The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

[candycorn]

Not sure why you think toppled light poles proves or disproves anything.

Well, something knocked them down. One landing on the road proved that they were there during the time that AA77 hit the Pentagon and not planted overnight.

They flew full sized RC planes into the towers, they could just as well have flown the same configuration into the Pentagon.

Okay...now TruthSeeker112125 says there were no plane parts found at the Pentagon. I showed him the pictures of sizable wreckage.

So which is it...planes or no planes?

IF you dismiss the 9/11 Commission story, cool...but you’ve got to fill the vacuum with something that makes some moducm of sense.

You guys can’t even agree if there were planes involved.

Eyewitness testimony and the radar data, however, show a turning radius and speeds which call a full size airliner, be it RC or piloted, into question.

No. This is an absolute lie.

One thing is certain though, the official version of events that you subscribe to is complete fiction.

Okay..please feel free to supply us a competing narrative in reasonable detail.

Of course you wont.

 

[ranfunck]

Well, something knocked them down. One landing on the road proved that they were there during the time that AA77 hit the Pentagon and not planted overnight.

Okay...now TruthSeeker112125 says there were no plane parts found at the Pentagon. I showed him the pictures of sizable wreckage.

So which is it...planes or no planes?

IF you dismiss the 9/11 Commission story, cool...but you’ve got to fill the vacuum with something that makes some moducm of sense.

You guys can’t even agree if there were planes involved.

No. This is an absolute lie.


Okay..please feel free to supply us a competing narrative in reasonable detail.

Of course you wont.

You have been presented with evidence time and time again because you refuse to look at it or accept it is on you.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You have been presented with evidence time and time again because you refuse to look at it or accept it is on you.

Wrong

Evidence has been asked for over and over and none presented

 

[ranfunck]

Wrong

Evidence has been asked for over and over and none presented

How much do you get paid to post

 

[Soupnazi630]

How much do you get paid to post

Less than you get paid to post lies

You cannot cite any evidence none has ever been posted THAT is a fact

 

[candycorn]

You have been presented with evidence time and time again because you refuse to look at it or accept it is on you.

Actually no I haven't been presented with any such evidence. I've been presented with speculation.

The lightpoles are physical evidence. Much higher hurdle for conspiratards to climb. To date...none have ever done so...few have ever tried.

Above all else, there is no discussion as to why the alleged plotters would add taking down 5 light poles and hitting a cab with one of them would be added to a to-do list.

 

[candycorn]

How much do you get paid to post

Billions. <sarcasm>.

The the nice bonus is that I'm right and continuously humiliate 9/11 conspiracy kooks in the process. Your tax dollars at work

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

What about the 100-200 jumpers, Were they real?

 

[wist43]

How many people here even know how false flags work??

Does anyone here know anything about Operation Gladio??

Understanding Gladio is a good primer for understanding 9/11.

 

[Soupnazi630]

How many people here even know how false flags work??

Does anyone here know anything about Operation Gladio??

Understanding Gladio is a good primer for understanding 9/11.

You are trying to build a narrative based on faith

Not a good way to think

Try evidence.

Oh there is none

 

[candycorn]

How many people here even know how false flags work??

Does anyone here know anything about Operation Gladio??

Understanding Gladio is a good primer for understanding 9/11.

So...you're not going to take a swing at explaining the light poles?

Typical.

 

[LibertyWeeps]

From the last conspiracy theory I read about 9-11...........

Jet fuel does not explode. It can catch fire, but it is meant to take a LOT of heat before it does.
Understanding this, some investigators found what seems to be cannisters of a highly flammable fuel set to go off on one of the empty top floors of one of the buildings a plane flew into. At which, on further investigation of all the videos they could find of the plane hitting the building, the explosion happened micro-seconds before the plane actually came in contact with the building.

Note pads were stolen from Bushes office desk, where he made notes of names and dates in regards to the towers in NY......before any of this happened.

And of course the nonchalant look he had when his aide came and whispered to him when he was in that classroom with kids, which told me everything I needed to know.

