The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

TruthSeeker112125

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2025
Messages
1,268
Reaction score
807
Points
903

A Massive amount of Data, from many, many sources, absolutely shows what The American people, & The World, were told about what happened on "9-11", was, & is a Horrific Lie, that led to Undeclared, & Unceasing War, Countless numbers of lives lost, & injured, "Trillions of Dollars Wasted", as well as the empowerment of "The Police State" in America, and many other nations.

I'm starting this post out with what the "New York Fire Commissioners" presented to The Public. Which The First Trump Administration "stonewalled", via Attorney General Barr, over "Procedural matters".


Ya'll, Jet Air Liners do not disintegrate upon impacting buildings such as the Pentagon, nor when crashing in to the ground!

The Plane to Ground, Cell phone call, which brought about the famous "Let's Roll!", was not possible until several years after 9-11.

No Plane crashed in to Building Seven, nor did WTC1, nor WTC2 collapse on it.

British News showed "Building 7" collapsing minutes before it actually did.

These are just a few examples of the Data that I will be posting herein. And I say again,.... The American People & The World were lied to.

===========





New York Fire Commissioners Call For new 9/11 Investigation: “Overwhelming Evidence Of Explosives”​

Date: July 30, 2019

"
History was made this month in regard to 9/11
ir
as New York area fire commissioners called for a new investigation into the tragic events that unfolded that day. The resolution called for a new investigation due to the “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”


On July 24, 2019, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District, which oversees a volunteer fire department serving a hamlet of 30,000 residents just outside of Queens, New York, became the first legislative body in the country to officially support a new investigation into the events of 9/11, according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.


The resolution calling for a new investigation was drafted by Commissioner Christopher Gioia and it was immediately and unanimously approved by the five commissioners."



 
New cell phone technology allows call from flights - what about 9/11 calls?

New cell phone technology allows call from flights?

What about all those 9/11 calls?

"Once you get to a certain height, you are no longer in the range of the cellular network, because cell phone towers aren't built to project their signals that high." ~~ Washington Post, 12/9/04

"Today's vote by the FCC is intended to address whether technology has improved to the extent that cell phone calls now are possible above 10,000 feet -- they weren't in the past." ~~ San Francisco Chronicle, 12/15/04

Dear friends,

Below is a very interesting article in USA Today about new technology enabling cell phone use on airplanes. We all know that you need to be within range of a cell phone tower in order to make cell phone calls. The new technology reported below sets up a beacon on planes allowing the use of cell phones. Yet, it is most interesting that all of the newspapers at the time of 9/11 reported multiple cell phone calls from the hijacked planes which could not have been within reach of a cell phone tower. Particularly on Flight 93, which crashed in the countryside of Pennsylvania, numerous calls were reported to have been made using cell phones, with at least one being a 30-minute call. How is this possible?



Note the claim towards the end of the article: "It was widely known that cell phones will sometimes work on jetliners. Some travelers use them surreptitiously. On Sept. 11, 2001, several passengers aboard hijacked airliners called loved ones." As far as I can tell, this is not at all a widely known fact. In my work as an interpreter, I have at times flown over 50,000 miles a year, yet have never seen or heard of someone making a cell phone call from a plane. Have any of you ever heard of this? Another unanswered question about 9/11. Please help spread the news.



With best wishes,

Fred



Note: To find articles showing multiple cell phone use on Sept. 11, 2001, type "9/11" and "cell phone calls" into your favorite search engine, or see see on washingtonpost.com [30-minute call] and see on cnn.com





see on usatoday.com


Cell phones test positive on AA flight


FORT WORTH (AP) – With television cameramen hovering, Qualcomm chief executive Irwin Jacobs sat in the front row of coach and made one of the first legal cell phone calls from a commercial jetliner. After chatting with a telecom industry lobbyist for a few minutes, Jacobs pronounced the technology behind the airborne phone call a success, although adding that it will be improved over the next couple years.


Jacobs and a group of reporters were aboard an American Airlines jetliner Thursday as it took off from Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport for a demonstration of Qualcomm's cellular technology at 25,000 feet.

The flight required special clearance from the Federal Aviation Administration and Federal Communications Commission, which ban the use of electronic devices abroad planes because of fear they would interfere with navigation systems and cellular networks on the ground.


"It's pretty cool," said Monte Ford, American's top technology official.

Ford said he called his wife, secretary and friends in Paris and Madrid and pronounced the quality of the links good, although he acknowledged the international connections weren't quite as good as domestic ones.

Reporters were given phones with code division multiple access, or CDMA technology, and a few minutes to make and receive calls. Qualcomm commercialized the CDMA technology used in wireless network equipment and licenses system software to cell phone makers.


