The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

[Soupnazi630]

Thank You Wist,.... From Day One, & I stayed up about 48 hours straight, watching the TV, & Collecting Data,.... I've never accepted what the Government told the American People & The World about 9-11, due to the Outright Lies, & Inconsistencies.

Feel free to add to what I've posted as well as join in the "Heated Debates".

LOL! I call those "skulls of mush" Sheeple that are afraid to look outside of the box.

You can name no such inconsistencies or post evidence

Oswald killed JFK that is proven fact and you can present no evidence to the contrary. Your claim that he could not have done is imaginary fiction

No one made up specifications about lightpoles you just run in fear from the question

There is no evidence of an inside job on 911 despite the disproven lies from retards like LARAM

 

[wist43]

Thank You Wist,.... From Day One, & I stayed up about 48 hours straight, watching the TV, & Collecting Data,.... I've never accepted what the Government told the American People & The World about 9-11, due to the Outright Lies, & Inconsistencies.

Feel free to add to what I've posted as well as join in the "Heated Debates".

LOL! I call those "skulls of mush" Sheeple that are afraid to look outside of the box.

It's been several years now since I've looked at anything, but these were my thoughts when I left the fight:

1) I agree with Webster Tarpley in his analysis of how false flags are conjured into existence. His book on Synthetic Terrorism is worth a read.

They plan drills which mirror the false flag they are going to implement. If the conditions remain favorable to proceed with the false flag operation they will go "live", and under the cover of the drills they already have underway, they can control the implementation of the false flag and are in position to manage any exigencies.

Of course on 9/11, there has never been a day before or since on which so many simultaneous drills were underway at once. This is how they were able to "plausibly" evacuate all fighter coverage from the east coast which enabled the planes to fly unmolested to their targets.

2) I believe the actual passenger planes were safely landed and all the passengers disembarked. They replaced the planes in-air on radar with remote controlled planes - thereby implementing a modified version of Operation Northwoods from the 1960's.

The planes were reinforced to fly at speeds beyond VMO to withstand the stresses. No normal commercial airliner could have withstood the speeds and maneuvers witnessed on the video footage.

It is absurd to believe that novice, poorly trained hijackers could have handled any aircraft in that manner.

3) They scripted the phone calls with the passengers and I'm sure threatened their families to ensure compliance. They then killed all of the passengers, sans Barbara Olsen.

4) They spent the proceeding couple of years wiring the buildings under the cover of an elevator contractor and a couple of other construction contractors. This gave them full and unfettered access to the elevator shafts and structural supports.

The sleeze who owned the buildings (can't remember his name) took out insurance policies that ensured the payout would be twice the value.

5) I can't remember all of the players I was able to connect as being involved, but I do remember that Dov Zakheim was probably the lead architect of the overall operation.

Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were certainly in the know. George W. Bush was just a puppet along for the ride.

It was largely a military and CIA operation. All of the Joint Chiefs had to be read in.

The cover-up afterward was an "all hands on deck" operation. CIA, FBI, JCS... I think Cheney was the lead for most of that.

That's just a cursory glance of some of my research, of course the overall operation would necessitate a warehouse of storage for all of the information.

 

[candycorn]

Thanks for posting on this subject.

There's no doubt it was a false flag, but the skulls of mush in perceptionland will never look at the evidence.

I gave up years ago, but I acknowledge it is vital to keep the truth alive.

Keep fighting the good fight!!

Can you explain what took down the light poles if it was’t AA77 and (more importantly) why the alleged plotters would have ever included such a thing in their plan--much less engineering having a cab getting hit by one of them?

Yeah...I didn’t think you could. Don’t feel any less of a man (if that were possible)...none of the other conspiracy crackpots could either.

 

[candycorn]

"Manufacturing specifications of those light poles, as well as Pics/documentation showing those "Damaged Poles" at the Pentagon"

Poles were made of metal.

As for the picture:

 

[Soupnazi630]

It's been several years now since I've looked at anything, but these were my thoughts when I left the fight:

1) I agree with Webster Tarpley in his analysis of how false flags are conjured into existence. His book on Synthetic Terrorism is worth a read.

They plan drills which mirror the false flag they are going to implement. If the conditions remain favorable to proceed with the false flag operation they will go "live", and under the cover of the drills they already have underway, they can control the implementation of the false flag and are in position to manage any exigencies.

