ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 59,116
- 64,274
- 3,615
Trump obstructed a fraud “investigation”?






Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it your contention that republicans orchestrated a fraud investigation?Trump obstructed a fraud “investigation”?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I repeated the propaganda of the left, to remind them of their proclamations.
Muller was appointed by a republican did those duties and then Dems wanted an investigation and thought they had a slam dunk emotionalist. Instead they had a law following thinker and you all lost it, abandoned reality and began the word definition changing process you still currently employWhich Democrat appointed Mueller?
Which Democrat appointed the person who appointed Mueller?
Your perceptions of "libtard" are irrelevant.
Quote the Mueller report. This thread is about the Mueller report. I have given the you the links. I have quoted the Mueller report. You and everyone else refuse to quote the Mueller report. Names you claim the Mueller report shows committed crime, can not even be found in the Mueller report.It isn't opinion. They were actually convicted based on finding from the Mueller report. That is fact
I don't need to quote the Mueller report to substantiate my claim...Quote the Mueller report. This thread is about the Mueller report. I have given the you the links. I have quoted the Mueller report. You and everyone else refuse to quote the Mueller report. Names you claim the Mueller report shows committed crime, can not even be found in the Mueller report.
It is clear to see, the Mueller report proves that the Democrats only have 2nd hand propaganda to make false claims with.
Not sure what all that means but it was still a Republican investigation.Muller was appointed by a republican did those duties and then Dems wanted an investigation and thought they had a slam dunk emotionalist. Instead they had a law following thinker and you all lost it, abandoned reality and began the word definition changing process you still currently employ
So republicans agreed and voted and initiated the Mueller investigation into TrumpNot sure what all that means but it was still a Republican investigation.
Mueller was appointed by a republican who was nominated by Trump when Republicans had control of the Senate, the house and the executive yet somehow it was a democrat investigation?
I'm not buying what you are trying to sell.
What I am trying to say is what I clearly laid out above...So republicans agreed and voted and initiated the Mueller investigation into Trump
That’s what you are trying to say?
You have massaged the parametersWhat I am trying to say is what I clearly laid out above...
Mueller was appointed by a republican who was nominated by Trump when Republicans had control of the Senate, the house and the executive yet somehow it was a democrat investigation?
Just out of curiosity, do you think the Benghazi investigations were democrat too?
um when and where did it say he could be indicted or that he recommended indicting trump on ten counts of obstruction?If you recall, the report:
-Proved Trump committed 10 counts of felony obstruction.
-Stated the only reason Mueller did not seek indictments is he could not indict a sitting President.
If you further recall:
-Mueller was very clear that a President -can- be indicted once out of office.
Trump left office 39 months ago.
No grand jury, no indictments.
As desperate as the lunatic left is to convict Trump of something, you think they’d be all over this.
So.... why hasn't he been prosecuted for these slam-dunk cases of obstruction?
Yes. It was Republicans in control.You have massaged the parameters
Was it Republicans who controlled making Mueller the one who conducted the hearing into Trump?
Not asking about how or whom appointed him to the position years earlier
You rated your a puote from your link, that I posted as, fake news.I don't need to quote the Mueller report to substantiate my claim...
Post 26
Several people were charged based upon the findings of the report.
My claim stands true, several people were charged based on the findings in the Mueller report.
Yet my claim stands true.You rated your a puote from your link, that I posted as, fake news.
You refuse to quote from the Mueller report.
You post names of people not even mentioned in mueller report.
The crimes are not in the mueller report.
I quoted the mueller report that stated they found no crime.
Even today, Trump is not charged with a crime in the mueller report, because they found no crime.
The thread is about the Mueller report which is the Trump investigation.Yet my claim stands true.
I never mentioned Trump committed a crime.
Are you obsessed with him or something.
Agreed. That is why I restricted my comment to crimes that stemmed from the Mueller report.The thread is about the Mueller report which is the Trump investigation.
You really are confused and lost
How did you do that without using the mueller report?Agreed. That is why I restricted my comment to crimes that stemmed from the Mueller report.
I never used the Mueller report.How did you do that without using the mueller report?
We all know, that in a thread about the Mueller report, with quotes and links to the Mueller report, you refuse to use the Mueller report or comment on the quotes from the Mueller report.I never used the Mueller report.