The New York Times finally gives up: "NO EVIDENCE IMPLICATING TRUMP IN EPSTEIN'S ABUSE AND TRAFFICKING OF MINORS"

How nice of you to thank those who pulled you out of the burning auto crash. You're welcome.
It goes without saying, really. I'm not a leftist. The Harris-Walz ticket was one of the worst in our history, and I am thankful we don't have to live under another DEMOCRAP Administration.
 
How nice of you to thank those who pulled you out of the burning auto crash. You're welcome.
Your vote didn't count any more than mine or Janet's did.

Nobody pulled any more or less harder than we did.

You are welcome back.
 
Something anyone with an IQ over 60 knew years ago when first the Clinton campaign, then the Biden campaign, and then the Harris campaign refused to release the Eptein files.

If there was anything in there implicating Trump, we would have seen it in 2016, and then ten million more times since then.


"The Times interviewed more than 30 former Epstein employees, victims of his abuse and others who crossed paths with the two men over the years. The Times also obtained new documents that illuminate their relationship and scoured court documents and other public records...An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors."

Sir, nearly 600 pages have been scrubbed from the Epstein files by Trump's orders. The times can only base their assessment on material that is non redacted. Of course, they're not going to find Trump implicated in anything. The whole point of getting 1000 FBI agents to work overtime to comb through the epstein files for his name is so they can redact his existence from Epstein's entire life.
 
Actually, since Epstein didn't die until 2019, wouldn't those files have come to light after that?

So maybe not 2016 when Hillary was running, but like you say, if there was /anything/ in there to incriminate Trump with, we all know Joe Biden and the democrats would have been all over it twisting and contorting the truth by 2021 when Joe got in office.

The democrats don't control the DOJ. But even assuming that they wielded the dept of justice, much like Trump does now and uses it to their advantage to prosecute their enemies, explain why it took 18 months simply to issue a long overdue search warrant for Trump's home? Why was Trump not arrested afterwards?

Trump incriminates Trump, he doesn't need the democrats to help him. They only respond to his incriminations because he's actually breaking laws.
 
If there is no Evidence of any wrongdoing of Trump, release the full unredacted files.
The redactions over time will change with victim permission... but a lot of what was released was grand jury testimony... has to remain redacted..... but there are more files coming soon... and some dems are wanting a slowdown on releasing those files until they can see them... lol
 
But lets get clear. Trump is not a small government conservative. I do complain about his deficits, but not much else. And I go after those who all to willing to play fast and loose with the truth in an effort to besmirch him.
There are no small government conservative politicians, and there hasn't been since Ron Paul. Was GW Bush a true conservative? Was his father? Was Reagan? Dare I say, Trump is the first GOP POTUS to actually try and slash the budget of worthless expenditures, like NSAID. Trump isn't the most likeable guy, but he is the ONLY person with the strength to stand up to the democrap machine and the establishment. How many other republicans would have persevered with what Trump had to and continues to fight against? Love him or not, when he is gone we go back to pure establishment politics and bigger, more wasteful government. We will miss Trump when he is gone and Gavin Newsom is POTUS. Yes, the democrap machine and the establishment will "make sure" that happens. And one of the ways they will do this is try to push the TDS trap while painting the democraps as the better choice. Many on the right have already fallen.
 
How many pedophiles have you been hangjng around with for over ten years?
Now that I am aware of…unlike many Dems from Clinton and his wife, to Jefferies, to Obama White House counsel, to Dems in Congress that took direct from Epstein in hearings
 
Oh so Trump & his stooges at DOJ are protecting Dems?

All the docs weren't released today which the law orders is because this country is being run by a bunch of criminal ******* scumbags in a suit led by Trump. It's as simple as that.
How are they protecting Dems? They just exposed how your party was deeply involved with Epstein, even after he was convicted
 
What Republicans?
I think it is time for those who embrace conservative ideology to give up and accept that the GOP has moved to the center and the democraps have moved to insanity.
 
Sir, nearly 600 pages have been scrubbed from the Epstein files by Trump's orders. The times can only base their assessment on material that is non redacted. Of course, they're not going to find Trump implicated in anything. The whole point of getting 1000 FBI agents to work overtime to comb through the epstein files for his name is so they can redact his existence from Epstein's entire life.
Why wasn't this the NYT response then?
 
Sir, nearly 600 pages have been scrubbed from the Epstein files by Trump's orders. The times can only base their assessment on material that is non redacted. Of course, they're not going to find Trump implicated in anything. The whole point of getting 1000 FBI agents to work overtime to comb through the epstein files for his name is so they can redact his existence from Epstein's entire life.
The link to the TImes article says they conducted their own investigation and concluded the same thing that the fbi did
 
The link to the TImes article says they conducted their own investigation and concluded the same thing that the fbi did
It's a shame they didn't interview the left leaning forum trolls here who have so much proof that Trump is a pedophile and guilty of sex trafficking. They have so much proof, but no one will listen to them. Maybe the leftists here should do their own investigation and gather up all their evidence and then provide their proof and results to the public for scrutiny.
 
Something anyone with an IQ over 60 knew years ago when first the Clinton campaign, then the Biden campaign, and then the Harris campaign refused to release the Eptein files.

If there was anything in there implicating Trump, we would have seen it in 2016, and then ten million more times since then.


"The Times interviewed more than 30 former Epstein employees, victims of his abuse and others who crossed paths with the two men over the years. The Times also obtained new documents that illuminate their relationship and scoured court documents and other public records...An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors."
Jeffrey Epstein was a “terrific guy” and “a lot of fun to be with.”
--Donald Trump.
 
It's a shame they didn't interview the left leaning forum trolls here who have so much proof that Trump is a pedophile and guilty of sex trafficking. They have so much proof, but no one will listen to them. Maybe the leftists here should do their own investigation and gather up all their evidence and then provide their proof and results to the public for scrutiny.
What we are seeing is just how easily the demafasict party can get their dembots to go along with fascism. They make wild accusations with no proof and when the evidence does come to light, their dembots don’t believe it, they just know there is a crime…because they were told there was one

And even more troubling they’ll ignore the evidence showing far more damning behavior by their own party leaders

It’s crazy but it’s why they are called a cult
 
15th post
The link to the TImes article says they conducted their own investigation and concluded the same thing that the fbi did

Remember when Epstein said, he can bring Donald Trump down with what he knows? There's a reason why Trump went to war over these files being released. There are certain things that is only known to two people, Trump and Epstein and Epstein is dead. All that is left are the files, which Trump furiously had redacted
 
Your vote didn't count any more than mine or Janet's did.

Nobody pulled any more or less harder than we did.

You are welcome back.


But on this site, you create votes against. Nice work Benedict, with your constant nit-piking TDS.
 
li
Remember when Epstein said, he can bring Donald Trump down with what he knows? There's a reason why Trump went to war over these files being released. There are certain things that is only known to two people, Trump and Epstein and Epstein is dead. All that is left are the files, which Trump furiously had redacted
I vaguely remember hearing something like that, I think it was during one of the many convos he had with Dems when he was colluding with them to try and take Trump down before Trump indicted him
 
li
I vaguely remember hearing something like that, I think it was during one of the many convos he had with Dems when he was colluding with them to try and take Trump down before Trump indicted him

Yeah, it's a shame Trump ruined their plans by having those on the inside execute Epstein in his cell, in order for him not to talk. See, i can play the same game and beat you at it every time if you want to go down that road.
 
Back
Top Bottom