Of course on 9/11, there has never been a day before or since on which so many simultaneous drills were underway at once. This is how they were able to "plausibly" evacuate all fighter coverage from the east coast which enabled the planes to fly unmolested to their targets.

2) I believe the actual passenger planes were safely landed and all the passengers disembarked. They replaced the planes in-air on radar with remote controlled planes - thereby implementing a modified version of Operation Northwoods from the 1960's.

The planes were reinforced to fly at speeds beyond VMO to withstand the stresses. No normal commercial airliner could have withstood the speeds and maneuvers witnessed on the video footage.

It is absurd to believe that novice, poorly trained hijackers could have handled any aircraft in that manner.

3) They scripted the phone calls with the passengers and I'm sure threatened their families to ensure compliance. They then killed all of the passengers, sans Barbara Olsen.

4) They spent the proceeding couple of years wiring the buildings under the cover of an elevator contractor and a couple of other construction contractors. This gave them full and unfettered access to the elevator shafts and structural supports.

The sleeze who owned the buildings (can't remember his name) took out insurance policies that ensured the payout would be twice the value.

5) I can't remember all of the players I was able to connect as being involved, but I do remember that Dov Zakheim was probably the lead architect of the overall operation.

Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were certainly in the know. George W. Bush was just a puppet along for the ride.

It was largely a military and CIA operation. All of the Joint Chiefs had to be read in.

The cover-up afterward was an "all hands on deck" operation. CIA, FBI, JCS... I think Cheney was the lead for most of that.

That's just a cursory glance of some of my research, of course the overall operation would necessitate a warehouse of storage for all of the information.

The only honest thing you said is that all of the ludicrous claims you describe are a belief.

There is nothing true about is and you did not actually do research

For example you claim there has been no day before or since where so many simultaneous drills were underway at once,

That is a manufactured claim pulled from thin air which has never been backed up with the slightest evidence.

The fact is yes the planes could have all performed the way they did on video without reinforcement. Your claiom to the contrary is ignorant BS. Therefore removing the passnegers and kikking them later is cartoonishly stupid.

It is not the least biut absurd to believe a person with minimal training could have done what the hijackers did. You simply know nothing at all about piloting an aircraft.

and on and on

You have manufactured BS not well researched ideas

 

[Ringo]

 

[Soupnazi630]

Failure

The same BS told over and over,

" official narrative " doesnt exist.

" Fire caused the collapse". Never claimed never happpened.

" No other steel structure brought down by fire " Not true and irrelevant if it were true

Your two miniute video is cartoonish fiction and is rooted in false premises therefore debunks NOTHING

 

[wist43]

The only honest thing you said is that all of the ludicrous claims you describe are a belief.

There is nothing true about is and you did not actually do research

For example you claim there has been no day before or since where so many simultaneous drills were underway at once,

That is a manufactured claim pulled from thin air which has never been backed up with the slightest evidence.

The fact is yes the planes could have all performed the way they did on video without reinforcement. Your claiom to the contrary is ignorant BS. Therefore removing the passnegers and kikking them later is cartoonishly stupid.

It is not the least biut absurd to believe a person with minimal training could have done what the hijackers did. You simply know nothing at all about piloting an aircraft.

and on and on

You have manufactured BS not well researched ideas

I'll let Webster Tarpley explain... although I know you won't watch it

 

[ReinyDays]

I'm just skimming through ... I didn't see any data posted here so I guess I missed a link somewhere ... if there is a link to the data, I'd like to look it over and at least check the math ...

"Ya'll, Jet Air Liners do not disintegrate upon impacting buildings such as the Pentagon, nor when crashing in to the ground! "

This caught my eye ... maybe this has been covered ... of course airplanes are destroyed when they crash ... I can't say they "disintegrate" so much as burn ... yes, we can get aluminum to burn in a campfire ... easy peasy ... these airplanes were carrying full loads of fuel, which burned and destroyed all the aluminum parts ... and there's a lot of aluminum parts on these commercial jetliners ...

Go to Youtube ... search "jet airliner crashes" ... or this B-52 ... how would we know if the airplane disintegrated or not? ... all that fuel has to burn off first ...

The "standard story" the government wants us to believe is the simplest explanation, what you present is layer upon layer of complexity and confusion ... as teenagers, our plan was to swipe an airliner ... this is back when they still left the keys in the ignition ... and/or these thing are fairly simple to hotwire ... and a willing pilot able to take off and fly the plane into the Golden Gate Bridge ... the difficulty with piloting is landing, everything else is super easy, and we were not planning on landing ...