Connections from the plane were generally good, although some calls were dropped. Sound quality was about the same as a regular cell call on the ground, other than the loud background noise on the MD-80 jet.

There was a delay of about one second in the voice communications, like that encountered when using a satellite phone, which interfered with natural conversation. The delay was caused by the way voices are digitally transmitted in so-called packets from the airplane to the ground.

Also, the caller could not hear the phone ringing on the other end, which caused at least one reporter to hang up while the person on the other end was shouting into the receiver.

Jacobs said San Diego-based Qualcomm would spend the next two years testing whether electronic signals interfered with the jet's avionics system. He also said the technology would be improved and the one-second delay would be shortened.

Eventually, air travelers should be able to make calls, download movies and do all sorts of other things with wireless devices aboard jetliners, he said.

"My guess is we will see the same kind of uses that you have with cell phones on the ground – maybe even more because you're confined to a seat for some time in a plane," Jacobs said.

The cooperation between Qualcomm and American is not exclusive. Qualcomm is talking to other carriers around the world about testing CDMA phones on their jets, and American may talk to other telecommunications companies, officials said.

Qualcomm's CDMA technology is one of a few standards used worldwide to convert voice into digital form for transmission over a wireless network.

American would have an important advantage over competitors if it could become the first U.S. carrier to allow cell phone use on most of its planes, Ford said.

Several years ago, American installed seatback phones, which could be used with a credit card, on many of its planes but ripped them out except in some Boeing 777s and 767s on international routes.

"People found those phones expensive to use and not necessarily convenient," Ford said. "They waited to get on the ground to make calls with their cell phones."

The seatback phones use FAA-approved technology that doesn't interfere with jet navigation systems. Airlines generally charge about $4 a minute plus a $4 access charge.

Even before Thursday it was widely known that cell phones will sometimes work on jetliners. Some travelers use them surreptitiously. On Sept. 11, 2001, several passengers aboard hijacked airliners called loved ones.

However, the FAA and the airlines ban them because they fear that the signals could interfere with navigational equipment. The FCC bans their use from planes because the signals reach many cell-phone towers and have been shown to disrupt cellular networks.

A nonprofit aeronautics group, RTCA Inc., is working on recommendations to the FAA on guidelines for testing wireless devices.

What you can do:
  • Inform your media and political representatives of this vital information on 9/11 cell phone calls. To contact those close to you, click here. Urge them to call for the release of classified documents and videos and to press for a new, impartial investigation.
  • Explore the wealth of reliable, verifiable information on 9/11, including several excellent documentaries, in our 9/11 Information Center available here.
  • Learn more about 9/11 and the secret societies likely involved in this powerful lesson from the free Insight Course.
  • Explore inspiring ideas on building a brighter future by reading this short essay.
  • Spread this news on 9/11 cell phone calls to your friends and colleagues, and recommend this article on key social networking websites so that we can fill the role at which the major media is sadly failing. Together, we can make a difference.
 



2003-money-stokqot.gif
Posted 7/19/2004 9:39 PM Updated 7/20/2004 7:50 AM

In-flight cell phones 'worked great' in test
By Dan Reed, USA TODAY
The race is on to enable airline passengers to make and receive cell phone calls in flight.
clear_002.gif
cell-flights-inside.jpg
clear_002.gif
Qualcomm Inc. chief executive Irwin Jacobs right, makes a call from an American Airlines jet as Monte Ford, left, listens in.
clear_002.gif
[td]
By Donna McWilliam, AP​
[/td]​
Cell phone company Qualcomm (QCOM) has teamed with American Airlines (AMR) to develop satellite-based air-to-ground cellular service. Several smaller companies are working on rival systems. In-flight cell service could be introduced within two years and become commonplace within four, developers believe.
Last week, American and Qualcomm officials circled over West Texas in a jetliner making calls from their cell phones. The Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal Communications Commission authorized the flight to test the technology's safety and transmission quality."


 

A Massive amount of Data, from many, many sources, absolutely shows what The American people, & The World, were told about what happened on "9-11", was, & is a Horrific Lie, that led to Undeclared, & Unceasing War, Countless numbers of lives lost, & injured, "Trillions of Dollars Wasted", as well as the empowerment of "The Police State" in America, and many other nations.

I'm starting this post out with what the "New York Fire Commissioners" presented to The Public. Which The First Trump Administration "stonewalled", via Attorney General Barr, over "Procedural matters".


Ya'll, Jet Air Liners do not disintegrate upon impacting buildings such as the Pentagon, nor when crashing in to the ground!

