Hi Chris:
I have read your Opening Post and see about 1000 holes in your feeble attempts to justify belief in deliberate 9/11 Govt Cover Story LIES. Anyone reading through my
"How To Spot A DoD Disinformation Operative" Post (
here) can see that you certainly fit the profile to a Tee ...
Hi Terral. Perhaps if there are 1000 holes, you could point out just one. No, I am not a disinformation operative; just a normal person with an understanding about who the real experts are regarding the 9/11 investigation.
Let us assume for the sake of this post that Chris is merely a Loyal Bushie/Obama DUPE and no DoD Disinformation Operative running diversion for Inside-Job Murderers of Innocent Americans. I am listed among people with Demolition Experience (30 years) who question the Official Cover Story (see
#3) and a member of
AE911Truth.org (search '
Terral'). The members at
ScholarsFor911Truth.org agree that the WTC Skyscrapers were taken down using Controlled Demolition, which is quite obvious to anyone searching through all the evidence. The
Patriots Questioning 9/11 include more than 1000+ Architects and Engineers at AE911Truth.org, 250+ Pilots, 400+ Professors among others, because the 'evidence' simply does NOT even begin to match the Official Govt Cover Story that 'you' are here to shove down the throats of these USMB members and readers.
Why would you assume that about me? Other than your need to fit me into a neat little box so that you can maintain your theories. I did not vote for Bush or Obama; in the last election I voted for Ron Paul.
How is it I am shoving the official story onto anyone?
Chris just disqualified himself as a real 911Truth Investigator by drawing this 'conclusion' before the presentation of any evidence. Chris is trying to lead these readers to draw 'his' unsupported conclusions without ever addressing anything about 9/11 at all.
You are assuming I have not seen the “evidence” from the conspiracy theorists. Stop assuming things about me. It is making you look foolish.
Now, stop deflecting the subject of this thread. The real issue is about whether the conspiracy theorists’ “experts” are more qualified than the experts that investigated 9/11. It is very clear they are not.
I have posted 'the' 911Truth on many Public Boards like USMB.com, just like many other 911Truthers that 'you' choose to ignore ...
After reviewing it in much detail some years ago I realized that we should ignore evidence from those that first of all do not have access to all the data and second of all are not qualified to provide analysis on the subject. I have seen so much lies and deceit from the conspiracy theorists, they have already discredited themselves.
If Chris is EVER going to make a real 9/11 Case for ANYTHING, then he is going to post 'his' Thesis, Claims, Evidence and Conclusions apart from all the the STUPID QUESTIONS. Each question in your presentation 'divides the reading audience,' which appears to Chris' motivation in the first place ...
Why would I post my evidence and conclusions, when the real experts have already done so? I did not nor do I have access to all the data the experts did, nor do I believe myself more qualified when compared to the resumes of the experts involved in the 9/11 investigation. You can continue pretending you are more qualified than those in the link I originally provided; I will continue to know better.
Bullony! Chris is speculating about people who question the Official Government Cover Story about 9/11 without addressing the evidence connected to the
Flight 93/Shanksville Case, the
AA77/Pentagon Case and the
WTC-7 Controlled Demolition Implosion Case. I cannot 'quote >>' and address his thesis about 9/11, because the guy is throwing dust into the air without being specific about anything. This is Chris' opportunity to 'quote me >>' to start debunking using 'his' evidence that makes the
Official Govt Cover Story Case. Chris will NEVER accept
Terral's Challenge (
Make My Day), because that requires real evidence!!!!
From everything I have seen, the conspiracy theorists have no evidence; just speculations, cherry-picking of evidence, selective reasoning, and resentment for the government. That is what has created these theories, nothing else. I will not waste my time on further “evidence” you think there might be. Until you address the premise of this thread, there is not need to go further.
Please forgive, but Chris saying so means NOTHING. There are plenty of Loyal Bushie DUPES and DoD Cover Story Stooges running around willing to defend Loyal Bushie/Obama 9/11 LIES, and Chris represents just one of them ...
This Is What Really Happened On 9/11
'and'
The Govt Documentation Proves 9/11 Was An Inside Job
Start debunking ... if you can ...
GL,
Terral
Sorry, but I do not fit into your box. The fact remains that the conspiracy theorists’ “experts” cannot hold a candle to the real experts that completed their analysis of 9/11. Does it really mean nothing to consider all the facts, from the most credible experts in the appropriate fields? Obviously this is not of importance to you since you accept the “1000+ engineers” which are lacking in education, training, and experience (not to mention all of the data surrounding 9/11) to dispute the results from the real experts.
Do you honestly believe that electrical, environmental, agricultural, computer systems, and software engineers are qualified to provide analysis of the structural failure of the towers? That is what is included in the “1000+ engineers” list you provided as your "experts".