Terrorists are supposed to die in order to be terrorists ... and these Saudi Arabians were extremely well funded ... our dreams ended when we started getting jobs and making money ... and girls got interested in us ... [sigh] ... babies end so many dreams ...

There's better reasons to curtail of fossil fuel use than some stupid "climate change" nonsense ... leave it to the Democrats to screw that up ...

 

[PeterPilot]

Can you explain what took down the light poles if it was’t AA77 and (more importantly) why the alleged plotters would have ever included such a thing in their plan--much less engineering having a cab getting hit by one of them?

Yeah...I didn’t think you could. Don’t feel any less of a man (if that were possible)...none of the other conspiracy crackpots could either.

Light poles? Who gives a shit?

A more intelligent question would be who took the $2.3 trillion that the now dead congressional auditors were trying to find? Why were those auditors 95% of the casualties after the explosion? Were the now destroyed records they were going over sufficient to find out how and why the money was missing?

Why did the FBI go and confiscate all the surveillance camera info on surrounding civilian buildings? Would that footage have ruined the official narrative? Likely so, taking surveillance footage is a recurring theme after such staged events.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Light poles? Who gives a shit?

A more intelligent question would be who took the $2.3 trillion that the now dead congressional auditors were trying to find? Why were those auditors 95% of the casualties after the explosion? Were the now destroyed records they were going over sufficient to find out how and why the money was missing?

Why did the FBI go and confiscate all the surveillance camera info on surrounding civilian buildings? Would that footage have ruined the official narrative? Likely so, taking surveillance footage is a recurring theme after such staged events.

You do

You give a shit because gthe questions destroys your narrative and therefore you riun from it in fear feigning that the question is irrelevant

Taking such footage is standard for any crime. The event was not staged.

 

[candycorn]

Light poles? Who gives a shit?

It proves a plane hit the Pentagon.

A more intelligent question would be who took the $2.3 trillion that the now dead congressional auditors were trying to find?

No such theft took place.

Why were those auditors 95% of the casualties after the explosion?

Again, not true.

Were the now destroyed records they were going over sufficient to find out how and why the money was missing?

Since nothing was missing, yes.

Why did the FBI go and confiscate all the surveillance camera info on surrounding civilian buildings?

Never happened.

Would that footage have ruined the official narrative?

Nope

Likely so, taking surveillance footage is a recurring theme after such staged events.

Only in your cartoonish mind.

But please tell us what took down the light poles if it wasn’t AA77. Get busy.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Thanks for posting on this subject.

There's no doubt it was a false flag, but the skulls of mush in perceptionland will never look at the evidence.

I gave up years ago, but I acknowledge it is vital to keep the truth alive.

Keep fighting the good fight!!

wist43 ALL the posters on here defending the official version of 9/11 candyass,soupnazi and admiral rockwell are paid shills from langley that have penetrated this site,stryder is the exception,he is just a trollboy that runs away from evidence and wont address the facts,those agents i mentioned though they KNOW it was an inside job.they wont admit to being proven wrong or any of the major ass beatings they have suffered here unable to stand toe to toe in a debate because their handlers wont pay them the big bucks for trolling if they do.

thank god for the ignore button,you will want to use it on those 3 i mentioned.

as i said earlier,when you see a poster that comes on here and says they admit that the CIA killed JFK unlike those 3 paid trolls i mentioned, well THOSE are the kind of people that i hold out hope for to be reasoned with on 9/11.

those people i come back and ask them-WELL IF YOU ACCEPT IT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA LIED TO YOU ON THE JFK ASSASSINATION AND IS STILL LYING TODAY,THEN WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THEY ALL OF A SUDDEN DECIDED TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH ON 9/11? they never have any answers,they wont address the evidence or acknowledge the facts. as i said,THOSE are the only ones you can ever hold out hope for.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Light poles? Who gives a shit?

A more intelligent question would be who took the $2.3 trillion that the now dead congressional auditors were trying to find? Why were those auditors 95% of the casualties after the explosion? Were the now destroyed records they were going over sufficient to find out how and why the money was missing?

