The Liberal Rape Myth

[RDD_1210]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Best be sitting down when you read this: Liberals Lie!!!!


4. Now, the "Liberal Rape Myth."

" c]

Date Rape' on Campus

Ah, now we see what is going on here. For generations now, girls, while consenting implicitly to sex, have wanted to assuage their guilt by being able to tell themselves afterward that they had not planned the action, and that they were merely “swept off their feet” by the charm of the guy and/or the magic of the moment. Hence, as all implicitly consenting parties have been long aware, the use of liquor is a marvelous catalyst of this feet-sweeping. Now, along comes our baneful feminist theoreticians who have been able to use their besotted theories to (a) free girls, once and for all, from guilt for their actions, and (b) to load that guilt onto the poor, hapless male population.

Reminder:

5. " My university recently hosted a forum on rape for female college students. They emphasized that rape is a serious issue on campus using statistics.Fact: 1 in 4 college women have either been raped or suffered attempted rape. "
Rape Statistics Are 1 in 4 women raped Skeptical analysis. AspiringEconomist.com


6. "... central tenet is that one-quarter of all college girls will be raped or be the targets of attempted rapeby the end of their college years (completed rapes outnumbering attempted rapes by a ratio of about three to two). The girls’ assailants are not terrifying strangers grabbing them in dark alleys but the guys sitting next to them in class or at the cafeteria.

This claim, first published in Ms.magazine in 1987, took the universities by storm.By the early 1990s, campus rape centers and 24-hour hotlines were opening across the country, aided by tens of millions of dollars of federal funding.Victimhood rituals sprang up: first the Take Back the Night rallies, in which alleged rape victims reveal their stories to gathered crowds of candle-holding supporters; then the Clothesline Project, in which T-shirts made by self-proclaimedrape survivorsare strung on campus, while recorded sounds of gongs and drums mark minute-by-minute casualties of the “rape culture.” A special rhetoric emerged: victims’ family and friends were “co-survivors”; “survivors” existed in a larger “community of survivors.”
The Campus Rape Myth by Heather Mac Donald City Journal Winter 2008




I proved it was a Liberal lie...and you're still whining 'is not, is not.....waaaaaaa.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

I have to stop saying "How stupid can you be?"....seems you take it as a challenge.

Hint: READ THE TITLE OF THE THREAD.

 

[RDD_1210]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

I have to stop saying "How stupid can you be?"....seems you take it as a challenge.

Hint: READ THE TITLE OF THE THREAD.

I did read the title. So what is the myth? I don't see that in your OP. Rape is a myth?

Explain it to me like I'm 5.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

From the OP:
College students are particularly vulnerable, with 1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college


A lie Liberals have attempted to advance to convince another group that they are victims.

 

[kaz]

What a sad thread, attaching an issue of sexual criminal behavior to one ideology and act like it is going to stick.

How utterly stupid can the OP be? Well, today, we found out.

That's why you keep blasting Democrats for their endless threads using sexism and racism and other isms as partisan political tools which actually protects true bigotry because people get deaf to it after hearing such endless use of obvious political posturing?

I hear you, I see why you would do that. The only problem being I never see you do that.

 

[rightwinger]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

From the OP:
College students are particularly vulnerable, with 1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college


A lie Liberals have attempted to advance to convince another group that they are victims.

Who says liberals are the victims?

Conservative girls don't get assaulted?

 

[PoliticalChic]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

From the OP:
College students are particularly vulnerable, with 1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college


A lie Liberals have attempted to advance to convince another group that they are victims.

Who says liberals are the victims?

Conservative girls don't get assaulted?

"Who says liberals are the victims?

Where does it say Liberals are the victims?


It seems you just need a sympathetic pat on the head....with a hammer.

 

[RDD_1210]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

From the OP:
College students are particularly vulnerable, with 1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college


A lie Liberals have attempted to advance to convince another group that they are victims.

So 1 in 5 college women aren't sexually assaulted? Because your title refers to rape.

What was your point again?

