Must be lots of Jewish here who think their country is innocent. Is that it. For the life of me, most people I know know it was an inside job, so if your trying to convince me it wasn't save your breath.
It's difficult to be convinced of the superior understanding of anyone who hasn't mastered the basics of English grammar after several decades.
The 'appeal to numbers' in the garbled verbiage above is a logical fallacy. When it is conveyed amidst numerous errors of a very basic nature, it's even less useful as a technique. Most people I know could write more correctly and clearly than the above post by the time their age was in double digits. Even after Daws explained the difference between 'your' and 'you're', the poster repeats the obvious error.
So either 'comprehensive' is NOT Penelope's strong point after all - or she's simply too ignorant and stubborn to accept a most valid correction on something as basic and well-documented as the correct usage of a common English word.
That does not argue for her ability to examine complex and very technical written material and reach any logical or reasonable conclusions - but against said ability. QED