The Most Famous Fakes In Science

So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

1596212664268.png
 
Aliens aren't in the Bible
Indeed they are. The Holy Ghost is not a common representative of persons on earth, neither is any God. Both are represented in the Bible. You’d have us believe there is a god of the entire universe of billions of objects yet ours and man is the only species he’s primarily concerned with, and only when he is naked and can tell what sex “he” is. How special are these “ aliens ?” And Satan(s) ? He’s/she is alien unless you think they are led by OAC.
 
Last edited:
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

View attachment 369530
So, you’re anti public education ? Who then should have decided thE curriculum ? David Koresh types ?
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

View attachment 369530
So, you’re anti public education ? Who then should have decided thE curriculum ? David Koresh types ?
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?


Keep lookin'..... (how to keep an idiot in suspense.)
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?
Boy, speaking of morons !
You use that word a lot yourself, then wonder why we don’t “ prove”
a theory. It’s called a theory because it is not proven Science. You’re a confused little puppy. You do know “quantum theory“ isn’t proven either. But you still have a cell phone, internet etc that all depends upon it.
Now pretend your cell phone was made by Dr Apple from the planet Oz...instead of science.
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

View attachment 369530
So, you’re anti public education ? Who then should have decided thE curriculum ? David Koresh types ?
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?


Keep lookin'..... (how to keep an idiot in suspense.)
Says the scaredy cat who won't say what she would prefer to Darwinism. I know, you're embarrassed.
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

View attachment 369530
So, you’re anti public education ? Who then should have decided thE curriculum ? David Koresh types ?
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?


Keep lookin'..... (how to keep an idiot in suspense.)
Says the scaredy cat who won't say what she would prefer to Darwinism. I know, you're embarrassed.
Her alternative is a lot more moronic then science.
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

View attachment 369530
So, you’re anti public education ? Who then should have decided thE curriculum ? David Koresh types ?
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?


Keep lookin'..... (how to keep an idiot in suspense.)
Says the scaredy cat who won't say what she would prefer to Darwinism. I know, you're embarrassed.
Her alternative is a lot more moronic then science.



Hurry up now......get that proof!!!

Chop chop!!!!
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.
So, your god came from Mars, as was it the Branch Davidians, or the Mormans It’s hard tell which strange version of Christianity you believe in. They all believe in stupid stuff.
 
What if you believed in a scientific principle....and became aware that it is only supported with lies and fabrications.
Would you continue to believe it?
It is....and you do. I'll prove it in this thread.



1.It would be amusing if it weren’t so tragic: the lies that have been perpetrated in government school. Like this...

“Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution




2. The ’proof’ offered by a number of those fooled is the fossil record, and the mechanism of mutations, both of which have been proven false. Proof can be found here:

The Pretense Called Evolution

and

The Biology Term For History

Both scrupulously documented and supported.



3. The reason this thread should be in Politics, not Science, is because Darwin’s plan, colloquially referred to as evolution, is that it, like the hallmark of politics, is based on lies.
In fact, that alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’ What makes advancing it so important?



4. One example is this, from the textbook currently used in NYC high schools, and probably throughout the nation:

“By examining fossils from sequential layers of rock, one could view how a species had changed and produced different species over time.” Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine, Prentice Hall Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002), 382.

The actual fossil record shows the opposite of Darwin’s beliefs: " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Entirely new lines simply materialize without the myriad failed changes that Darwin predicted.


And, why is it acceptable, or necessary, to lie to make the point?
But there is an even greater fabrication used to advance Darwinian beliefs....you learned it....and believed it….I’ll get to it…



Below is the rest of the story. The takeaway, never ever trust PC.
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

View attachment 369530
So, you’re anti public education ? Who then should have decided thE curriculum ? David Koresh types ?
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?


Keep lookin'..... (how to keep an idiot in suspense.)
Says the scaredy cat who won't say what she would prefer to Darwinism. I know, you're embarrassed.
Her alternative is a lot more moronic then science.



Hurry up now......get that proof!!!

Chop chop!!!!
C'mon NKChic, let's hear your whacky theory that's instead of evolution. :popcorn:
 
What if you believed in a scientific principle....and became aware that it is only supported with lies and fabrications.
Would you continue to believe it?
It is....and you do. I'll prove it in this thread.