The Bushes are RINOs, and whether they are puppets for Jinping or the Islam nation, I don't give a shit......but they ALL need to be hung in public!!!!

 

[candycorn]

From the last conspiracy theory I read about 9-11...........

Jet fuel does not explode. It can catch fire, but it is meant to take a LOT of heat before it does.
Understanding this, some investigators found what seems to be cannisters of a highly flammable fuel set to go off on one of the empty top floors of one of the buildings a plane flew into. At which, on further investigation of all the videos they could find of the plane hitting the building, the explosion happened micro-seconds before the plane actually came in contact with the building.

Wow, could you imagine if any of that was true?

 

[Soupnazi630]

From the last conspiracy theory I read about 9-11...........

Jet fuel does not explode. It can catch fire, but it is meant to take a LOT of heat before it does.
Understanding this, some investigators found what seems to be cannisters of a highly flammable fuel set to go off on one of the empty top floors of one of the buildings a plane flew into. At which, on further investigation of all the videos they could find of the plane hitting the building, the explosion happened micro-seconds before the plane actually came in contact with the building.

Note pads were stolen from Bushes office desk, where he made notes of names and dates in regards to the towers in NY......before any of this happened.

And of course the nonchalant look he had when his aide came and whispered to him when he was in that classroom with kids, which told me everything I needed to know.

The Bushes are RINOs, and whether they are puppets for Jinping or the Islam nation, I don't give a shit......but they ALL need to be hung in public!!!!

How would investigators find cannisters or fet fuel on the top floor when no one investigated until after the towers FELL . There was no top floor or floors to investigate.

There is no such video of any explosion before the plane hit.

If note pads were stolen where are they?????????????

Of course noone has ever seen them so that story is bullshit.


He had a look of shock

So far you have exactly NOTHING

 

[PeterPilot]

candycorn

Only in your thoroughly brainwashed mind do the light poles prove that an airplane hit the pentagon. Theoretically it COULD prove that an aircraft struck the Pentagon, because it's clear that some sort of small aircraft DID hit the Pentagon. The trouble for your position is that all the evidence shows that something hit the Pentagon, BUT IT WAS NOT A BOEING, NOT AA77

 

[Soupnazi630]

candycorn

Only in your thoroughly brainwashed mind do the light poles prove that an airplane hit the pentagon. Theoretically it COULD prove that an aircraft struck the Pentagon, because it's clear that some sort of small aircraft DID hit the Pentagon. The trouble for your position is that all the evidence shows that something hit the Pentagon, BUT IT WAS NOT A BOEING, NOT AA77

Wrong

All the evidence shows AA77 is what hit

You have never shown any evidence to the contrary and it indeed took a large airliner to knock over those poles.

It is a bald faced lie to claim evidence shows otherwise and you cannot cite any such evidence

 

[EMH]

 

[Soupnazi630]

Good job

Clearly proves an airlioner struck

 

[candycorn]

candycorn

Only in your thoroughly brainwashed mind do the light poles prove that an airplane hit the pentagon.

Well, feel free to explain what took them down if it wasn’t a plane. Your move.

Theoretically it COULD prove that an aircraft struck the Pentagon, because it's clear that some sort of small aircraft DID hit the Pentagon.

Okay now TruthSeeker112125 said “no plane” hit the Pentagon.

So which is it?

The trouble for your position is that all the evidence shows that something hit the Pentagon, BUT IT WAS NOT A BOEING, NOT AA77

Every shred of evidence says the exact opposite. The wreckage, the human remains, the tracking of the air traffic controllers, and yes the wingspan of AA77 is one of the few aircraft large enough to have taken down those 5 light poles.

But I’m eager to hear your laughable explanation of why the plotters would even include the lightpoles in this sinister plot you’ve created. Certainly, light poles are not found at every crash site...but somehow you’re arguing that the plotters not only have to fake all of this wreckage, human reamins, and the air traffic control data...they now. also had to stage lightpoles?

Hey...its your grave you dug...hop on in. That sound you’re hearing is me laughing at you.

 

[EMH]

an airlioner

what a MORON!!!