Terral
Terral Corp CEO
- Mar 4, 2009
- 2,493
- 92
- 83
- Banned
- #21
Hi Chris:
I have read your Opening Post and see about 1000 holes in your feeble attempts to justify belief in deliberate 9/11 Govt Cover Story LIES. Anyone reading through my "How To Spot A DoD Disinformation Operative" Post (here) can see that you certainly fit the profile to a Tee ...
Let us assume for the sake of this post that Chris is merely a Loyal Bushie/Obama DUPE and no DoD Disinformation Operative running diversion for Inside-Job Murderers of Innocent Americans. I am listed among people with Demolition Experience (30 years) who question the Official Cover Story (see #3) and a member of AE911Truth.org (search 'Terral'). The members at ScholarsFor911Truth.org agree that the WTC Skyscrapers were taken down using Controlled Demolition, which is quite obvious to anyone searching through all the evidence. The Patriots Questioning 9/11 include more than 1000+ Architects and Engineers at AE911Truth.org, 250+ Pilots, 400+ Professors among others, because the 'evidence' simply does NOT even begin to match the Official Govt Cover Story that 'you' are here to shove down the throats of these USMB members and readers.
I was a member at AE911Truth.org for some time and I started the very first WTC-7 CD Implosion Topic (USMB duplicate) in the WTC-7 Forum. We debated these 911Truth Topics behind closed doors, beyond the prying eyes of the general public, until the fact became apparent that AE911Truth.org is a haven for DoD Operatives hiding in plain sight (like at the LooseChange Board = more info). Richard Gage (and Bill his Website Manager) are running in place, as part of the 'fake' 911Truth Movement doing nothing to bring anyone to 911Justice. BTW, most everyone in Congress already knows that 9/11 Was An Inside Job and they are all looking the other way ...
Chris just disqualified himself as a real 911Truth Investigator by drawing this 'conclusion' before the presentation of any evidence. Chris is trying to lead these readers to draw 'his' unsupported conclusions without ever addressing anything about 9/11 at all.
I have posted 'the' 911Truth on many Public Boards like USMB.com, just like many other 911Truthers that 'you' choose to ignore ...
If Chris is EVER going to make a real 9/11 Case for ANYTHING, then he is going to post 'his' Thesis, Claims, Evidence and Conclusions apart from all the the STUPID QUESTIONS. Each question in your presentation 'divides the reading audience,' which appears to Chris' motivation in the first place ...
Bullony! Chris is speculating about people who question the Official Government Cover Story about 9/11 without addressing the evidence connected to the Flight 93/Shanksville Case, the AA77/Pentagon Case and the WTC-7 Controlled Demolition Implosion Case. I cannot 'quote >>' and address his thesis about 9/11, because the guy is throwing dust into the air without being specific about anything. This is Chris' opportunity to 'quote me >>' to start debunking using 'his' evidence that makes the Official Govt Cover Story Case. Chris will NEVER accept Terral's Challenge (Make My Day), because that requires real evidence!!!!
Please forgive, but Chris saying so means NOTHING. There are plenty of Loyal Bushie DUPES and DoD Cover Story Stooges running around willing to defend Loyal Bushie/Obama 9/11 LIES, and Chris represents just one of them ...
This Is What Really Happened On 9/11
'and'
The Govt Documentation Proves 9/11 Was An Inside Job
Start debunking ... if you can ...
GL,
Terral
I have read your Opening Post and see about 1000 holes in your feeble attempts to justify belief in deliberate 9/11 Govt Cover Story LIES. Anyone reading through my "How To Spot A DoD Disinformation Operative" Post (here) can see that you certainly fit the profile to a Tee ...
For me, I see the main issue with the 9/11 conspiracy theories is a lack of real, credible experts on the conspiracy side.
Let us assume for the sake of this post that Chris is merely a Loyal Bushie/Obama DUPE and no DoD Disinformation Operative running diversion for Inside-Job Murderers of Innocent Americans. I am listed among people with Demolition Experience (30 years) who question the Official Cover Story (see #3) and a member of AE911Truth.org (search 'Terral'). The members at ScholarsFor911Truth.org agree that the WTC Skyscrapers were taken down using Controlled Demolition, which is quite obvious to anyone searching through all the evidence. The Patriots Questioning 9/11 include more than 1000+ Architects and Engineers at AE911Truth.org, 250+ Pilots, 400+ Professors among others, because the 'evidence' simply does NOT even begin to match the Official Govt Cover Story that 'you' are here to shove down the throats of these USMB members and readers.
Yes, ae911 has many on their list. However, this is just to be on a list to appeal Congress for more investigation, an “independent” investigation.
I was a member at AE911Truth.org for some time and I started the very first WTC-7 CD Implosion Topic (USMB duplicate) in the WTC-7 Forum. We debated these 911Truth Topics behind closed doors, beyond the prying eyes of the general public, until the fact became apparent that AE911Truth.org is a haven for DoD Operatives hiding in plain sight (like at the LooseChange Board = more info). Richard Gage (and Bill his Website Manager) are running in place, as part of the 'fake' 911Truth Movement doing nothing to bring anyone to 911Justice. BTW, most everyone in Congress already knows that 9/11 Was An Inside Job and they are all looking the other way ...
Still, many on that list have little or zero experience in the area needed to question the investigation.
Chris just disqualified himself as a real 911Truth Investigator by drawing this 'conclusion' before the presentation of any evidence. Chris is trying to lead these readers to draw 'his' unsupported conclusions without ever addressing anything about 9/11 at all.
For those listed on the ae911 list if they believed in the 9/11 conspiracy theories, why don’t all of them publicly say so?
I have posted 'the' 911Truth on many Public Boards like USMB.com, just like many other 911Truthers that 'you' choose to ignore ...
Why don’t they show through analysis their theories? Probably because most of them are just calling for more investigation without actually believing all the conspiracy theories postulated by many 9/11 theorists. Perhaps they are seeking for government work?
If Chris is EVER going to make a real 9/11 Case for ANYTHING, then he is going to post 'his' Thesis, Claims, Evidence and Conclusions apart from all the the STUPID QUESTIONS. Each question in your presentation 'divides the reading audience,' which appears to Chris' motivation in the first place ...
As a licensed structural engineer, I try to face the reality of the situation.
Bullony! Chris is speculating about people who question the Official Government Cover Story about 9/11 without addressing the evidence connected to the Flight 93/Shanksville Case, the AA77/Pentagon Case and the WTC-7 Controlled Demolition Implosion Case. I cannot 'quote >>' and address his thesis about 9/11, because the guy is throwing dust into the air without being specific about anything. This is Chris' opportunity to 'quote me >>' to start debunking using 'his' evidence that makes the Official Govt Cover Story Case. Chris will NEVER accept Terral's Challenge (Make My Day), because that requires real evidence!!!!
The fact is there were hundreds of real experts who conducted their independent detailed investigations, who had all the access to the data and information available and who have the proper credentials.
Please forgive, but Chris saying so means NOTHING. There are plenty of Loyal Bushie DUPES and DoD Cover Story Stooges running around willing to defend Loyal Bushie/Obama 9/11 LIES, and Chris represents just one of them ...
This Is What Really Happened On 9/11
'and'
The Govt Documentation Proves 9/11 Was An Inside Job
Start debunking ... if you can ...
GL,
Terral
Last edited: