The next time someone tells you the Nazis were anti-capitalist, show them this.

[BILLSANDS]

Is it a freaking joke or are economists "at Columbia" as ignorant as ordinary revisionist lefties these days? The Nationalist Socialist Workers (Nazi) party controlled the government as well as private sector ownership during the 30's. You could call it capitalism but it would more accurately be called "puppet capitalism".

you equate the state ans socialism, in socialsim the state dies away you dont even understan d what socialsim is so shut up dummy

 

[BILLSANDS]

The Myth: ADOLF HITLER, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the holocaust , was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.


The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

 

[bripat9643]

Is it a freaking joke or are economists "at Columbia" as ignorant as ordinary revisionist lefties these days? The Nationalist Socialist Workers (Nazi) party controlled the government as well as private sector ownership during the 30's. You could call it capitalism but it would more accurately be called "puppet capitalism".

you equate the state ans socialism, in socialsim the state dies away you dont even understan d what socialsim is so shut up dummy

That's leftwing fantasy. Reality is that socialism gives the state unprecedented power to control everything you do. Gulags and concentration camps exist under socialism, never under capitalism.

 

[BILLSANDS]

Is it a freaking joke or are economists "at Columbia" as ignorant as ordinary revisionist lefties these days? The Nationalist Socialist Workers (Nazi) party controlled the government as well as private sector ownership during the 30's. You could call it capitalism but it would more accurately be called "puppet capitalism".

you equate the state ans socialism, in socialsim the state dies away you dont even understan d what socialsim is so shut up dummy

That's leftwing fantasy. Reality is that socialism gives the state unprecedented power to control everything you do. Gulags and concentration camps exist under socialism, never under capitalism.

its called a deinition socialsim might be a fantasy but words have a specidic meaning and like most brainwashed americans you dont knw the y proper defintion because you r stupid

 

[bripat9643]

The Myth: ADOLF HITLER, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the holocaust , was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.


The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

That's an outright fabrication.

"Socialism as the final concept of duty, the ethical duty of work, not just for oneself but also for one’s fellow man’s sake, and above all the principle: Common good before own good, a struggle against all parasitism and especially against easy and unearned income. And we were aware that in this fight we can rely on no one but our own people."

- Adolph Hitler -
​

Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists. Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic. We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfillment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one.

- Adolph Hitler -
​

To put it quite clearly: we have an economic programme. Point No. 13 in that programme demands the nationalisation of all public companies, in other words socialisation, or what is known here as socialism. … the basic principle of my Party’s economic programme should be made perfectly clear and that is the principle of authority… the good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners. If you say that the bourgeoisie is tearing its hair over the question of private property, that does not affect me in the least. Does the bourgeoisie expect some consideration from me?… Today’s bourgeoisie is rotten to the core; it has no ideals any more; all it wants to do is earn money and so it does me what damage it can. The bourgeois press does me damage too and would like to consign me and my movement to the devil.

- Hitler's interview with Richard Breiting, 1931 -​

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

- Speech by Adolf Hitler, On National Socialism and World Relations, delivered in the German Reichstag, January 30, 1937. -
​

And numerous people whose families belong to the peasantry and working classes are now filling prominent positions in this National Socialist State. Some of them actually hold the highest offices in the leadership of the nation, as Cabinet Ministers, Reichsstatthalter and Gauleiter. But National Socialism always bears in mind the interests of the people as a whole and not the interests of one class or another. The National Socialist Revolution has not aimed at turning a privileged class into a class which will have no rights in the future. Its aim has been to grant equal rights to those social strata that hitherto were denied such rights.

