The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

[progressive hunter]

You also have several federal circuit decisions that say that they can't invalidate votes based on decisions that changed after election day. That the law and regulations, in effect on election day, even if later overturned, are the basis for legal votes on election day.

since you lied before theres nothing you say that should ever be believed without a link,,

 

[meaner gene]

so why did you lie before??

How is it a lie? People were afforded 100% vote by mail. But the constitution says you can't force everybody to vote that way.

 

[progressive hunter]

How is it a lie? People were afforded 100% vote by mail. But the constitution says you can't force everybody to vote that way.

everything you said in your comment you have now changed and those you even proved wrong with your own links,,

 

[meaner gene]

thats not what you said before,,,

Actually it is. Read it again. Several states have been 100% mail-in ballot (where they mail everybody a ballot).

They have the right to refuse to vote by mail, and instead vote in person.

 

[meaner gene]

since you lied before theres nothing you say that should ever be believed without a link,,

Griffin v. Burns, a 1978 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit

The 1st Circuit, affirming the federal district court, held that the retroactive invalidation of what were otherwise properly cast absentee ballots, on the basis of a new legal interpretation of state law unannounced before the election, was a violation of the voters’ federal due process rights.

 

[progressive hunter]

Actually it is. Read it again. Several states have been 100% mail-in ballot (where they mail everybody a ballot).

They have the right to refuse to vote by mail, and instead vote in person.

based on all the lies youve told just in the last 20 mins you are a waste of time to discuss anything but a minstrel cycle with,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Griffin v. Burns, a 1978 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit

The 1st Circuit, affirming the federal district court, held that the retroactive invalidation of what were otherwise properly cast absentee ballots, on the basis of a new legal interpretation of state law unannounced before the election, was a violation of the voters’ federal due process rights.

its best you run away from what you said,,,

 

[meaner gene]

based on all the lies youve told just in the last 20 mins you are a waste of time to discuss anything but a minstrel cycle with,,

As have you, based on your lies about lies.

 

[progressive hunter]

As have you, based on your lies about lies.

yeah well youre a poopy head,,

see I can be childish too,,

 

[meaner gene]

I'm not saying you've been brainwashed, but several states do nothing but mail-in voting, and have for over a decade.

Table 18: States With All-Mail Elections

These tables are part of the Voting Outside the Polling Place report and shows which states have all-mail ballot elections.

www.ncsl.org

States With All-Mail Elections

In all-mail elections, all registered voters are sent a ballot in the mail. The voter marks the ballot, puts it in a secrecy envelope or sleeve and then into a separate mailing envelope, signs an affidavit on the exterior of the mailing envelope and returns the package via mail or by dropping it off.

Your denial of the definition of the term "mail-in" voting, is your own downfall.

As I said (no lie) several states do all mail-in voting.

 

[meaner gene]

yeah well youre a poopy head,,

see I can be childish too,,

Apparently you don't know the definition of the term all "mail-in" voting.

You think it excludes in person voting, when it doesn't. So your not knowing the definition is why you accused me of lying.

So you lied, about lying.

 

[progressive hunter]

Apparently you don't know the definition of the term all "mail-in" voting.

You think it excludes in person voting, when it doesn't. So your not knowing the definition is why you accused me of lying.

So you lied, about lying.

man you are desperate to backtrack on your lies,,

 

[meaner gene]

You accused me of lying, just because you don't know the definition of "mail-in" voting.

 

[meaner gene]

man you are desperate to backtrack on your lies,,

Post the definition of mail-in voting, and show how it differs from what I said.

Tic-toc

I'll wait. Or you could just run away from your lies and save face.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump lost. Biden won. Be an adult and accept it. You’re embarrassing yourself.

That's not an adult. That's a servile minion.

 

[Billy000]

That's not an adult. That's a servile minion.

Go cry in the corner. Biden will remain president for the rest of the term either way.

 

[bripat9643]

Go cry in the corner. Biden will remain president for the rest of the term either way.

Biden will always have an asterisk after his name, and he will likely be impeached after pubs take over Congress.

 

[Billy000]

Biden will always have an asterisk after his name, and he will likely be impeached after pubs take over Congress.

Lol that’s hilarious considering Trump was impeached TWICE in one term. That’s a huge asterisk. He’s a pathetic sack of dog shit.

 

[bripat9643]

Lol that’s hilarious considering Trump was impeached TWICE in one term. That’s a huge asterisk. He’s a pathetic sack of dog shit.

We know those impeachments were just a means to keep Hillary's ass out of prison. The FBI has already admitted they were totally baseless.

 

[Billy000]

We know those impeachments were just a means to keep Hillary's ass out of prison. The FBI has already admitted they were totally baseless.

Oh yeah? If the evidence was so compelling, why would they even need Trump to lock Hillary up? Hell even if they did need Trump - even though they sure as hell wouldn’t - why didn’t he order her prosecution right out of the gate? Also, since Trump was not convicted, what was stopping it after that point? It’s such a retarded notion to make this about Hillary lol. Like seriously why should I take you seriously as an adult?