The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

[PoliticalChic]

Congratulations on joining the useful idiots. They also polled that in 2003 a majority of people thought that Saddam Hussein had WMD's, and was responsible for 9-11.

After I was forced to expose you as the lying scum you are, when you were caught altering my posts to claim that they said other than what I wrote, I asked you not to address me again.



Please honor that request.....





“I cut it down” January 6th Is But A Detail… post 31

 

[PoliticalChic]

So be specific. What changes did PA male and how did it make for a fraudulent count?

The Constitution is known as ‘the law of the land.’

The U.S. Constitution calls itself the "supreme law of the land." This clause is taken to mean that when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.

The Constitution as Supreme Law

http://www.let.rug.nl › usa › outlines › government-1991




The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.



Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

​

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.





Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law

 

[PoliticalChic]

MOST voters. Aren't the Democrats a slight majority in this country?

Whatever the numbers, it is Mass Psychosis......the same that infected the Germans in the 30s and 40s.

The very same doctrines, too.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Covering the counting room windows in Detroit drew my attention along with after midnite votes in suitcases showing up in other locations.
They played us like suckahs!!

Give them credit......it was well planned and rehearsed.


Blame the Republicans....they had decades to recognize the enemy.

 

[PoliticalChic]

,,,,,,,,,
DONNIE BOY IS PATHETIC

Is this your definition of 'pathetic'?

Let's remind all the mindless....you......of Trump's five Nobel nominations for peace in the Middle East, quieting of North Korea, no invasions by Russia, keeping Iran guessing, having the courage to move our embassy to Jerusalem, forcing Mexico to keep invaders on their side of the border, sending ships through the South China Sea that China claimed was theirs, not turning over tons of armaments to the Taliban..........astounding foreign policy achievements that no Democrat can claim.

And that amazing achievement involving foreign policy: American energy independence.

Put 'dictionary' on your letter to Santa.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If we're down to that comparison, jesus fuck, let's just cash out.

Who'd you vote for again?????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Go cry in the corner. Biden will remain president for the rest of the term either way.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We know those impeachments were just a means to keep Hillary's ass out of prison. The FBI has already admitted they were totally baseless.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Is this your definition of 'pathetic'?

Let's remind all the mindless....you......of Trump's five Nobel nominations for peace in the Middle East, quieting of North Korea, no invasions by Russia, keeping Iran guessing, having the courage to move our embassy to Jerusalem, forcing Mexico to keep invaders on their side of the border, sending ships through the South China Sea that China claimed was theirs, not turning over tons of armaments to the Taliban..........astounding foreign policy achievements that no Democrat can claim.

And that amazing achievement involving foreign policy: American energy independence.
View attachment 651237



Put 'dictionary' on your letter to Santa.

Definitely a keeper. Worth 10,000 words

 

[Carl in Michigan]

View attachment 651243

Those mean tweets. Ahhh, the good old days

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh yeah? If the evidence was so compelling, why would they even need Trump to lock Hillary up? Hell even if they did need Trump - even though they sure as hell wouldn’t - why didn’t he order her prosecution right out of the gate? Also, since Trump was not convicted, what was stopping it after that point? It’s such a retarded notion to make this about Hillary lol. Like seriously why should I take you seriously as an adult?

That would be goose-steppers of the FBI and the CIA.


1. The Hunter Biden Laptop story was censored by the state media.

2.The Democrat handmaidens rushed out ot lie about the Laptop story.

Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel ...​

https://www.politico.com › news › 2020/10/19 › hunter...
Oct 19, 2020 — More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice ...

50 former intelligence officials warn NY Post story sounds like ...​

https://thehill.com › homenews › campaign › 521823-5...
Oct 20, 2020 — More than 50 former intelligence officials said emails alleged to have been found on a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden show signs of a ...

3. "CIA Officer Who Signed Crackhead Hunter Biden Laptop Letter Says He Takes ‘Special Pride’ for ‘Swinging the Election Away From Trump’​

Posted on March 29, 2022 by Constitutional Nobody
John Sipher, who served for more than 20-years as a CIA senior operations officer, wrote, “I take special pride in personally swinging the election away from Trump,” reported enVolve.

“I lost the election for Trump? Well then I fell [sic] pretty good about my influence,” the ex-CIA officer wrote.