- Speech by Adolf Hitler, On National Socialism and World Relations, delivered in the German Reichstag, January 30, 1937. -​

 

[bripat9643]

Is it a freaking joke or are economists "at Columbia" as ignorant as ordinary revisionist lefties these days? The Nationalist Socialist Workers (Nazi) party controlled the government as well as private sector ownership during the 30's. You could call it capitalism but it would more accurately be called "puppet capitalism".

you equate the state ans socialism, in socialsim the state dies away you dont even understan d what socialsim is so shut up dummy

That's leftwing fantasy. Reality is that socialism gives the state unprecedented power to control everything you do. Gulags and concentration camps exist under socialism, never under capitalism.

its called a deinition socialsim might be a fantasy but words have a specidic meaning and like most brainwashed americans you dont knw the y proper defintion because you r stupid

You can play word games all day, but the people who setup the Gulags and the concentration camps all called themselves "socialists." That's a fact that all your bullshit propaganda can't get around.

 

[night_son]

National Socialism Fascism and Bolshevik become Stalinist Communism were different strains of the same virus; different interpretative implementations of Marxism. The highly personal war between Germany and Soviet Russia; between Hitler and Stalin, was also an ideological war to determine which strain of the Marxist virus would become the world predominate one.

Socialism is Marx's transitory stage between Capitalism and Communism, when a dictatorship of the proletariat seizes control of a nation's means of production. The next phase is the transition from a revolutionary physical action, to the ideological realization of a utopian communist state. Trust me, we Americans and the rest of Western peoples never want to experience either a socialist (fascist) dictatorship, or a Utopia based on Thomas Moore's fictional paradise. In fact, many, many Americans—myself included—will by any means necessary prevent all stages of Marxian transition in our nation's government, in any and all of its hybrid forms.

 

[Tehon]

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

That's an outright fabrication.

Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists. Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic. We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfillment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one.

- Adolph Hitler -

bripat claims BILLSANDS fabricated a description of Nazism and then proceeds to attribute a quote from Hitler that exactly supports BILLSANDS description.

 

[Picaro]

The roots of Nazism derive from Marxist ideology; the racist component merely comes from the morphing of the program of instilling a sense of nationhood and of being a distinct 'people' in the new state of Germany created in the 1871 or so, by the Kaiser and Bismarck; Max Planck was a contributor, as were many leading intellectuals of the day, even outside of Germany. The political and economic component comes largely from the 'National Bolshevism' ideology of the Strasserites, Himmler was a leftist as was Goebbels. Hitler himself was merely a creation of Goering and the Junkers, who sponsored him early on, and Hitler managed to turn his popularity into a personality cult. He wasn't concerned about anything but his own personal power, and not much of a ideologue outside of the racist component. He had his own army personally loyal only to him and not the Party, and the numerical superiority of that dominated the other factions, most of whom he murdered.

National Bolshevism - Wikipedia

Anybody who thinks Marxists aren't racists is invited to look into Marx's beliefs that 'tribal savages' like blacks and other non-white races aren't advanced enough to create industrial societies or evolve, and left them outside of his theories. Ghandi was also a racist.

 

[bripat9643]

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

That's an outright fabrication.

Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists. Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic. We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfillment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one.

- Adolph Hitler -

bripat claims BILLSANDS fabricated a description of Nazism and then proceeds to attribute a quote from Hitler that exactly supports BILLSANDS description.

bullshit. The quote shows that Hitler endorsed socialism.

 

[bripat9643]

The roots of Nazism derive from Marxist ideology; the racist component merely comes from the morphing of the program of instilling a sense of nationhood and of being a distinct 'people' in the new state of Germany created in the 1871 or so, by the Kaiser and Bismarck; Max Planck was a contributor, as were many leading intellectuals of the day, even outside of Germany. The political and economic component comes largely from the 'National Bolshevism' ideology of the Strasserites, Himmler was a leftist as was Goebbels. Hitler himself was merely a creation of Goering and the Junkers, who sponsored him early on, and Hitler managed to turn his popularity into a personality cult. He wasn't concerned about anything but his own personal power, and not much of a ideologue outside of the racist component. He had his own army personally loyal only to him and not the Party, and the numerical superiority of that dominated the other factions, most of whom he murdered.

