The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

[EMH]

Well, feel free to explain what took them down if it wasn’t a plane. Your move.

Okay now TruthSeeker112125 said “no plane” hit the Pentagon.

So which is it?


Every shred of evidence says the exact opposite. The wreckage, the human remains, the tracking of the air traffic controllers, and yes the wingspan of AA77 is one of the few aircraft large enough to have taken down those 5 light poles.

But I’m eager to hear your laughable explanation of why the plotters would even include the lightpoles in this sinister plot you’ve created. Certainly, light poles are not found at every crash site...but somehow you’re arguing that the plotters not only have to fake all of this wreckage, human reamins, and the air traffic control data...they now. also had to stage lightpoles?

Hey...its your grave you dug...hop on in. That sound you’re hearing is me laughing at you.

The light poles are not dented. They were sucked out by the air wake of the cruise missile.

Had a 757 wing clipped a light pole, the 757 would cartwheel.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The light poles are not dented. They were sucked out by the air wake of the cruise missile.

Had a 757 wing clipped a light pole, the 757 would cartwheel.

There was no criuse missile you illiterate moron

Your own video proves it was an airliner

Igt would not cartwheel you dumbfuck it is anchored

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

Poles were made of metal.

As for the picture:
View attachment 1199749

"Poles were made of metal."

Seriously,....... That's All that You have? Just one picture, & no data about "Shear strength", etc.?

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

I'll let Webster Tarpley explain... although I know you won't watch it

Greetings Wist,..... I'll skim thru it, but it's 3 hours, 41 minutes, & 14 seconds long, can You post the link for the video here?

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

I'm just skimming through ... I didn't see any data posted here so I guess I missed a link somewhere ... if there is a link to the data, I'd like to look it over and at least check the math ...

"Ya'll, Jet Air Liners do not disintegrate upon impacting buildings such as the Pentagon, nor when crashing in to the ground! "

This caught my eye ... maybe this has been covered ... of course airplanes are destroyed when they crash ... I can't say they "disintegrate" so much as burn ... yes, we can get aluminum to burn in a campfire ... easy peasy ... these airplanes were carrying full loads of fuel, which burned and destroyed all the aluminum parts ... and there's a lot of aluminum parts on these commercial jetliners ...

Go to Youtube ... search "jet airliner crashes" ... or this B-52 ... how would we know if the airplane disintegrated or not? ... all that fuel has to burn off first ...

The "standard story" the government wants us to believe is the simplest explanation, what you present is layer upon layer of complexity and confusion ... as teenagers, our plan was to swipe an airliner ... this is back when they still left the keys in the ignition ... and/or these thing are fairly simple to hotwire ... and a willing pilot able to take off and fly the plane into the Golden Gate Bridge ... the difficulty with piloting is landing, everything else is super easy, and we were not planning on landing ...

Terrorists are supposed to die in order to be terrorists ... and these Saudi Arabians were extremely well funded ... our dreams ended when we started getting jobs and making money ... and girls got interested in us ... [sigh] ... babies end so many dreams ...

There's better reasons to curtail of fossil fuel use than some stupid "climate change" nonsense ... leave it to the Democrats to screw that up ...

"search "jet airliner crashes""

I have, from when Jets were first introduced for Public Use, to many years after 9-11. In every case, there was always enough wreckage remaining that easily identified the wreckage as that being of a "Jet Airliner".
"everything else is super easy,"

Not according to many pilots, that studied the maneuvers made by at the least the air liner alleged to have crashed in to the Pentagon.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

It's just a black box, I can't see anything other than that

 

[EMH]

It's just a black box, I can't see anything other than that

Clearly a cruise missile.

A 757 cannot fly at 600 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

Clearly a cruise missile.

A 757 cannot fly at 600 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground.

My Bad EMH,.... I have several "Security applications" that I installed since I got badly hacked several years ago.
I also recently had some Major Problems with Firefox, that have not been resolved by Mozilla, and I'm using a different Browser, that has some conflicts with this browser. After I posted about the "Black Box",... I then saw that You had posted a video.

 

[gipper]

There was no criuse missile you illiterate moron

Your own video proves it was an airliner

Igt would not cartwheel you dumbfuck it is anchored

Yeah and Oswald was a lone nut who killed JFK all by himself.

LMFAO!

 

[ReinyDays]

"search "jet airliner crashes""

I have, from when Jets were first introduced for Public Use, to many years after 9-11. In every case, there was always enough wreckage remaining that easily identified the wreckage as that being of a "Jet Airliner".
"everything else is super easy,"

Not according to many pilots, that studied the maneuvers made by at the least the air liner alleged to have crashed in to the Pentagon.

So you didn't search ... consider the case of the Fairchild B-52 crash ... you said every case ... now, where's the wreckage? ...

MH370 ...
AF447 ...
Valuejet 592 ...
PSA 1771 ...

Pilots don't say that ... I've flown a small airplane a little myself ... have you? ... and these Saudi Arabians had graduated flight school and had training on the machines they were flying ... I don't know if they were certified on the types, but they did have extensive training ...