The Plane to Ground, Cell phone call, which brought about the famous "Let's Roll!", was not possible until several years after 9-11.

No Plane crashed in to Building Seven, nor did WTC1, nor WTC2 collapse on it.

British News showed "Building 7" collapsing minutes before it actually did.

These are just a few examples of the Data that I will be posting herein. And I say again,.... The American People & The World were lied to.

===========





New York Fire Commissioners Call For new 9/11 Investigation: “Overwhelming Evidence Of Explosives”​

Date: July 30, 2019

"
History was made this month in regard to 9/11
ir
as New York area fire commissioners called for a new investigation into the tragic events that unfolded that day. The resolution called for a new investigation due to the “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”


On July 24, 2019, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District, which oversees a volunteer fire department serving a hamlet of 30,000 residents just outside of Queens, New York, became the first legislative body in the country to officially support a new investigation into the events of 9/11, according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.


The resolution calling for a new investigation was drafted by Commissioner Christopher Gioia and it was immediately and unanimously approved by the five commissioners."


Conspiracy theory. Reported to be moved.
 

I Physically Watched this "News Report" before Building 7 collapsed!!! :

by theshowpodcast.com



Publication date 2007 Topics infowars,theshow,showpodcast,theshowpodcast,news,911,wtc7,building7,building 7,bbc Item Size 247.0M




Revealing, shocking video shows reporter talking about collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background, Google removes clip

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 (UPDATED 5:36AM CST)



RELATED: After This Fiasco, How Can We Trust Anything They Told Us About 9/11?

An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.

Minutes before the actual collapse of the building is due, the feed to the reporter mysteriously dies.

This amazing clip was on Google Video
(now back again here), but was removed within hours of the story breaking. However, hundreds of people had already managed to download the clip and it has gone viral on the Internet and the censors won't be able to shut the lid this time. A You Tube upload is available here but we fully expect this to be removed soon. You can watch it for the time being at this link and also here. A WMV link is here (on our server) and a Quicktime here. Bit torrent versions of the file can be found here. An avi version can be found here.

To be clear, the Salomon Brothers Building is just a different name for Building 7 or WTC 7. Skip forward to around the 14:30 minute mark.

Although there is no clock or time stamp on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm. While the exact time of the report cannot be confirmed at present, it is clear from the footage that the reporter is describing the collapse of WTC 7 while it clearly remains standing behind her in the live shot.

Here are some further screenshots from the video.







The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building's structure.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv. Thousands of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences, speeches, events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15 cents a day! Click here to subscribe!


Alex Jones' Endgame


 

Waiting for Seven: WTC 7 Collapse Warnings in the FDNY Oral Histories​


Dr. Graeme MacQueen January 10, 2008


Abstract: On September 11, 2001 there were numerous advance warnings of World Trade Center 7’s collapse, and many people have argued that these warnings are evidence that the building was subjected to controlled demolition. But other researchers feel the warnings are compatible with the hypothesis of natural collapse from damage that the building sustained throughout the day. In this article I examine the arguments of one researcher, Ryan Mackey, who argues, using the oral histories of the New York Fire Department, that the collapse was natural and the warnings rational and based on direct perception. Although I agree with Mackey that the damage to Seven was serious and must be acknowledged as such, I argue that a close reading of the FDNY oral histories does not support his claims and does not remove the cloud of suspicion that hangs over the collapse warnings. The majority of FDNY members did not rationally conclude, on the basis of direct perception of damage to the building, that it was in danger of collapse; they accepted that it would collapse on the basis of what they were told.

Read at The Journal of 9/11 Studies.



 

"BBC Reports 911, WTC 7 Collapse BEFORE it Happens"​





"926,274 views Jun 4, 2013

TOO FAR FETCHED. On September 11, 2001 the BBC reported that the Salomon Brothers building (WTC 7) collapsed before it actually collapsed. Hard to explain and most people aren't even aware that the building collapsed much less that it was reported to have happened before it had happened!According to the video linked below, BBC was reporting this collapse beginning at 4:20pm with a rumor, by 4:30 pm the Salomon building collapse was being reported as fact, according to this video. This was more than 50 minutes before it actually collapsed. The interview in the above video cut off just 5 minutes before the collapse.See this video for the timeline: • 9/11 WTC 7 Collapse Reported On BBC Multip... "


 
Yeah, it is, dumbass!

Go to the conspiracy theory subject heading and see how many more just like it you can find. You are still a rookie and make the same mistakes everyone does.
You Failed to even examine the evidence that was posted, (& there is Many Years worth of Data that I will post), before You with a Kneejerk fashion started Whining "Conspiracy"!