1.It would be amusing if it weren’t so tragic: the lies that have been perpetrated in government school. Like this...

“Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution




2. The ’proof’ offered by a number of those fooled is the fossil record, and the mechanism of mutations, both of which have been proven false. Proof can be found here:

The Pretense Called Evolution

and

The Biology Term For History

Both scrupulously documented and supported.



3. The reason this thread should be in Politics, not Science, is because Darwin’s plan, colloquially referred to as evolution, is that it, like the hallmark of politics, is based on lies.
In fact, that alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’ What makes advancing it so important?



4. One example is this, from the textbook currently used in NYC high schools, and probably throughout the nation:

“By examining fossils from sequential layers of rock, one could view how a species had changed and produced different species over time.” Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine, Prentice Hall Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002), 382.

The actual fossil record shows the opposite of Darwin’s beliefs: " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Entirely new lines simply materialize without the myriad failed changes that Darwin predicted.


And, why is it acceptable, or necessary, to lie to make the point?
But there is an even greater fabrication used to advance Darwinian beliefs....you learned it....and believed it….I’ll get to it…



Below is the rest of the story. The takeaway, never ever trust PC.



When you are as dumb as you are, you post things like the above.

The Cambrium Period proves Darwin WRONG!!!


And he admitted it, you moron.

"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302


“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”ch.6



. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”
Darwin, "On The Origin of Speices," chapter nine

The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”



Chinese paleontologist J.Y. Chen excavated a new discovery of Cambrian fossils in southern China, he brought to light an even greater variety of body plans from an even older layer of Cambrian rock than those of Burgess! And the Chinese fossils established that the Cambrian animals appeared even more explosively than previously imagined!!! " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors." Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)


There are the folks who know, and the folks who don’t know, but you belong to the third group: the ones who don’t know, and don’t know they don’t know.
A true imbecile.
 
What if you believed in a scientific principle....and became aware that it is only supported with lies and fabrications.
Would you continue to believe it?
It is....and you do. I'll prove it in this thread.



1.It would be amusing if it weren’t so tragic: the lies that have been perpetrated in government school. Like this...

“Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution




2. The ’proof’ offered by a number of those fooled is the fossil record, and the mechanism of mutations, both of which have been proven false. Proof can be found here:

The Pretense Called Evolution

and

The Biology Term For History

Both scrupulously documented and supported.



3. The reason this thread should be in Politics, not Science, is because Darwin’s plan, colloquially referred to as evolution, is that it, like the hallmark of politics, is based on lies.
In fact, that alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’ What makes advancing it so important?



4. One example is this, from the textbook currently used in NYC high schools, and probably throughout the nation:

“By examining fossils from sequential layers of rock, one could view how a species had changed and produced different species over time.” Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine, Prentice Hall Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002), 382.

The actual fossil record shows the opposite of Darwin’s beliefs: " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Entirely new lines simply materialize without the myriad failed changes that Darwin predicted.


And, why is it acceptable, or necessary, to lie to make the point?
But there is an even greater fabrication used to advance Darwinian beliefs....you learned it....and believed it….I’ll get to it…



Below is the rest of the story. The takeaway, never ever trust PC.



When you are as dumb as you are, you post things like the above.

The Cambrium Period proves Darwin WRONG!!!


And he admitted it, you moron.

"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302


“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”ch.6



. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”
Darwin, "On The Origin of Speices," chapter nine

The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”



Chinese paleontologist J.Y. Chen excavated a new discovery of Cambrian fossils in southern China, he brought to light an even greater variety of body plans from an even older layer of Cambrian rock than those of Burgess! And the Chinese fossils established that the Cambrian animals appeared even more explosively than previously imagined!!! " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors." Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)


There are the folks who know, and the folks who don’t know, but you belong to the third group: the ones who don’t know, and don’t know they don’t know.
A true imbecile.
So where did all these animals come from?
 
“In China we can criticize Darwin, but not the government; in America, you can criticize the government, but not Darwin!” - Jun-yuan Chen, Paleontologist

Darwinists succumb to the theory that if you want to criticize a theory you ought to offer something better. This is a complete error. It doesn’t hold water. There is no duty to put something better in its place. It is the best-in-field fallacy. – Darwin's Enigma, by Luther Sunderland, page 40

Karl Marx had no scientific basis for his atheism until Darwin came along. Marx offered to dedicate his book, Das Kapital, to Darwin. – p 125
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

View attachment 369530
So, you’re anti public education ? Who then should have decided thE curriculum ? David Koresh types ?
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?