 

[PoliticalChic]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

From the OP:
College students are particularly vulnerable, with 1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college


A lie Liberals have attempted to advance to convince another group that they are victims.

So 1 in 5 college women aren't sexually assaulted? Because your title refers to rape.

What was your point again?

Now, for all of the dolts who have breathlessly accepted the LIBERAL RAPE MYTH, that millions of college students have been sexually assaulted....the "one in five" nonsense....


"A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims is several orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.

The full study, which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent (instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped

 

[RDD_1210]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

From the OP:
College students are particularly vulnerable, with 1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college


A lie Liberals have attempted to advance to convince another group that they are victims.

So 1 in 5 college women aren't sexually assaulted? Because your title refers to rape.

What was your point again?

Now, for all of the dolts who have breathlessly accepted the LIBERAL RAPE MYTH, that millions of college students have been sexually assaulted....the "one in five" nonsense....


"A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims is several orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.

The full study, which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent (instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped

Ok.....and what does this have to do with your Thread Title?

Remember your thread is titled "Liberal Rape Myth" Your "proof" all centers around sexual assault, not rape. You do understand that there is a difference, right?

 

[PoliticalChic]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

From the OP:
College students are particularly vulnerable, with 1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college


A lie Liberals have attempted to advance to convince another group that they are victims.

So 1 in 5 college women aren't sexually assaulted? Because your title refers to rape.

What was your point again?

Now, for all of the dolts who have breathlessly accepted the LIBERAL RAPE MYTH, that millions of college students have been sexually assaulted....the "one in five" nonsense....


"A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims is several orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.

The full study, which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent (instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped

Ok.....and what does this have to do with your Thread Title?

Remember your thread is titled "Liberal Rape Myth" Your "proof" all centers around sexual assault, not rape. You do understand that there is a difference, right?

It's a little trick I use to expose morons like you.

Didn't take much exposing, huh.

 

[Discombobulated]

What is the point of this thread?

PoliticalChic - Are you stating that only liberals are rapists? Are you stating that liberals claim rape when it didn't actually happen.

I don't follow your point.

From the OP:
College students are particularly vulnerable, with 1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college


A lie Liberals have attempted to advance to convince another group that they are victims.

So 1 in 5 college women aren't sexually assaulted? Because your title refers to rape.

What was your point again?

Now, for all of the dolts who have breathlessly accepted the LIBERAL RAPE MYTH, that millions of college students have been sexually assaulted....the "one in five" nonsense....


"A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims is several orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.

The full study, which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent (instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped

Ok.....and what does this have to do with your Thread Title?

Remember your thread is titled "Liberal Rape Myth" Your "proof" all centers around sexual assault, not rape. You do understand that there is a difference, right?

It's a little trick I use to expose morons like you.

Didn't take much exposing, huh.

 

[gipper]

This 'problem' is entirely blown out of proportion by the elite, to divide Americans....and it is working.

It is clear to anyone interested in the truth, that campus rape is not nearly the sizable problem proclaimed by the intelligentsia. They lied about it and even when their lie is exposed, many Americans willfully continue to believe the lie and condemn those who expose the lie.

The elites must be laughing their asses off at how easily they can divide us.

This old truism certainly applies:
'You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time but you cannot fool all the people all the time'?

 

[Toro]

I skimmed the methodology of the study which concluded that 0.61% of women have been raped or sexually assaulted and at first glance, thought it was sound. IIRC, I think they interviewed ~160,000 people, and included not just forced sex but also unwanted groping and fondling. I can't recall if they adjusted for those who didn't self-report, but it would seem unlikely to me that the numbers would jump to 25% for the adjustment, or even as high as 35% as one study claimed. I think it's probably higher than 0.61%, but I'm skeptical that it is 25%.

The topic is important not because people are denying there is rape or sexual assault - obviously, there is. Rather, it is that if one believes it is so acceptable and widespread, it is easy to entrap innocent people. We want to stop rape and sexual assault, but we don't to destroy innocent people's lives as well.

 

[Toro]

And liberals are certainly guilty of hyperbole. I remember when the political correctness thing exploded in the 1990s, and sexual harassment and assault became a huge topic during the Anita Hill hearings. Liberals went over-board then as well. I remember some article written by the feminist that hit the wires (you know, before the Internet) detailing what was sexual harassment or assault. Included on the list was "Leering at another woman on a date."

 

[reason10]

Back in the 50's you could slap a girl's ass and honk a titty and no one would think twice about it. Nobody gave two ***** about it because, hell, who wants to listen to a dumb woman complaining anyways? She needs to shut the hell up and get back to answering the phones!

Let's go back to those times what do you think cons? It would be great right?

I don't know what sick twisted universe you sprouted from, but it's obvious you haven't been on the earth for very long. In the 50s, women were very strong individuals who also acted like ladies. Slap one on the ass or honk her breast and you'd likely get her palm across your face, shortly before her brothers and her father beat the living shit out of you. Then a cop somewhere who wasn't forced to wear a bullet proof vest because of cop killing gang bangers would haul your ass to jail.
In the 50s, nobody ******* DARED call a woman dumb. It was suicide. She'd **** you up and then her family would **** you up.
Today, women have Miley Cyrus as a role model, creating dances that emulate ass ******* during awards ceremonies. No wonder no one takes them seriously any more.
In the 50s, most of the time you wouldn't have sex with a woman until the honeymoon. Today, NINE YEAR OLD GIRLS are giving birth.
Do the math.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And liberals are certainly guilty of hyperbole. I remember when the political correctness thing exploded in the 1990s, and sexual harassment and assault became a huge topic during the Anita Hill hearings. Liberals went over-board then as well. I remember some article written by the feminist that hit the wires (you know, before the Internet) detailing what was sexual harassment or assault. Included on the list was "Leering at another woman on a date."

I appreciate that you expanded your discussion of myths to the general, which was my original reason for the OP.

 

[Contumacious]

Let's go back to those times what do you think cons? It would be great right?

I don't know what sick twisted universe you sprouted from, but it's obvious you haven't been on the earth for very long. In the 50s, women were very strong individuals who also acted like ladies. .[/QUOTE]


" There are several ways by which this terrible crisis on the campus can be solved. One, we can go back to the prohibition of alcohol, which our culture is almost ready for in any case. Two, we can go back to the good old days of campuses before the 1950s, especially in the South: not only the banning of coed dorms, and abolishing coeducation altogether, but insisting on official chaperons for girls on every date, on dance-cards filled out in advance and cleared with the chaperon, on boys being barred from the entire girls’ campus except the official room, etc. And finally, why not go the whole hog toward Left Puritanism and define all sex as per se coercive? That would clear up all the fuzziness and sex, or at least hetero-sex, could be outlawed completely. Or is that the point, after all?"

Murray Newton Rothbard

 

[TheOldSchool]

Back in the 50's you could slap a girl's ass and honk a titty and no one would think twice about it. Nobody gave two ***** about it because, hell, who wants to listen to a dumb woman complaining anyways? She needs to shut the hell up and get back to answering the phones!

Let's go back to those times what do you think cons? It would be great right?

I don't know what sick twisted universe you sprouted from, but it's obvious you haven't been on the earth for very long. In the 50s, women were very strong individuals who also acted like ladies. Slap one on the ass or honk her breast and you'd likely get her palm across your face, shortly before her brothers and her father beat the living shit out of you. Then a cop somewhere who wasn't forced to wear a bullet proof vest because of cop killing gang bangers would haul your ass to jail.
In the 50s, nobody ******* DARED call a woman dumb. It was suicide. She'd **** you up and then her family would **** you up.
Today, women have Miley Cyrus as a role model, creating dances that emulate ass ******* during awards ceremonies. No wonder no one takes them seriously any more.
In the 50s, most of the time you wouldn't have sex with a woman until the honeymoon. Today, NINE YEAR OLD GIRLS are giving birth.
Do the math.

Back in the 50's a women made your dinner, scheduled your appointments, and chain smoked cigarettes because it was considered improper for them to do anything. They lived a couple steps above sharia law.