National Bolshevism - Wikipedia

Anybody who thinks Marxists aren't racists is invited to look into Marx's beliefs that 'tribal savages' like blacks and other non-white races aren't advanced enough to create industrial societies or evolve, and left them outside of his theories. Ghandi was also a racist.

Anyone who believes Marx wasn't a racist should read the following:

On The Jewish Question by Karl Marx

 

[Tehon]

The roots of Nazism derive from Marxist ideology; the racist component merely comes from the morphing of the program of instilling a sense of nationhood and of being a distinct 'people' in the new state of Germany created in the 1871 or so, by the Kaiser and Bismarck; Max Planck was a contributor, as were many leading intellectuals of the day, even outside of Germany. The political and economic component comes largely from the 'National Bolshevism' ideology of the Strasserites, Himmler was a leftist as was Goebbels. Hitler himself was merely a creation of Goering and the Junkers, who sponsored him early on, and Hitler managed to turn his popularity into a personality cult. He wasn't concerned about anything but his own personal power, and not much of a ideologue outside of the racist component. He had his own army personally loyal only to him and not the Party, and the numerical superiority of that dominated the other factions, most of whom he murdered.

National Bolshevism - Wikipedia

Anybody who thinks Marxists aren't racists is invited to look into Marx's beliefs that 'tribal savages' like blacks and other non-white races aren't advanced enough to create industrial societies or evolve, and left them outside of his theories. Ghandi was also a racist.

Anyone who believes Marx wasn't a racist should read the following:

On The Jewish Question by Karl Marx

What is racist about Marx's critique of Bruno Bauer's book "The Jewish Question"?

 

[Picaro]

The roots of Nazism derive from Marxist ideology; the racist component merely comes from the morphing of the program of instilling a sense of nationhood and of being a distinct 'people' in the new state of Germany created in the 1871 or so, by the Kaiser and Bismarck; Max Planck was a contributor, as were many leading intellectuals of the day, even outside of Germany. The political and economic component comes largely from the 'National Bolshevism' ideology of the Strasserites, Himmler was a leftist as was Goebbels. Hitler himself was merely a creation of Goering and the Junkers, who sponsored him early on, and Hitler managed to turn his popularity into a personality cult. He wasn't concerned about anything but his own personal power, and not much of a ideologue outside of the racist component. He had his own army personally loyal only to him and not the Party, and the numerical superiority of that dominated the other factions, most of whom he murdered.

National Bolshevism - Wikipedia

Anybody who thinks Marxists aren't racists is invited to look into Marx's beliefs that 'tribal savages' like blacks and other non-white races aren't advanced enough to create industrial societies or evolve, and left them outside of his theories. Ghandi was also a racist.

Anyone who believes Marx wasn't a racist should read the following:

On The Jewish Question by Karl Marx

And Engels, too.

 

[night_son]

Marx's complete ethos, epistemology, paradigm, dialectic and philosophy of and for the primacy of his central political theory was predicated upon class warfare: the struggle between the working class and the wealthy, and by association with the wealthy, the middle class or bourgeoisie. Distantly similar to the Identity Politics practiced by today's American Democratic Party, was Hitler's own adaptation of race warfare traded in place of Marxist class warfare, but an inter- societal race war against the Jews instead.

In order to intimately know Hitler's mind, one must read and slowly digest Mein Kampf. Hitler was fiercely tribal in his ultra passionate belief in protecting and defending the sanctity of his childhood communities, from encroachment by anyone really other than the ancient generational peoples whom he believed were the only ones who should be living there. Not only was he protective of those regions and communities, however, Hitler was also very willing to both justify doing violence to protect his beloved geographies, and, to actually do violence to meet those ends.