One who refuses to examine the Evidence, & Debate it is a Certified FOOL.
 
You Failed to even examine the evidence that was posted, (& there is Many Years worth of Data that I will post), before You with a Kneejerk fashion started Whining "Conspiracy"!

One who refuses to examine the Evidence, & Debate it is a Certified FOOL.
It's in the wrong subject, dumbass! I have looked at everything posted in the conspiracy theory threads and you likely have nothing new. Perhaps you could use your "expertise" in those old treads instead of creating another useless gab fest. You are merely repeating what has already been disproven. That's why I don't care to participate. You do you! waste all the elctrons you want.

I am just going to ignore you from now on.

Oh, BTW, look at the thread title heading now! The mods agreed with me!

The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects​


Later, loser!
 

The Ultimate Inside Job, Part I: The Lies of 9/11, Victims File Petition to Reopen Investigation​


May 8, 2018 11:00 am by IWB



By Bob Shanahan

2018-05-08_10-58-51.png


Image via 9/11 Photos on Flickr

The U.S. war in Afghanistan is now the longest in American history and has been a complete failure, abandoned by our lawmakers. The 2003 invasion of Iraq and the subsequent rise of ISIS was based on lies. NSA spying on American citizens is as bad as ever today with over 530 million U.S. phone records collected last year. The creation of the now third-largest U.S. government agency, the Department of Homeland Security, with its 240,000 federal employees and its $47.5 million budget have bloated the size and scope of the federal government to an alarming level.



None of this would have been possible without the catastrophic and catalyzing events of September 11, 2001, the ultimate inside job.



On April 10th, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, a group representing the families of victims, filed a petition with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to demand a thorough and transparent investigation into the crimes committed on September 11th. The committee claims to have “conclusive” evidence that explosives were planted and detonated at the World Trade Center which led to the free fall collapse of both twin towers and WTC 7.



The 52-page petition is accompanied by 57 exhibits and federal statute requires the U.S. Department of Justice to review the evidence with a special grand jury. The petition states: “The Lawyers’ Committee has reviewed the relevant available evidence . . . and has reached a consensus that there is not just substantial or persuasive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted crimes related to the use of pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries . . . on 9/11, but there is actually conclusive evidence that such federal crimes were committed.”




Add your name as a supporter of their petition here.



Below is a video of the press conference announcing the petition.







The evidence laid out includes the following:

  • Independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries in the form of thermite or thermate.
  • Expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 prior to the airplane impacts on the WTC Towers, and prior to the building collapses.
  • Technical analysis of video evidence of the WTC building collapses.
  • Firefighter reports of explosions, and of seeing “molten iron like in a foundry.” The petition states that the presence of molten iron would require temperatures higher than jet fuel and building contents could create when burned, but consistent with the use of the high tech explosive and incendiary thermite or thermate.
  • The presence of previously molten iron microspheres, which have been established by electron microscope analysis of WTC dust samples, by both government and independent scientists, is another phenomenon that would be scientifically impossible based on the burning of jet fuel and office contents alone.
  • Video and eyewitness testimony of the ejection during the collapse of WTC 1 and 2 of heavy steel elements laterally from the buildings which would not be possible from a gravity collapse.
  • Scientific analysis, eyewitness testimony, and government reports confirming sulfidation and high-temperature corrosion of the steel found in the rubble after the collapse of the WTC towers and WTC 7, a phenomenon not expected in a jet fuel fire and gravity collapse but consistent with the use of thermate and high explosives.


Conveniently, none of this evidence was discussed in the 9/11 commission that was initially appointed to investigate the collapse of the WTC. The commission has since been exposed as a fraud and members of the commission believe they were being lied to and were not given an adequate timeline to completely discover the truth around the events of that day.







A 2006 report from the Washington Post revealed that most of the people who oversaw the commission believed they were being lied to and talked about referring the matter to the Department of Justice.



The report stated:



“Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said.”



John Farmer was one who expressed these doubts and he later wrote a book called “The Ground Truth,” digging into how evidence was intentionally left out of the report and how intelligence agencies lied about the incident. A coalition of agents from the NSA, FBI, and other intelligence agencies blew the whistle about the commission and said there was evidence that was intentionally ignored and left out of the report.



Needless to say, almost 17 years later, a new investigation is long overdue.




It is time to wake up. The truth is staring us in the face and we cannot accept the government’s story that led to the endless war on terror, loss of liberty, privacy, and warrantless spying on American citizens, and costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and now Syria and possibly Iran. Convenient how Saudi Arabia is absent from this list.







