The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

I prove they are liars. They have lied to us for 63 years.

70% of Americans know they lied about 911.



The numbers on CO2 FRAUD are trending that way.
When were you called on to investigate 911? Were you paid as the experts are?
 
When were you called on to investigate 911? Were you paid as the experts are?


Oh that's the "definition," anyone who "gets paid" is an "expert" and it is "treason" to notice when they lie...


LOL!!!


The Zionist Fascist Jew Supremacist TRAITOR knows full well that the ones who have been lying are all from his demographic.
 
I prove they are liars. They have lied to us for 63 years.

70% of Americans know they lied about 911.



The numbers on CO2 FRAUD are trending that way.
You are lying about americans

There is no evidence backing up your 70% claim
 
You are lying about americans

There is no evidence backing up your 70% claim



Got a whole threat on that....


 
Got a whole threat on that....


Which proves you to be a liar
 
Oh that's the "definition," anyone who "gets paid" is an "expert" and it is "treason" to notice when they lie...


LOL!!!


The Zionist Fascist Jew Supremacist TRAITOR knows full well that the ones who have been lying are all from his demographic.
You say weird things about climate, and it shocks me not you say weird things about professionals who examine accidents/crashed airliners.
 
You say weird things about climate, and it shocks me not you say weird things about professionals who examine accidents/crashed airliners.



"weird things" nobody can refute, minor issue...
 
"weird things" nobody can refute, minor issue...
You claim a cruise missile damaged the pentagon yet the damage was not an explosion, it was a hole caused by the aluminum tube of an airliner creating the hole. The skin of airliners all over is thin and made of soft metal. but you deny the experts reports.
 
You say weird things about climate, and it shocks me not you say weird things about professionals who examine accidents/crashed airliners.
Some of us have common sense, and some of us have been in aviation for 50+ years and have seen and studied aircraft accidents for that many years. NTSB has a website, and before the internet a magazine that published findings after all accidents, including aviation.

The official story of the aviation events related to 911 is contradicted by all the facts. You don't understand that, and you don't want to understand that, making your ignorance on the subject matter a personal problem.

Most mature adults are honest enough to know or admit when they've been fooled. Some cannot.
 
Some of us have common sense, and some of us have been in aviation for 50+ years and have seen and studied aircraft accidents for that many years. NTSB has a website, and before the internet a magazine that published findings after all accidents, including aviation.

The official story of the aviation events related to 911 is contradicted by all the facts. You don't understand that, and you don't want to understand that, making your ignorance on the subject matter a personal problem.

Most mature adults are honest enough to know or admit when they've been fooled. Some cannot.

Okay, tell us where the 9/11 Commission Report got it wrong on any major fact.

You can’t.

You won’t.

Because the drivers and others were paid to promote a certain narrative. Were you born yesterday?
Ahh...

So according to you the plotters decided, for some reason I’ll ask you about later, to have light poles involved that were rigged to fall and a car involved that was to be hit by a falling light pole, and never ending payments made to “the drivers and others” as you put it.

Why would the alleged plotters add all of that to their to-do list? Because when you have a plane crash, you don’t always have poles that are taken down, cars that are hit by the poles, and of course drivers who are in their cars when the superfluous poles and cars are included in the scheme...not to mention a cadre of operatives you will have to pay to keep silent for decades to come.

Can you tell us why the plotters would do this?

Again...nobody forces you dumbfux to assume these ridiculous postures. You could just say AA77 hit the pentagon because, well, it did. What is the downside of that to your “it was an inside job” nonsense?

Anyway, tell us why they included all of this extra crap you have said they did if you would, please.

You lose.
 
Some of us have common sense, and some of us have been in aviation for 50+ years and have seen and studied aircraft accidents for that many years. NTSB has a website, and before the internet a magazine that published findings after all accidents, including aviation.

The official story of the aviation events related to 911 is contradicted by all the facts. You don't understand that, and you don't want to understand that, making your ignorance on the subject matter a personal problem.

Most mature adults are honest enough to know or admit when they've been fooled. Some cannot.
You are quite wrong there are no such facts contradicting it.

No aviator claims any such facts
 
Some of us have common sense, and some of us have been in aviation for 50+ years and have seen and studied aircraft accidents for that many years. NTSB has a website, and before the internet a magazine that published findings after all accidents, including aviation.

The official story of the aviation events related to 911 is contradicted by all the facts. You don't understand that, and you don't want to understand that, making your ignorance on the subject matter a personal problem.

Most mature adults are honest enough to know or admit when they've been fooled. Some cannot.
We both are pilots who have studied accidents for over 50 years, and I see silly things claimed about crashes that are a product of their own minds and not of the facts.
 
You claim a cruise missile damaged the pentagon yet the damage was not an explosion, it was a hole caused by the aluminum tube of an airliner creating the hole. The skin of airliners all over is thin and made of soft metal. but you deny the experts reports.
Are those the same "experts" who confirmed to the world that Poland did, in fact, attack Germany on September 1, 1939??

The "Official Version" from the 9/11 Commission has the same credibility as Joseph Goebbels.

If you haven't figured it out yet, you never will.
 
15th post
Are those the same "experts" who confirmed to the world that Poland did, in fact, attack Germany on September 1, 1939??

The "Official Version" from the 9/11 Commission has the same credibility as Joseph Goebbels.

If you haven't figured it out yet, you never will.
No, nothing at all like that. I am not going by the commission, I go by NTSB and eyewitness accounts.
 
No, nothing at all like that. I am not going by the commission, I go by NTSB and eyewitness accounts.
Government bureaucrats can never be trusted - ever!!

They are committed to one thing first and foremost - their career.

Ensuring they can continue and advance in their career necessitates toeing the company line. If they are told to lie, they lie; if they are told to produce a certain result, that's what they do - always and forever.

Step out of line?? Tell the truth?? Defy your superiors?? It's goodbye pension - and for what?? To be ostracized into the "whistleblower" spiral of career and social death??

Given that choice, what would you do??

You are very naive.
 
Government bureaucrats can never be trusted - ever!!

They are committed to one thing first and foremost - their career.

Ensuring they can continue and advance in their career necessitates toeing the company line. If they are told to lie, they lie; if they are told to produce a certain result, that's what they do - always and forever.

Step out of line?? Tell the truth?? Defy your superiors?? It's goodbye pension - and for what?? To be ostracized into the "whistleblower" spiral of career and social death??

Given that choice, what would you do??

You are very naive.

Government bureaucrats can never be trusted - ever!!

And you should be trusted.......why?
 
Are those the same "experts" who confirmed to the world that Poland did, in fact, attack Germany on September 1, 1939??

The "Official Version" from the 9/11 Commission has the same credibility as Joseph Goebbels.

If you haven't figured it out yet, you never will.
Yet you can not point to any major fact they got wrong.

So I think your credibility is along the lines of a Hollywood psychic
 
Back
Top Bottom