Why did the FBI go and confiscate all the surveillance camera info on surrounding civilian buildings? Would that footage have ruined the official narrative? Likely so, taking surveillance footage is a recurring theme after such staged events.

PeterPilot agent candyass as DOZENS have discovered over the years,ALWAYS retreats to his pathetic obsession of the irrelevent point of lightpoles when he is suffering major ass beatings that 9/11 was an inside job.

 

[candycorn]

Light poles? Who gives a shit?

It proves a plane hit the Pentagon.

A more intelligent question would be who took the $2.3 trillion that the now dead congressional auditors were trying to find?

No such theft took place.

Why were those auditors 95% of the casualties after the explosion?

Again, not true.

Were the now destroyed records they were going over sufficient to find out how and why the money was missing?

Since nothing was missing, yes.

Why did the FBI go and confiscate all the surveillance camera info on surrounding civilian buildings?

Never happened.

Would that footage have ruined the official narrative?

Nope

Likely so, taking surveillance footage is a recurring theme after such staged events.

Only in your cartoonish mind.

But please tell us what took down the light poles if it wasn’t AA77. Get busy.

agent candyass as DOZENS have discovered over the years,ALWAYS retreats to this his pathetic obsession of lightpoles when he is suffering major ass beatings that 9/11 was an inside job.

feel free to explain them.

You cant
You won’t

I own you

 

[Soupnazi630]

agent candyass as DOZENS have discovered over the years,ALWAYS retreats to this his pathetic obsession of lightpoles when he is suffering major ass beatings that 9/11 was an inside job.

It was no inside job you retard

No one here has presented evidence that it was especially you
\
LA RAM FAN is the only proven paid shill

 

[wist43]

You do

You give a shit because gthe questions destroys your narrative and therefore you riun from it in fear feigning that the question is irrelevant

Taking such footage is standard for any crime. The event was not staged.

Not sure why you think toppled light poles proves or disproves anything.

They flew full sized RC planes into the towers, they could just as well have flown the same configuration into the Pentagon.

Eyewitness testimony and the radar data, however, show a turning radius and speeds which call a full size airliner, be it RC or piloted, into question.

One thing is certain though, the official version of events that you subscribe to is complete fiction.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Not sure why you think toppled light poles proves or disproves anything.

They flew full sized RC planes into the towers, they could just as well have flown the same configuration into the Pentagon.

Eyewitness testimony and the radar data, however, show a turning radius and speeds which call a full size airliner, be it RC or piloted, into question.

One thing is certain though, the official version of events that you subscribe to is complete fiction.

dude this is a BOT,its not even a person like langley agents candyass and agent rockwell. you arent even talking to a person,IT is programmed to come back to you with all kinds of garbage dude.you are talking to yourself.this BOT is even a magic bullet theorist so you think you will get anywhere with a computer bot when this bot puts out stuff on its computer endorcing the warren commission?

 

[wist43]

dude this is a BOT,its not even a person like agent candyass and agent rockwell. you arent even talking to a person,IT is programmed to come back to you with all kinds of garbage dude.you are talking to yourself.this BOT is even magic bullet theorist so you think you will get anywhere with a computer bot when this bot puts out stuff on its computer endorcing the warren commission?

dude this is a BOT,its not even a person like langley agents candyass and agent rockwell. you arent even talking to a person,IT is programmed to come back to you with all kinds of garbage dude.you are talking to yourself.this BOT is even a magic bullet theorist so you think you will get anywhere with a computer bot when this bot puts out stuff on its computer endorcing the warren commission?

Just getting some 9/11 exercise

 

[Soupnazi630]

Not sure why you think toppled light poles proves or disproves anything.

They flew full sized RC planes into the towers, they could just as well have flown the same configuration into the Pentagon.

Eyewitness testimony and the radar data, however, show a turning radius and speeds which call a full size airliner, be it RC or piloted, into question.

One thing is certain though, the official version of events that you subscribe to is complete fiction.

They flew airliners into the towers. Not RC planes

Eyewitness testimonmy and radar data shows no such thing.

They showed turning radius and speeds well within the capability of the hijacked airliners. You are simply wrong

The only certian thing is that you have it exactly backwards eerything YOU claim is the fiction here and you do npot have one poinht or sentence or shred of evidence to prove your idiotic claims

BTW having watched your video it is fact that Wevster Tarpley is a fool and liar. You merely parrot what he says and he provides no evidence of any kind whatsoever