Mysterious truck vans were seen on site at the WTC in weeks leading up to 9/11 entering the parking garage of the office buildings at 3AM outside of regular business hours and after the janitors left. More and more curious and devout patriots and truth-seekers are speaking up and bringing the truth to the surface. One of the most confounding aspects of the 9/11 attacks was the fact that WTC 7 collapsed hours after the twin towers fell despite not being hit by any airplane. Most do not even know that this almost 50-story tower fell crumbling to the ground that evening. Finally, engines found on the ground in Manhattan did not match those of the plane claimed to have crashed into the WTC and there were many instances of explosions being heard throughout the towers as white smoke billowed up from the lobby.



The WTC 7 tower has become a key focus for 9/11 truthers. The building is about 100 yards away from the twin towers but was apparently brought down by fires resulting from debris after the collapse of the other two towers. Explosions were heard at WTC 7 by paramedics and firefighters on the ground as well as people who were trying to get out of the building. The lobby of the tower was shattered by some kind of explosion.



A 2008 report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that WTC 7 collapsed in free fall after fires on multiple floors “caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down.” But this could not be the case. The fires could not have been hot enough to bring the building down and there are many errors in the NIST report. AE911 Truth board member Roland Angle confirms that there are plenty of discrepancies in the report and further claims that there his organization has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund additional research at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. The conclusions of that study will be published later this year.







Loose Change 9/11, a documentary written and directed by Dylan Avery is an illuminating film on what really happened that day. He mentions the Project for a New American Century, founded by neoconservative war hawks Bill Kristol, Dick Cheney, and Robert Kagan, which put out a report in September 2000 that concluded a multi-front war could not commence outside the occurrence of a catastrophic and catalyzing event like Pearl Harbor.



WATCH LOOSE CHANGE 9/11 here.



So, exactly one year later, Dick Cheney was in the White House with President George W. Bush and that catastrophic event timely occurred, shaping Bush’s foreign and domestic policies for the next seven years in office.



No steel or concrete building has collapsed due to fire like the three WTC buildings have in American history. Explosions were heard similar to how charges sound during a controlled demolition of a building. Evidence at ground zero was promptly removed. Many eyewitness accounts claim that the airplanes that hit the towers looked like a black or gray military plane without any markings of a commercial airliner and YouTube videos show something ominous like an explosive device on the bottom of the plane.



Explosive residue studied by physicists obtained from a NYC resident next door revealed that the highly explosive thermite was found from the debris after the towers collapsed. This would explain why the fires were so hot and burned on ground zero for four whole months after 9/11. Further perplexing facts are that no plane debris was found at the Pentagon, no videos released show a plane hitting the building, and no plane remnants or engines or passengers were found in that field in Pennsylvania, something that has never happened in the history of plane crashes.







Edward Curtin reviewed David Griffin’s book, Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World, released last August. The 15 miracles listed below are what Griffin identified as impossibilities and unexplained phenomena surrounding 9/11.



  1. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 were the only steel-framed high-rise buildings ever to come down without explosives or incendiaries.
  2. The Twin Towers, each of which had 287 steel columns, were brought down solely by a combination of airplane strikes and jet-fuel fires.
  3. WTC 7 was not even hit by a plane, so it was the first steel-framed high-rise to be brought down solely by ordinary building fires.
  4. These World Trade Center buildings also came down in free fall – the Twin Towers in virtual free fall, WTC 7 in absolute free fall – for over two seconds.
  5. Although the collapses of the of the WTC buildings were not aided by explosives, the collapses imitated the kinds of implosions that can be induced only by demolition companies.
  6. In the case of WTC 7, the structure came down symmetrically (straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline), which meant that all 82 of the steel support columns had to fall simultaneously, although the building’s fires had a very asymmetrical pattern.
  7. The South Tower’s upper 30-floor block changed its angular momentum in midair.
  8. This 30 floor block then disintegrated in mid air.
  9. With regard to the North Tower, some of its steel columns were ejected out horizontally for at least 500 feet.
  10. The fires in the debris from the WTC buildings could not be extinguished for many months.
  11. Although the WTC fires, based on ordinary building fires, could not have produced temperatures above 1,800℉, the fires inexplicably melted metals with much higher melting points, such as iron (2,800℉) and even molybdenum (4,753℉).
  12. Some of the steel in the debris had been sulfidized, resulting in Swiss-cheese-appearing steel, even though ordinary building fires could not have resulted in the sulfidation.
  13. As a passenger on AA Flight 77, Barbara Olson called her husband, telling him about hijackers on her plane, even though this plane had no onboard phones and its altitude was too high for a cell phone call to get through.
  14. Hijacker pilot Hani Hanjour could not possibly have flown the trajectory of AA 77 to strike Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, and yet he did.
  15. Besides going through an unbelievable personal transformation, ringleader Mohamed Atta also underwent an impossible physical transformation.