In my own academic opinion, Adolf Hitler's personality, both public and private, can be categorized under Moral Anti-Realism, or perhaps more specifically, Moral noncognitivism. Hitler had a moral code for himself and his inner tribe to uphold among themselves, the innermost circle and his most trusted ethnicities. Outside of that circle, however, crimes such as theft, rape, prejudicial violence, and even mass murder, were capable of being reduced to mere moral propositions incapable of being proven either true or false. Thus , and oh so conveniently for Hitler and the Nazi high-command, statements such as, "Killing is wrong" could be reduced to just "Killing" and "is wrong" could be dropped all together. What better justification could one have for mass murder—particularly when standing on the shoulders of Marx as well?

 

[Tehon]

Marx's complete ethos, epistemology, paradigm, dialectic and philosophy of and for the primacy of his central political theory was predicated upon class warfare: the struggle between the working class and the wealthy, and by association with the wealthy, the middle class or bourgeoisie. Distantly similar to the Identity Politics practiced by today's American Democratic Party, was Hitler's own adaptation of race warfare traded in place of Marxist class warfare, but an inter- societal race war against the Jews instead.

In order to intimately know Hitler's mind, one must read and slowly digest Mein Kampf. Hitler was fiercely tribal in his ultra passionate belief in protecting and defending the sanctity of his childhood communities, from encroachment by anyone really other than the ancient generational peoples whom he believed were the only ones who should be living there. Not only was he protective of those regions and communities, however, Hitler was also very willing to both justify doing violence to protect his beloved geographies, and, to actually do violence to meet those ends.

In my own academic opinion, Adolf Hitler's personality, both public and private, can be categorized under Moral Anti-Realism, or perhaps more specifically, Moral noncognitivism. Hitler had a moral code for himself and his inner tribe to uphold among themselves, the innermost circle and his most trusted ethnicities. Outside of that circle, however, crimes such as theft, rape, prejudicial violence, and even mass murder, were capable of being reduced to mere moral propositions incapable of being proven either true or false. Thus , and oh so conveniently for Hitler and the Nazi high-command, statements such as, "Killing is wrong" could be reduced to just "Killing" and "is wrong" could be dropped all together. What better justification could one have for mass murder—particularly when standing on the shoulders of Marx as well?

Marx didn't start the class war, he merely brought attention to it. He correctly understood that the working class needed to gain class consciousness if it was to compete in the war that was being waged against it by the ruling class.

It is interesting watching you try to draw a parallel between Marx and Hitler where none really exists. A closer examination of Hitler's philosophy shows the parallel is much closer to your philosophy than Marx's. You have expressed a willingness to defend America from Marxism. In Mein Kampf, Hitler only took one more step from your stated position by implicating the Jews in the Marxist conspiracy against Germany.

"The Jewish doctrine of Marxism repudiates the aristocratic principle of Nature and substitutes for it the eternal privilege of force and energy, numerical mass and its dead weight. Thus it denies the individual worth of the human personality, impugns the teaching that nationhood and race have a primary significance, and by doing this it takes away the very foundations of human existence and human civilization. If the Marxist teaching were to be accepted as the foundation of the life of the universe, it would lead to the disappearance of all order that is conceivable to the human mind. And thus the adoption of such a law would provoke chaos in the structure of the greatest organism that we know, with the result that the inhabitants of this earthly planet would finally disappear. Should the Jew, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the people of this world, his Crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through ether, without any human life on its surface, as it did millions of years ago. And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord."
https://mk.christogenea.org/_files/Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf english translation unexpurgated 1939.pdf

 

[night_son]

Marx's complete ethos, epistemology, paradigm, dialectic and philosophy of and for the primacy of his central political theory was predicated upon class warfare: the struggle between the working class and the wealthy, and by association with the wealthy, the middle class or bourgeoisie. Distantly similar to the Identity Politics practiced by today's American Democratic Party, was Hitler's own adaptation of race warfare traded in place of Marxist class warfare, but an inter- societal race war against the Jews instead.

In order to intimately know Hitler's mind, one must read and slowly digest Mein Kampf. Hitler was fiercely tribal in his ultra passionate belief in protecting and defending the sanctity of his childhood communities, from encroachment by anyone really other than the ancient generational peoples whom he believed were the only ones who should be living there. Not only was he protective of those regions and communities, however, Hitler was also very willing to both justify doing violence to protect his beloved geographies, and, to actually do violence to meet those ends.

