The news is out Trump Campaign obstructed

[tycho1572]

Have a link for that?

I'll look but it was just a headline on MCNBC Let me ask you IF it is true as stated would you give a damn???

OMG, a "headline on MCNBC."

Talk about not giving a damn if it's true or not ...

Senate Intelligence Committee report says Trump campaign was eager to accept help from foreign power Lol! You'll never argue it down, so the big laugh is on you.

as reported by Maddow?

These clowns still think Maddow is a reputable source of accurate information. lol

 

[BWK]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

 

[2aguy]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

 

[dudmuck]

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign shouldn't have built the dossier using Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign didnt use it during campaign, but they did give it to authorities.
It was actually Steele who worked with anti-Putin contacts within Russia, but was likely fed some misinformation from Russian intelligence as well.

its completely legal to get opposition research from foreign sources.
What makes it illegal is to receive it as a gift instead of paying for it.
Because if its a gift, there can be quid-pro-quo.

 

[BWK]

Have a link for that?

I'll look but it was just a headline on MCNBC Let me ask you IF it is true as stated would you give a damn???

OMG, a "headline on MCNBC."

Talk about not giving a damn if it's true or not ...

Senate Intelligence Committee report says Trump campaign was eager to accept help from foreign power Lol! You'll never argue it down, so the big laugh is on you.

as reported by Maddow?

These clowns still think Maddow is a reputable source of accurate information. lol

But, you'll never destroy that information with counter arguments and documentation. Therefore, the Right continues their campaign of saying nothing.

 

[2aguy]

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign shouldn't have built the dossier using Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign didnt use it during campaign, but they did give it to authorities.
It was actually Steele who worked with anti-Putin contacts within Russia, but was likely fed some misinformation from Russian intelligence as well.

its completely legal to get opposition research from foreign sources.
What makes it illegal is to receive it as a gift instead of paying for it.
Because if its a gift, there can be quid-pro-quo.

No, it is illegal to use it to get FISA warrants from Federal judges...

 

[BWK]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

Are we watching, instead of listening to a broken record folks? This crowd of pathetic, unprepared, Right wing ignoramuses always say nothing.

 

[colfax_m]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

This is a new legal defense for Republicans.

The “yeah I did it but I was only caught and held responsible because I’m a Republican”. It doesn’t really work.

 

[2aguy]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

Are we watching, instead of listening to a broken record folks? This crowd of pathetic, unprepared, Right wing ignoramuses always say nothing.

You guys are really funny....the Russia Helped Trump train left the station months ago....and like a Japanese soldier fighting World War 2 on an isolated island years after the war ended...there you are...

 

[2aguy]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

This is a new legal defense for Republicans.

The “yeah I did it but I was only caught and held responsible because I’m a Republican”. It doesn’t really work.

No, the defense is they are innocent but the democrat party lawyers pretending to be States Attorneys will use the power of their office to wrongly accuse and then convict the innocent republican...and if they can't lie convincingly to a jury, they will simply destroy the republican by bankrupting them.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign shouldn't have built the dossier using Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign didnt use it during campaign, but they did give it to authorities.
It was actually Steele who worked with anti-Putin contacts within Russia, but was likely fed some misinformation from Russian intelligence as well.

its completely legal to get opposition research from foreign sources.
What makes it illegal is to receive it as a gift instead of paying for it.
Because if its a gift, there can be quid-pro-quo.

Hillary's campaign didnt use it during campaign, but they did give it to authorities.

Hillary's campaign used Russian intelligence misinformation to get the Obama administration to corruptly investigate an opposing party during a presidential campaign?

It was actually Steele who worked with anti-Putin contacts within Russia, but was likely fed some misinformation from Russian intelligence as well.

I know, Dems using Russian intelligence.......there ought to be a law!!!

its completely legal to get opposition research from foreign sources.

Foreign interference is legal? So why were Dems whining about a meeting in Trump Tower?

What makes it illegal is to receive it as a gift instead of paying for it.

Oh, paying for foreign interference makes it legal.

Because if its a gift, there can be quid-pro-quo.

If a Russian gifts a Facebook meme, it's illegal, but if he's paid for the meme, it's legal?

 

[Billiejeens]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

Poor baby
Barr had literally no involvement in the actions being discussed

 

[Billiejeens]

The video destroys these ******* lunatics arguments and they are far too ignorant to understand.

Can you charge a sitting President -
No the office (of legal) council has established the precedent that you can't

Can you charge a President after he leaves office if he commits crimes
Yes (he is supposedly not exempt for life)

Mueller then clarifies - this is not the reason we did not find the President committed a crime.

The end
Literally the end
Checkmate.

Mueller then clarifies - this is not the reason we did not find the President committed a crime. First off, we need documentary evidence Mueller said those exact words, and second, "this is not the reason we did not find the president committed a crime" makes no sense as it applies to his statement that Trump could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. What is it about simple semantics do you not get? By way of your own explanation, Mueller is talking out of both sides of his mouth, and not making any sense.