Still unconvinced that 9/11 was an inside job? There are so many questions and unexplained realities of that day that there seems to be no other explanation. This is a dangerous day for America, but we are waking up: 54.3 percent of Americans believe the government is concealing what they know about 9/11, according to the National Survey of Fears.



Stay tuned for Part II of my series, The Ultimate Inside Job, that delves into how 9/11 was predicted and how 9/11 truthers are finally starting to gain traction as the truth continues to bubble toward the surface in today’s YouTube/social media era.
 
15th post

The Ultimate Inside Job, Part II: 9/11 was Predicted and the Truth is Finally Bubbling Toward the Surface​


May 8, 2018 11:03 am by IWB



By Bob Shanahan

2018-05-08_11-02-17.png


Image via Cliff on Flickr, courtesy of photojournalist Bill Biggart who took this final shot of his life before breathing his last breath

As I discussed in Part I of The Ultimate Inside Job, there are a multitude of discrepancies in the explanation that September 11th was solely a terrorist attack carried out by Islamic jihadists. Ample evidence points to the World Trade Center being brought down via controlled demolition and the truth is coming out as the American public is becoming increasingly skeptical of the Deep State’s explanation for that deadly day in American history.



Almost 17 years later, 9/11 victims’ families are demanding a grand jury investigation into what really happened that day and government officials are coming out of their daze and waking up to the truth staring them in the face. Over half of Americans are now more curious as 54 percent believe the government is withholding the truth from us about 9/11.



A North Carolina city councilwoman, LaWana Mayfield, recently questioned whether the 9/11 attacks were terrorism at all a few weeks ago. Almost 3,000 people died, leading to the perpetual war on terror, the Department of Homeland Security, thousands more dead American soldiers in the Middle East (and a ceaseless supply of disgruntled terrorists), and an exploding military budget. The Charlotte Observer reported that Mayfield posted on her Facebook page a link to an article from Awarenessact.com titled, “It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 Was A Controlled Demolition.” Mayfield also wrote that she’s still waiting for someone to produce pieces of the “alleged plane that opened the doors for US citizens to (lose) all privacy rights.” She would apologize five days later but still claimed she’s unsure whether planes took down the WTC.



Mayfield told a radio station in Charlotte that she thought the September 11th attacks were aimed “to not only create a way through government to spy on the American people, but also to privatize a lot of the work that is happening on the ground.” This truth is far from a conspiracy theory as 9/11 truthers continue to point to scientific evidence pointing to the inside job that occured on that fateful day.



The truth about WTC 7 falling as a result of controlled demolition was exposed in the mainstream media on C-Span in August 2014.







9/11 was predicted before it even happened by those who saw it coming. Radio host Bill Cooper, in June 2001, predicted a coming terrorist attack that would be blamed on Osama bin Laden. Cooper was killed later that year after 9/11 by police in a convenient encounter stinking of entrapment, escalation, and sketchy circumstances.



“Whatever they’re going to blame on Osama bin Laden – don’t you believe it…They will soon do something outlandish to gain the support of the Sheeple,” Cooper claimed on that June 2001 radio show. Only 11 weeks later, his predictions would become reality. Cooper connected the dots through information obtained from his sources, allowing him to see through the lies being fed to the American public (AKA the Sheeple). The mystery surrounding Cooper’s death has led to the belief by many that it was not an accident but a carefully constructed plot to remove a dangerous truth-teller.



Below is Cooper’s prescient pre-9/11 radio broadcast.







Alex Jones, now of InfoWars.com, was another radio host dismissed as a fake news conspiracy theory nut job. Up until 9/11, Jones was syndicated on 100 radio stations and was heard widely across the American radio waves. However, after September 11th, Jones began to talk about how the attacks were a conspiracy by the Bush administration. This caused a number of the stations to drop his program and for him to be ostracized by the radio industry, relegated to his present status as a conspiracy theorist that few in mainstream media or political circles take seriously.



Funny how what the government finds uncomfortable and the public sees as deplorable is dismissed as unfounded conspiracy theory. The truth can be hard to accept when it is so atrocious.



