Ravi
Diamond Member
Neg to whichever hairbrained poster asked for nested quotes. Looks like we are stuck with it forever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Neg to whichever hairbrained poster asked for nested quotes. Looks like we are stuck with it forever.
Well, let's see. I can't control the idiots that make the uber-long stretched out miles long stupid nested quotes. And I can't neg them since that option is gone.Then well just have to learn how to manage them, won't we?
Well, let's see. I can't control the idiots that make the uber-long stretched out miles long stupid nested quotes. And I can't neg them since that option is gone.Then well just have to learn how to manage them, won't we?
So far I've bailed out of about 4 threads because of the ridiculousness of nested quotes.
I like the previous poison. And it is virtually impossible to delete the nested quotes on a touch screen.That's simply going to be the price that poster pays, which is what I noted from the beginning. A post that's unreadable won't be read. Same thing as a poster who insists on running a 135-sentence rambling diatribe with no paragraph breaks.
Seems to me the site can't be expected to hold a poster's hand and do his work for him; the writer has to take responsibility. Part of making a point is lucid logical progression, and the other part is presentation. In other words, that's on them (the poster who puts it up).
It's the limitations of the software. Apparently it's not possible to nest-with-limits, so We the People must self-govern, so to speak. The alternative is having no context or to rely on a poster multi-quoting, which is both voluntary and erratic. And multi-quote is itself a new pattern of usage, so .... pick your poison.
It's just something to deal with.
I like the previous poison. And it is virtually impossible to delete the nested quotes on a touch screen.That's simply going to be the price that poster pays, which is what I noted from the beginning. A post that's unreadable won't be read. Same thing as a poster who insists on running a 135-sentence rambling diatribe with no paragraph breaks.
Seems to me the site can't be expected to hold a poster's hand and do his work for him; the writer has to take responsibility. Part of making a point is lucid logical progression, and the other part is presentation. In other words, that's on them (the poster who puts it up).
It's the limitations of the software. Apparently it's not possible to nest-with-limits, so We the People must self-govern, so to speak. The alternative is having no context or to rely on a poster multi-quoting, which is both voluntary and erratic. And multi-quote is itself a new pattern of usage, so .... pick your poison.
It's just something to deal with.
big thumbs up Cabbie. Couldn't agree more. Its forum 'etiquette'. I don't like to subject the person I'm having a discussion with and those reading it to extraneous shit. I grab what I need (like I did here) and respond.Also, there is never a need to quote the entire OP just to respond to a thread.
I grab what I need (like I did here) and respond.
My sucking up to CK is complete for the day.
It would be nice if certain posters would refrain from replying to every post with a meme of Obama eating a banana.
It's beyond lame after the first 600 times.
My sucking up to CK is complete for the day.
It would be nice if certain posters would refrain from replying to every post with a meme of Obama eating a banana.
It's beyond lame after the first 600 times.
Oh sure, when YOU do it...![]()