The more guns in a country the more gun deaths.

Then why are so many trying to come here ?
Luxury seekers. That's why Western countries are inundated with these so called asylum seekers and illegal immigrants.

The freedom index is made up from many indices, even the US contributed to these. So each country is measured against many areas of freedom as opposed to one, two, or a tiny few.
 
Luxury seekers. That's why Western countries are inundated with these so called asylum seekers and illegal immigrants.

The freedom index is made up from many indices, even the US contributed to these. So each country is measured against many areas of freedom as opposed to one, two, or a tiny few.
People from China or North Korea or Cambodia who watched their Auntee or Older sister get Shot in the back of the Head by a Fat Military Policeman with an SKS , Executed And kicked into a Ditch along with other Arrested prisoners know when they come here they can arm up to fight Marxist Tyranny or Communist overreach .
 
People from China or North Korea or Cambodia who watched their Auntee or Older sister get Shot in the back of the Head by a Fat Military Policeman with an SKS , Executed And kicked into a Ditch along with other Arrested prisoners know when they come here they can arm up to fight Marxist Tyranny or Communist overreach .
Hmm.
Why do you supposed Democrats have such a hard on for gun control laws?
Especially for bans on the firearms best suited to resist tyranny like this?
Hmm.
 
Hmm.
Why do you supposed Democrats have such a hard on for gun control laws?
Especially for bans on the firearms best suited to resist tyranny like this?
Hmm.
I watched the Videos of this from back then so that is why I Replied with that paragraph .
 
See? Delusions of adequacy.

Correlation does not prove causation, troll-boy.

/ Thread
Statistically significant correlation has a cause. What do you say the cause is.
Of course you MAGA minions do not believe in science. Quantitative analytics are a science.
Stupidity does not understand science so the deny it's validity.
 
See? Delusions of adequacy.

Correlation does not IMPLY, much less PROVE, causation, troll-boy.
Do you even know waht statistically significant correlation is? Any correlation can imply. You are talking out of your ass. Stupid is as stupid does.
A statistically significant correlation is a relationship between variables that is unlikely to be due to chance. It's determined by a p-value, which is the probability of getting the observed result if there were no correlation. A p-value of 5% or less is generally considered statistically significan
 
Another public school math failure.
 
Do you even know waht statistically significant correlation is? Any correlation can imply. You are talking out of your ass. Stupid is as stupid does.
A statistically significant correlation is a relationship between variables that is unlikely to be due to chance. It's determined by a p-value, which is the probability of getting the observed result if there were no correlation. A p-value of 5% or less is generally considered statistically significan
You understand statistics, but what you don't understand is "gun deaths per capita" has many aspects beyond statistical significance.
For example if you go into some rural communities, you might have much more than one gun per person but zero gun deaths. Then if you go into some urban communities, you might have less guns per person but hundreds of gun deaths per year.
 
See? Delusions of adequacy.

You are talking out your ass, troll-boy

Correlation does not IMPLY, much less PROVE, causation
Mark Twain said, “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience".
 
You understand statistics, but what you don't understand is "gun deaths per capita" has many aspects beyond statistical significance.
For example if you go into some rural communities, you might have much more than one gun per person but zero gun deaths. Then if you go into some urban communities, you might have less guns per person but hundreds of gun deaths per year.
True, you take the big picture analysis as a comparison to other countries. You can then do more granular analysis by country. That will give you insights to the big picture analysis. The big picture analysis stands true, but you can get better understanding of why the macro analysis trends the way it does.
 
True, you take the big picture analysis as a comparison to other countries. You can then do more granular analysis by country. That will give you insights to the big picture analysis. The big picture analysis stands true, but you can get better understanding of why the macro analysis trends the way it does.
We are a nation of gun owners and that will never change. There are more guns than people in this country and that will never change. Most are responsible gun owners who do not contribute to the gun death numbers. Some are criminals who produce most of the gun deaths. Gun laws will never make a difference, address the root cause of why there are "hotspots" of gun deaths in certain areas and certain demographics.
 
Indeed. That's why you've been on ignore for months.
Welcome home.
Mark Twain said, “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience".
 
Back
Top Bottom