In my own academic opinion, Adolf Hitler's personality, both public and private, can be categorized under Moral Anti-Realism, or perhaps more specifically, Moral noncognitivism. Hitler had a moral code for himself and his inner tribe to uphold among themselves, the innermost circle and his most trusted ethnicities. Outside of that circle, however, crimes such as theft, rape, prejudicial violence, and even mass murder, were capable of being reduced to mere moral propositions incapable of being proven either true or false. Thus , and oh so conveniently for Hitler and the Nazi high-command, statements such as, "Killing is wrong" could be reduced to just "Killing" and "is wrong" could be dropped all together. What better justification could one have for mass murder—particularly when standing on the shoulders of Marx as well?

Marx didn't start the class war, he merely brought attention to it. He correctly understood that the working class needed to gain class consciousness if it was to compete in the war that was being waged against it by the ruling class.

It is interesting watching you try to draw a parallel between Marx and Hitler where none really exists. A closer examination of Hitler's philosophy shows the parallel is much closer to your philosophy than Marx's. You have expressed a willingness to defend America from Marxism. In Mein Kampf, Hitler only took one more step from your stated position by implicating the Jews in the Marxist conspiracy against Germany.

"The Jewish doctrine of Marxism repudiates the aristocratic principle of Nature and substitutes for it the eternal privilege of force and energy, numerical mass and its dead weight. Thus it denies the individual worth of the human personality, impugns the teaching that nationhood and race have a primary significance, and by doing this it takes away the very foundations of human existence and human civilization. If the Marxist teaching were to be accepted as the foundation of the life of the universe, it would lead to the disappearance of all order that is conceivable to the human mind. And thus the adoption of such a law would provoke chaos in the structure of the greatest organism that we know, with the result that the inhabitants of this earthly planet would finally disappear. Should the Jew, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the people of this world, his Crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through ether, without any human life on its surface, as it did millions of years ago. And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord."
https://mk.christogenea.org/_files/Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf english translation unexpurgated 1939.pdf

I suspect the narrative you aim to support, is the one wherein the radical revolutionary Leftism of Voltaire and Marx can never be fascist because Nazism is the true radical authoritarian manifestation of the fairy tale far Right. While there is no arguing that so-called neo-Nazi white supremacists do exist, they are identical to low budget Satanists in their having been mislead into believing they fight for some anti-radical Left cause, which has never existed, at least not since the end of WW2 and the fall of the 3rd Reich, which was just as radical Left as was Lenin and later Stalin.

At length, I tire of your adversarial pro-Marxist roleplay. The hour is late, and I fear for the hour. If you are not so young as I imagine, then naiveté followed you into your older age. You seem to have fixed your mind into a very small four-walled box defined by a political philosophy untenable for all of human time, at least by the common man who always falls victim to it.

You are welcome to cite sources as you like. The realm of internet cyber "historical truth" is rife with historical revisionism crafted to support any ideological narrative you choose. However, the truth is the radical revolutionary Left, American or otherwise, has no legs now with which to stand upon and endure through applied to civilizational form for centuries, as it never has, and never will have.

You argue for the deaths of tens of millions.

 

[Tehon]

Marx's complete ethos, epistemology, paradigm, dialectic and philosophy of and for the primacy of his central political theory was predicated upon class warfare: the struggle between the working class and the wealthy, and by association with the wealthy, the middle class or bourgeoisie. Distantly similar to the Identity Politics practiced by today's American Democratic Party, was Hitler's own adaptation of race warfare traded in place of Marxist class warfare, but an inter- societal race war against the Jews instead.

