yea, it was JUST HER ALONE, thats his point, dipshit. One person does not a case make.
The Next Administration
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
yea, it was JUST HER ALONE, thats his point, dipshit. One person does not a case make.
bigrebnc1775
][][][% NC Sheepdog
It's called testing the waters or are you too ******* stupid to realize that dipshit. Of course you are.
don't call me too stupid when you're the cornball conspiracy theorist who has a zero % track record of any of your conspiracies coming true, whack-job. have another drink and smoke another bag of shrooms. there's democrats in the basement and under the bed, *****.
Liability
Locked Account.
He's swimming in the ocean that demonstrates how far over your head you have always been and will always be.
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
A whole lot of chicken counting here. And all I see are unhatched eggs. The election is a year away. That is an eternity in Presidential politics. Much can and probably will happen.
bigrebnc1775
][][][% NC Sheepdog
I call you stupid while you acting the part or are you acting? Is this your normal you? Politicans don't say what she said as a mishap or mispoke or in jest. Yes the government was testing the reaction she got when she said it. They are glad you don't think there was anything wrong with what she said. You are what they call a usefull idiot.
YOU are what they call a useful idiot.
They keep you thinking there is a THEY there.
BOOOOOO!
Idiot.
bigrebnc1775
][][][% NC Sheepdog
Sleep on sheeple
Sleep with a clove of garlic and a silver bullet next to your bed, vagina.
bigrebnc1775
][][][% NC Sheepdog
I bet you'll say America could never be taken over by a dictator. Create a few laws restriction of a few rights and you have the making of a dictatorship
I'll bet you think there's colonies on the moon, area 51 is harvesting alien life, 9/11 was an inside job, and jfk's assassination was never solved.
stfu you gullible fruit
bigrebnc1775
][][][% NC Sheepdog
If you can think about those things enough to ask about them you must think about them all the time.
Flopper
Diamond Member
Obama beats Cain in the major polls by 7 points.
Obama beats Romney in the major polls by 1.5 points.
The Republicans are in limelight with all the primaries and debates. Next summer the Democrats will start grabbing the airways.
Don't count your chickens till hatch.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama
RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Cain vs. Obama
Obama beats Romney in the major polls by 1.5 points.
The Republicans are in limelight with all the primaries and debates. Next summer the Democrats will start grabbing the airways.
Don't count your chickens till hatch.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama
RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Cain vs. Obama
JoeB131
Diamond Member
Wishful thinking. Actually, I think Obama has a pretty good chance of winning re-election, because almost all of the GOP choices suck. I've voted Republican in every presidential election since 1980, and frankly, the only one I would even consider voting for is Perry.
If you look at the five presidents who have been voted out in the last century (Taft, Hoover, Ford, Carter and Bush-41) you have a lot of elements that are missing this time. Obama will face no internal party challenger and if there is a third party challenge, it will be splitting the GOP, not his base. not to mention he'll have a billion dollars to bank and the power of the incumbancy.
The flaw in that thinking is giving credit to the political situation for the economic one. In Ike's case, he benefited from the political advantage of the huge post WWII boom where the US had the only standing industrial infrastructure. We were raking it in because we were exporting to rebuild the rest of the world. We still had huge government spending- the largest domestic building program of the Interstate highway system and huge cold war spending. But we also had a vibrant middle class (mostly unionized) making good wages and the FDR taxes on the wealthy were in place.
Same deal with Clinton. Had little to do with the Bickersons of Bill and Newt. We had a boom based on a tech bubble and a housing bubble, both of which eventually burst, with the horrific results we saw in the "Oughts".
Yet despite the Great Society, the Vietnam War and the Space Program, LBJ still managed to post surpluses. Again, the US Economy was a powerful enough engine to do all those things.
Again, I don't think Romney can beat Obama. But even if he does, he'll probably lose one or both houses of Congress in 2014. More to the point, would you trust any Supreme Court justice Romney appoints? Mr. "I'll be better for gays than Ted Kennedy" Romney? Yeah, maybe Scalia or Thomas might feel like retiring because there's a Republican in, but I don't see him appointing anyone that conservative.
You lose credibility when you quote a bomb-thrower like Coulter.
I have no real expectations, because I think a choice between Romney and Obama is like a choice between a stick in the eye... and a stick in the eye.
Liability
Locked Account.
TODAY's polling numbers don't necessarily reflect what will happen on the day that matters.
Heed your own advice.
In the interim, why should the GOP nominate a candidate (Romney) who is just a pale imitation of the very guy (President Obama) with whom we we are in such basic disagreement. What's the virtue in electing a pale imitation of the guy who we disagree with on the fundamentals?
Because in your unpersuasive way you are claiming that Romney might beat President Obama? That's the selling point?
How do you run a guy who packaged the Massachusetts' version of Obamacare and then run AGAINST Obamacare?
No thanks. It makes far more sense to run against the President's re-election by offering some serious and stark CONTRASTS.
President Obama will not only lose. He's going to lose big time. Therefore, it's best to run a conservative alternative to what President Obama stands for.
- Thread starter
- #96
"Steve Jobs warned President Barack Obama that he would not be back in the White House for a second term unless he adopted more business-friendly policies, according to a new biography of the Apple Computer co-founder.
"You're headed for a one-term presidency," Jobs bluntly told Obama during a meeting in San Francisco in the fall of 2010.
The encounter is detailed in "Steve Jobs," by Walter Isaacson. The book will be released Oct. 24, but several news organizations obtained advance copies. Isaacson also talked about the biography in an interview with "60 Minutes" that will air Sunday on CBS.
The book describes Jobs as highly critical of the Obama administration's policy toward businesses, saying that companies were more like to build factories in China because of "regulations and unnecessary costs."
Steve Jobs told Obama: You'll Be a One-Termer
Liability
Locked Account.
Almost certainly NOT President Obama.
Better to oust the loser you know than to double down on failure.
- Thread starter
- #98
"The U.S. Department of Energy is defending its $529 million loan to a startup electric car company that will be building its first line of vehicles in Finland.
ABC News reported Thursday that Fisker Automotive had decided to outsource the job of assembling its new electric Karma sports car in the Nordic nation. Its reason for choosing Finland, the company's CEO said, was that the U.S. lacked facilities capable of doing the work."
US Loan Goes To Company Building Cars in Finland
Wadda guy!
Love the attention he's giving to US jobs?
Full-Auto
Gold Member
- Jun 13, 2009
- 13,555
- 1,625
- 153
Liability
Locked Account.
Bundlers must get rewarded!
Even if the rewards don't benefit Americans.
President Obama effectively declaring: 'I said I'd create jobs. And I am creating jobs. I did not say where!'
Similar threads
- Locked
New Topics
-
-
The Bigfoot community is being torn apart by a documentary's new evidence- Started by EvilEyeFleegle
- Replies: 4
-
