The Nanking Massacre and Iris Chang's Book The Rape of Nanking

Axis Mikey Squeels again.
Neo-Nazi Jihad Joe keeps using his comical "Axis Mikey" nickname because, well, one, he's not too bright, and two, now that he's openly repeating Hitler's claim that the Jews wrecked Germany and most of Europe after WWI, and now that he's actually doubling down on the obscene neo-Nazi claim that the Jews provoked the Holocaust, he needs to try to offset his open neo-Nazism with his silly nickname for me.

Frankly, it shows what an inept knob that Zhang was, that he 1) sided with a traitorous scum like Wang and 2) fumbled a sensible offensive with a 10-1 advantage. Treasonous AND incompetent.
But that's not the point. Leaving aside the fact that Fakui (Zhang Fakui) won battles and was awarded with several commands by Chaing Kai-Shek, the point is that you brazenly lied about Fakui's relationship with Chiang Kai-Shek.

When I pointed out that Fakui admitted the Chinese were the aggressors in the fighting at Shanghai, you said his admission didn't matter because he defected to Jengwei during the war and thus would naturally blame the Chinese for the Shanghai battle. But, as you surely knew, Fakui only sided with Jengwei for a few weeks and only did so long before the war started. Fakui served Chiang faithfully throughout the war.

No, guy, you avoided it. You keep pretending the Japanese weren't the aggressors in China, and that somehow, it was China's fault when the Japanese kept attacking them over and over again.
You know that's another lie, as anyone can see by reading my earlier replies in this thread. The picture is far complicated than your simplistic version of events. You keep pretending that the Japanese had no valid reason for being in China, that the Japanese were always the aggressors, and that the poor little ole' Chinese were merely innocent victims of ruthless aggression.

Actually, if it was a nutty claim, 70 million Germans wouldn't have agreed with it.

Was it bad? I guess.
Oh! You "guess" the Nazis' mass murder and repression of the Jews was "bad"?! You "guess"?! Wow! Decent, sane people don't need to "guess" about this. There's nothing to "guess" about.

But then I look at how your hero Trump demonizes undocumented immigrants, (which I'm sure you fully support) and I remember, no one was starving to death recently.

Nobody talks about it because it's not polite to talk about it. Not that it didn't happen. Just limiting what they did in Germany. They overthrew the Kaiser in the middle of a war and then they took advantage of the economic chaos. None of this JUSTIFIES what the Nazis did, but it did explain why so many Germans went along with it at the time.

Go back and read what I actually said, and then put away your sissy emotions before you soil your magic underwear.

I pointed out that there were MULTIPLE factors as to why Germans turned on the Jews so viciously. (Ironically, most German Jews got the hell out of Germany before the War started. The Jews who were killed were Poles, Russians and Hungarians, mostly.)

No, they never really had the high ground. They've always been an apartheid state who have been oppressing an indigenous people. The ironic thing is that now that Jews are considered "White enough", they immediately exhibit the worst behaviors of white people. They are like abused children who got big enough to abuse someone else.

"I don't know why those college kids are protesting us on campus."

Um, because you are committing GENOCIDE, dipshit.
Humm, well, I don't see any need to say anything else, except to state that I'm glad you keep repeating your neo-Nazi propaganda about Jews and Israel.
 
Last edited:
Neo-Nazi Joe keeps using his comical "Axis Mikey" nickname because, well, one, he's not too bright, and two, now that he's openly repeating Hitler's claim that the Jews wrecked Germany and most of Europe after WWI, and how that he's actually doubling down on the obscene neo-Nazi claim that the Jews provoked the Holocaust, he needs to try to offset his open neo-Nazism with his silly nickname for me.

They didn't provoke the holocaust. The Germans did have a valid grievance, though.

Kind of like if someone catches his wife cheating, he has a valid grievance. It's still a crime for him to shoot his wife and her lover dead, though.

So let's review. World War I, a bunch of Jewish revolutionaries like Hugo Hasse, Otto Landesberg, Rosa Luxemburg, Kurt Eisner, were responsible for the 1918 revolution that toppled the Kaiser. This is a historical fact.

And the government they formed presided over the worst period in German History up to that point. Starvation, depression, a humiliating peace treaty.

Check this out, this was a cartoon from 1919. The Nazi Party wasn't even a thing yet, but people knew what the score was.

1746186602100.webp




But that's not the point. Leaving aside the fact that Fakui (Zhang Fakui) won battles and was awarded with several command, the point is that you brazenly lied about Fakui's relationship with Chiang Kai-Shek.

What battles? The Japanese rolled the Nationalists on a regular basis. The Japanese were STILL gaining territory in China in 1945 when the Axis had been effectively crushed in the rest of the world.

When I pointed out that Fakui admitted the Chinese were the aggressors in the fighting at Shanghai, you said his admission didn't matter because he defected to Jengwei during the war and thus would naturally blame the Chinese for the Shanghai battle. But, as you surely knew, Fakui only sided with Jengwei for a few weeks and only did so long before the war started, and Fakui served Chiang faithfully throughout the war.

He defected to Wang Jengwei during Wang's struggles with Chiang. Then he defected back. Then Wang became a Japanese quisling, and Zhang was pretty half-ass about fighting them. He was kind of a weasel. That Chiang kept giving him commands and he kept getting rolled by the Japanese (seriously, did anyone check his bank account) should have been a big old red flag.

You know that's another lie, as anyone can see by reading my earlier replies in this thread. The picture is far complicated than your simplistic version of events. You keep pretending that the Japanese had no valid reason for being in China, that the Japanese were always the aggressors, and that the poor little ole' Chinese were merely innocent victims of ruthless aggression.

Yes, just so we are clear.

The Japanese were the aggressors.
They had no valid reason to invade China or take China's territory
The Chinese were the victims of Japanese aggression.

Other than the guy with the Japanese poop fetish name, no one has come on this thread and said, "Yeah, the Chinese really had that shit coming!!!"


Oh! You "guess" the Nazis' mass murder and repression of the Jews was "bad"?! You "guess"?! Wow! Decent, sane people don't need to "guess" about this. There's nothing to "guess" about.

I just can't get worked up about shit that happened before I was born. What Japan did in China was worse than what Hitler did to the Jews of Europe. (And Hitler's original plan was to deport them all to Palestine, ironically enough. The British vetoed that plan.) And you excuse it.



Well, I don't see any need to say much about your anti-Semitic ranting, except to say that I'll just let you keep repeating your neo-Nazi propaganda about Jews and Israel.

The rest of the world is turning against the Zionist Entity.

1746185899463.webp
 
Joeblow keeps degrading himself more and more ridiculously with each post.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom