/———/ Abortion is eugenics when the vast majority of aborted babies are African America.
Nazis were socialists, in fact it’s right there in their name, National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Looks like you’re the failure.
Only because right-wingers never have better capital solutions at lower capital cost. Socialism on a national or international basis is all y'all understand.
/———/ Abortion is eugenics when the vast majority of aborted babies are African America.
Nazis were socialists, in fact it’s right there in their name, National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Looks like you’re the failure.
Only because right-wingers never have better capital solutions at lower capital cost. Socialism on a national or international basis is all y'all understand.
Liberals place the rights and protected liberties of the individual above all else, they oppose authoritarianism, and seek to encourage diversity and defend dissent.
The Nazis and fascists were puppets of the wealthy elite.
Hitler was made Chancellor by Hindenburg, not elected.
Mussolini was appointed Prime Minister, not elected.
Other than gun control, I do not see what correlation there then can be with the left in US politics and Nazis or Fascists?
It is the right that generally is more for the wealthy elite, like lowering taxes, starting wars, etc.
Then how is it that the wealthiest members of the US citizenry have always done better under Democrat leadership than Repub? The wealthiest one percent watched their net worth explode upward under obummers rule. More than any other POTUS in history. And the same is happening now under xiden.
The wealthy have done well under the last democratic presidents because the democrats are no longer leftists.
Leftist avoid wars and protect unions.
Clinton and Obama instead deregulated banks, conducted the War on Drugs (poor), started or continued every war they could, and mandated private health insurance.
It was a symbiotic relationship - Jeff Zuckerberg and the democrats type of relationship. Hitler let the elite profit. Mussolini recognized the failure of Marxism and fixed it with his brand of collectivist authoritarianism by allowing the elite their place. Warren Buffett doesn't serve the democrat Reich because he loves the poor, he does so because like Hitler, they offer oligarchs like him a protected monopoly.
The parallels don't end with the rigged election. Like Biden, Hitler had a staged "insurrection" to use against his enemies, the Reichstag Fire
Likewise Mussolini was elected in 1924.
While there is no evidence of election fraud with Il Duce, he was a famous Communist who had gone to prison in Switzerland for sparking a general strike in hopes of creating a Bolshevik revolution. This gave Mussolini both the industrialists and the Communists in his corner. In the same way that the democrat Nazis appeal to the Marxists and the Oligarchs like Cook, Grove, Gates, et al.
Other than gun control, I do not see what correlation there then can be with the left in US politics and Nazis or Fascists?
It is the right that generally is more for the wealthy elite, like lowering taxes, starting wars, etc.
As I've demonstrated above, the democrats follow Hitler's plans to the letter, in an accelerated manner. Anyone who doesn't recognize that death camps and genocide are part of the democrat agenda is just not paying attention to the 24/7 drumbeat of hate by the Nazi democrats against their new Juden, against the whites.
Two years ago, the hate was there, but the calls for violence less. We've had a year of Kristalnacht by the Brownshirts now and the Nazis are emboldened and openly advocating genocide.
First of all, both Italy and Germany used parliamentarian type governments, where the most powerful person, the Prime Minister or Chandelor, is not elected.
When Hitler was also elected president, that was purely symbolic and had no additional power.
{...
On August 19, 1934, Adolf Hitler, already chancellor, is also elected president of Germany in an unprecedented consolidation of power in the short history of the republic.
In 1932, German President Paul von Hindenburg, old, tired, and a bit senile, had won re-election as president, but had lost a considerable portion of his right/conservative support to the Nazi Party. Those close to the president wanted a cozier relationship to Hitler and the Nazis. Hindenburg had contempt for the Nazis’ lawlessness, but ultimately agreed to oust his chancellor, Heinrich Bruning, for Franz von Papen, who was willing to appease the Nazis by lifting the ban on Hitler’s Brown Shirts and unilaterally canceling Germany’s reparation payments, imposed by the Treaty of Versailles at the close of World War I.
But Hitler was not appeased. He wanted the chancellorship for himself. Papen’s policies failed on another front: His authoritarian rule alienated his supporters, and he too was forced to resign. He then made common cause with Hitler, persuading President Hindenburg to appoint Hitler chancellor and himself vice-chancellor. He promised the president that he would restrain Hitler’s worst tendencies and that a majority of the Cabinet would go to non-Nazis. As Hindenburg’s current chancellor could no longer gain a majority in the Reichstag, and Hitler could bring together a larger swath of the masses and a unified right/conservative/nationalist coalition, the president gave in. In January 1933, Hitler was named chancellor of Germany.