 

[ReinyDays]

wist43 ALL the posters on here defending the official version of 9/11 candyass,soupnazi and admiral rockwell are paid shills from langley that have penetrated this site,stryder is the exception,he is just a trollboy that runs away from evidence and wont address the facts,those agents i mentioned though they KNOW it was an inside job.they wont admit to being proven wrong or any of the major ass beatings they have suffered here unable to stand toe to toe in a debate because their handlers wont pay them the big bucks for trolling if they do.

thank god for the ignore button,you will want to use it on those 3 i mentioned.

as i said earlier,when you see a poster that comes on here and says they admit that the CIA killed JFK unlike those 3 paid trolls i mentioned, well THOSE are the kind of people that i hold out hope for to be reasoned with on 9/11.

those people i come back and ask them-WELL IF YOU ACCEPT IT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA LIED TO YOU ON THE JFK ASSASSINATION AND IS STILL LYING TODAY,THEN WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THEY ALL OF A SUDDEN DECIDED TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH ON 9/11? they never have any answers,they wont address the evidence or acknowledge the facts. as i said,THOSE are the only ones you can ever hold out hope for.

HEY ... I'm a shrill for Langley too ... No Such Agency exists ... even if they did, they weren't there at the time ...

I have to ask though ... why are you defending Saudi Arabia? ... shilling for law enforcement is one thing, shilling for an enemy government is treason ...

Some Morning Scarlet for your coffee ... you're welcome ...

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

So you didn't search ... consider the case of the Fairchild B-52 crash ... you said every case ... now, where's the wreckage? ...

MH370 ...
AF447 ...
Valuejet 592 ...
PSA 1771 ...

Pilots don't say that ... I've flown a small airplane a little myself ... have you? ... and these Saudi Arabians had graduated flight school and had training on the machines they were flying ... I don't know if they were certified on the types, but they did have extensive training ...

Reiny,

I did Search, & Every Crash, That I found , and I'll be more specific here,..... Every Jet Air Liner that crashed in to "The Ground", always showed evidence that a Jet Air Liner had crashed.

And Yes,.... Pilots did state that.

And, It's Totally Irrelevant to this topic of whether I can fly a Jet Airliner.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

So you didn't search ... consider the case of the Fairchild B-52 crash ... you said every case ... now, where's the wreckage? ...

MH370 ...
AF447 ...
Valuejet 592 ...
PSA 1771 ...

Pilots don't say that ... I've flown a small airplane a little myself ... have you? ... and these Saudi Arabians had graduated flight school and had training on the machines they were flying ... I don't know if they were certified on the types, but they did have extensive training ...

"now, where's the wreckage?"

"Valuejet 592 ..."

It was Found,.... You should "Search a little harder".

Valuejet 592 ... - Search Videos

Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.

www.bing.com

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yeah and Oswald was a lone nut who killed JFK all by himself.

LMFAO!

Exactly

That is proven

You became my total ***** every time you attempted to argue otherwise

You are liar and fool who has never presented evidence

Your entire schtick is CIA BAD CIA BAD CIA BAD

That is not an argument boy and I have absolutely proven you wrong at every turn

 

[Soupnazi630]

"search "jet airliner crashes""

I have, from when Jets were first introduced for Public Use, to many years after 9-11. In every case, there was always enough wreckage remaining that easily identified the wreckage as that being of a "Jet Airliner".
"everything else is super easy,"

Not according to many pilots, that studied the maneuvers made by at the least the air liner alleged to have crashed in to the Pentagon.

Yes according to most pilots there was nothing impossible about the maneuvers made on 911.

There was enough wreckage to identify all the airliners on 911

 

[Soupnazi630]

Reiny,

I did Search, & Every Crash, That I found , and I'll be more specific here,..... Every Jet Air Liner that crashed in to "The Ground", always showed evidence that a Jet Air Liner had crashed.

And Yes,.... Pilots did state that.

And, It's Totally Irrelevant to this topic of whether I can fly a Jet Airliner.

No they never said that

the wreckage on 911 shows airliners crashed

 

[gipper]

Exactly

That is proven

You became my total ***** every time you attempted to argue otherwise

You are liar and fool who has never presented evidence

Your entire schtick is CIA BAD CIA BAD CIA BAD

That is not an argument boy and I have absolutely proven you wrong at every turn

Hahahahahahahaha…..

 

[wist43]

Greetings Wist,..... I'll skim thru it, but it's 3 hours, 41 minutes, & 14 seconds long, can You post the link for the video here?

"...https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pzT9JF9X37E&pp=ygUUd2Vic3RlciB0YXJwbGV5IDkvMTE%3D..."

See if that works... minus the quotes and ... of course.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Hahahahahahahaha…..

That is exactly what you do when evidence proves you wrong

You have never presented evidence, you lost every argument so you just run away and laugh

What a ******* child

 

[ReinyDays]

Reiny,

I did Search, & Every Crash, That I found , and I'll be more specific here,..... Every Jet Air Liner that crashed in to "The Ground", always showed evidence that a Jet Air Liner had crashed.

And Yes,.... Pilots did state that.

And, It's Totally Irrelevant to this topic of whether I can fly a Jet Airliner.

I'm asking about the Fairchild B-52 ... specifically ... not the dizzying array of things pilots manage to hit with their propellers ...

No ... pilots don't say that ... you made a comment about flying skills ... that makes your own piloting experience completely relevant ... I once flew a 360-degree turn ... just once, about as simple a flight maneuver as can be ... except perhaps level flight into a building the size of the WTC ... what pilots call a CFIT ( = Controlled Flight Into Terrain ) ...

ETA: Disintegrated ...