries Martin had were the gun shot and the bruises to his knuckles consistant with him punching someone.
Do you understand this? If someone follows me I don't have the right to jump them and beat them to the ground. They have to be hostile to me first. There is no evidence that Zimmerman was hostile to him.
Now could he have initiated? it's possible. But we have no evidence to suggest that. With an absense of evidence that Zimmerman started any aggression and ample evidence that Trayvon was aggressive towards Zimmerman, there is more than enough reasonable doubt to drive a semi truck through.
You can try to lie about what evidence we have. You can try to ignore the evidence we have. You can try to assume a bunch of facts that we don't have. But the evidence is public record. We have what we have. We don't have all your guesses and assumptions as part of the evidence. We have absolutely no evidence of stalking or even an attempt to provide evidence of stalking as he was
never charged for it.
If Im going to send someone way for potentially life for murder. I need evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt. it isnt here. You can think he is a piece of crap all you want. You can think him wrong and evil. But if there is no evidence to
prove beyond a reasonable doubt, then he is not guilty.
What is so damn difficult to understand about this?