But that was not enough for Hitler either. In February 1933, Hitler blamed a devastating Reichstag fire on the communists (its true cause remains a mystery) and convinced President Hindenburg to sign a decree suspending individual and civil liberties, a decree Hitler used to silence his political enemies with false arrests. Hitler then proceeded to purge the Brown Shirts (his storm troopers), the head of which, Ernst Röhm, had began voicing opposition to the Nazi Party’s terror tactics. Hitler had Röhm executed without trial, which encouraged the army and other reactionary forces within the country to urge Hitler to further consolidate his power by merging the presidency and the chancellorship. Hindenburg died of lung cancer on August 2, 1934. A plebiscite vote was held on August 19. Intimidation, and fear of the communists, brought Hitler a 90 percent majority. He was now, for all intents and purposes, dictator.
...}
On August 19, 1934, Germany holds a plebiscite vote, in which Adolf Hitler wins a 90 percent majority. Already made chancellor more than a year earlier, and unofficially made president after the death of German President Paul von Hindenburg two weeks earlier, Hitler is now officially elected the...
www.history.com
I don't see Mussolini being elected to anything?
{...
In the Italian election of 1924, Benito Mussolini’s National List, a coalition of fascists and nationalists, won 65% of the vote. Mussolini immediately became Prime Minister. He then gradually took total control of the government. In 1926, after a 15-year old boy tried to assassinate him, Mussolini banned all non-fascist political parties.
...}
When you say "democrat", it is not clear to me what that means.
But I am saying that leftist politics is supposed to be supporting the common man, while it it the right that supports the wealthy elite.
Left is supposed to be progressive liberals, while the right conservative nationalists.
The left is supposed to increase taxes on the wealthy, while the right cuts them.
/———/ Abortion is eugenics when the vast majority of aborted babies are African America.
Nazis were socialists, in fact it’s right there in their name, National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Looks like you’re the failure.
Liberals place the rights and protected liberties of the individual above all else, they oppose authoritarianism, and seek to encourage diversity and defend dissent.
The Nazis and fascists were puppets of the wealthy elite.
Hitler was made Chancellor by Hindenburg, not elected.
Mussolini was appointed Prime Minister, not elected.
Other than gun control, I do not see what correlation there then can be with the left in US politics and Nazis or Fascists?
It is the right that generally is more for the wealthy elite, like lowering taxes, starting wars, etc.
Then how is it that the wealthiest members of the US citizenry have always done better under Democrat leadership than Repub? The wealthiest one percent watched their net worth explode upward under obummers rule. More than any other POTUS in history. And the same is happening now under xiden.
The wealthy have done well under the last democratic presidents because the democrats are no longer leftists.
Leftist avoid wars and protect unions.
Clinton and Obama instead deregulated banks, conducted the War on Drugs (poor), started or continued every war they could, and mandated private health insurance.
/———/ Abortion is eugenics when the vast majority of aborted babies are African America.
Nazis were socialists, in fact it’s right there in their name, National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Looks like you’re the failure.
Only because right-wingers never have better capital solutions at lower capital cost. Socialism on a national or international basis is all y'all understand.
Political names in Europe have long not been what they actually are. Your fixation on that proves it. Both Hitler and Mussolini ran fascist governments. That is not in doubt.
He murdered civilians in the war he waged with his Al Qaeda allies to overthrow Kosovo. Clinton waged a terrorist war on civilians to secure victory for Al Qaeda.
Forgotten lies almost guarantee new political treachery. Twenty years ago, President Bill Clinton commenced bombing Serbia in the name of human rights, justice, and ethnic tolerance. Approximately 1,500 Serb civilians were killed by NATO bombing in one of the biggest sham morality plays of the...
Clinton and Obama instead deregulated banks, conducted the War on Drugs (poor), started or continued every war they could, and mandated private health insurance.
It was a symbiotic relationship - Jeff Zuckerberg and the democrats type of relationship. Hitler let the elite profit. Mussolini recognized the failure of Marxism and fixed it with his brand of collectivist authoritarianism by allowing the elite their place. Warren Buffett doesn't serve the democrat Reich because he loves the poor, he does so because like Hitler, they offer oligarchs like him a protected monopoly.
The parallels don't end with the rigged election. Like Biden, Hitler had a staged "insurrection" to use against his enemies, the Reichstag Fire
Likewise Mussolini was elected in 1924.
While there is no evidence of election fraud with Il Duce, he was a famous Communist who had gone to prison in Switzerland for sparking a general strike in hopes of creating a Bolshevik revolution. This gave Mussolini both the industrialists and the Communists in his corner. In the same way that the democrat Nazis appeal to the Marxists and the Oligarchs like Cook, Grove, Gates, et al.
Other than gun control, I do not see what correlation there then can be with the left in US politics and Nazis or Fascists?
It is the right that generally is more for the wealthy elite, like lowering taxes, starting wars, etc.
As I've demonstrated above, the democrats follow Hitler's plans to the letter, in an accelerated manner. Anyone who doesn't recognize that death camps and genocide are part of the democrat agenda is just not paying attention to the 24/7 drumbeat of hate by the Nazi democrats against their new Juden, against the whites.