Behold a Pale Horse should be required reading for every #Anon #qanon #911Truth pic.twitter.com/IWT6ILJatm

— WarriorPrincess (@Truthseeker805) May 2, 2018




A report put out by Europhysics News on the 15th anniversary of 9/11 questions the official explanation of the collapse of all three WTC buildings on September 11th. The stark conclusion will make even the most rational or logical person see the truth in the supposed conspiracy theorist’s version of events.



The report notes:



“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST [U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology] reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.”



Further investigations include, “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” by Steven Jones, a former professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada and fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering as well as Ted Walter’s (a mechanical design engineer and author of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s Beyond Misinformation) “What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7.” It’s science, not conspiracy! Not speculation! Far from fake news! There is no other reason why the buildings came down that day other than controlled demolition. The facts are impossible to ignore any longer.







Here are some more stunning revelations the researchers pointed out.



Fires generally are not hot enough and do not last long enough to generate the ample energy to bring down the structural infrastructure to bring a building down. In addition, most high rise buildings have fire sprinkler systems to prevent a fire from releasing the requisite energy to heat the steel enough to collapse a building of that size. Structural members are always protected by fireproof material designed to prevent them from reaching high enough temperatures.




“Countless other steel-framed high-rises have experienced large, long-lasting fires without suffering either partial or total collapse,” the report points out. The architects and engineers’ report goes on to state:

“… neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise—nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-story office building. Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.”



And yet, on 9/11, we saw three high rise structures fall to the ground, reduced to rubble.







Politicians formerly in power are sounding the alarm to the discrepancies involved in the 9/11 commission. Former U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Bob Graham, a Democrat from Florida, has protested that The Senate-House Intelligence Committee Joint 9/11 Inquiry that he co-chaired had been given a deadline in 2002 that was unrealistic and therefore prevented full completion of the work required. The ten-member group, The 9/11 Commission, issued a report in July 2004 that left many serious researchers and 9/11 victims’ family members up in arms about many unanswered questions after significant new evidence continues to come to light.



The sound evidence has led to numerous articles decrying the accepted explanation for 9/11. Most notably, a 2016 column titled, “Experts Reject Planes, Fire As Cause For 9/11 WTC Collapses.” The article, put out on the 15th anniversary of the attacks, posited: “Technical experts are mounting major challenges to official U.S. government accounts of how three World Trade Center skyscrapers collapsed in near-freefall after the 9/11 attacks 15 years ago.” This article links to government reports on the attacks in addition to the previously mentioned Europhysics News report challenging the government’s findings. The AE911Truth link also mentioned above revealed that the article has been downloaded nearly 700,000 times since August 2016 and “continues to rack up over 2,000 reads per week, keeping it at the top of Europhysics News’ ‘Most read articles.’” Americans are searching for the truth and finally becoming skeptical of the mainstream media kowtowing to the government-led narrative.



Congress is showing increasing willingness to uncover the what really happened on 9/11. One recent victory was the release of the 28 pages that had been suppressed from the 2002 Joint House-Senate Intelligence Commission Inquiry report. The documents released exposed the the relationships intact before 9/11 by Saudi Arabian entities with the 19 accused airplane hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals. Another victory over the last couple years was the congressional passage of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act in 2016 that narrowed the definition of sovereign immunity for civil court claims resulting from international terrorism. April’s petition by the lawyers for 9/11 victims is the latest opening of civic dialog on arguably the most controversial and pivotal event in American history.



The Saudi connection cannot be ignored. Saudi Arabia is the largest sponsor of terrorism in the world, despite claims that Iran is. Furthermore, the Israel lobby continues to pollute Washington DC, getting our bloated military to fight its wars for them despite our military aid that will total $3.9 billion in 2019. Sadly, it seems that President Trump has been hijacked by the Saudi-Israeli cabal as former presidents have.



Ten Irrefutable, Devastating 9/11 Facts https://t.co/CRSJ4whhv3 #911Truth pic.twitter.com/UJhwdXO2B5

— wake up (@corruptplanet) April 29, 2018




U.S. District Judge George Daniels said that there is “a reasonable basis” to implicate Saudi Arabia as one of the countries behind the 9/11 attack. But they will likely never be held to account for their crimes. Saudi Arabia helped “two hijackers acclimate themselves to the United States, and begin preparing for the attacks… James Kreindler, a lawyer for many of the plaintiffs, said he was ‘delighted’ the case can proceed.” Saudi Arabia needs to be viewed as the criminal country they are truly are. Trump has said the Saudis were largely responsible for 9/11 but has done nothing about it.



“Who blew up the World Trade Center? It wasn’t the Iraqis,” Trump said in February 2016. “It was Saudi — take a look at Saudi Arabia, open the documents.” Trump also said they are “the world’s biggest funder of terrorism. Saudi Arabia funnels our petrodollars, our very own money, to fund the terrorists that seek to destroy our people.”



