compared to 12 million indigenous Arabs.
Arabs indigenous to anywhere other than Arabia?
LOL!
That is VERY ignorant, as not only did the Arabs in Arabia come via Palestine, from Africa, but Hebrew were Arabs.
Except that Hebrews already had a thriving civilization for a thousand years,
when Arabs were still illiterate and buriying their daughters alive in the deserts of Arabia.
That is nonsense.
Arabs go back over 10,000 years in Palestine, like the Canaanites in Jericho.
There is no history of Hebrew at all until they invaded Palestine around 1000 BC.
Arabs like the Amorites were literate over a thousand years before the Hebrew created a written script for Hebrew around 100 BC. Why do you think the Dead Sea Scrolls are mostly in Aramaic?
Again, the Arabian Peninsula is NOT where Arabs came from. The came from Africa, and slowly migrated to Arabia, via Palestine.
And the whole point of Mohammad reforming Judaism to Islam was to increase the rights of women.
Yeah, but why only 10,000?
For millions of years, Palestinozaur Rex was freely roaming the mountains of Narnia,
until Jews arrived from Venus and made him a cornivor,
everyone knows that.
{...
First city
...
6500 BCE
Jericho is the first major walled
city, with a population of about 2,500.
...}
In the study of the ancient world a City is generally defined as a large populated urban center of commerce and administration with a system of laws and, usually, regulated means of sanitation. This...
www.ancient.eu
.
Not only wwre the Canaanites the first in Palestine, but they built the first city ever, anywhere.
The Hebrew left not a trace of building, history, or writing until after about 1000 BC when they invaded the Land of Canaan.
In fact, most Hebrew spoke and wrote in the Arab Aramaic until around 100 BC.
And as a proof you bring up Jericho,
a city with a Hebrew name?
Priceless.
That is ignorant.
Jericho is NOT a Hebrew name.
Nor is Jerusalem.
They predate the Hebrew invasion by thousands of years.
Jews got their name from Jerusalem, not the other way around.
And both names came originally from the ancient Canaanite word for the river Jordan and its fertile valleys.
{... Etymology. Jericho's name in Hebrew, Yeriáş–o, is generally thought to derive from the Canaanite word reaáş– ("fragrant") ...}
Everything Hebrew is likely of Canaanite or some other Arab source.
Hebrew is just a derivative of the original Arab language.
Potato patatoe...
We can argue who adopted who's language,
Canaanites, Hebrews, or that they're one and the same.
But we can surely say their language was NOT of an "Arab source"
because Arabs themselves were still illiterate for another 1000 years...
No we can not at all argue who adopted who's language.
We have hard evidence of advanced Canaanite civilization, architecture, language, etc., over 5000 years before we begin to see a trace of Hebrew existence.
And no, Arab script predates Hebrew script by over 1000 years at least.
{...
was written in a script derived from the Phoenician alphabet.
Aramaic is thought to have first appeared among the Aramaeans about the late 11th century bce. By the 8th century bce it had become accepted by the Assyrians as a second language.
...}
I think you are still incorrectly calling the Arabian Peninsula as the origin of Arabs, and it is not.
Arabs originated in the Land of Canaan.
There is not a single anthropologists who believes otherwise.
Why else would they define the word "Semitic" are to belonging to an Arab language group.
It does not mean Jewish as all.
Jews and Hebrew are only Semitic because they also are of Arab origins.
Think about it.
We now all know Africa is the source of all humans.
And which would come first, walking through the Land of Canaan, or building ships to cross over to the Arabian Peninsula?
courses.lumenlearning.com