Two years ago, the hate was there, but the calls for violence less. We've had a year of Kristalnacht by the Brownshirts now and the Nazis are emboldened and openly advocating genocide.
First of all, both Italy and Germany used parliamentarian type governments, where the most powerful person, the Prime Minister or Chandelor, is not elected.
When Hitler was also elected president, that was purely symbolic and had no additional power.
{...
On August 19, 1934, Adolf Hitler, already chancellor, is also elected president of Germany in an unprecedented consolidation of power in the short history of the republic.
In 1932, German President Paul von Hindenburg, old, tired, and a bit senile, had won re-election as president, but had lost a considerable portion of his right/conservative support to the Nazi Party. Those close to the president wanted a cozier relationship to Hitler and the Nazis. Hindenburg had contempt for the Nazis’ lawlessness, but ultimately agreed to oust his chancellor, Heinrich Bruning, for Franz von Papen, who was willing to appease the Nazis by lifting the ban on Hitler’s Brown Shirts and unilaterally canceling Germany’s reparation payments, imposed by the Treaty of Versailles at the close of World War I.
But Hitler was not appeased. He wanted the chancellorship for himself. Papen’s policies failed on another front: His authoritarian rule alienated his supporters, and he too was forced to resign. He then made common cause with Hitler, persuading President Hindenburg to appoint Hitler chancellor and himself vice-chancellor. He promised the president that he would restrain Hitler’s worst tendencies and that a majority of the Cabinet would go to non-Nazis. As Hindenburg’s current chancellor could no longer gain a majority in the Reichstag, and Hitler could bring together a larger swath of the masses and a unified right/conservative/nationalist coalition, the president gave in. In January 1933, Hitler was named chancellor of Germany.
But that was not enough for Hitler either. In February 1933, Hitler blamed a devastating Reichstag fire on the communists (its true cause remains a mystery) and convinced President Hindenburg to sign a decree suspending individual and civil liberties, a decree Hitler used to silence his political enemies with false arrests. Hitler then proceeded to purge the Brown Shirts (his storm troopers), the head of which, Ernst Röhm, had began voicing opposition to the Nazi Party’s terror tactics. Hitler had Röhm executed without trial, which encouraged the army and other reactionary forces within the country to urge Hitler to further consolidate his power by merging the presidency and the chancellorship. Hindenburg died of lung cancer on August 2, 1934. A plebiscite vote was held on August 19. Intimidation, and fear of the communists, brought Hitler a 90 percent majority. He was now, for all intents and purposes, dictator.
...}
On August 19, 1934, Germany holds a plebiscite vote, in which Adolf Hitler wins a 90 percent majority. Already made chancellor more than a year earlier, and unofficially made president after the death of German President Paul von Hindenburg two weeks earlier, Hitler is now officially elected the...
www.history.com
I don't see Mussolini being elected to anything?
{...
In the Italian election of 1924, Benito Mussolini’s National List, a coalition of fascists and nationalists, won 65% of the vote. Mussolini immediately became Prime Minister. He then gradually took total control of the government. In 1926, after a 15-year old boy tried to assassinate him, Mussolini banned all non-fascist political parties.
...}
When you say "democrat", it is not clear to me what that means.
But I am saying that leftist politics is supposed to be supporting the common man, while it it the right that supports the wealthy elite.
Left is supposed to be progressive liberals, while the right conservative nationalists.
The left is supposed to increase taxes on the wealthy, while the right cuts them.
He murdered civilians in the war he waged with his Al Qaeda allies to overthrow Kosovo. Clinton waged a terrorist war on civilians to secure victory for Al Qaeda.
Forgotten lies almost guarantee new political treachery. Twenty years ago, President Bill Clinton commenced bombing Serbia in the name of human rights, justice, and ethnic tolerance. Approximately 1,500 Serb civilians were killed by NATO bombing in one of the biggest sham morality plays of the...
Political names in Europe have long not been what they actually are. Your fixation on that proves it. Both Hitler and Mussolini ran fascist governments. That is not in doubt.
Fascism has a command and control economy where the government controls the means of production. It is socialism and the form of socialism promoted by the Nazi democrat party.
Fascism has a command and control economy where the government controls the means of production. It is socialism and the form of socialism promoted by the Nazi democrat party.
Semantics. Before everyone went crazy we All used the term Democracy or Democratic nation. Before we all went crazy the term dictator was used to describe people like Hitler & Mussolini as dictator behavior & actions. Please show me the DIRECT actions & words of a president of the United states that show conclusive actions & words that say follow only me, that I have all the answers to everything.
While that's a lie, it is also irrelevant. You lied that Clinton started no wars, he started the war in Bosnia where he fought with Al Qaeda to overthrow Kosovo in the ever expansion of the Islamic Caliphate. Clinton targeted civilians in Sarajevo in a campaign of outright terrorism in his war to make Al Qaeda great.