4. ....list of “officials” that “signed a letter saying that the laptop has the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

“Yet, these 51 purported intelligence experts didn’t have any evidence to back up their assertions at the time – they were merely operating off a convenient hunch that happened to behoove the Biden campaign right before the election.”

“The letter they’d all signed on to was published on October 19th of 2020, a mere five days after the New York Post dropped the bombshell story on the laptop that has since been validated by a myriad of outlets – to include The New York Times.”


5. Illegitimate President Biden cited the letter during the 2020 presidential election as proof the laptop story was false. According to former Attorney General Willam Barr and a scathing report in Politico, Biden knew the letter was not based on evidence but reported it as fact to win the election.

Last week, The New York Times circumspectly admitted its reporting on the Hunter laptop story was inaccurate."

Empress Royalty Strengthens Management and Appoints New Chief Financial Officer | VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESSWIRE / May 3, 2022 / Empress Royalty Corp. (TSXV:EMPR)(OTCQB:EMPYF) (“Empress” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the appointment of Janet M​

VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESSWIRE / May 3, 2022 / Empress Royalty Corp. (TSXV:EMPR)(OTCQB:EMPYF) (“Empress” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the appointment of Janet Meiklejohn as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. “It gives me great pleasure to welcome Janet to the Empress team as Chief...

ussanews.com

 

[Carl in Michigan]

And remember, 17% said, if they had known about the Hunter laptop story they WOULD HAVE CHANGED THEIR VOTES.

That ALONE would have changed the outcome of the election

Lying and covering FACTS is how the Democrat Media COLLUDES With the Democrat Party to STEAL ELECTIONS

 

[justoffal]

Trump lost. Biden won. Be an adult and accept it. You’re embarrassing yourself.

You're preaching to the wrong audience you've already lost the argument nationally. Rational minds that are capable of at least 3rd grade math know that the election was a robbery. Deep down inside so do you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're preaching to the wrong audience you've already lost the argument nationally. Rational minds that are capable of at least 3rd grade math know that the election was a robbery. Deep down inside so do you.b

The trained Democrat voter cannot pivot even when their own party admits they lied.

See how many of them are still ranting about Russian collusion.....even after Mueller and now Durham.

And if you bring up what we claimed about Bill Clinton being a rapist for decades....they still claim "is not, isn not!!!!!!!!" even when the party had dropped the pretense:

. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?

The New York Times

MSNBC

The Atlantic

Slate

Vox



Politico



"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.

….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient." Dems’ ‘reckoning’ with Bill’s sexual offenses is the final nail in the Clintons’ coffin


On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....who can't keep up with the program.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh yeah? If the evidence was so compelling, why would they even need Trump to lock Hillary up?

Hmmm . . . . because the FBI is infested with deep state minions who have no interest in enforcing the law.

Hell even if they did need Trump - even though they sure as hell wouldn’t - why didn’t he order her prosecution right out of the gate?

Because Jeff Sessions recused himself are refused to prosecute her. That's why Trump got rid of him.

Also, since Trump was not convicted, what was stopping it after that point? It’s such a retarded notion to make this about Hillary lol. Like seriously why should I take you seriously as an adult?

It's not stopped. Barr put Duram on the job. Of course, Biden is doing everything possible to obstruct him.

 

[dblack]

View attachment 651238





Who'd you vote for again?????

Not Biden. Why?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Not Biden. Why?

You know why.

I'm gonna assume you didn't vote for Trump.

There are never any possible victors other than the two main parties.

Why didn't you vote for the American candidate?

 

[dblack]

You know why.

I'm gonna assume you didn't vote for Trump.

Jesus no.

There are never any possible victors other than the two main parties.

Whatever. Not voting for a shitty candidate. Period.

Why didn't you vote for the American candidate?

I did.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Jesus no.

Whatever. Not voting for a shitty candidate. Period.

I did.

Avoid the juvenile vulgarity, even though I've clearly embarrassed you.

The only American candidate who had the abilty to win was named Trump.


If you didn't vote for Trump, you allowed an un-American candidate to claim victory.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

 

[dblack]

Avoid the juvenile vulgarity, even though I've clearly embarrassed you.

Piss off.

The only American candidate who had the abilty to win was named Trump.

LOL

If you didn't vote for Trump, you allowed an un-American candidate to claim victory.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

Keep dancing. I'm not voting for your shitty candidate. Beg, plead, make excuse after excuse - but it ain't happening. If Republicans or Democrats want my vote, they're going to have to do better.