The only checkmate going on here is you trying to checkmate yourself with nonsensical gobbly goo. Try again.

I agree that after 3 years of dumbass social media posters screaming go Mueller- it did seem as if all that went was his brain
Maybe its with Bidens

So, you provide us with a watered down argument of nonsensical semantics, while combining it with unrelated Biden comments, and we have ourselves a full on checkmate against you. You lost it totally with this post, because it clarifies absolutely nothing of what you claimed.

Poor baby berg
So confused.

 

[Billiejeens]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

Are we watching, instead of listening to a broken record folks? This crowd of pathetic, unprepared, Right wing ignoramuses always say nothing.

You guys are really funny....the Russia Helped Trump train left the station months ago....and like a Japanese soldier fighting World War 2 on an isolated island years after the war ended...there you are...

Like the slaves that didn't know that the Republicans freed them for years
One day we should have a juneteenth for them, when these idiots find out.

 

[Marion Morrison]

 

[eddiew]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

Are we watching, instead of listening to a broken record folks? This crowd of pathetic, unprepared, Right wing ignoramuses always say nothing.

You guys are really funny....the Russia Helped Trump train left the station months ago....and like a Japanese soldier fighting World War 2 on an isolated island years after the war ended...there you are...

Like the slaves that didn't know that the Republicans freed them for years
One day we should have a juneteenth for them, when these idiots find out.

How long will it take you to admit trump is a crook and liar?

 

[georgephillip]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

We won't know the full extent of Trump's collusion with Russian intelligence until his financial statements become available.

G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia

"But the report showed extensive evidence of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and people tied to the Kremlin — including a longstanding associate of the onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, whom the report identifies as a 'Russian intelligence officer....'"

"The Senate report for the first time identified Mr. Kilimnik as an intelligence officer. Mr. Mueller’s report had labeled him as someone with ties to Russian intelligence.

"Democrats highlighted those ties in their own appendix to the report, noting that Mr. Manafort discussed campaign strategy and shared internal campaign polling data with Mr. Kilimnik, and later lied to federal investigators about his actions."

 

[dudmuck]

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign shouldn't have built the dossier using Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign didnt use it during campaign, but they did give it to authorities.
It was actually Steele who worked with anti-Putin contacts within Russia, but was likely fed some misinformation from Russian intelligence as well.

its completely legal to get opposition research from foreign sources.
What makes it illegal is to receive it as a gift instead of paying for it.
Because if its a gift, there can be quid-pro-quo.

Hillary's campaign didnt use it during campaign, but they did give it to authorities.

Hillary's campaign used Russian intelligence misinformation to get the Obama administration to corruptly investigate an opposing party during a presidential campaign?

It was actually Steele who worked with anti-Putin contacts within Russia, but was likely fed some misinformation from Russian intelligence as well.

I know, Dems using Russian intelligence.......there ought to be a law!!!

its completely legal to get opposition research from foreign sources.

Foreign interference is legal? So why were Dems whining about a meeting in Trump Tower?

What makes it illegal is to receive it as a gift instead of paying for it.

Oh, paying for foreign interference makes it legal.

Because if its a gift, there can be quid-pro-quo.

If a Russian gifts a Facebook meme, it's illegal, but if he's paid for the meme, it's legal?

The Steele dossier did not interfere with 2016 election, because nobody in the public knew that it existed (or at least what was in it) prior to the vote. Nor was the dossier used by the campaign. The dossier only became public after Trump entered into office.

Our intelligence agencies are duty bound to investigate foreign interference in our elections; if US citizens are detected during that process, its the fault of those US citizens for communicating with foreigners.

However, the actual foreign interference is details here.

Six revelations in Senate intel report on 2016 Russian interference

The bipartisan report provides new details on Trump’s conversations with Roger Stone and the activities of the president’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Billiejeens]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

Are we watching, instead of listening to a broken record folks? This crowd of pathetic, unprepared, Right wing ignoramuses always say nothing.

You guys are really funny....the Russia Helped Trump train left the station months ago....and like a Japanese soldier fighting World War 2 on an isolated island years after the war ended...there you are...

Like the slaves that didn't know that the Republicans freed them for years
One day we should have a juneteenth for them, when these idiots find out.

How long will it take you to admit trump is a crook and liar?

If he becomes those.

 

[j-mac]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

Are we watching, instead of listening to a broken record folks? This crowd of pathetic, unprepared, Right wing ignoramuses always say nothing.

You guys are really funny....the Russia Helped Trump train left the station months ago....and like a Japanese soldier fighting World War 2 on an isolated island years after the war ended...there you are...

Like the slaves that didn't know that the Republicans freed them for years
One day we should have a juneteenth for them, when these idiots find out.

How long will it take you to admit trump is a crook and liar?

About the time that you admit that Hillary is a bigger one....