Keep lookin'..... (how to keep an idiot in suspense.)
Says the scaredy cat who won't say what she would prefer to Darwinism. I know, you're embarrassed.
She’s afraid that she and trump had the same orange chimp ancestor.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Taz
“In China we can criticize Darwin, but not the government; in America, you can criticize the government, but not Darwin!” - Jun-yuan Chen, Paleontologist

Darwinists succumb to the theory that if you want to criticize a theory you ought to offer something better. This is a complete error. It doesn’t hold water. There is no duty to put something better in its place. It is the best-in-field fallacy. – Darwin's Enigma, by Luther Sunderland, page 40

Karl Marx had no scientific basis for his atheism until Darwin came along. Marx offered to dedicate his book, Das Kapital, to Darwin. – p 125
The gargantuan text adds that’s sense of urgency and melodrama to your cutting and pasting.
 
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?

Dagosa can't find how he's going to use fake science and evolve next. Maybe he'll blast himself to Mars and mutate into a space alien. The first human Martian.


Give credit where it is due: the single more successful and most efficient agency of big government is government school:

That dunce is an example of how indelible the indoctrination is.

View attachment 369530
So, you’re anti public education ? Who then should have decided thE curriculum ? David Koresh types ?
So you still can't find any proof of Darwinism?


Keep lookin'..... (how to keep an idiot in suspense.)
Says the scaredy cat who won't say what she would prefer to Darwinism. I know, you're embarrassed.
Her alternative is a lot more moronic then science.



Hurry up now......get that proof!!!

Chop chop!!!!
The confirmation is obvious. You and Trump think alike and have the same orange monkey ancestor.
 
What if you believed in a scientific principle....and became aware that it is only supported with lies and fabrications.
Would you continue to believe it?
It is....and you do. I'll prove it in this thread.



1.It would be amusing if it weren’t so tragic: the lies that have been perpetrated in government school. Like this...

“Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution




2. The ’proof’ offered by a number of those fooled is the fossil record, and the mechanism of mutations, both of which have been proven false. Proof can be found here:

The Pretense Called Evolution

and

The Biology Term For History

Both scrupulously documented and supported.



3. The reason this thread should be in Politics, not Science, is because Darwin’s plan, colloquially referred to as evolution, is that it, like the hallmark of politics, is based on lies.
In fact, that alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’ What makes advancing it so important?



4. One example is this, from the textbook currently used in NYC high schools, and probably throughout the nation:

“By examining fossils from sequential layers of rock, one could view how a species had changed and produced different species over time.” Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine, Prentice Hall Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002), 382.

The actual fossil record shows the opposite of Darwin’s beliefs: " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Entirely new lines simply materialize without the myriad failed changes that Darwin predicted.


And, why is it acceptable, or necessary, to lie to make the point?
But there is an even greater fabrication used to advance Darwinian beliefs....you learned it....and believed it….I’ll get to it…



Below is the rest of the story. The takeaway, never ever trust PC.



When you are as dumb as you are, you post things like the above.

The Cambrium Period proves Darwin WRONG!!!


And he admitted it, you moron.

"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302


“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”ch.6



. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”
Darwin, "On The Origin of Speices," chapter nine

The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”



Chinese paleontologist J.Y. Chen excavated a new discovery of Cambrian fossils in southern China, he brought to light an even greater variety of body plans from an even older layer of Cambrian rock than those of Burgess! And the Chinese fossils established that the Cambrian animals appeared even more explosively than previously imagined!!! " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors." Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)


There are the folks who know, and the folks who don’t know, but you belong to the third group: the ones who don’t know, and don’t know they don’t know.
A true imbecile.

How stereotypical. All the same phony, edited and fraudulent “quotes”



Another fraud.

" A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists(http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)





No link to Nature exists. The link redirects here: freerepublic.com/focus/fr/854288/posts
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists



Holy Harun Yahya but you're a dishonest fraud
 

Forum List

Back
Top