In June 2016, during the chaotic presidential campaign, Trump tweeted out: “Saudi Arabia and many other countries that gave vast amount of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays. Hillary must return all money from such countries!”



To silence now President Trump, Saudi Arabia offered a promise to spend at least $110 billion on “American weaponry — one of the biggest arms deals in history.” The LA Times wrote, “This weapons deal, the president said, is all about U.S. jobs. Yet how many Americans want to work to arm the country that, as Citizen Trump said, ‘blew up the World Trade Center’?”



The previously mentioned Alex Jones, who has proven himself a truth-teller but also an Israeli whore and puppet came out and said Trump has threatened the Saudis and told them not to use their weapons to fund terrorism. This does not seem to be rooted in reality however. Today, Trump still perpetuates the claim that Iran must stop its terrorist-related activities because it is fomenting disarray throughout the Middle East, when they are simply planting their flag in Syria, defending a regime rightly in power and in Iraq, where chaos has been the status quo since the American invasion in 2003.



9/11 truth movements continue to fight on and are gaining traction in the age of YouTube. These truth-seekers regularly dismissed as conspiracy theorists are seeping into the mainstream as their scientifically-backed evidence is being promoted on the Internet. A growing number in the scientific, engineering, and architecture communities are questioning the U.S. government narrative of Middle Eastern jihadists carrying out the deadliest attack on American soil on.



The “Truthers” are getting the incontrovertible evidence that 9/11 was an inside job out to the world. Hoping to reach a tipping point point one day, they are relying on video evidence that cannot be ignored. Seeing for their own eyes the perplexing fall of WTC 7 and other confounding pieces of information coming out around the events of 9/11, Americans are starting to come around to the idea of something not adding up, judging for themselves what they think really happened, since the government won’t tell us.



The truth is out there. The seeds of doubt have been planed. But will the tree of truth blossom and those responsible be held accountable for their crimes? Free thinking is on the rise in the U.S. at last and we need to promote the evidence that proves that the government is lying to us about 9/11.


 
It's in the wrong subject, dumbass! I have looked at everything posted in the conspiracy theory threads and you likely have nothing new. Perhaps you could use your "expertise" in those old treads instead of creating another useless gab fest. You are merely repeating what has already been disproven. That's why I don't care to participate. You do you! waste all the elctrons you want.

I am just going to ignore you from now on.

Oh, BTW, look at the thread title heading now! The mods agreed with me!

The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects​


Later, loser!
Seaman Rockwell,.... You are highly constipated, and Certifiably Ignorant.

"I am just going to ignore you from now on."
:yes_text12:
 

A Massive amount of Data, from many, many sources, absolutely shows what The American people, & The World, were told about what happened on "9-11", was, & is a Horrific Lie, that led to Undeclared, & Unceasing War, Countless numbers of lives lost, & injured, "Trillions of Dollars Wasted", as well as the empowerment of "The Police State" in America, and many other nations.

I'm starting this post out with what the "New York Fire Commissioners" presented to The Public. Which The First Trump Administration "stonewalled", via Attorney General Barr, over "Procedural matters".


Ya'll, Jet Air Liners do not disintegrate upon impacting buildings such as the Pentagon, nor when crashing in to the ground!

The Plane to Ground, Cell phone call, which brought about the famous "Let's Roll!", was not possible until several years after 9-11.

No Plane crashed in to Building Seven, nor did WTC1, nor WTC2 collapse on it.

British News showed "Building 7" collapsing minutes before it actually did.

These are just a few examples of the Data that I will be posting herein. And I say again,.... The American People & The World were lied to.

===========





New York Fire Commissioners Call For new 9/11 Investigation: “Overwhelming Evidence Of Explosives”​

Date: July 30, 2019

"
History was made this month in regard to 9/11
ir
as New York area fire commissioners called for a new investigation into the tragic events that unfolded that day. The resolution called for a new investigation due to the “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”


On July 24, 2019, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District, which oversees a volunteer fire department serving a hamlet of 30,000 residents just outside of Queens, New York, became the first legislative body in the country to officially support a new investigation into the events of 9/11, according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.


The resolution calling for a new investigation was drafted by Commissioner Christopher Gioia and it was immediately and unanimously approved by the five commissioners."


Any American who believes the government story on 9/11 is a ******* dunce. Sadly, I suspect many still do.

Many still believe Oswald acted alone. Lol. Like this dunce Soupnazi630.

Americans are a dumb lot.
 
Back
Top Bottom