In order to intimately know Hitler's mind, one must read and slowly digest Mein Kampf. Hitler was fiercely tribal in his ultra passionate belief in protecting and defending the sanctity of his childhood communities, from encroachment by anyone really other than the ancient generational peoples whom he believed were the only ones who should be living there. Not only was he protective of those regions and communities, however, Hitler was also very willing to both justify doing violence to protect his beloved geographies, and, to actually do violence to meet those ends.

In my own academic opinion, Adolf Hitler's personality, both public and private, can be categorized under Moral Anti-Realism, or perhaps more specifically, Moral noncognitivism. Hitler had a moral code for himself and his inner tribe to uphold among themselves, the innermost circle and his most trusted ethnicities. Outside of that circle, however, crimes such as theft, rape, prejudicial violence, and even mass murder, were capable of being reduced to mere moral propositions incapable of being proven either true or false. Thus , and oh so conveniently for Hitler and the Nazi high-command, statements such as, "Killing is wrong" could be reduced to just "Killing" and "is wrong" could be dropped all together. What better justification could one have for mass murder—particularly when standing on the shoulders of Marx as well?

Marx didn't start the class war, he merely brought attention to it. He correctly understood that the working class needed to gain class consciousness if it was to compete in the war that was being waged against it by the ruling class.

It is interesting watching you try to draw a parallel between Marx and Hitler where none really exists. A closer examination of Hitler's philosophy shows the parallel is much closer to your philosophy than Marx's. You have expressed a willingness to defend America from Marxism. In Mein Kampf, Hitler only took one more step from your stated position by implicating the Jews in the Marxist conspiracy against Germany.

"The Jewish doctrine of Marxism repudiates the aristocratic principle of Nature and substitutes for it the eternal privilege of force and energy, numerical mass and its dead weight. Thus it denies the individual worth of the human personality, impugns the teaching that nationhood and race have a primary significance, and by doing this it takes away the very foundations of human existence and human civilization. If the Marxist teaching were to be accepted as the foundation of the life of the universe, it would lead to the disappearance of all order that is conceivable to the human mind. And thus the adoption of such a law would provoke chaos in the structure of the greatest organism that we know, with the result that the inhabitants of this earthly planet would finally disappear. Should the Jew, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the people of this world, his Crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through ether, without any human life on its surface, as it did millions of years ago. And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord."
https://mk.christogenea.org/_files/Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf english translation unexpurgated 1939.pdf

I suspect the narrative you aim to support, is the one wherein the radical revolutionary Leftism of Voltaire and Marx can never be fascist because Nazism is the true radical authoritarian manifestation of the fairy tale far Right. While there is no arguing that so-called neo-Nazi white supremacists do exist, they are identical to low budget Satanists in their having been mislead into believing they fight for some anti-radical Left cause, which has never existed, at least not since the end of WW2 and the fall of the 3rd Reich, which was just as radical Left as was Lenin and later Stalin.

At length, I tire of your adversarial pro-Marxist roleplay. The hour is late, and I fear for the hour. If you are not so young as I imagine, then naiveté followed you into your older age. You seem to have fixed your mind into a very small four-walled box defined by a political philosophy untenable for all of human time, at least by the common man who always falls victim to it.

You are welcome to cite sources as you like. The realm of internet cyber "historical truth" is rife with historical revisionism crafted to support any ideological narrative you choose. However, the truth is the radical revolutionary Left, American or otherwise, has no legs now with which to stand upon and endure through applied to civilizational form for centuries, as it never has, and never will have.

You argue for the deaths of tens of millions.

The only historical revisionism is coming from you and your ilk. The citation supported the source you prescribed as offering an intimate knowledge of Hitler. The knowledge gained is that there is no connection between the philosophies of Marx and Hitler. Hitler holds the same views of Marxism as do you. Hitler didn't kill Marxists and Jews because he was a radical leftist, he did it because he was a right wing nationalist who saw them as standing in the way of his efforts to Make Germany Great Again.

The hour is late and you should fear it. We are frightfully close to seeing if history will repeat itself, due in no small part to an errant analysis of history crafted by right wing ideologues.